Re: Another Big Patch Day, and a Week of Start Up Repair Routines
My ancient EEE came with Linux, out of the box.
It was OK, but ASUS cocked up the support a few months later, and I switched to Ubuntu.
2133 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Sep 2007
If they're using a laser to a shore station, they have to be in line-of-sight. The horizon would be about 17 miles from the ship. The shore station wouldn't be on-shore, but would have more height. You're not going to get clear of the 200nm economic zone. That would need a 20,000 foot tower.
About the only advantage I can see is the possibility of in-person visits by US nationals to external programming teams. And getting the non-US personnel to the ship looks tricky.
As far as pay and tax collection go, I suppose that there are precedents for the crew of ships.
It all sounds a bit far-fetched. I wonder how much money will be spent on the "planning" before the investors in the company notice nothing is happening.
I agree, it wasn't Acorn and the ARM which failed.
But there is something about the British industrial and financial environment which seems to let the winnings from these works of genius drift away out of reach.
Its not just globalisation, and some factory that is so expensive to build that there can only be one on the entire planet. And we can't expect to spot the right investment choice every time. But what is it about this country which turns a successful entrepreneur into somebody fronting a TV show that tests how people can run a market stall in Essex?
Essentially, this says nothing directly about patents. It just means that the longer-lived copyright protection cannot apply. And there are a huge number of questionable software patents.
I don't think it makes a lot of difference. Though stuff patented in 1998 should be seeing protection expire around now. On the other hand, some look and feel elements might be protected by other long-lasting IP methods. Whatever the options are, the problems come from abusive, rent-seeking, human behaviour.
What I remember is John Noakes getting training from the RAF before making a high-altitude parachute jump. They gave him experience of anoxia, in a way that demonstrated just how much he didn't realise he was suffering the effects.
I'm not claiming to be any sort of expert, but that memory makes me wonder what's wrong with the higher ranks in the USAF. Not every pilot would make a good ngeneral, but that's why you need pilots in the higher ranks. Or maybe Blue Peter viewers.
The Nook uses the ePub format, which can be produced from a Word file by free software. And past experience of Word outputting HTML files (which are the basis of the ePub format) more than curbs my enthusiasm.
The example of the Amazon Vanity Slush-Pile doesn't help.
Just guessing here, from my days studying chemistry, but I would expect the plant to take brackish water and produce a stream of pure water, and a larger stream of more saline water. You'd have to site intakes and outlets with a bit of care, but is it any different in the end from taking more water out of the upper reaches of the Thames drainage system, and putting it through a set of kidney-filters?
Your point about using such things as a sink for surpluses of wind-generated energy is a good one. If the electricity demand can be quickly changed, it would help stabilise the system. But it might have to run in a steady state.
I admit it, I would be curious about the Shakespeare productions, which I suppose are that series of foreign language productions being put on at the Globe. The guy wrote some good stuff, and too much has been messed with by school teachers.
It sounds like he may be responsible for the only good stuff that ever gets shown on that channel.
I think that one may be a difference between the US and the USA. Do you see a difference between google.com and google.co.uk?
But it does look as though a checking system is over zealous. That does seem an obvious case where Google should give results for the search term as entered, while giving the option for the alternatives. I know the typing errors I make.
One of the problem is that the right to sell a book is often (not always) held by different publishers in different regions. Some authors let a publisher buy all the rights, some find they can earn more by exploiting the region-split, and then there are translation rights. So B&N may not have the right to sell many ebooks into the UK or the EU.
Amazon is rather careless about what they advertise, physical books or ebooks.
With the news that at least one large publisher, with both US and UK labels, is dropping DRM, there's a potential for the Nook to exploit. It's an ePub reader, B&N have an internet sales and delivery system for eBooks, and they don't have the same bad rep in the business that Amazon has. Getting the Nook reader, and the ebook business, into a different branding to the bookstore business, could be a smart move.
Selling off a profitable part of the business to raise cash to improve the balance sheet is a very short-term plan. The Nook is the centre of what has a chance of surviving.
