Christoph Hellwig sued VMware not SFC. He is a key linux dev who wrote the code and owns the copyright. SFC, supported and financed the lawsuit.
40 posts • joined 4 Dec 2015
SFC started trying to negotiate with VMware in 2011, and were instantly directed to the lawyers. They tried to negotiate without litigation for over 3 years, then eventually filed suit in 2015. If this is too hasty, what do you want? Should we wait until everyone who wrote the copyright has been dead for 70 years, that would solve the problem.
I hope they will succeed in a feasible phone operating system where others have failed, as android is getting more and more frustrating. Hopefully they will take the easy route of starting AOSP and building something from there. No it is not perfect or ideal but it would foster compatibility and it might actually get finished unlike GNU HURD.
Also a pity to see octave fall off the list. I know many people are moving over to numpy, but personally I still prefer Octave for data analysis over numpy.
Intelligent Richard from the Institute of Male Members has a keen interest in other men's trouser snakes. Clever Dick, as he is most commonly known, has devised a hypothesis to disprove that penis size is genetic. "If penis size is genetic then logically there is exactly one gene that switches, and thus penis sizes will fall into two distinct categories: tiny todgers and enormous erections. If penis sizes show a single Bell curve then genetic theories of penis sizes will be at an end." Reports Clever Dick, explaining to us his Bell-End hypothesis.
The results are in with a clear Bell curve, thus disproving the genetic link to penis size. Clever Dick reports that the most likely explanation is that how much time children spend thinking about their penis size is far more relevant than genes. He goes on to explain that he hardly ever thought about his John Thomas as a child, a decision he severely regrets. He does, however, hope that online news will pick up on his dubious research and present it as fact with exaggerated headlines.
Put in some SMPTP, IMAP, LDAP, and maybe CalDAV, and you are well ahead of sodding Exchange for adhering to the standards the rest of the world use.
Exchange is the software metaphor for an iPhone7 lots of shiny alternatives you don't want and no way to connect it so normal stuff you already have.
"That would certainly give GitLab a major boost in popularity."
I would move everything next day. Microsoft already deleted all my emails from a dormant hotmail account in an "upgrade". Customer service usefully told me to "log in more often" to prevent this. With GitHub they can delete my code too if they feel like it.
You portioned your system to put core OS files on one partition and data (including app data) on another? This way what ever happens to the OS you can replace it while keeping your data. Standard practice for the competent computer user...
"The competent computer user" - no wonder it broke Windows 10, no one expects a competent computer user to have Windows 10.
Chinese knock off sound desks causing conference interruptions? Windows on supported hardware is normally the culprit. The only conference interruption I have ever had when speaking was at a conference where we couldn't use our own laptops. Adobe reader decided to notify me of a new version 10 mins into a full screen presentation. This, I suppose, is Adobe incompetence not Microsoft, but still it felt like a Genuine Windows Experience™.
Just wipe your machine and re-install.
Luckily most of your average Windows users are completely backed up, and those who are not can easily get the files back with a linux live CD.
Luckily all their personalised settings are simply in a few plain text (hidden) files in their home directory so after the reinstall all personalised settings can be restored.
And most Windows users pick Windows due to the speed of the install and their love of making their own bootable disks. Not just because it comes as standard.
Personally, I feel I am missing out on the fun here. None of my Kubuntu installs have ever kerploded on me like this.
I can just imagine the tears of joy streaming down the faces of web app programmers. Previously stuck in an environment where they are forced to use awful Turing complete languages, they will now have OVER 300 excel functions!!! It is like Christmas came early! I hope they integrate MS paint next, how can I design websites without a shitty spray can?
Thunderbird is great. But if you are forced to use Microsoft's awful exchange nonsense to connect to the email server, you need to install davmail to translate (unless you want to pay for the custom exchange addon someone made). I use thunderbird and davmail at work, it works, but it is definitely not a simple solution would recommend to someone who isn't tech saavy.
This is why we have standard! It annoys me when a proprietary protocol becomes more common that a recognised standard. It is a step backwards and everyone else suffers.
