in space nobody can hear you yeeeehaaaa!
513 posts • joined 16 Jun 2016
"Bulk surveillance is recording every beach, all the time, and then being able to do a search at some point for where you have been. See the difference?"
Oh, you mean like security cameras in shopping areas? The ones they trawl back through to catch paedophiles, rapists and terrorists?
No, I don't see the difference, or at least, not that difference. (I noted a different difference already - got that?)
There is and there isn't.
First, let's include commercial spying, aka data harvesting, in the mix. What "right to privacy" applies to NSA and GCHQ that does not apply to Facebook and Google?
Next there is the POPD - Plain Old Physical Domain. What "right to privacy" does online trawling breach, that a telescope on a pier above a crowded beach does not?
And what "right to privacy" should override the right not to get abused by a paedophile, rapist or terrorist?
I am not saying there are no such rights (for example trawling the 'net often reveals an ID that the telescope seldom does), but I am saying that a lot of BS is spouted by rights activists.
Company I was with had a helldesk system just like that. Problem was, sales were falling because the printer in the sales dept had been borked for so long.
I was asked to take the desk over, fit it into my spare moments, so I did the job properly. A couple of months later sales are back up again. But management decides I am "spending too much of your valuable time" on it, a euphemism for my once-weekly round-robin status emails, which were embarrassing said managers for not getting things done.
So it gets passed back to a secretary who could teach the PFY a thing or two. Couple more months and it is back to square one.
Yeah, but we have so much legacy flash/office stuff that our business depends on, we cannot just turn it all off.
We are too dumb to plan migration to a secure policy. We just have to learn and not do it again. This time we really will learn, we really believe that.
Except, we are still as dumb as Charlie Brown when it comes to being suckered one more time.
BTW, it's spelled AUGH!
The regular hydrogen nucleus is just one positively-charged proton.
The innermost electron orbital around it, known as the S, has room for two negatively-charged electrons.
H+ has no electrons and is just a proton.
H has one electron and a neutral electric charge.
H− has two electrons, and is stable because they fill the S orbital so nicely.
So, if there is no driver giving signs of life, how the feck does the car manage to carry right on as if there is?
@Elonmusk: The default behaviour is not happening. That is a bug the size of an elephant. Look into it, or get cuffed when the court case that notices your failure to do so comes up.
"So I unplugged the network and took pictures of the screen with my phone."
Used to use an old Polaroid instant film camera with special adapter hood.
Sysadmin went nuts. "Not what we are here for" blah blah.
But he insisted on being the only one who could set up network connections, because
self-promotion security. He was a backroom admin, not routinely allowed on customer premises, so we explained that it was the only non-network option available and told him we needed a consistent presentation style in our reports (Pritt stick and photocopier).
After a bit he came back whining about digital backups. "OK, if you want to scan and archive everything, the roomful of filing cabinets is over there".
Nobody really understands the pros and cons of mass surveillance. Where do you draw the lines between publicly-available Internet stuff, commercially-sensitive Internet stuff, personal Internet stuff and private Internet stuff? Commerce, the right to privacy, and the national security we all pay taxes for, all have different ideas about where to draw those lines. Blink and the technology changes and the rules need to change with it. Don't expect politicians to keep up.
The UK constitution has a reasonably robust series of checks and balances built in to try and work towards a sensible balance on such thorny issues. It's more than most countries' constitutions have, but there's no point in expecting miracles.
Back in the day, PCs had no hard drive and an OS like MSDOS or CP/M had to be loaded from floppy disk on startup.
Neighbour had an Amstrad PCW. The main program for it was the Locoscript wordprocessor, which was integrated with a modified CP/M so that the whole shebang booted off a single disk: clunk, click, whirr, and you were away. You could also get other programs, such as spreadsheets, which ran on CP/M.
Talking one weekend, he says he's bought a spreadsheet but it won't run, so he'll have to send it back on Monday.
I offer to take a look, he shows me the PCW and the offending spreadsheet disk.
I ask, "have you got the CP/M floppy which came with the machine?"
"Somewhere probably, why?"
"You need to load the OS before programs can run on it."
" * "
Three things I would use are phonecall/message status, a big navigation pointer while walking strange streets and voice-activated dictation while driving (as the thing is already in the right place. No talking back to me, mind you!).
An external interface for clip-on medical sensors might come in handy later, if I ever get diabetic or something.
It's more subtle than that. Mass and energy tell spacetime how to curve, the curvature of spacetime tells matter and energy how to move. Gravity is effectively the local curvature of spacetime induced by the presence of mass and energy, so as mass moves around the curvature follows it and as the curvature changes so the mass follows it in a tight feedback loop. Depending where you are looking on the loop, effects on/by are interchangeable.
On time dilation, redshift is just how time dilation is measured, regardless of whether it originated in motion or gravity. A "gravitational redshift" is a measure of gravitational time dilation and is a perfectly sensible way to express that.
Oh, and gravitational waves are indeed "gravity", just as light waves are "light".
To be fair to NASA, the issue is more about risk management and assurance than a lone TV incident. What controls does SpaceX have in place to minimise the risk of doped-out or coked-up staff making dangerous manufacturing slips? Company policy, an inspection and enforcement regime, and corporate culture all play into that mix.
Fair enough. But they should also be asking about the risk of exhausted and sleep-deprived workaholics making similar blunders.
My Mum got much the same job with the Admiralty, and at much the same age. Though the coded messages were ours, they still carried the same horror. And she smoked Black Russians afterwards, not cigars. She in turn taught me what was "important" for the rest of my life.
