I never used these either - until Lambdas. Now that you can use and algorithm on a single line they have become very handy.
76 posts • joined 13 Aug 2007
You have just answered your own question. The DVD drive by virtue (or sin) of being mechanical is highly prone to failure and infrequently used so moving it outside the case makes a lot of sense from a servicing perspective. I'm no Apple fan, far from it, but on this they are right and the PC I'm building at the moment won't have an internal DVD drive either.
All of the articles I've seen comparing the S3 to the Nexus 4 seem to use over-inflated prices for the S3.
Amazon are selling the blue 16gb S3 for 389.99 (not the £430 quoted in the article)
While the equivalent 16gb Nexus 4 is 279.99. (not the 8gb £230 price quoted).
It's still a bargain, and I would have bought one had I not bought an S3 last month (Doh!), but £110 is a far cry from £200.
The idea of yet another subscription would certainly put me off. Someday soon you won't be able to buy anything that doesn't require some sort of wallet draining tax to keep it fully operational, but until that day comes I'm steering well clear.
Besides, it's not even necessary. The console should be driven off the smartphone in your pocket via bluetooth.
Bollocks they did! The BBC wanted out sure, but the big cost is the broadcasting rights not making the programmes. The Sky deal allowed them to get a discount on the rights while them showing some races and highlights allowed Bernie to sidestep the 'free-to-air' clause in the concorde agreement.
If the deal hadn't been made the BBC would still be broadcasting all of the races live and then at the end of their contract Channel 4 would have bid for it and probably won. It was a dirty stitch-up orchestrated by the BBC so they could spend more money on pleb-numbing shit like 'The Voice'.
I think that when they by 'removable solid state storage' they don't mean memory cards or cartidges. What they are talking about is a a low capacity SSD (it will need to be >50gig so a memory stick no longer cuts it) that you can remove from the console and take to a shop to 'download' your game if your internet connection is slow.
What a spurious argument. Can the writer not see the difference between someone asking for higher taxes on an entire bracket and being willing to give that money voluntarily and unilaterily?
It's the difference between saying 'here have my gun and let everyone else keep theirs if they wish' and 'I'll keep my gun unless you take everyone's away'. The former is perhaps more noble, but also fucking stupid.
Compression is important, but if you're watching SD material on an HD set the upscaling and filtering also makes a massive difference.
I use an HTPC using DXVA for rendering with carefully chosen codecs, and 0 TV scaling (since the PC always outputs 1080p) and watch Freeview. All sources look great, with artifacts greatly reduced. OTOH my friend's Sky+ on an equally sized TV looks, frankly, like shit with tons of artifacts and blockyness.
Properly upscaled SD material on an HD set can look a lot better than native SD, even with the crap bitrates some channels use.
Btw. I sit about 1.5m from my 42" and I'm pretty sure I could tell the difference between 720p and 1080p. I never understood why people by massive sets and then sit miles away from them.
Hear, hear! Its entirely possible to write c++ without memory leaks with just by using containers and smart pointers. When i write code the isn't a single `new`, `delete` or `malloc` to be seen in application code, and consequently memory leaks are easily avoided.
Interestingly the only app i`ve worked on recently that suffered badly from memory leaks was written in .net.
As much as I dislike Apple for various reasons it's hard not to applaud that sort of behaviour. VPs get paid a lot of money, when they cock up they should pay the price. Far too often the guys at the top get away with passing the buck.
If investment banks all had Jobsian 'tyrant' at the top perhaps we wouldn't all have got so screwed by their incompetence.
The problem here is that while it's possible that App Store might technically be non-generic enough to qualify for protection (though given Apples market share using a measurment like '88% of references are to the Apple store' is idiotic), it is certainly generic enough that protection will stiffle competition.
What are people supposed to call non-Apple app stores? Application Marketplace? Program Shop?
If apple wanted trademark protection they should have called it the iShop or some other branded nonsense.
Charlie over at SemiAccurate claims to have info that the iPhone 5 will have a mini-display port output, so it makes sense for it to be on the iPad 2 also, though as you say on the iPad I would expect there to be an HDMI out.
OTOH DP -> HDMI adapters aren't too pricey these days, especially if you only need 1080p.
I'm highly sceptical. While it sounds ok in theory the critical part seems to be determining exactly where the observers eyes are. I'm assuming a reasonably high level of precision is required here for a believable 3D image to work and any imprecision could break the whole effect or, even worse, make the user quite sick.
Frankly I don't think it's possible, expecially if you allow the observers to move about.
Surely upgrading the exchanges with highest density of users first is only sensible, espcially given that the upgrade is a fixed cost. More people will benefit quicker and it will cost less per user.
If you want to live in a village in the middle of nowhere that's fine, but you can't expect to get a fiber upgrade before major metropolitan areas. You get the beautiful countryside, fresh air and shit braodband. We get the filth and stink of the city and fibre upgrades. Suck it up.
The result is the same - not action. Whether or not that is the best course of action is debatable (though it's clear which position the writer favours) but calling it 'Adaptation' is no better than calling it 'denying'. It's essentially a PR rebranding of exactly the same policy that's been pushed from one side of the debate the whole time - do nothing, ignore the problem and hope somebody else fixes it in the future. The human default option of passing the buck.
OTOH, while the Eco-Activists may have won the PR battle some time ago they were always going to lose the war. Fighting against the hubris, greed and inertia of the entire human race was always futile.
In 'Alien 1' the crew recieve a distress broadcast.
In 'Aliens' the Comapny learns of the crashed ship from Ripley - and presumably the ships logs - and sends Newt's family to investigate (this is seen in the Special Edition), thus starting the base infection.
I'm actually excited about this. Scott has a mixed record in general but has produced some of the best Sci-Fi in cinema history. And it's not like the franchise hasn't beed raped already, if it's bad it can't be any worse than the others...
Boeing should try and compete on merit with the smaller companies and develop a commercially viable lifter that they can then sell/run for NASA.
But it seems they actually just want to suckle on the Goverment teat and have no interest in furthering Space exploration. Bunch of whining pussies.
I would expect that a higher death rate among junkies would actually be the result of their deteriorated physical condition caused by long term drug abuse rather than just 'being high'.
So it's essentially a marketting/coverup excercise for Taser/The Police force that means absolutely nothing.
At least those that can remember what it was like before. The introduction of the Oyster has had a massive improvement on bus speeds (due to quicker boarding times) particularly, and makes getting on the Tube much quicker too.
I don't entirely see the point of using it for other things (maybe vending machines?), but it's definitely been a major improvement for the transport netwrok.
Tbh it was pretty silly of the app developers to not expect Apple to have a change of heart, it was only a matter of time really. This is what happens when you live at the behest of a single company.
What is utterly reprehensible is Apple only doing this to people too small to fight back. They know full-well that what they are doing could land them in court if they targetted someone with enough money to see it through.
I actually don't understand how they've taken all those parts and managed to make them perform so poorly. Your test system (practically identical to a system I own, just a different make of SSD) is much cheaper to build and outperforms it in every area.
Maybe they used cheapest mobo. and RAM that money can buy?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019