This would still allow the compulsively over-ambitious, satisfactionly challenged to still have an outlet for their natural compulsions, while setting limits so that they are safely contained. Provides a return flow the that lets them safely indulge their passions, while still preventing them from acquiring more power than they can resist abusing.
13 posts • joined 3 Nov 2016
Amazon exec tells UK peers: No, we don't want to be dominant. Also, we don't fancy being taxed on revenues
How about we use taxes to make big business Financial suicide, the idea is to adjust the rules of the environment to take away any advantage they currently have . loss of profitability for large entities will force them to liquidate Capital, freeing it up for creation of smaler local businesses, who due to less layers of bureaucracy in middle management can react quicker with would more relevance to their local markets and needs of their customers. The idea is to prevent any private entity or faction from Gaining majority market control so as to prevent compromising and stacking of the deck. And to provide essential turn over.
Limit your Influence out of respect for opportunity for others, or be limited more than if you had responsibly handled it on your own, and micromanaged to the point of Destruction,, as your assets are seized and used to provide for others, whose chance for Success was stolen buy greedy over-reaching.
I found a security hole in Steam that gave me every game's license keys and all I got was this... oh nice: $20,000
Video games have no inherent value, like art. And so rely on patronage. People don't purchase a video game versus pirate it because they are afraidof the law. They do it to invest in the artists(development team) to make new things in the future because they want to see more created by this artist(development team).
Tsk tsk tsk
How are we ever going to do away with the idea of intellectual property as unenforceable, if people play nice with the bug bounties. We stand to gain a lot more by Mass non-compliance. People will still program out of passion and share out of a desire to show off. If you think about how much combined value there is available to everybody in a world where intellectual property is no longer a legal concept, it seems naive and cool Hardy to support such things went in the end you're losing access to more than that 20, 000 could have ever boughten. And then multiply that by Everybody who might ever have an interest in something currently protected by IP law. Elimination of intellectual property law equals life upgrade for the entire world
Re: Meet our CSO, Mr. Hindsight
You haven't tryed to hack your own system yet have you? Metrics with the fingerprint easily fooled.
Your encryption, has known back doors in the math unless you rolled your own algorithm and code. You sir are the perfect victim due to your misplaced faith in security theatre.
when it comes to security anyone sufficiently motivated will eventually break any and all security
Re: ... for various meanings of 'realistic'...
So we still are notwe Advanced enough yet to acknowledge the offense originates in the perception of the offended, and as such recognize that their thoughts are their own responsibility and do not apply to the rest of the world. Breasts are universally loved, this is instilled as infants or possibly instinctual. until people get old enough to be taught to hate the sight of them by people with a strategy that seems intent on maximizing opportunities to feel upset, battery warning and feeding into inappropriate emotional reaction
Is it all or nothing strategy. Human body is not an island. A living human is a composite of multiple interdependent creatures working in symbiosis It is many creatures with distinctively different DNA working together and symbiosis. Our body is a biome. When that biome is out of balance, the effects on it by external factors are offset by both additional presence of foreign bacteria, or the absence of essential symbiantic varities. You're not just you, you are the components of multiple life forms and their interactions.
Re: The reports so far with some editorial....
well anything that effects my awareness or experiance is my business.measured by effect, you can not observe something without effecting it, therefore if i have observed something, then it and i have effected each other and therefore are eachothers busines
in reality laws simply change the official story, to save their asses everyone with direct influence begins looking for or avoiding knowledge, details and events to hopefully find the result that will maximize their perception of their personal future stability within their career. its not a conscious intent, nut a side effect of the survival drive in the subconscious. laws don't change behavior, the just decide whose turn it is to be demonized, if you want to successfully. and sustainably change behavior in other people then you have find a way to get them the perception and experience that whatever behavior they are currently was giving them. if the new source of perception and experience results in an equivalent experiance, they will no longer desire the previous, their percieved needs having been met. anything less would result the underlying percieved need not beiong filled, fuleing motivation to recover the previous source, or fear that the alternative source you are offering could be insufficient and then it would be too late, this virtually guarentees hostility and conflict. this is a game of human motivations and strategies by wich to feel safe. you don't feel safe when they have guns. they don't feel safe when you have guns, everyone is going to try for what makes them feel safe. laws be damned fear is a greater motivator then the cultural worship of legal processes.
As a citizen of the USA, I would beg the world to refuse business with the U.S.A. until it's prohibit ively expensive to not protect waterways, olease help us get our country back, most of us don't condone the acts of our government, but are scared of retribution if we don't pretend to like it. Americans are not patriotic. We are scared .We are a country held hostage by it's own government and just trying not to disappear mysterious ly like the others that spoke out with a voice loud enough to be heard
Here's the thing, is that pipeline is not even to help the US people. We get nothing for putting up with that pipeline and the disruption to our lands and basic water supply. It's for International interests at our expense and at the expense of future generations to the US citizens and since the water tables have been considered expendable, for the sake of building this pipeline, water polution interacts and effect s things worldwide, as it a dynamic interdependent planetwide system. Countries, laws and ethics, species and religion s all come and go, but the same we stand to do to the water systems of Earth have longer lasting and farther reaching consequences, which is why protection of them transcends and supercedes law and country
Re: ovveriding of user initiated formatting is sabatoge and malicous hacking of a personal pc
really putting anyinformation on a computer that connected in anyway to a public network such as the internet is parrallel to making it public domain, security has never been anyting but an illusion, a lie that has been taught by ecommerce to the masses, because if people were actually being tesponsible and keeping their private data and financials off the web, then eccomerce could not operate. and hacking would only ever be annpoyi ng and never devastating. connecting information to the iknternet is the equivalaent of saying anybody who is motivated can have this, by measure of causality to make it accessavle form the internet is to give up all control, back in the 90s internet users and providrs were well aware of this fact, really wanting reality to be different doesn't make it so, it just exposes people to risk and encourages confusion