Re: It's Used, not abused.
Hmm. If they picked the lock, though, it could be considered abuse of the normal function.
Or perhaps, since we're doing home break-in analogies, that would be climbing in through a window accidentally left open.
1208 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Sep 2007
"In all the nuking I've ever done, "give or take" 10 seconds on that would not be an issue. There's variation in the amount of ${food}, there's variation in composition of ${food}, there's variation in where on the plate ${food} is put, ..."
When I use the microwave to soften butter, 10 seconds is easily enough for most of the stick to go from hard to liquid. Sometimes having precision is useful.
If you never use it for that particular task, I can see why you wouldn't care.
Back in the 1980s I managed to spill tea into the open top of my printer -- an old Centronics dot matrix printer with some fairly hefty motors. At the time I took my tea with milk and sugar. A friend helped me find replacement fuses, and advised me to carefully wash the electronics in water, not alcohol -- alcohol doesn't dissolve sugar.
It really doesn't.
The tip was a good one, the printer worked for several more years afterwards.
Fast forward into the 1990s when I spilled a sugary drink into my keyboard at work. I went to IT for a replacement keyboard and talked to them about washing the old one; they said they always washed them with alcohol. I pointed out that didn't dissolve sugar, but took the replacement with me. At the time computer hardware was a bit more spendy than now, so there weren't a lot of spares hanging about; I didn't like the new one, so I took the old one apart, washed it with water, rinsed with alcohol (dries faster) and used compressed air to dry it. When I brought the replacement back they asked why, I said that I'd fixed my old one and didn't need the replacement. The response? "How did you do that? We can never get them to work again!" "That's because you wash them in alcohol!"
I don't have a 100% success rate (last keyboard I dumped a sugary drink into works 99% -- for some reason I can't get the numpad + to work) but, generally speaking, washing with water > washing with alcohol. Once the contaminants are washed off, however, alcohol makes a good rinse. Best combined with disassembly so there are no trapped pockets of liquid. Take a photo of your keyboard before pulling off the keycaps, if you do that, so you know where they all go back. :)
I generally like Apple's phones, don't like their walled garden and their blindfold dartboard approach to app management. Prefer a phone I can put into my pocket, and pick up with one hand, so IF I were to but an iPhone today it would probably be a 6E.
Meantime I have four Galaxy S4 phones (including my daughters') that are working OK. Wouldn't mind an upgrade but don't feel a strong need. Mine's running CM13 for a multitude of reasons. The kids are running apps that don't want rooted phones so they're on Lollipop stock ROMs.
One of the drawbacks of running old Android phones that aren't Google brand is update support. But we can Skype and stream and send MMS and do phone calls and for now it's Good Enough.
Also I can read and comment on El Reg while on the can. :)
So maybe there's some market saturation going on. But when I think about new phones I also think, maybe Chinese next time. We'll see. Keeping an eye on them.
Well, 25 years ago I was writing firmware for Industrial Process Control, so I suppose this was all my fault.
Hah hah. Perhaps we were naive and short-sighted, but understand that the Internet wasn't A Thing yet. It was there, but had very limited use. It never occurred to us that we'd need or even want to hook into it, or any clue what it would become.
First, I'd have to dial into my ISP, then get into Usenet to download my pr0n. Usenet was intended for text, so it was mostly discussions, but there were also automated e-mail lists. (Think "Yahoo! Groups.") Speaking of Yahoo!, it didn't exist yet. Google was in the distant future. Searches were done using Gopher, often via Archie, Jughead or Veronica. IRC handled your chat rooms. Assuming you were online in the first place. Wolfenstein 3D was a year away. We were using MSDOS on 80286- and 80386-based computers on a Novell network.
Our own protocols weren't even inter-connectable without huge effort. One of my biggest projects was one allowing our main networking protocol to talk to HART devices via one of our small systems devices -- an enormous kludge.
I can't speak for the minds of my fellows, but none of us were thinking in terms of the Internet for inter-connecting systems, and we had no more clue as to the need for security than the very people who were making the 'net.
I certainly didn't expect to be carrying the Internet around on a phone in my pocket. Why would I be expecting people to be able to hack into a power station from their living room? Why on Earth would anybody want to connect a power station to a public network anyway?
"I just can't see any advantage to a wireless keyboard or mouse anyway"
I prefer them. Especially the mouse, no cable to drag. Takes less space in my backpack. *shrug* That's just me.
"liable to run out of battery at awkward time"
It is a drawback.
"the stupid keyboards sleep and miss your first few keystrokes"
Huh. Haven't noticed that.
I've heard the same thing many times. I've actually found DDS to be quite reliable, but with a major caveat.
