Re: It's 2018
Am I allowed to both look down on someone for being computer illiterate if I also look up to them for their non computer based skills?
I might need some sort of MC Escher Staircase to do it, but I'm sure it's possible.
587 posts • joined 26 May 2016
Create new company using robot trucks from the start, undercut prices, companies with drivers forced to downsize or close - nothing a union can really do about that, except try and complain to the government to get the automated vehicles banned.
During the development of Windows 2000, MS gave bug-fixes a higher priority than any other task.
It slowed down development a little, but resulted in probably the most reliable and least buggy version of the OS they have ever produced.
Shame they lost the lessons learned that led to that...
Having seen the picture, it's quite like what I expected - a very simple outline. You know, the sort of thing you have to know what it's meant to be in order to realise what it is meant to be.
Regarding the "what if a child saw" comment - they would see an arrangement of lights on a wall and not understand what it is meant to be.
@ExcellentSword - want me to wander around there and take a photo for the article?
If its fast enough, it's fast enough.
How fast do you need a mobile network connection to be?
About the most demanding thing I think most people might do on a phone is watch video.
ok, if you use the mobile network for home internet, that's a different matter and you want large downloads (like games for example that can be ~60GB+) to complete as fast as possible, but on a phone?
The app on my phone worked just fine for retrieving passwords.
And worst comes to the worst - I run through the "forgotten password" loop for a service I really need access to.
Yes, any downtime has the capacity to be annoying, but then again, I also get all the synchronisation handled for me between devices.
comme ci comme ça
I could have sworn I saw something there about the Russian side being prepared to split their sections off in the event the US decided to stop supporting it. It might have been this post: https://space.stackexchange.com/a/266/6241 but there isn't much detail there.
... have a good point
What would be the problem of accepting the current suggestions, on the proviso that they are still going to push for firmware updates and so on?
I guess it is probably easier to expand the current guidelines that they are proposing, as if it doesn't go into this set, it's going to have to start again from scratch?
A family member was having trouble with internet connection over wifi at home, mobile internet was fine, so I had a look.
He had the Opera security/helper app installed (whatever it is called), which amongst other things enabled a VPN (might have been a proxy, it called it a VPN, I didn't waste time investigating further) which had a terrible throughput. It _may_ have been useful against a dodgy "public" wifi point, but not being able to white-list home wifi?
nixing that thing was the best solution.
I hope they are looking out for dead birds around the new 5G sites.
Or not... https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/5g-cellular-test-birds/
These tin foil hatters get around, don't they?
What that snopes article doesn't say is that a couple of years ago there was another sizeable mass bird death - that one was, upon examination of the bodies attributed to toxins from a nearby building site getting into the water the birds drank from (e.g. puddles).
I wouldn't be surprised if something similar was the cause this time too.
If you're out and about you don't need the USB-C port for charging and if you're at home you don't need to use your headphones for music.
What about when I'm in the car on a long trip, with the sat nav on and want to play music through my stereo?
Need to charge my phone and plug it in for sound - no Bluetooth audio in my car
various tools that do some measure of hosting content that expect UPnP to be enabled - games that do peer to peer/self hosting multiplayer that don't readily provide which ports need to be exposed.
Not that you can't find out, but the hassle is likely enough to get a semi-tech-literate gamer to turn it back on, or someone using a peer to peer voip app etc.
I thought the whole point of Agile was that you didn't need to know about such things up front, you just dealt with them as you discovered them.
You're going to want key safety issues identified in advance - things like which certification levels are you going for, what technologies you are going to be using/restricting.
Contrary to popular belief, agile doesn't mean you don't do any planning in advance, you just don't plan everything to the nth degree before you begin.
If there are things that are fundamental requirements of your product, then you plan those in advance.
OR, more accurately, that the general population don't understand the capacities of an autopilot and ascribe it abilities beyond what it can actually do.
I've flown a plane exactly once - a red-letter day, I'm no pilot - but I wanted to know everything I could before I went up. The plane had an autopilot - it was two dials, one for desired heading, one for desired altitude. It would attempt to match heading and altitude by adjusting the current by a limited rate, and once reached, hold it.
That's it. That's an autopilot in a nutshell.
Yes, airliners have other systems that are capable of landing the plane etc, but those are additional systems.
Transferring that to the surface domain - an enhanced cruise control is exactly what an autopilot describes.
We have terms for cars that drive themselves - "fully autonomous vehicle", or "self driving car".
"Autopilot" is an apt description of the capabilities of the Tesla. The problem is people thinking that it does more than it does.
I went to a test drive event for the model X - the staff there made it very clear that it was a driving aid, and not autonomous.
I also made sure I got to try it out - lets just say that its immediate insistence on pulling off the side of the dual-carriageway I was on, and that it wanted to accelerate hard beyond the speed limit (signage limited it to 60, the car decided it was in a 70 zone despite a speed limit sign being in clear view) gave me doubts about the quality of the system.
At the same time, the realization that something as simple as a regional ISP misconfiguring a server could trigger a global outage does not sit particularly well either.
Worth noting that this isn't a global outage of all internet traffic, or all traffic to google even.
As the article says, it was "primarily propagated by business-grade transit providers and did not impact consumer ISP networks as much"
so it was mostly "just" business grade providers connecting through one region that lost access to one company's services.
Disruptive? yes, especially when that one company is as big as Google.
Not quite the end of the internet though.
The thing about guns being available isn't that if someone really, really wants a gun he can't get one - that'll happen through means legal and otherwise.
