or Admiral Akbar Applies.
At times like this, look for giant fish in Admiral's uniform, giving a warning.
264 posts • joined 6 Aug 2016
or Admiral Akbar Applies.
At times like this, look for giant fish in Admiral's uniform, giving a warning.
Michigan State University astronomer Jay Strader tweeted rumours
Rumours about the gyroscopes, so NASA 's spin doctors got involved...
...for the sub headline. Made my day.
Gosh those days seem so far away now. My biggest mental somersault was in the days when we happily paid £10 for a small sun box as a gateway/firewall, and another £10k per annum for "management", and then in the late 90s finding that a throwaway box running linux was just as, if not more, capable, and that maybe, just maybe, we'd been taken for a ride for some years. No wonder we all developed such cynicism. I remember so desperately trying to see the flaw in the reality when concluding that there really wasn't some special secret security sauce in the expensive version.
Query regarding embedding chips in the motherboard substrate. Is this even a part of the normal manufacturing process? If it isn't, we can probably discount that part of the story as hyperbole.
That's roughly what I was thinking. Embedding a physical device, no matter how small or how smart, is such absolute proof of where the attack was carried out that it seems far too clumsy, and far too likely to be found out.
Still, as others have pointed out, none of the actors in the story necessarily inspire one with confidence of truth, while all have something to gain from being manipulative.
But overall, this sounds more like the current equivalent of a Red under the Bed hysteria which seems so boringly cyclic in some parts of the world, the Chinese being the bogeyman-de-jour. Where's Arthur Miller when he's needed?
Adblockers don't stop server-side analytics.
Maybe not, but I wonder what a combination of ublock origin and the EFF's Privacy Badger would do on the new slurpy chrome/chromium? It's possible to disallow cookies using Privacy Badger, and even block connections entirely, to say nothing of what's possible with a well crafted hosts file. One can see an extension to yoyo.org adserver blocks aimed at analytics overreahc, for example.
Basically, all our base are belong to Google already.
That may be true, but it is not inevitable that we the people, whether citizens or subjects, will roll over and accept this. To maintain some vestige of what it means to be human, we must continue to resist, making life as hard for data collectors as possible.
I don't get why people think that is so stupid or funny.
Because when confronted with a message on a screen, people's understanding becomes astonishingly literal. The stupidity really isn't as one sided as it seems at all.
(I wonder how many have headed for the exits when seeing the lpd "printer on fire" message)
Huh! Who remembers the early days of the 80286, which had the A20 gate in the keyboard, meaning one way of speeding up the machine was the replace the keyboard with a newer one.
It may not have been called "DevOps", but we most certainly used the same concepts and methods in the mid 90s. Of course, back then, buzzwords were real buzzwords....
Perhaps they did have politicians.
Perhaps they were politicians
I tried going to the openSUSE link but in true linux fashion it didn't work out the box and had to be tweaked before it would work.
Mea culpa, mea culpa ad comma.
Here are several sites which will resolve this problem for good:
Really, why do people put up with this nonsense? It's just not necessary.
This seems one of those things that can be rather annoying. What is so wrong with physical keys that a techgasm of adding layers of technology solves, but results in such poor implementations? I know that sounds merely Luddite, but really, surely by now we can at least look at things more empirically rather than tumble headlong along a path we have kidded ourselves is called "progress"?
I still think they are wasting their time trying to create a useful speed measure though.
But then advertisers should not such use a non-metric, which, if you are right, would then be wilfully misleading. A bit like when one has some problem on a support forum, and someone replies "works for me". Fascinating, but of no use whatsoever.
... lazy and hopeless.
Sure - letsencrypt.org
I know, as for some reason I recognise the description.
He's really "Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells", isn't he?
Oh yeah, they built a new aircraft carrier, but forgot the catapults.
Don't forget the contract - the "£5billion" will balloon to £15 billion, which will have to change hands whether the system gets built or not. The satellites will end up in a shed in Basingstoke.
