It would be far more profitable if the beam could be accurately focused onto small areas, like 1 square metre or less. Then they could hire it out to governments, superpowers, assassins, terrorist groups etc. I'd say that would make far more money than just saving a large city's leccy bill.
427 posts • joined 9 Feb 2016
It's no good without genuine pictures of his cat.
It's a quality assurance problem. When writing code that deletes user files (due to age, being in the wrong place, whatever), the code needs to go through some extra quality assurance. I'm sorry Microsoft but if we aren't told that there is extra quality assurance that occurs when this sort of code is written, we can't trust your code. It's just not an option. They need to get this done and reassure us.
How they do this is really not our concern, they're the company we are all trusting with our computers. Sorry, I mean 'the computers that we are allowed to use by the grace of microsoft'.
Surely a company the size and might of Microsoft would have the manpower to have worked out what the hell caused this almighty clusterfuck by now?
They should publish what it was that went wrong ASAP so that competent technicians (i.e. not Microsoft support) can fix it themselves.
I bet the scammers will have produced a web page saying "call this toll free number to recover your files after bad update lost them" before Microsoft admit to and publish whatever the hell went wrong.
My dad's computer tried upgrading to 1809. It failed. It then tried again, but refused to do any of the work on reboot. So it's sat on 1803, but with a message saying reboot pending. It absolutely won't install the new OS version. I've tried deleting the software distribution folder, all sorts of stuff to no avail.
Come on Microsoft! At least it hasn't hosed the machine I suppose, small mercies.
One way of getting round the problem with edge not working would be to install chrome or Firefox. Isn’t that the first thing you do with Edge, aka the chrome downloader?
Interesting. Yes, it’s not so bad because there’s WhatsApp and iMessage but it’s still annoying. I just started a new contract as well.
O2 really need to get ahead of the curve with new tech. They had a very good app called TU GO which worked as a VoIP phone, letting you send/receive texts and make/receive phone calls through wifi. Great, until they got rid of it and replaced it with WiFi calling, which is built into most modern handsets. At least I thought it was great until I moved house to somewhere where there is absolutely no mobile signal on any network.
I thought "wifi calling will cover me". Well, sort of. Calls work fine, but SMS is not carried over the wifi bearer for some reason! My wife's EE phone can do it, but not O2. Trying to get an answer out of them elicits the telephonic equivalent of a blank stare. They have no clue when or if it'll work. But WHY? Why doesn't it work? Why can't they make it work like other networks do?
Re: Not worried for the next 12 months
"There is nothing in this release I want so I will continue my policy of delaying all feature upgrades for the maximum permitted time while the rest of the world tests and debugs them for me."
You absolute rebel!
It'll tie up older PCs that still use spinning disks for a long time. But even a fast computer with an SSD will be tied up for at least 15-30 minutes. People who use their computers for a living, you know, who actually need it to do their job, will be pissed off as usual. Microsoft have to find a way to do their feature updates without a reboot for people to stop thinking the whole process is a joke.
And another thing. This 'fast boot' thing where when you shut down it really only does a log-out-and-hibernate so that it'll start up quicker next time will get turned on if it was turned off. This would be great if it worked. We all know that Windows needs to be rebooted from time to time because it's 'gone wrong'. So people shut it down and start it up again. Except that is NOT the same as a reboot. Problems persist, time is wasted. We see people's computers not having been properly actually rebooted for weeks sometimes. So once again, Microsoft haven't thought something through. Windows needs rebooting regularly to work properly. Shutting it down every night isn't the same thing. People naturally assume that if it's not working they should 'turn it off and on again' and that makes no difference.
What microsoft need to do is to make the system reliable enough that it doesn't need rebooting every few days, and that's a tall order.
And before anyone downvotes me, I can say that it's our number 1 fix for our 600-odd customer end users' problems. They have a problem, we ask them to RESTART, and they protest, saying they've done that. So we explain that they haven't. We talk them through the process and the problem is fixed.
But the virus writers can check their code on VT anyway. So it's no more or less risky that having the browser do it automatically.
It's easy to blame GDPR. What next? Blame Brexit?
The truth is, Microsoft like to change user interfaces in order to piss off users. It's the only logical explanation.
Seriously, I'm going to be stuffed when I get home. I won't have a clue how to turn on the bedside lights (I believe there's a device called a 'light switch' attached, but heaven knows how you address it). I won't be able to ask Alexa how many cm 18 feet is, and I won't be able to convert celsius to Fahrenheit for my wife. Well, I won't be able to do these things upstairs, but I can go down and ask google to do it for me. But the inconvenience of having to go downstairs to ask to turn on my bedside light is so great I feel a class action lawsuit here.
