And no mention of JBoss?
Funny how everyone is talking about the OS - what about the middleware stack !? Is that so small that it's insignificant ?
Regardless: I can see it being killed off - it's a direct competitor to the IBM stack.
22 posts • joined 11 Jan 2016
I'm still trying to figure out "why" they bought Red hat.
The only thing my not insignificant google trawling can find me is that Red Hat sell to the likes of Microsoft and google - now, that *is* interesting. IBM seem to be saying that they can't compete directly but they will sell upwards to their overlords - no ?
Hmm, so the conversation goes like this...
"Hello Sir, you have been identified by our systems as a person of interest - are you Dr Death who is an international terrorist?". "No Mr/Ms PC sir, I am not but, as I'm not living in a police state I have no official proof other than these fake credit cards on me". "Oh, in that case, thanks for your time. Did you want a leaflet on why we pulled you up sir and made you feel like a piece in a machine?...."
I'm allergic to some stuff and when it kicks in my android, my laptop and previous laptops can't recognise my fingerprint. I always have to revert to "old fashioned" methods. let's hope that no one forgets about me.
Oh and today I seem to get more and more people who just swipe my card and don't give a damn about identification - pin, signature or otherwise. Clearly, it's too expensive for them to worry about my small transactions so they are only interested in the large ones. the large ones are mainly going to be on-line going forwards so it has to link up to my home somehow - in which case what's the point ?
Ex-IBMer here with a few IBM patents under my belt. I was assuming that IBM hadn't re-invented the wheel and that this was just bad reporting. It's a nightmare trying to get a patent past the IBM system and its lawyers. They do not want to waste their time with any of the hundreds of would be inventors that fling nonsense at them all day long. There is a *very* rigorous process that weeds out the failures before they happen. So, you can bet your bottom dollar (pound in my case !) that the IBM patent has something significant/different in it.
Thanks for reading the patent Bakker ! (not a fun thing to do in my experience).
Speaking as one who is married to a vegan she is more concerned about the animal's welfare as a whole. Think e.g. dipping in chemicals, confined environments, slaughtered at an early age, stress at any one of those stages.
Another comment is oft heard coming from the less well educated in this field (a major majority of people ) - the "animals dead anyway" - clearly, not the point !
What fascinates me about this stuff (and I know enough to be dangerous) is that you don't know what the NN is going to do before it happens. Nor do you know where "the logic" is when it's finished. to that end, progress will always be slow - it's taken us 25 years to get to this state.
When I look at the NN research of today it's not moved on hugely but it's just that we have more researchers now playing with it as the "simpler" problems of enterprise solutions have been cracked so we're got time/money to focus on it. I hope we find a new tech that beats NNs because I'm not convinced they are the answer.
I've got a WD duo drive and I'm getting rid of it. Regardless of whether you asked it to or not they encrypt the drives using hardware in the enclosure. if the enclosure dies - you've pretty much lost your data !! The "passwd encryption option" merely encrypts the passwd - the data is already encrypted regardless of whether you set it or not.
At least - that's what I have found out from the forums e.g. https://community.wd.com/t/wd-my-book-duo-data-forever-lost-if-drive-enclosure-dies/6496/23
and, as WD seemed to not take this on-board, I'm outta here - they can keep it.
Two points if i may...
IBM is full of in-fighting. Employees are incentivised to be better than their piers. Depts are incentivised to be better than their piers and countries are incentivised to be better than their piers. This is why IBM's software set is such a confusing mish-mash of offerings. Every new acquisition has its own goals and isn't towed into line PDQ. No one can tell you - including IBM - what it's one definitive answer is to a solution. Just ask the guys at Hursley how many ESBs IBM has (five I think !!).
Second point: I'm glad to see that someone else has caught up with the IBM ers. When I worked there we used to say that the company was being run only for the top execs in IBM. It wasn't being run for the customers, it certainly wasn't being run for the employees - the only message relayed down was the share price. And who made the most direct money out of the share price - the execs ! (go look at when they sell shares - say no more !).
I was pestered into upgrading our Sammy to win10 and it kept on blue screening. It was then that it dawned on me that perhaps, just perhaps, computing is still in the dark ages when it comes to actually working easily. Checking the samsung website told me that I couldn't upgrade my specific model. So, quick uninstall later and I'm left with the incessant requests to upgrade to win10 - aarrgh - I hate computers !!!!
And that's kinda the point. Yes, you can get programmers ten a penny nowadays but to get someone who knows the business and a wide angle of technology and has the foresight to 'do the right; thing' is a lot harder. Consistently I've seen off-shoring becoming near-shoring becoming on-shoring.The UK still have some of the worlds best quality IT folk and that's just fine. You have to accept that the clue is in the name - Hong Kong... This is not a British company being disloyal - this is a multi-national company doing the right thing for its share holders. They are already a highly distributed workforce with numerous local regulations that they abide by so to them this is nothing more than another restructure to save money. I find it strange that India is mentioned so many times in these diatribes, In my experience China is where the skilled people are.
Don't buy from multi-nationals if you don't like 'em !
I did once argue that in order to be a good coder you had to have a good command of grammatical structures and ability to communicate well. I don't know many story telling 'coders' or 'programmers' - but I do know an awful lot of introverted techies who are always looking for something more interesting than 'making sure that thing runs well and is maintainable'.....Sigh.
I agree - this is an over simplistic view on a very complex problem. There are lots of things that can be gotten 'just like that' - but there an awful lot that can't. Most people I end up speaking to have no idea what they are creating and need specialised help - you know - that sort of technical help that isn't just asking for what sort of anti-virus I need. If every Tom Dick and Henrietta got the company credit card - watch out world - IT has just descended into Chaos.
Simplistic article - however, I quite liked the style and a lot of the content - it just needs moving away from 'IT' as a whole..
(But he did get an article published so what does he care ;-)
Wow - so, node.js doesn't have libs that do the standard edge-cased out stuff (as many others have said already). And... How ironic that people are also complaining about tiny packages in the potentially dawning era of Micro-services.
I've always said that micro-services are a management nightmare waiting to happen. It turns out that we already have such a version of that nightmare - screaming at us!
Ah well - I love it every time somebody tells me that the way they do it is just that little bit better than the last one. Is it any wonder that programming is still in the equivalent age of finding new metals and not the age of building bigger and better bridges from pre-made girders !
And - before anyone quips in. Yes, It's just fine (and sometimes good ) to make new shiny languages/paradigms etc. BUT - make sure they do all the best bits of the previous new shiny thing so we have just a strong as girder as we did last time but shinier and quicker.
I always laugh at the idea that I can save money by spending it e.g. save pounds per year by replacing your boiler. LOL ! so, let me get that straight 400 quid plus of boiler will save me how much - hmmm.
As for smart meters - I used to work on them at IBM and they were all about the consumer voting in to get their electricity reduced at times of high-demand. It's also going to mean the death of the meter man as it'll be remote,possibly, drive-by (depending on the tech they use). But, so what - that'll save the companies money but it won't be handed on. This is nothing more than big companies lobbying the government with their usual corrupt back-handers.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019