Also a UK only system can be based on 3 x 3 satellites
Unfortunately, the UK military doesn't plan to restrict its bombing to the UK alone.
The Leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition
Wouldn't have known there was such a thing based on the amount of abstaining or rubber stamping the last two years have shown.
Why can we not have mainstream journalism dealing with complex controversies as thorough as El Reg journalists produce? The range of responses garnered and the way they are presented is exemplary, especially as this issue will rear its head repeatedly over the next few years, and won't be closed down by a specific view.
In the old South Africa, the Rotarians or Round Tablers in a Cape Town suburb had a similar fund-raising idea, and the Republic of Hout Bay came into being. This was made easier by the fact that, as Hout Bay is on the opposite side of Table Mountain to the city, there were (and maybe still are) only three roads into and out of the suburb. So they had "road blocks" at which you could but a "passport" that would make you a citizen.
Rumour had it at the time that people were successfully using these "passports" on trips away from South Africa, at a time when South African passports were regarded extremely dubiously, claiming that the Republic of Hout Bay was a breakaway dissident state.
> Why would Dropbox want to do that?
I never did understand why the risk of software audits (remember the FAST wars?) did not kill proprietary software, as the risk to business is so high, not just financially, but reputation risks too. Perhaps it's because licence compliance sounds simple and benign, rather than the minefield and constantly moving target greed has made it.
Historical examples: I can certainly recall that the final and biggest reason for migrating from Netware to NT networking was the fact that the licence restrictions were non-existent in comparison with Novell's draconian rules. Also, we first started looking at Linux at a time when adding a single login to a Sequent Dynix ptx system costs thousands. Some infrastructure development needed at that time was nearly prevented by the cost of the development logins, so I did the research on Linux instead.
> (insert Windows cheap-shot here...)
No doubt the next silly acronym for a vulnerability will indeed be called CHEAP-shot or cheap-SHOT or maybe ChEAP-sHOT.
Hah! You'll be laughing on the other side of your paper cassette when the machine, sounding remarkably like Tony Hawks replies "Howdee Doodley do". It's not just the toasters, you know.
> The number of people who are confused
Must agree with the surprised title. Some really astonishing lack on understanding about how the linux kernel works, and the significance, or otherwise of a new project managing to get approval from the kernel developers. The nonsense about bloat and assumptions that being in the mainline meant wg would no longer be a module is so misplaced, one wonders whether trolls have pounced on this. Attempted comparisons of particular distros' kernel compilation choices and the kernel development process really read like FUD shill comments. So unlike ElReg commentards, who we expect and hope to be better informed.
> dig AAAA theregister.co.uk
I think that would be a fair criticism if ElReg was a consultancy, but they're a news outlet. So it's legitimate to yell "FAKE ipv6 address!" but less legitimate to say "AAAA.news".
I resigned from one job, on a 3 month notice period. They found a replacement within a month, and the usual "handover" discussion started. . Instead, I said to my boss "It's really not fair on the new guy if I'm hanging around al the time; it'll cramp his style terribly. How about I, you, know, not show up?" They fell for it and I had a couple of months of rather well paid garden tending, and my boss thought I was being rather kind.
>Sorry, but that you were using your own personal licence
>to run business functions reflects worse on you, but reflects
> badly on them whether or not they throw you out.
As a generality, I'd agree with you, but some employment circumstances are utterly bizarre, and maintaining one's sanity does not always mean following ideal ways of working. There are some truly dreadful employers out there, and some truly knobheaded PHBs believing the world is something it is not. It may not always be possible to maintain one's own standards and remain sane if unfortunate enough to find your self in those straits.
> The bill read: "hit car with hammer: 5. Know where to hit: 95."