I suspect this is partly why some factions make such a fuss about the Human Right Act and the European Convention on Human Rights. They falsely blame all the trouble on the EU as well.
And some of the rights can easily conflict. That's why we have courts, but oh! the screaming about interfering judges.
They're not investigating crimes. They don't have a suspect to point to. They can't exploit the wiggle room that is built into all these things. This isn't just collecting the information that a Police State collects, and far more. It is setting up the privileged apparatus that is essential to a Police State.
I wouldn't trust mental arithmetic.
I'm one of the last generation to have used a slide rule in exams. You need to know what you're doing, arithmetically, to use one of those. You have to at least estimate the order of magnitude. These days, everyone punches the buttons on a calculator, me included. And, while I am slower than I was, I can still stop dead, seeing an answer which screams "wrong", and wonder if I pressed the wrong button.
I would be very wary, myself, of an application doing this sort of thing which doesn't log every calculation. I don't expect it to get the arithmetic wrong. It's inevitable that data entry will be imperfect.
Both the US and UK announcements seem to describe the same scheme, a three-month transition to DRM-free, and I suspect new releases, after a week or two, will be DRM-free from both.
I'm not finding it easy to find anything published by Tor books on Amazon, they don't appear to have a search-by-publisher option. They've had hissyfits with Macmillan before, but I could just be using the wrong search terms.
They tell me that nothing in the Kindle Vanity-Slushpile is DRM-free. Back to Gutenberg, I suppose.
I've seen arguments that it's the electric and magnetic fields in the vicinity of the catapult that would be an issue. It might need some things kept further away from the catapults. That has some plausibility, and i wouldn't want to route a data cable alongside a catapult. But the thing is going into a steel box. Is it really going to be a big problem with that sort of inherent screening?
(I bet BAE will tell you it's going to cost a lot to be sure.)
There are arguments that we should be looking at these issues on an EU-wide basis. What do we gain from the rest of the EU? What can we best provide them? There's more to a Navy than tradition, that's worthless without effective ships, but we could do a good job of being one of the naval specialists. The service we have the least need for is an Army.
It's division of labour, all very sensible, but i can't really see the Conservatives wanting to cooperate with the EU
Out of the box, this might be enough turn a modern TV into a proper computer. It's tight for RAM, but so were those ultra-cheap Linux boxes which were coming out of China, two or three years ago. You have HDMI and a USB port to power the 'Pi
What this really needs is multi-player Elite.
So what is a "data controller employee"?
AFAIK, "data controller" has a specific legal meaning under the DPA, and this all feels a funny way of saying IT worker, implying a pretty direct chain of authority. It's almost as if there's some outsourcing going on here. And what the heck are they doing to the data? Selling it to Mothercare?
And, now, I don't see how the government's brilliant plans to put GPs in charge are going to help. Based on my experience, GPs don't seem able to attain reliable communications, never mind secure coimmunications.
I can see what you're getting at, but I think you are mistaken.
Copyright is essentially about documenting who owns something. In the old US system. there was a requirement to register copyright, just as there are registers of land ownership. It's a sometimes imperfect extension of the ideas of property and real estate. You can, especially in the digital age, drag in some sometimes non-obvious economic theory. You can steal a printed book, because the person you steal from can no longer use it. If I were to "steal" a file from your computer, you would still have the original.
Privacy also depends on ownership rights. And sometimes gets complicated: when you rent a hotel room, do you have a right to privacy? In English law, there is a conflict between the right of a tenant to privacy, and the rights of the landlord to protect their property. There have been court cases. There are are words such as "reasonable" in the statutes. But at the heart of that balance is a clear identification of the parties to the contract.
I suspect we all are over-simplifying a bit, and the whole idea of an absolute property right can be challenged. If you want to blame William the Bastard for it, feel free. But, in the world we have, it isn't stupid to associate privacy with property rights, and some way of documenting ownership.
I don't want my privacy to depend on registering copyright with some government office. Which is why I dislike some of the assumptions that seem to be common amongst Americans. Some of them don't seem to have realised that US Copyright Law has changed to implement the Berne Convention. They have the same automatic copyright as us unfortunate Europeans.
