* Posts by Grumpy Rob

4 posts • joined 20 Oct 2016

'Year-long' delay to UK 5G if we spike Huawei deals, say telcos

Grumpy Rob

What could possibly go wrong?

Gee - I can't think of any reason why you wouldn't install equipment in the CORE of your national communication network from a country that:

- has recently been accused of hacking into businesses all over the world and stealing IP

- has the power to coerce a local company to spy for it while ensuring that that company can't tell anyone about it.

And if you think you can mitigate the risk by inspecting the source code then you're dreaming - for a start try looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Obfuscated_C_Code_Contest to get an idea of how you can hide stuff if you want. And then the nightmare of checking that *every* piece of kit delivered has the same firware, doesn't have extra hidden ROM, firmware updates are "clean", etc, etc, etc...

BTW - I would be just as suspicious about equipment bought from the USA, except that with the "Five Eyes" agreement they already have access to all our phone conversations anyway!

The bottom line is that if you don't have equipment designed and manufactured in-country you can't really trust it 100%. So you're already stuffed!

BA IT systems failure: Uninterruptible Power Supply was interrupted

Grumpy Rob

Coarse colonial

May not be relevant, but my favourite quote (not original) when sytems go down is:

Q: Why is a computer system like an erect penis?

A: Because if you f**k with it it's going to go down.

Seen it any number of times!

systemd-free Devuan Linux hits version 1.0.0

Grumpy Rob

Re: geez, the ignorance about systemd here is astounding

Well, let's see what Linus thinks about the Red Hat developers working on systemd (back in 2014).


Oh, sorry - Linus must be an ignorant troll too </sarc>

South Australia blacked out by bad bespoke software, not wind farms

Grumpy Rob

Gosh, I like simple answers to complex questions!

There are a few contributors who seem to think network stability is really simple, but I can assure you it's not. Once you have a succession of big disturbances on the transmission network you are in uncharted territory. It's all very well saying that big rotating machines (i.e. coal-fired turbines) have lots of capacity to "instantaneously" provide extra power, but that's conveniently ignoring the problems involved in trying to keep widely separated generators in sync - there are transmission delays, reaction times of the turbine governors, etc, etc Even if the SA generation had been 100% coal-fired there's no guarantee that it would have stayed up. So it's just opportunistic to blame wind generation.

I certainly agree with the consensus that the introduction of lots of green power could have been better managed (hindsight *is* 20-20 vision), and griffo is right that this was a "learning event". But I get *really* annoyed by the pollies and pundits mindlessly (or is it duplicitously?) demanding cheap AND 100% reliable electricty - it's an engineering trade-off, you can't have both simultaneously.

And on the subject of the cost of electricity - it's a few years since I looked at the annual reports of the NSW electricity distributors, and they were then 100% Government owned. But from memory the annual reports showed that the distributors paid a total annual "dividend" to the Government of around a billion dollars, plus another half a billion odd in debt repayments. But "dividend" is just accountant bullshit for tax, since they are (well, were) publically owned assets. So a lot of the blame for high electricity prices lies at the door of our pollies, rather than "network gold plating" or green energy. Don't believe me? Well get off your bum and look at the publically available annual reports.

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019