I'm sure the Baroness needs someone to talk to. This beer's for you, Mum.
Was staggered how fast a 4G connection is at St Pancras station, massively beats my home WiFi/router/BTcopper-cos-sod-you-Sir. A fair bit slower in most provincial towns, but still comparable.
Home 4G is a bit weak and consequently stutters/cuts out a lot, so can't really judge its native speed.
Seriously considering giving myself a 4G through-the-wall thingy for Christmas. If I scrap my copper archaeology it'll pay for itself in a couple of years at most.
With the cost of minor updates being passed on to the consumer, how much are these f*cking things going to cost us once their pwnage gets so obvious even the industry has to admit it, and security fixes start coming through - at cost plus? And how blindingly in-your-face-and-out-your-*rse is exploitation at scale going to have to get before that happens?
Amber Rudderless will get a peerage for this, no doubt.
Upvote for standing up.
However I do find that comparison sites can be useful in narrowing down the field: typically I check several of them out, draw up a shortlist, and then visit each vendor individually. Never buy through them though (except once when a site was running an exclusive bargain offer from my chosen vendor).
"If [company name] ceases trading or delivering on its commitments to UK Gov, for whatever reason, then all its proprietary code shall immediately become licensed under a GNU Public License such as GPL3 or as appropriate to the system usage such as LGPL. Any licensed usage of proprietary third-party tools, such as compilers, used to prepare the code for installation, shall at the same time pass to UK Gov. Agents for UK Gov may take any reasonable steps to recover the source code and place it in a publicly accessible repository, and to recover usable copies of licensed toolsets. Agents for [company name] are forbidden to impede this process in any way and are obliged to support it to the best of their ability."
Hey-ho, I'll get my coat....
"The CSS is only for appearance, it makes a bunch of links look like a picture of a calculator."
Wrong. You evidently didn't try cutting out the CSS between the <style> tags and seeing how the pure HTML actually renders. Try it now. Then eat your words. The key is whether or not the shit is *displayed*, and that is in the CSS attributes.
Markup for display needs to be able to handle white space intelligently. Coding for white space by using alternative markup characters in place of the white space itself is just a little bit mental. Every page markup language seems to have its own touch of the moon, I have never met a really clean one.
CSS does have some more sophisticated semi-programmatic features, such as the var () function, so it it possible that the code could be much reduced. But AFAIK that could only shrink the amount of boilerplate and bury it deeper, CSS cannot provide true programmability.
More proprietary vendors dropping in incompatible boxen with ripoff support needs built-in. >sigh<
I know, how about starting with a schema/framework standard for the secure storage and interchange of personal health data. Then any fool can buy any box as long as it implements the standard properly. Why, you could even >sharp intake of breath< "publish" the schema in the public domain and >catch that bureaucrat as he faints< solicit comment.
"I had a dream last night" — John B. Sebastian
One thing that Tesla's control software is not is an autopilot. No autopilot vendor recommends that the pilot keep their hands on the controls at all times, that is the whole point of the damn thing. Nor do autopilots cut out automatically and leave the plane potentially out of control.
Tesla need to be sued for misleading users and to be forced to change the product name.
If it was just called "supercruise" or similar, we might be less inclined to hand over responsibility to it.
I am told that Google has an aren't-we-nice subculture which describes itself as "goolgy". Something unethical, ugly or stupid may earn the criticism "that's not very googly".
I should like to remind the world at large that in the game of cricket there are some strong parallels. Not only is unethical conduct deemed to be "just not cricket, old bean", but a googly is the delivery of a ball so that it breaks (bounces) first to one side and then the other, thus pursuing a zig-zag path which confuses and defeats the defender.
The acquisition of NHS patient data through DeepMind appears to be just such a googly, though delivered in circumstances which are very far from being so. It is just not cricket.
"open-source is not just about a business model, it’s also a way in which people relate to each other and work with each other."
I would say that business is about more than just money and sales, it is also about your resources, such as your staff. The way folks get along is a part of any sustainable business model, it is not a bolt-on extra.
Still, It's good to see the old mantra is finally doing its work, no longer do we need to repeat ad nauseam, "Open Source is not about the software, it is about the business model."
So go to it, OS geeks, wherever you spot a proprietary consumer, get in a loud argument about whether OS is about "more than just the business model". Consumer then sucks up the subliminal message that OS is definitely about business, without triggering their conscious prejudice the other way. (H'mm, I wonder if Mr. Howard is ahead of me there?)
Interesting that anti-drone technologies are evolving. Missiles tend to cost more than the drone they shoot down, a win-win for the drone operator. If Russian bragging is to be believed, ground gunfire and cyber attack have both proved effective. The problem with drone-on-drone is the one Britain had with the air war in 1939 - getting enough defenders to the battle zone before the attackers have done their stuff and effed off.
If I were an armaments company, I'd be building hi-res sensors and AI into my anti-aircraft gunnery systems right now.
means the big boyz'n'girlz will lawyer it into a bottomless pit. Nice for the legal profession, f*** all use to anybody else.
If it is ever to work, then KISS applies.
For example why not just tax company revenues based on the UK share of their global user base? OK it's probably not /that/ simple, but the principle is there.
"someone who by his own admission writes seriously buggy untested code"
@boltar: It is old-fashioned politeness to deprecate one's professional expertise in a mildly humorous way. What you should draw from this is not that Kawaguchi is a bad coder but that he has an old-world charm and good manners that you appear to lack.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018