Re: My take on the whole Belize thing
That's a lovely story, but it's far more likely that the cocaine addled lunatic shot the guy. IMHO naturally.
487 posts • joined 3 Feb 2016
That's a lovely story, but it's far more likely that the cocaine addled lunatic shot the guy. IMHO naturally.
@LocalzUK it can make geoblocking on firewalls etc a pain too.
We had a very security conscious customer with a sophos X type FW. It offers geoblocking based on a country by country basis.
"everything off apart from countries we do business with" was the cry. The reality was DOZENS of countries needing to be unblocked or you'd get periodical, random failures of MS office Products and an email from the sophos unit saying it was a blocked country.
Munich were not doing fine, not even close. It over ran by years and by millions of pounds. At the "end" of the project they had people unable to perform their job roles because software still wasn't working.
It took them a decade to migrate circa 15k end user machines, and related back end, at this point things still had major issues.
From that point it took them 4 years to bite the bullet and move back, mainly citing the MS office alternatives as the issue.
Yes, they had an MS fanboy come in, but that was not the primary driving factor. They recruited them *because* of the issues, and because that after a decade long project they were being told they had to switch to *another* open source office suite and try that for a bit.
Last year it was circa 50 UK gun related deaths vs circa 30 thousand deaths in the states.
Yet Americans really think all our "bad guys" still have guns.
It's also one sad incident, not one per day or more.
Slightly different. the fact it hasn't happened *since* speak volumes, no?
The access control for these routers is as follows:
Do you work for (relevant ISP)?
Do you have the credentials?
That's it. Of course things are logged, but by the hooky ISP(s) in question.
The logs will be where they always are, somewhere google/law enforcement can't look, within a Chinese/Russian/African ISP.
YouTube all but admitted they wouldn't be able to keep the lights on without the pirated stuff. It is *the* primary use for youtube for massive sections of society.
IF 80%+ of all YouTube content disappeared, it follows that so would a large percentage of users, because they are there to consume that content. Teenagers use it for music with no payment required, entire seasons of TV shows are available as well as movies etc.
The advertisers are playing for those eyeballs, those eyeballs are, mostly, only there to view the stuff that would be removed.
Not only true of cash. The same is true of the magical electronic GBP in our accounts.
When someone gets scammed or stolen from *that* money isn't recovered, the banks pays you back and has insurance for this sort of thing.
They haven't recovered the fund stolen, they've replaced them. That's different.
I suspect it was the suggestion that almost a grand is hardly any difference in price :)
When the reality is that is another reasonable spec'd laptop cost on top. OR a very good mobile phone. i.e not an insignificant number.
You're an actual grown up human being and you think the reason we aren't all robbed at gunpoint for our devices is because the "scamps" can't remove components for sale?
Setting aside the fact I don't think there's been a gunpoint robbery in my town ever, that I remember (something mirrored by many of us in the UK) you honestly believe we are safer because devices aren't repairable?
You're a clown.
I've looked at similar before, but they've been a but pricey just to "try" one.
My office is 2 miles away from my house, it's a lovely walk there, but uphill all the way back. Might be a laugh on one of the scooters, looking a clown aside.
They'd sell by the boatload, IMHO of course.
@James51, they'll get there, give them chance.
They'll want a grand or more for this surely, think what they'd price something that folds out to 24 or 27 for monitors, or 40" for TVs.
No Bob or our favourite random-conspiracy-related-word-generator, AMFM, are you ok?
Yep. came here to say that.
I'll bet this months salary that the thing he/it wiped between them was what he called his "backup".
I.E the only copy of the data anywhere but on an external USB thing = BACKUP!
@I ain't Spartacus
Another reason it was dropped by steam et al was fluctuation in value and time taken,
As you mentioned not only did transactions hit too high a point but along with this (as the blockchain gets longer and more complex if you like, to over simplify) it was taking more and more time for the transactions to go through and be processed.
With a fluctuating value like with BTC etc this meant that by the time the transaction was "complete" and the pretend money was in their possession the value had changed from the time of purchase.
Sometimes this worked in their favour, sometimes they lost out.
Obviously they foresaw the potential of that "one day" when they'd take Xnumber of sales in bitcoin for them to suddenly become worth much closer to zero than when the lucky punters handed them over, and they didn't much fancy that.
Experiment over, call it a success as they now "own" however many of the various currencies they took and can see what happens to them, but not so much than when/if value hits approx 0 it won't hit the company too hard.
They've probably moved them all on already.