Now which way up do I sit on the toilet?
I'll get my coat. It's the one with the piss-filled boot with pouring-out instructions written on the heel.
I don't get why people are queuing up for iphones tomorrow. The whole thing about delivering to people waiting in the queue just normalises the materialistic madness of the whole thing. I for one won't be queuing up for hours just to get the new phone. I'll be paying someone to do it for me, while I drink avocado smoothies at an artisan coffee and avocado bar nearby.
Re: In the current environment, women are too much of a business risk..
@AC the point is, we are meant to spread the risk. Men can get sick, women can get sick, men are more likely to do something risky and get killed, women are more likely to get pregnant and have kids. By spreading the risk and never discriminating by sex/gender/whatever it's called these days, we give fair and equal opportunities to everyone. We can pick and choose to some extent i.e. only hire people qualified to do the job, but we have to stop discriminating based on gender, race, etc.
However, the problems start when you run a small business. You can't afford to spread the risk between men and women. Women *are* more likely to get pregnant and have kids, so do you really want to spend time training and money investing in someone who is likely to be a drain on your resources?
By the way I don't speak to my sister either.
Linux kernel's Torvalds: 'I am truly sorry' for my 'unprofessional' rants, I need a break to get help
I'll get flamed for this...
... but should I switch to Windows now that nobody's at the helm of Linux?
"On the average salary, after tax, that is roughly 6% of take home pay for something which will depreciate almost completely over the two years."
No, it doesn't depreciate almost completely after two years. iPhones hold their value remarkably well. Everything else you say is spot on though.
Why not just call everything a 'thingie'?
Actually, on second thoughts, who gives a fuck, seriously?
Re: @Vometia Munro
"Because berating the front line staff is the key to getting policy changed? Well done."
That's why they're called 'front line staff'. Who else are you going to talk to? Unless you've got time to say 'Before you deal with my appointment, could you please put me through to the member of staff whose responsibilities include setting the outgoing CLI on your outbound phone calls?'. These organisations have no other person to talk to, other than the person who is on the 'front line'. Obviously you don't need to berate them, but you could try and get across how annoying it is.
I've missed several appointments from the doctors because I won't take withheld calls. Tossers.
Re: @aks - Personal Privacy
Then they can disable Caller Display on their phone. Either they want it, or they don't.
Doctors surgeries should not be allowed to withhold their CLI. It's 2018 for fucks sake!
Last time I checked, international calls come up with the full CLI and not the word 'international' - I believe that only a few of the crappier phone service providers in the UK don't pass full CLI for international calls.
chain of command
The problem is that the PPI (and other) companies pay other companies for leads. These companies pay other companies to do cold calling. These companies are based in India and not under TPS regulations. So who does the ICO need to fine? Does the buck stop at the PPI company, who (unlikely but possible) might not know how the leads are being brought in?
Re: Emergency service
"I have a cordless phone, yes. I also have a cheap corded one in a box upstairs. In case of, you know, a power cut."
So in the event of an emergency you have to go and find the corded phone which is in a box, and find a socket and plug it in. Doesn't sound especially useful in an emergency situation. Maybe a mobile phone would be more useful.
I would have thought that most calls to emergency services are over mobile now anyway. But this 'power failure' argument doesn't wash. Most people have a cordless phone at home, which, guess what, has a base station that isn't battery-powered, and will not work in the event of a power cut.
At what stage does a communication service become a public utility though? Some people make most of their calls over whatsapp or similar apps. Some emergency services accept communications by means other than the PSTN. At what stage does a PSTN itself stop being a public utility? When it's all VoIP? or when people stop using it, because other technologies are better quality and more reliable?
Let's face it, we already get better quality from mobile-to-mobile calls with the widespread use (in the UK at least) of higher bandwidth codecs. You can't get that sort of quality on regular fixed-line phones.
I would say that if a service is designed to route the majority of its voice comms through what is currently called the PSTN, then it's as much of a public utility as any other voice provider, irrespective of the endpoint technology used.
I really can't understand the point of a remotely controlled smart kettle. I mean you need to be there both pre- and post- the boiling part anyway. There are three actions needed to use a kettle to make a cup of hot drink:
- fill the kettle with water
- boil the water in the kettle
- pour the water out into the previously prepared cup of coffee/tea
The so-called smart kettles can only deal with the second of these, and that's the simplest thing for a human to do, as it involves pressing a switch or button. If it were truly smart, it would do the other two steps too. And of course the preparation of the cup.
And smart fridges? What is this obsession with making fridges smart? OK, so a fridge might just be persuaded to know that you've got a pack of bacon in there. But how does it know there's only one slice left?
