and still
can't get the sub liter motor in California, US :( so most of the "charm" of an urban commuter the 500 would offer, isn't available
522 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Aug 2007
I've test ridden the Zero S a couple months ago. I owned and daily commuted a Gen II FJR for 6 years. While I like the new Zero it comes nowhere close to out-pulling a 'Busa, or even the Feej with a much lower power/weight ratio.
Having the Zero loaded with the options I want puts it also $4K over the cost of a new FJR. I sadly sold mine because I could afford to only park and maintain one vehicke-no charging ports in apartment parking lots anywhere I can afford to live either.
Fun toy, but definitely not in the 'busa class. More like the Triumph Speed Triple. Which is a third the price last I checked. Can buy a LOT of fuel for the extra $10K.
Course that's also because for some reason, Zero doesn't get the government largesse Tesla does, or the entire Zero line would be actually affordable and I'd have one right now. Zero must not have enough politicians in the payroll yet.
so if a politician is "caught out" can he (or she) get the "offensive" material removed simply because it contains nudity? How about "revenge email" or "revenge text"? or anything else once sent consentually but now potentially damaging to one's reputation or career?
why did they have laser scanning units? the one I saw in San Jose had two oscillating mirror scanners as well as the multiple cameras and a hub connected sensor.
GPS and the cameras give all the necessary street view for maps. Scanners are for machine level recognition of relative positions. Hub mounted sensors for speed and distance travelled are best for dead reckoning navigation, which isn't very good when satellite positioning is available.
I have a crazy uncle who posts this sort of thing. He can easily apply "logic and science" to any religious belief he happens to hate, but can't apply it to anything like mutant chickens, chemtrails, or government conspiracies to vaccinate us against WTC bombings or whatever.
The evil Military can do anything and is under direct control of the President, except when it's "his" President, then that Prez knows nothing of the vast conspiracies under his watch...but my crazy uncle knows The Truth that the "super intelligent" President cannot find out or something.
KFC, I can take or leave it. El Pollo Loco, surprisingly (when you find a site managed properly, its worth it) is better.
I understand their concerns. But as I'm helping crawl thru the bowels of a 158 foot long WWII vintage combat vessel that spent too much time in salt water, spending weekends trying to stop rust and dodge toxic lead and asbestos, I know the reasons why we gotta keep trying to keep these relics afloat (or flying) as a reminder of what history MEANS. It's one thing to read about an event, or watch a dramaticized, sanitized movie about them. But with the popular contempt of defeated enemies, until you FEEL what it was like when your combat power screams overhead, or the tight sharp edged conditions our sailors lived in 24/7 for months at a time, you have no real idea the fear and doubt that drives an enemy into retreat, or defines the actual sacrifices made by all the "normal" people of the Greatest Generation.
As an aviation fan, let me add a despairing "NOOOOOOOOOooooooo *inhale* OOOOOOOOOO!" I'm not rich enough to get to Britain in time!
www.mightymidgets.org
this silliness is countered by the same comparison to saying Kennedy wouldn't be accepted by current Democrats.
Hillary Clinton cannot be determined as a "centrist" based on anything but the current message her campaign is trying to sell. Unless you believe Bill Clinton's entire Presidency was actually HER in charge, which then one could demonstrate an actual centrist position. But on her own actions, of which there are very very few (legal) accomplishments to work from, we've got nothing but advertising copy.
And as modern individuals, we should have learned in our childhood just how trustworthy advertisements actually are.
where the old saying about "never attribute to malice that which can be caused by incompetence" was ever more likely true.
As in, I bet the malware was already all over the place in the police systems.
I mean, come on. you cannot sit and talk about how "dumb" the police are always supposed to be and then give them the intelligence at the same time to do something clever. Cognitive dissonance, natch.
(whoops someone beat me to it)
we here on the other side of the ocean would like to apologize for the creation of Facebook and Google and what's being done to the world's informational/intellectual freedom in the name of crony capitalism.
It may be that's what we're doing "better" (for values of "better" actually negative) than Britain for "making" corporations. Press and political hyperbole aside, it doesn't seem as if your government is choosing winners and losers based on transparent (also for values one would consider "opaque") financial largesse and appointment of crony personnel into critical industry monitor apparatus.
In other words, I don't think it's a bad thing Britain lacks a Google or Facebook. one could have a dozen companies producing a thousand jobs each and the consumer (and society) be better off than one company with 12 thousand jobs.
when someone tells her that one can make reasonable boomstick materials from stuff found in the back of almost every Mexican (err, "undocumented") groundskeeper's work truck.
High nitrate fertilizer? stump remover? sulphur additive for pesticide dust? some irrigation pipe?
And that's before one hits Home Depot for the pool cleaning supplies.
good thing she's retiring soon. Discovering that her enemies (the Little People) had the capability for decades to do what she feared most, yet DID NOT in spite of all her shrill doomsaying excuses, might be more than her elitist mind can accept.
because often, there's some critical bit of information missing that, if one really has no clue about dangerous chemical reactions or nature of explosives, either makes a rather unimpressive flare instead of a BOOM, or makes that BOOM when being manufactured.