Some years back, the viscous coupled fan on my Landie froze, so I decided to replace it with an electric one. Removing the old fan seemed really hard. Some people spoke of having to buy a special tool, others that it could be done but only if you were a contortionist. I took it down to my local old-style garage, and asked f he could help. He said "Pull it in closer," and while i was doing that got an air line and a percussion attachment. He opened the bonnet, had a good look, aimed the tool carefully, and there was a short "PRRFT, and then he simply hand-spun the fan off the now-loosened bolt. As he closed the bonnet, I said to him "That took 10 seconds and 25 years." He smiled, understanding me perfectly.
He wouldn't charge me either.
...and thanks for all the fsssssssshhh of halon releases and power supply failures in these and other articles.
Reading through my post above, apologise I must for allowing my inner Yoda to over-ride my typing fingers. Not try to brief, must in future be done.
Not to do with Russia directly, but fascinating is an article on the ANC's web site describing how their operatives communicated in Apartheid South Africa. The use of computers in the 1980s, basic encryption, then modems to transfer audio to cassette tape. Then find a phone and switch on the tape, to send screeches down a phone line. Receiving was the reverse of the above. Relevant to the article is the process this involved. A great read.
"Talking To Vula"
The Story of the Secret Underground Communications Network of Operation Vula
by Tim Jenkin
Variation on pretentious wine snob: "Try the 2018 Californian Carpe Diem. The name means 'cesium the day', you know"
Beer icon, because it's always unadulterated. Oh hang on...
> There were only two things which drove it off the scale.
> Cucumbers (specifically the peel) and forest mushrooms.
You mean mushrooms like this one? ------------------------>
It was 1995 or 6 for me. Also no CD, so at work, I gathered as many Compaq driver disks as I could find, cellotaped over the write-protect slot, and started copying. Back home, I stumbled my way through the installation, and eventually ended up with a big X on the screen. I didn't know you then had to run a window manager on top of X. I also remember running an MS-Windows machine against the Slackware machine, using a X server called mIx, or maybe MiX - can't recall exactly. The thrill of this achievement was wonderful - but as Linux matured and got easier to install, it's hard to be too nostalgic.
> all you needed was screwdrivers, insulating tape and penknife
In the early years of the PC, the standard kit was a rubber eraser, a toothbrush and a bottle of methylated spirits. It was surprising what could be cured by removing the "daughterboard" cards, cleaning the contacts and replacing.
Yes, these scumbag companies (The BBC report lists others) and their disturbing lack of ethics deserve to be held to account, but what about the political results of these activities? There appears to be complete silence about that. Is it simply that all political colours were up to their necks in this, so politics over the last 10 years was all about a financial arms race, or do we simply not have the leadership to draw any societal conclusions from these scummy activities?
> The whole idea is driven by the thought that if you cram more people into a given space,
Don't forget the power politics in play, not just because those higher up in open-plan and cubicle environments tend to have offices, and can both insulate themselves from open plan reality and enjoy the power pleasure of inflicting it on others.
I worked at a company in the early 90s in an open-plan office. I left after a few years, and returned as a consultant a few years after that. After a meeting at my desk - they had those teardrop-shaped desk add-ons for small meetings - someone went to my boss to complain about my desk. He said as a consultant he was not sure I was entitled to the desk I had, which to my eye was identical to all the others. It turned out that for those above a certain level, the desks had a rounded edge, while minions had square-edged desks. I had known the place for 8 years and never noticed this trivial bit of status semiotics.
> Horribly noisy little things
I flew Newcastle to Southampton once in a DASH 8. It must have had active noise cancelling because soon after take-off, everything went weirdly quiet. A few minutes before landing the noise started again. Whatever did it, it was certainly effective.
"as does jet-powered replacements for routes currently served by turboprops."
Genuine question for Those Who Know - does that make sense? Turboprops for shortish (an hour or two) flights are not that much slower than jets, and surely use a lot less fuel. Is it just a fashion thing, or has all the technology and boffinry gone into full-fat jets recently?