All this is really just a solution looking for a problem.
Talkie Toaster anybody?
8 Billion hours of testing?!
That's a lot of testing. I think I know how it was done. They must have got 8 million beta-testers to load it on their computer, and spend 40 days and 40 nights trying to understand how it worked. About 10000 of these beta testers must have worked out how the 'charms' worked, and 1000 also worked out how to get Windows to stay in 'desktop mode'. These 1000 people actually wrote a report on their findings. Microsoft then deleted all the reports and telemetry from the other beta-testers and released the product anyway because they decided that's what people would love to use.
The rest is history.
Seriously though, how Microsoft could release something like Windows 8 upon the public makes the mind boggle. They even incorporated it into their server products. They were pursuing the mindless goals of that idiot clown Ballmer who thought that he would install windows 10 on phones, tablets and PCs with exactly the same shitty interface. Totally deluded and it cost the company dearly.
We got one of these surface devices (can't remember which - their product naming is confusing - could have been surface book, surface pro, surface, surface book pro? All I remember is that it cost over a grand and that was about 18 months ago) for a customer once.
I took it out of its box, and yes, it's a nice design. I turned it on, and it came up with the usual welcome crap, and I realised I needed the keyboard, so I attached it. Immediately I got a 'something has gone wrong' blue-screen.
Really? On a flagship device!
Anyway it didn't do that again, but the customer hated it. He said the fan was always coming on and it was too noisy to use as a tablet. His colleague had one too and that one had the same problem, except it kept overheating and turning off. He'd returned it three times to Microsoft but it was still too keen to turn its fan on but overheat anyway.
So yes, testing is key.
Agreed, most of the time. But in a work environment, writing down passwords is very stupid indeed. And it isn't always safe to do this at home either.
By the way whenever a website asks for my DOB, I use 1/1/1970. I'm beginning to think I should use 1/1/1910. I'll get far less marketing shite then.
Re: advised customers to update their ... password ... “on an on-going, frequent basis.”
Totally agree, whilst there may be some advantages to frequently changing your password, there are plenty of disadvantages. Asking thousands or even millions of people to change their passwords regularly just creates more vulnerabilities. If there are keyloggers on PCs, they're just waiting for peopl to change their passwords and the more frequently people change them, the more likely a keylogger is to strike gold. Then there's the issue of people having to remember said passwords. People aren't very good at remembering a few dozen passwords, and even less so if they keep changing. So what do they do? They write them down or put them in a file called 'passwords'.
Not only that but people hate changing passwords, it's a stressor and will actually put them off using a site, especially if they're forced to keep doing it.
They were all called PDAs at one point. They've gone the way of the ipod now.
"You have been able to backup most things via adb since android 4.0."
<command line instructions redacted>
That doesn't seem like a backup solution for the average joe, who wants to know how to back up their phone, and not how to run a load of command line nonsense that most of us thought we'd lost 30 years ago with DOS. Seriously, there's a time and a place for command line stuff, and if this is how you're meant to back up an android phone locally, forget it!
Well I'd like to add that <censored> and that <censored>-the-<censored> and his friend <censored> the donkey do look a lot like <censored>.
<censored> boil his head <censored>
And on a separate note, I bought one of these Mesh Wifi things, not one of the mainstream ones, but one made and designed by a Chinese company. It really is very good indeed and appears to be functioning perfectly. Not had any problems with it at all.
Re: scanning directly into OneDrive via the device’s camera
Beat me to it :-)
Mine's going to be 22:11, far better than your 18:9. Though I hear that 30:15 will be available soon.
Re: Better in the 3rd World
5G? What are you talking about? What device exactly uses 5G?
They put the ‘fib’ into ‘fibre’
That’s Sky’s special guarantee. They won’t even bother providing crap broadband so they ‘guarantee’ your speed that way. In reality it just means that if you think you can go to sky to get guaranteed 24Mbps broadband, you won’t get what you want if the service just isn’t available. Hate them
Re: Is it important?
“...(covering the entire 2.4 GHz band” — that’s a bit selfish and pointless
“, plus a couple of 5 GHz channels” — why?
“...One of the routers has a Yagi antenna aimed at the lake.” — what lake? Why?
“There are two or three additional Gb switches. “ - why? What’s the point you’re making?
“Everything is wired up with STP (Cat 5e/6) Gb cables.” — why STP?
“I had to ensure that the IP addresses, “ — well, yes, this is standard stuff
“WiFi channels” — So?
“ and DHCP settings in the multiple routers didn't conflict. “ — why are you using DHCP settings in multiple routers? Have you not understood the point of a LAN?