When our HP drive stopped reading the tapes it had written, I called support and was asked just how many hours a night I was running it? I answers 14, and was scornfully told that there was a 20% daily duty cycle limit on the heads. After that the heads would heat up enough to soften them and they'd experience excessive wear.
I asked where I could find that in the manual... At which point he admitted it wasn't there. So I said, ok, I get warranty on this unit, and afterwards it's up to me to keep the wear down on the next unit, now that I'm informed.
Next time we bought (non-HP) DDS drives I proactively asked about the duty cycle and was told 15%.
So I very meticulously scheduled backups to limit the duty cycles, and after that the drives worked pretty well.
If the manufacturers were not bothering to mention the little detail of the heads smoking after 3-5 hours of use, no wonder DDS has such a bad rep. I don't actually know if that's the case, I haven't exactly been doing surveys, but so far nobody I've talked to has admitted to knowing about the limit.
Already did a longer post on this earlier, on a different article, but... I like the options a removable battery gives me. Pull the battery and my phone is instantly untraceable and cannot be turned on remotely nor spied on. And I can replace a worn battery in 20 seconds using a fingernail, instead of an hour of meticulous disassembly and reassembly using a spudger, suction cup and jeweller's screwdrivers. And torx drivers.
I don't think that's religion. I think it's personal preference. Can't speak for others, ofc.
Could be the battery manufacturer, but lithium ion batteries in particular seem susceptible to this sort of failure. Methinks we've gotten a bit ahead of the science -- we haven't quite figured out how to keep this particular bit of high-density energy storage remain reliably stable. Yet we're building entire technologies around it, and pushing its limits every chance we get.
"It's a schlep" certainly means that, but just "schlep" means to carry or, especially, to drag. And is usually used in amusing context. Thus "schlep it along".
"Schmutz" is another good one, meaning dirt or grime. A good example was a weatherman using it correctly in context during a light snow, describing the dirty wet stuff that ends up on your windshield, thrown up by cars ahead of you esp. in town. In PA, at least, we like to salt our roads during snow, so dirty wet schmutz is exactly what you end up with.
I can turn my phone off in seconds by removing the battery, and it cannot be tracked, traced, monitored, recorded or remotely turned back on no matter what is running on it, even if hacked.
Not that I'm particularly paranoid or engaged in any activity that would require such measures, but it's nice to know I have the option.
I can replace a bad battery in my Galaxy S4 in less than a minute. Using my fingers. My iPhone requires at least half an hour of meticulous work using special tools (... OK, not VERY special, but not everybody keeps a set around... spudger, anyone?) and constant reference to ifixit.com. The battery has an adhesive backing so it has to be carefully pried out, and there's a significant chance of rupturing it in the process.
I suppose if you just buy a new phone every year, battery replacement isn't a problem that comes up very much.
My biggest problem with Apple is the walled garden. I actually like the iPhone, but Apple likes to keep too much control. It might be forgiveable if they did a better job, but their apps curation has the consistency of throwing darts blindfolded with their backs to the dart board. And if you jailbreak the phone, instead of merely washing their hands of you, they've been known to actively try to destroy the phone. Control freak much?
Anyway, mixed feelings. Not sure what I'm going to buy when I go for my next phone.
I've got a Galaxy S4, which is stuck at at 5.0.1 (not even the latest Lollipop). After many hours of experimentation, Google searches, trial and (mostly) error I've gotten CM13 running on my main phone. The biggest problem was getting data to work on Ting (Sprint MVNO), but this morning I found a magical patch that somebody had made and posted.
So if I make a reasonable effort I can keep my S4 patched, yay! But I also realize it's not for everybody; two of the other three S4 phones in my household are still on stock ROM because the users aren't as fiddly as I am. (But they are also out of room, if only because their phones have a butt-ton of useless apps they can't uninstall. Thanks, Google. Thanks, Samsung. Thanks, Sprint. Anybody else want to put their crap on my phone? Because there's still room, as long as I don't actually turn it on and try to use it.)
The fourth S4 is a spare Freedompop phone I use to experiment on. There's a certain symmetry in the fact that the Ting patch is just a modified version of the patch I use on the Freedompop phone.
So hey, that's me sorted. But it's a hassle I shouldn't have had to engage in any more than Trevor. But at least I'm not an entitled millennial dick. Me, I'm an entitled baby boomer dick.
I'm just not sure this is actually a trademark violation. Seems like Intellectual Property law is being bent to fit behaviour somebody doesn't like, but can't find a relevant law for.
Then again I don't know what trademark law is like in Tokyo. But it just doesn't seem to fit the intent of a trademark.