Need some clarity on a few things. We have these drives in the wild and windows 10, but all devices (laptops) have TPM, and it was my understanding win10+TPM (we pay a premium for 'enterprise' devices that include TPM), explicitly does NOT do this.
It means you have whole ranges of machines you can't even consider, until you hit the most costly in whatever brand you're looking at.
Waste of time and money eh? Brilliant.
@Semtex451 - Yep, mirrors my thoughts too.
Was trying to persuade the beancounters to let us have a couple for out of hours support etc.
I can't do that now, not knowing that a better version in en-route, because this one looks like it could actually replace my work issued phone too (something the current iteration can't quite manage).
I know full well that if they can have £several_hundreds worth of iPhone back off me, then the spend on this won't be as bad.
With the current model I need my laptop, a phone *and* the toy, when this lands then I'll only need this+laptop. That saves them circa £500 in i-phone money.
Hah! Spot on. My daughter now attends the same junior school I went to, complete with the "temporary" porta-cabins that went up in the late 80s/early 90's.
Still there, still in use as classrooms. They were put up as a temporary measure while I attended, to allow the decoration/refit of another area.
As shown by this whole magecart thing, and all the issues of the past, the only thing granting any level of relative safety with online shopping is the sheer number of targets,
*You* (we, me etc) have only not been "had" yet because we are hidden in the crowd. Security by obscurity etc.
Someone at work recently had an account drained via lots of small (sub £30 mobile phone top up cards). Queue lots of guffawing and asking what they did online. The truth is probably just being unlucky that day, despite all the assumptions that they must have done something monumentally stupid on t'internet..
Good luck to the approx 1 in 4 people that suffer from depression or anxiety, or both, or similar. Those not particularly over the moon about returning home from a holiday, etc etc.
What could go wrong?
other than everyone when they use said 5 million pound algorithm to reduce staffing levels I mean.
Apart from the slide/vs sort-of-clamshell approach, it's the planetcom gemini, which they mention in the article, that you appear to want.
It's the only thing close to what you want. It's a thing you can go and buy now. Sorted.
Manage an enterprise environment that includes windows and windows 10.
The 'feature updates' hit our WSUS server around the same time as the plebs get them. Within days normally.
It's up to us to not approve them until the dust settles. Then we have a test group (we limit the laptop models we buy to one brand and 3-4 models for this reason), then we deploy.
The update was there though. This particular feature update was available on the same day as the first articles about user issues appeared. The day before the data deletion thing became widely know.
In fact we have a group of five test laptops *with* this current badgered feature update installed on them! something tells me they will have issues updating when the "fixed" version finally lands.
This issue aside our fleet of laptops never struggle with updates *apart* from the feature update. they don't exhibit any issues, the update simply gets perma-stuck at "downloading, 0%" and they need manual intervention. this is probably 1 in 5 laptops. Which is a pain.
Basically we catch them as and when we are interacting with that device for any other issue. It has become habit to check windows update status when doing *anything* to a user laptop.
No, it was (according to snowden et al) literally a man or three in the back of a delivery truck while the cisco gear were on a part of their journey.
The point here isn't likelihood of being websites etc compromised, it's likelihood of the company being up to "shenanigans" for their benefit.
As the article states the app on their site *is* different to the one they already have on the playstore.
They *could* be doing it 'correctly' but choose not to. Why? Why mislead people into thinking they are getting playstore content?
As I say, the issue isn't google being hacked vs their site getting hacked, it is that they have, for some reason, made a conscious decision to fib to customers and force them to sideload. Sideloading on android requires a few security related settings being turned off for starters, then there's the fact the content of the APK is different to that on the play store.
It all stinks. This isn't about 3rd parties, hacking or anything else. It's about the trust placed in companies people buy tat from, and why this one is purposefully (apparently) misleading customers.
Loads of places use them. At least when we last looked a few years back there wasn't much out there that could do the same level of packet manipulation at a similar cost. They aren't just "simple" load balancers.
So, yes, they'll be all over the place
I don't think the majority will be purchased alone.
I read elsewhere they will be "bundling" it with whatever the upcoming flagship "pro" phone is. I imagine the majority of them shipped will be acquired in this manner. IIRC samsung did the same with the first "gear".
There's nothing wrong with "replete" in that context, it's entirely correct.
Unlike your heroic attempt at a snarky correction.
Cost is a small issue there too. SMS cost money.
I can't see them being keen on paying £X000+ each time they have a fault for text messages. they'd need to do another price rise, and we've all just had this years!