Finally, why do you use their router anyway? None of what you’ve written makes sense outside the context of someone who just likes to throw their money around at routers.
We 'upgraded' one of our customers from ADSL to VDSL on a FTTC link and the download speed when DOWN from 2 Mbps to 1.3Mbps. The upload speed stayed at 0.9Mbps.
Too far from the cabinet, despite OpenWretch's estimate being 8Mbps.
Fibre? They've heard of it. It'll cost tens of thousands to get a leased line
Re: Yes and while your at it...
The old version of windows is shit because it's ancient and out of step with computing in the 21st century. The new version of windows isn't so shit when you look at how many shitty things they're trying to fix. But I digress.
You wrote "In the meantime, what is so differnet about an emailed doc printed out and a fax?" - well, the difference is that an emailed doc DOES NOT HAVE TO BE PRINTED!! What is this fascination with having to print everything?
And you wrote "Don't pagers have guaranteed delivery?" and the answer is NO. For guaranteed delivery you'd need something like, um, a mobile phone, which can actually send delivery receipts with texts and also can run several apps that do the same such as whatsapp, google hangouts etc.
The document on pagers...
....was written like an advert of course. All fancy graphics and no substance. I know pagers are out of date, but they just wrote about 'pagers per bed' and 'staff members per pager' which infographic-style pictures. They made common errors like quoting figures to rather too many significant figures such as
"In the UK, the direct cost of pagers to the NHS is estimated to be £6,600,879". Really? £9 on the end of that, not £8 or £0'? And the savings from mobile software of £ 2,718,009!
But the thing that got me was the paragraph that read:
"This high figure is often
attributed to reliability of the
devices, which operate on radio
frequencies as opposed to
mobile or internet networks."
What in hell are they talking about?
All this leads me to think that the report is totally biased, while in fact there are genuine use-cases for pagers after all. And who knows? Maybe fax as well (but I doubt it).
Nobody has a bloody clue
My daughter has recently gone to Melbourne for a year of study and took her o2 phone with her as they do an 'unlimited roaming' thing where it costs £5 a day for as much data as you like, but apparently it's throttled at some indeterminate point. The plan is that she uses that for the first few days and then gets an australian sim card.
Anyway she'd been happily using this until suddenly she found that whist perfectly able to browse web pages without any slowness or any problem at all, all her messenger apps: facetime, iMessage, facebook messenger and whatsapp just plain refused to work at all. She was able to send and receive SMS. So I started a chat with o2 and they went through the obligatory 'take your sim our, wipe it with a soft cloth and put it back', and then abruptly ended the chat.
So I tweeted at them, and I had someone reply who initially seemed quite helpful. They asked pertinent questions and then came up with this absolute fucking gem of a response:
“Ah okay, we're unable to guarantee speed and strength of signal whilst abroad as you're roaming on another network. As your daughter can access the internet through a web browser, it shows that her phone is able to connect, but that the connection isn't strong enough to be able to send messages by iMessage and Whatsapp. We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.”.
It started working the next day anyway.
It's a portable hard disk. Is this really such a big deal? I'll get my coat. It's the one with 300 USB drives on a set of keys in it.
Camera or more battery
If my phone had a longer battery life but no camera, I'd *still* need to carry a charger on me for when it eventually does run out, but I would have no option for taking pictures, apart from carrying a separate device.
Just because something isn't used doesn't mean it shouldn't be there. If you don't want a camera, don't buy a phone.
I deal mostly with small businesses where the only thing the customer knows is that "it's done another big update - took ages". What Microsoft don't realise is that at the user level, they couldn't give a fetid dingo's kidney about these updates, only that in an office with, say, 10 PCs of different provenance, there's at least one PC doing a large update every week or so, with a user completely unable to do any bloody work at all for 2 hours (if their computer has spinning rust inside). And that takes us almost half way to the next 'big one'.
We have a few customers who are financial consultants of sorts, and they love to use fast desk scanners with USB connections. Without exception, something to do with scanning broke in the 1803 update, causing the scanners to maybe work once, then need a power cycle. This has affected epson, fuji and brother scanners, and with no update coming for older scanners (some of them have a driver dated 2016), there's not much hope for them.
I'm sure other people have similar stories of other things MS broke, but that's all people see - things breaking. The "improvements" are largely cosmetic (or so it seems) - anyone use the 'people' button on the bottom right?
I can see thing are probably improving, but when are MS going to make this thing called Windows reliable?
It's funny how the scammers get their act together and produce scams to specifically prey on TSB victims quicker than the bank can get their act together.
Re: Perhaps I need a forwarding email address for every shop
Aren't yahoo accounts compromised on creation?