But if everyone and their mother don't have gun/s to hand - when [random member of society] gets themselves into a pissed off state, there isn't a firearm to hand with which they can just go and murder a group of people.
@Claptrap314 It's quite difficult to get folks to drop windows after growing up with it and being dependent on it for critical bits of kit you have no control over (if you are a SMB). By comparison dumping MS Office was easy.
Bar needing it for specific tasks where software and hardware is unsupported on other OSes (whether or not you can get it to work, as a business, you probably want the support) I would have thought moving to another OS would be fairly easy, as long as it still has a task-bar and some sort of launcher that is not too dissimilar to the start menu. - In fact, many Linux distros have window managers with launchers that are closer to old Windows in style and functionality than new Windows...
Failing that, there is always the shortcuts on the desktop approach.
Then it's a question of how fast explosive bolts and the abort motor light up after being lit up. Hopefully fast enough that the fireball shockwave still hasn't reached the crew.
They're designed to be fast and get the crew away, unsurprisingly.
https://youtu.be/AqeJzItldSQ?t=100 apollo capsule escape system firing
https://youtu.be/1_FXVjf46T8?t=9 spaceX dragon escape system test
https://youtu.be/ESc_0MgmqOA?t=51 Blue Origin New shephard escape system test
You have to consider the fuel tank and the shuttle itself as one item at launch. Given that you want the expensive engines back, they need to be connected to the lander. You also want the sources of drag (e.g. the wings and tail) as far back as possible.
Given that the engines are used in the launch, and the whole point is to make as much of it usable as possible, you don't want the entire thing on top of a first stage that is disposed of each time you launch.
The only viable place to put any booster rockets is on the side, like the side boosters of the falcon heavy or any other boosters used on any rocket in the past.
The only alternative design I can really think of would be to mount the fuel tank right on top of the shuttle - in front of the nose.
Of course that would mean that you would require long pipes to get the fuel to the engines, instead of a direct connection.
I don't think there is really another alternative layout for a reusable rocket launched winged craft, unless you were to put a smaller winged pod on top of something like the Falcon Heavy or the BFR where you can land the first stage as well.
At this point though, a good capsule like the Dragon is going to work out cheaper and lighter, which is why of course that's the route SpaceX is taking.
The Shuttle was, as much as anything a product of the technical limitations of the time, as much as it was the technical abilities and the political wrangling that went on.
Comparing the two different sources of info in the article, is the Which? graph based purely on absolute numbers?
Because the Ofcom graph shows that VM are below the industry average per capita
With a larger customer base, but the same problem density, you're going to have a lot more complaints.
Agreed so much. I've turned off the web search, and it still suggests searching on bing, sometimes without returning the result I'm looking for on my local machine when I've even spelled it correctly.
For example, one time when trying to start notepad++:
Type "notepad" into start menu.
ONLY web "results"* returned
This is silly.
(*actually, search suggestions that would launch bing search for the term, I have to admit that it doesn't actually perform the search with it turned off)
How do you think the indexing works?
The indexing process takes those file names and puts them into a structure that can be searched faster than linearly - like a binary tree for example. That way it can take O(log(n)) time to search instead of O(n).
In fact it can index contents and search that too faster than a linear search of the MFT for a decently sized file system.
I know my dad keeps getting his documents redirected to the one-drive documents directory and not his user documents directory.
He then can't find them when he needs them, and potentially sensitive documents have been copied onto the internet...
I've now nixed One-Drive on his PC as he didn't want or need it, but Windows keeps redirecting his saves there when it recreates the directory... sigh.
I'm not talking about inaction.
You still make every possible attempt to avoid the incident.
You just don't choose to kill something else.
That's the key here.
When we have a situation where an incident becomes unavoidable, do you make the decision to targetthat granny on the sidewalk?
As harsh as it may sound, if a kid ran out in front of a car within its breaking distance, its an accident. That car choosing to mount the pavement to hit Great Aunt Ethel instead? That's choosing to take a life.
And this is the essence of what the real answer should be:
- Avoid all possible collisions outright.
- Mitigate collision as much as possible if not possible to avoid
It seems that while he did not discuss it directly, another possible principle is being discussed here - one of the key points of the trolley problem is not that you have to pick left or right - in fact you are already on one of those paths - you instead have the choice whether to change who you hit.
At which point, you have the option of actively choosing to run over someone, or ending up hitting someone in a terrible accident.
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to choose and so have that (or those) deaths on my hands, were I standing at the junction in the traditional problem, or programming an autonomous vehicle, and would focus on stopping or improving my sensory capability and keeping the vehicle within the limits of control given the outside situation.
Anything happening that cannot be avoided by doing so, e.g. a grand piano falling from the sky, sinkhole opening up or someone jumping off the curb? Its unavoidable and you react to it as best as you can given the emerging situation.
Being home repairable suggests that its been built to be easy to repair.
That's the reason for supporting it. It may very well be that you take it to a shop for the actual repair to be done, but the faster and cheaper it can be done, the better, right?
Back in the not so distant past, that battery replacement would have been £20 for the battery and £0 for taking the backplate off yourself and just swapping the old for the new.
Why call a web page with writing on it an article, or a piece of paper with writing a letter?
Why have male and female instead of having "Humans with parts that go inside another, and humans with parts designed to take other humans parts inside them?"
Its the definition of a term to define a common situation, in this case an apparent force, which allows for succinct communication.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018