Came here to say that too.
"I work in IT and decided ONLY having access to my property via an app was a good idea"
What an absolute sponge.
"rogue engineer"....."deeply sorry"....."committed to blah safety, blah privacy"
It's a common thing here in the comments section to forget *we* are not the target market,
Loads of people will, initially, eat this up. Just like Alexa/google home etc. If it sticks around longer than one iteration is the question.
Just because 'we' think it's mental, doesn't mean the other 8 people in a sample of ten will think it is.
It's not "updates" as we know and 'love' them.
The feature updates for win10 are effectively OS re-installs. More scope for stuff to go badly wrong.
They tend to be huge, 1.5-3GB. A far cry from the old windows updates most are familiar with.
That mirrors our experience. WSUS\test group\rollout.
We haven't had any of the reported issues on the test group, just the issue we always seem to get with "feature updates". Namely it works on around 50-85% of machines, the remainder get stuck at "downloading, 0%". They will do this until you manually intervene, usually requiring the manual update tool.
To us it feels like if the update fails to work the first time, it will not work automatically. Even if you do the whole stopping services and deleting updates routine. IF I update 5 laptops (via WSUS) normally one will fail. This is for feature updates (the biggies like this one) only. It never happens for regular updates.
Hardly a shock though, these "feature updates" are often 2GB plus so almost an OS reinstall rather than a feature change.
(in the interests of balance - Yes we are all "at it", but most countries don't have near-monopolies on various types of hardware. Lets not add the OS too!)
He/We know that.
What he means is many companies would actually see this as a downside, and go with the "easier to use" competitor.
@ Rameses etc.
The unit doesn't come with anything. Just the console, in a massive box.
I sort of agree with him.
All the same, bloody odd hill he's picked to die on, given the general abuses of privacy etc that happen on the internet.
The US will have their NSA equivalent (or whichever agency it is).
They will know how to properly secure such things. No one will ask them, no one will listen to their answers if they do.
It'll be too expensive to implement. I.E any cost higher than the current one.
when you open it, it's actually belongs to someone else. A random american turns up and drinks it.
6.5%, but only to the guy called "Chad" who snatches it and drinks it all.
It's because You, I and reg readers know about this problem.
Joe public hasn't a clue. If my mum, uncle,sister etc etc (all bright but you'll never find them on a tech blog or similar) wanted a new laptop they wouldn't get a sniff of broken keyboards and recalls.
New, more quiet, keyboard.
new more reliable keyboard.
It's quite simple. It's nothing to do with where things are hosted etc. It was a drug deal.
They ordered drugs from abroad and had them delivered to the US. Sting buys basically.
From that point 'they' are drug dealers and have committed a crime in the US (facilitating the sale of drugs there).
The bloke in question works for that organisation in some way. That's it. No matter where servers or sites are hosted.
I don't think sysadmin falls anywhere near what the guy did.
Think forum moderator.
Still would be nice to get the moolah clarified. honestly it probably is 50k/year.
I doubt he was fixing VMs, He was settling squabbles about the quality of drugs delivered etc.
I assumed VM.
i.e he walked out with a copy of a server, rather than a physical box.
Could be either though, it's generally true that if you act like you're allowed to be doing something, you'll be left alone.
Isn't that going to be quite a sizable fine?
Should be the first time we see if GDPR has teeth,
"It is your Duty and an Inalienable Right to Correct All Such Wrongs if you don't want to be Thought Easily Cuckolded and Taken for Granted and Simply made the Ignorant Fool for Milking and Bilking."
The problem, @amanfrommars1, is we all struggle to tell because of chemtrails and vaccines.
Were it not for those pesky chemtrails, and the autistic knees I have because of vaccines, I'd be able to spot when i'm being takrn advantage of.
I'm almost positive the MMR vaccine gave me ADHD of the hip too. Bastards. Obviously this is what the CIA want.
*sad slide whistle noise*
The clangers live on, the new series (done by his son etc) are very faithful to the original. Everything is still wool and tin foil, just in HD! It's actually beautifully made.
It's the firm favourite of mk2 son, who is almost 2. When those episodes had all been watched, the original series was free on prime too, so on that went. All went down an absolute treat.
They've copped to the problem, you can stop trying to pretend it's not a real thing and is being exaggerated etc.
Your unit hasn't broken, well done.
@Chairman of the Bored,
The BOFH would have to be able to remotely initiate some lift-shaft pushing, from India.
"This giant cost centre, here, on this chart.
SHOW IT TO ME"
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018