Darwinism in action.
because it lets you KNOW where you stand. As it is, forcing people to accept your business, when they would rather not, means you're paying good money against your own best interest.
Me, I WANT to know what business hates me and why, so I KNOW not to go there.
Forced tolerance, means hidden hate. Open that sh*t up and expose it. Don't force it to hide.
having done the San Jose to Olympia WA (closer than Seattle) run quite a few times, 14 hours is average.
Unless one is peeing in a water bottle and never stopping for charge, and going up the pass, and not encountering any traffic at all around Portland, this cannot be done at legal speeds to get the "average".
I might know individuals who might have done this run in under 12 hours and they might have been on motorcycles and quite possibly have exceeded 130mph in order to get that time. But I could be totally mistaken and not actually have been involved in such a thing. Maybe it was Brian Williams who did it.
they've "seen" this for years. and for some reason, "shades of grey" equals exactly the same "worst of everything except for a few bright spots"
and have been remaking the exact same theme hundreds of times in the last decade or so. Only difference is the level of dystopia.
Nowadays, a "golden age" movie with an actual position of optimism would be "edgy"...
is not that it's an "exploration" of anything. The writer/director has a message that is the whole point of the production. The story will be manipulated, cut, shoved, and forced to meet that message.
Exploration is about taking a set starting point and seeing "where it goes". This often does NOT go where the writer/director wanted it to all along.
Too many "special conditions" are shoved in here to make sure the message is met. And that's what breaks these sorts of films. It's preaching, pure and simple.
The only "trick" to commercial success of such a film is making sure one already has an audience at the pulpit who want to hear the sermon again with a different "twist".
don't forget the Landing Craft Support that was built in WWII. True littoral capability and rather impressive firepower for the size.
Disclaimer: my grandfather in law is William Mason so he's always "hassling" me to help with maintenance on this little gem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_LCS%28L%29%283%29-102
at work I just use a generic presspot and a cheap "heats the water till it boils then shuts off" water kettle. I don't mind "micro grit" and don't want to have to replace "micro filters" or anything else.
other than the "fancy" stainless steel micro coffee grinder (hand cranked japanese import) my whole "caffeine infrastructure" was $50 USD.
makes translation flight a low speed affair. Unlike the Harrier, which could and did use thrust vectoring for VTOL and enhanced dogfighting capability to extreme effectiveness in the Falklands, the F35 is not going to slam the nozzles on to tighten a turn, nor possibly engage vertical lift to deal with loss of lift due to damage.
As an American I'd rather have seen an updated "Super Harrier" (which was kind of what Boeings much uglier entry into the contest was) which used the front engine intake in both modes and simply swivelled nozzles. With independent nozzle movement, computer controlled, some really odd flight maneuvers could have been done at any speed the airframe could support. Could've made the SU-27's Cobra Maneuver look like a skate-park trick.
But politics not need choose our defense systems on both sides of the Atlantic. And our bad decisions force yours. double down :(
you mean we now have Taxation Without Representation. We get taxed to build the infrastructure, subsidies and such to build the pipes Comcast et al laid, and Google wants to use that infrastructure without having to pay for their "extra popular" usage nor pony up for their own pipe.
Kind of like paying for auto companies that make cars 90% of the nation cannot afford, military hardware that is illegal for non-rich citizens to use, or giveaway programs that the productive 60% of society pays for but gets no use of.
he is however, doing his primary job: campaigning for the rest of his Party. Which has been the entire job of all party politicians since whenever.
Everything said or done is to either gain power for oneself within the Party structure or pay back that structure by doing whatever possible to get more of that Party in more positions of power.
Now considering his actual record, of how many SOTU promises broken, the only ones that have been carried out are those who have pretty wrapping but simply transfer more public wealth to private companies with unsavory crony connections.
even with a faster pipe, you're still only good for 6 shows before your friendly neighborhood ISP says you've passed the data cap and are going to be throttled down to dial-up speeds or charged the equivalent of $5 a movie for "using more than your fair share, Komrade!"
Everyone talked up streaming, then took away our unlimited services. No service, not even a kumbaya world where somehow Google does not act like every corporate entity in human history and change its stripes once in control, offers large enough data plans at home to support current state of the art 4K or anything "next gen".
I guessed you missed the tsunami aid missions where one carrier was repeatedly able to handle more humanitarian aid (as well as power and water generation) than any infrastructure built for weeks.
the whole deterrent factor, of how many dozens of tinpot dictators kept their tiny air forces on the ground because one carrier was projecting force in the region probably goes over your head too.
If you're going to talk tactics, you need to think the big picture, where you're partially correct; But it is also smarter for the Chinese to get the Americans to shovel more money into *defending* their expensive hardware as well as just building it.
the carrier is probably the only military vehicle that is worth it for its NON military use.