I have a photo that reminds me how security works in the minds of many, and which illustrates this story perfectly. The picture is of a boat on a loch, secured by a large and imposing padlock one wouldn't dream of trying to pick. But above and below the padlock are two conventional shackles, easily removed with a pair of pliers, or maybe a bit of wire. Most people, except miscreants, concentrate on the padlock. So it's excellent security for keeping out people who wouldn't steal the boat anyway. Not sure whether links are acceptable on ElReg but the pic is here:- http://www.tinslave.co.uk/vrp/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TinSlave-175624-05102012.jpg
Worse - " the pair have given undertakings about future trading that extends to their relatives" Does the law allow one person to undertake to restrict a third party's activity? Could be that they are not allowed to coerce a third party, but it sounds as though the third party is being punished.
> virtualisation made Wine irrelevant for anyone wanting to do serious work with Windows
The last time I needed to use Wine in anger was with CIX's Ameol offline reader. To fire up a VM just for that would have been overkill, as well as requiring a windows licence. Even at that stage, with StarOffice, becoming freely available under Sun's ownership, there were fewer and fewer things needing windows, and hence less need for wine. (Need for beer remained at acceptable levels.)
However, I can confirm the article's comment of "since it will allow malware aimed at Microsoft's products to be run." After shutting down Ameol on one occasion I noticed a wine process still running, courtesy of something dirty going on in the Ameol conferences.
> Or you just set up G Suite/Office 365 for offline access.
Had you suggested Collabora you might have understood the zeitgeist as well as the point of the article.
> tempted to try Suse out again occasionally.
OpenSUSE is probably your friend, then. It's already been announced that the newly independent SUSE will continue to support the community version, which remains free-as-in-beer. The OpenSUSE chair confirmed on a list this morning:- "Nils Brauckmann (CEO of SUSE) personally called me this morning to assure me this news will have no negative impacts on openSUSE."
Quite a relief, as I run OpenSUSE on quite a few systems, and it has been amazingly solid. Upgrades are a joy. There was a lot to learn for one coming from a preference for Debian and Debian-style systems, but these days it seems harder to go back. It feels more unix-y somehow. I assume this is because OpenSUSE backs directly into what will become the paid-for mainframe-powering full fat SUSE.
We used to run SuSE (as it was capitalised in those days) on most servers, and had bookcases of the full box sets as each new version arrived. We came to the conclusion that, from 5.3, the odd point-numbered versions were great, but the even numbered and point-zero versions were best avoided. Then Ubuntu came along and changed the game for the better, especially when we didn't really need to run a "certified" OS. I came to prefer Ubuntu as a desktop OS, but came back to OpenSUSE around 12.1, probably out of nostalgia. What I found was remarkable quality and a satisfying experience.
I wish them well as independents under new owners.
> 1. Sell software available free elsewhere
I think in SUSE's case, what they sell is not so much the software, but the certainty that it runs on extremely big iron.
Oh sure, like one place where the labelling of the underfloor wiring was dodgy, so they decided to put the labels on the ceiling tiles. Great idea, until one weekend the aircon guys had to come in and do work, collected all the ceiling tiles into a pile and at the end of the job restored them, not, as the saying goes, necessarily in the correct order.
> (I'm a very old kid and IMHO they ought to be El Reg readers least detested cellular network)
Must agree, sadly to all of that. We have no mobile signal here*, so phone use is occasional. A tenner of credit lasts months, and doesn't "expire". Some international calls are astonishingly cheap, and with family in Australia, the US and South Africa, it makes phoning them, when we are out and about and have a signal, almost a pleasure, from the cost point of view anyway.
However I must also admit that I didn't know Giffgaff was allegedly hip. Do hipsters really say "Champion!" when they express approval, the way the Giffgaff voice does?
* - in other news, I wonder how that Home Office 4G rollout will do around these parts. Nearest 4g signal is tens of miles away.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018