For a second....
I misread the first line as "The fall of systemd is here" but alas, not today it seems...
7 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Jan 2018
Prostetnic TheVogon is right. Whenever our on-prem customers request provisioning & sizing parameters we start by asking what type of CPU they're currently running because that will impact significantly the response time you will get (we sell calculation intensive based software) and in 75% of the cases the customers has no idea. Most never really pay attention to the base freq / turbo freq / L2 cache etc and say something like "we've got 16 core CPU's" and think that by adding lots of vCPU's to a virtual server it will perform better while in fact it's really easy to waste 30-40% of overall CPU time just by over allocating vCPU's.
So yes, it really matters what type of CPU you are using for what type of workload.
When having a meeting with EA's my first question is always "have you ever worked or finished a project with xyz before?" followed by "do you wanna go tech deep or do you just want to go over some diagrams you made?".
Gets 'em tiptoe'ing instantly and you can seperate the idiots from the real EA's pretty quick.
It's always a pleasure to work with experts but since some years the EA field has been invaded with vendor-trained shills or pretty clueless body shopped PFY's. A real EA with proven trackrecord is hard to find, like one that figures out 443 is probably https... and working as a dev(/ops) with expert EA's there is never any friction but only cooperation towards a mutual goal.