But, wherever we are, it seems that money talks. Google can make money out of playing fast and loose with our privacy. And, too often, money shouts, screams, and throws the mother of all temper tantrums.
As far as privacy and copyright go, the various corporates and collectives are getting away with acting like spoiled children.
Think of the adults, please.
In some ways this sounds a lot like Second Life. The big similarity is the dependence on user-created content.
Second Life has its own scripting language, relatively high-level, and few people can use it well.
Just the idea of an emulation of a 16-bit computer being a vital component for game success is scaring me. I once wrote something in Assembler, for an early microcomputer which used the Z80 processor, but it was a long time ago, and in another country. Add the potential for "griefers", and I think I shall give this oine a miss.
It's a game for an intellectual elite of coders. I cannot see how it can be made to pay.
It is a change to an existing body of law, extending limits on telephone calls to all electronic communication. So at least the lawyers and the courts know what has been classed as "annoying". It may very well not match how we use the word.
One possible example: telephone sales. If the some telephone sales calls have been classified as annoying, under the earlier law, we might have an anti-spam law here.
I don't think this is as crazy as it sounds.
Just how much will this cost per computer?
Even if all it does is buy time, and let them use current replacement hardware/OS systems, it sounds as though the cost is remarkably low. I've just upgraded to Win 7 myself from XP, and I am not 100% convinced it was a good move, but XP just can't get the best out of current hardware. Trouble is, Win 7 can still do some things horribly slowly, even if some things are incredibly faster than under XP on the same hardware.
I don't think I would particularly trust either side on their claims about ACTA, but I do have some sympathy with the point that ACTA would mess up any hope of a reform of copyright law.
If it wasn't for the use of old black-and-white movies to fill TV schedules, there wouldn't be any value in the old stuff.
It is the same as the current version of the Kindle, a USB lead which also allows you to transfer .mobi files from your computer, such as those available from Project Gutenberg. The touch screen doesn't have much appeal for me, but it's a natural enough upgrade. How does it work with a screen-protector film stuck on?
That case was relatively local to me, and a week or two after I saw it reported, it was reported that the laptop had been returned and the restrictions ended.
The man, it seemed, might have had his laptop exploited by Malware, and used as a distribution site. I don't claim expertise on such things, but most of the news media are capable of getting computer stuff badly wrong. Are Social Services any better at understanding the story they have?
I've had the chance to compare prices for the same goods from both the Channel Islands and the High Street, and the price difference is a lot more than the 20% down to VAT. Though sometimes the pricing might be a little lower than the seller would like, because it gets under the limit.
The VAT exemption is a great thing to scream about, but it's a long way from all the story.
SZC bought the "non-literary" rights from Tolkien well before he died, and while it looks a poor deal now, he was apparently happy enough. Considering Tolkien's age at the time, I don't think Saul Zaentz could claim to have a clear conscience over the deal.
When the Bakshi animated film came out the Tolkien Society had to spend time and money on pre-emptively registering some very limited trademarks, and a curiousity I recall was that the SZC subsidiary, Tolkien Enterprises, registered trademarks using the spelling "hobbite". There was a wheat variety around at the time called "Maris Hobbit".
I've lost count of the number of houses I have seen which are named "Rivendell" I don't recall seeing any nestled away in a steep-sided mountain valley.
The usual web-site copyright grab makes some sense as an attempt to allow the website to function: think how much copying happens as the data is viewed. And I don't think there's much chance of removing the data from any back-up system. So they end up having to talk about some sort of perpetual and non-exclusive right.
It's one of the non-piracy reasons why current copyright law isn't a good fit with the internet.
There are parts of UK copyright law where it matters who provided the raw materials, photography is one. There are probably more court decisions than any non-specialist can know of which could be applied to this contract. My own view is that we're all suffering from the side effects of the aggressive IP enforcement which happens these days. Projects such as this one would rather be mocked than sued.
A smart lawyer can probably draft a better contract in their sleep. Too many people don't even realise that publishers only need a licence.
Copyright 2012 David G. Bell
(The Register looks to do this sort of stuff right.)