Re: Locali(s/z)ation....
And in English it is a small dent / area of damage in something like a car.
6400 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Aug 2016
Birmingham is the the largest lower-tier local authority. The largest lower-tier local authority in London is Croydon with a population of 390k.
The largest upper tier local authority in Europe is Île-de-France (Paris and surrounding region).
The largest sub-national division in Europe is England.
I don't live locally, but I guess it would be along the same lines as how London and Manchester are split up.
As I'm not local, I don't have any proposals for the specific names and borders for the new councils, but they don't all need to be the same size, and the names will likely be based on neightborhood names and the towns that make up what is now Birmingham.
It is the largest lower-tier local authority in Europe, so it is probably too big. There is already the West Midlands Combined Authority which isn't much bigger than Birmingham, it would remain as the upper-tier local authority, but maybe it would be restructured to be more like Greater London or Greater Manchester.
I guess choosing a Mastodon server is a bit like choosing an email server.
How do people choose an email server these days? I suppose there's basically two choices, Microsoft or Google, and there are actually differences between them, whereas with Mastodon, there generally isn't, they mostly all use the same software.
Don't think you can order an EUV machine off the shelf either. Yes, I know Wish dot com claims to have one for £104.20 with free shipping, and Amazon claims to have one for £39.99, but I doubt either of them will actually work.
But then again, my iPhone 15 Pro Max has single-thread performance that is basically the same, or maybe very slightly slower than intel's 13900K.
This is comparing a phone running on battery power with passive cooling that charges from a 20W power source, with a flagship gaming desktop that requires 125W just for the CPU.
"Other tasks Infosys promised ICAC can tackle is turning legacy workloads into composable functional capabilities that reside in the cloud; improving crowd control with AI and optimizing route planning for decarbonization – an effort that coincidentally could also reduce flight costs."
So translated into English, it is a load of marketing buzzwords and the product doesn't actually do anything.
"turning legacy workloads into composable functional capabilities that reside in the cloud" - it runs old software on new hardware
"improving crowd control with AI" - crowd control is not a problem that luggage handling software needs to solve, therefore it does nothing
"optimizing route planning for decarbonization" - the optimal route for luggage is it to take the same plane as its human owner. Obviously that doesn't always happen, but taking decarbonization[sic] into account isn't going to help that. Therefore it does nothing.
I am aware there is zero proof.
The only way to prove it one way or ther other is to either get a Turing Machine to emulate it, which doesn't appear to be happening, or to gain a better understanding of how the human brain works which also isn't happening, and demonstrate that it relies on a feature that isn't offered by a Turing machine.
I believe it is not possible to do it on a Turing machine. Obviously it is possible to create new intelligent beings, it is called having babies, but it is impossible to preduct whether it will be possible at some point the the future to do it another way outside of the more obvious techniques in the biology lab.
Lets suppose you encounter a door with a slightly different shape of handle from any you have seen before.
Will you have any difficulty recognising the handle and opening the door? Do you think other humans would struggle? [with the recognition and understanding the method of opening it, I get that due to disabilities some humans struggle with door handles in general, that's not what I mean]
This is the sort of really obvious thing that computers struggle with.
Sure, but a taxi driver who passes the knowledge in London isn’t qualified to drive a taxi in Glasgow, or in the Highlands District. They are allowed to take a passenger there from London, or do a pre-booked return journey back to London, but otherwise, they are only allowed to work in London.
But there is the difference that you can recognise a roundabout you’ve never seen before[1], whereas that isn’t guaranteed for a computer.
[1] unless it is those particularly evil ones in Swindon and Hemel Hempstead.
Level 5 certification probably needs to be done by the city rather than state or national governments. A computer that is able to drive safely in San Francisco isn't necessarily able to drive safely in New York, and almost certainly isn't able to drive safely in London, or the Scottish Highlands.
The way I look at it is this:
At my local Tesco, there are 16 petrol pumps, and 500 parking spaces.
There's generally a queue for the petrol station, but it doesn't take too long to get through.
4 of the parking spaces have chargers, and they are always fully occupied, so at the moment, 4 is clearly not enough.
Basically, all of the parking spaces in use would need to have chargers. People would park, plug their car into the charger, do their shopping, and hopefully come out to a fully charged car.
I'm not sure we actually need 500 parking spaces, but definitely we need 250, maybe 350 to allow for really busy shopping periods before Christmas.
So about 20 chargers for each pump.
Efficiency of a petrol engine - around 40%
Efficiency of a combined cycle gas power station - around 50%
National grid efficiency from powerstation to plug - around 92%
Efficiency of an electric car from plug to wheel - around 90%
Multiply those together and you get 41.4%, or basically it is the same. Gas emits less carbon than petrol. Other energy sources emit less carbon than gas, except for coal which mostly isn't used any more.
So the benefits are from using better fuel sources, not the fact that it is electric.