These features are probably good in the hands of serious presenters. As a scientist at conferences, there are too many people who present badly, and spend too much time designing overcrowded slides rather than considering 3 things:
1. What do I want the audience to learn?
2. What do I need to say so they can learn this?
3. What visual information will add to this?
When Prezi first introduced its non-linear presentations, suddenly a bunch of enthusiastic PhD students spent hours writing incomprehensible talks, where the field of view spirals around zooming in and out of a giant page, inducing motion sickness to the audience. The first one I saw got people somewhat engaged, I heard the audience guessing where it would next zoom, no one learned anything.
Bringing these features to powerpoint will bring the ability to write mind warping presentations to everyone who has never strayed from powerpoint. And you just know that everyone who still uses slide transitions will be all over this feature, like a tramp on hot chips.
"Appears you can use Office365 using a Linux based web browser:"
I have to do this at work occasionally when people send me things. Normally presentations to look over and forms to fill in.. But large files wont open in the browser version so the presentations rarely work and lots of other features don't work including the in-word form thing. Maybe this improved over the last few months. I just log into a VDI machine for these things, but it is ridiculous that we need to do that.
"Historically, yes. But those monopoly days are over for MS. Now we can tell them to take a hike."
Try buying a laptop from a major vendor without Windows (or Mac). You can either go the somewhat specialist route of system76 or the like, or start arguing with sales about Windows refunds which is often near impossible. Acer will let you buy the computer then mail it to support (at your own cost) for an unspecified refund. Dell used to offer some linux machines but that is harder and most Dell's suck.
Also the F3 to split screen in Nautilus disappeared. When people complained on a forum that it was a good feature, they were told to set up pack left/right hotkeys. Simply failing to realise that on a small screen the sidebar now appears twice and there is little space. Plus all the move/copy to other pane options disappeared.
Still, Unity is the worst. An almost uncustomisable is about the most arrogant program you can design. Do you really believe your favorite layout is SO much better than anyone else's in every single possible situation that you can just remove any other options. Are you Steve Jobs?
I am currently working across the pond at a US Federal government institute. On one hand they talk the talk about how all the computers must be super secure, on the other hand all of their IT security training (and all other online training) is only accessible with Flash.
'an "SOS" function that automatically places an emergency call and sends medical ID information (such as allergies or health conditions) when the side button is held down.'
Luckily the emergency services wont have to deal with nuisance calls, because no on has ever accidentally held in a watch button.
I hope the browser chat will still work on the desktop site. I work in a basement deep underground. No phone signal, no internet for non-work devices, and I don't install non work software on work machines. Facebook is very useful because I can still contact people if I need to and have them respond quickly. (Email would work except most people check it so infrequently.)
There are two distinct issues in this case and they have very different results for the FLOSS community.
1. Is and API itself copyrightable
An API is how other programs interface with your software. The people writing that code, as far as I am concerned, are users of your software. Hence the API is the user interface. Copyright doesn't extend to user interfaces as was decided in the case Lotus v. Borland. If the court rules against Google this then this is devastating for open source efforts to duplicate the functionality of propriety software while maintaining compatibility.
2. Direct copying of code sections:
IF it is clear that google did copy the Java source code then this article is correct. THEN result for FLOSS should rule in Oracles favour, as we need to be able to protect our source for the GPL to be powerful. It is a big IF and a big THEN and I admit I haven't delved into the code, but a cursory glance at the example seem to point to code stealing as all the private variable have identical names.
So as long as the court decides that an API is a user interface and copyright doesn't extend to it, this becomes just a code stealing case. I am disappointed that the API distinction is largely glossed over in this piece.
I am in the US on a J1 visa in a university setting. There are academics who are exceptionally important to the work that goes on in this physics department who are past 5 years on their J1. These people are on H1B and applying for green cards. This is very common in an academic setting. Yes tech companies abuse H1Bs, but just completely removing a system rather than clamping down on abuses is crazy.
If you end the H1B visa program entirely you are screwed in science. All over the world science is done by the best in niche fields travelling to the best groups all over the world. If America block all talented scientists who are past 5 years on their J1 scholar visas from staying it will fall into ruin. How ever good you try to get your education, science works best with easy spread of knowledge and expertise over borders.
You have "init freedom" as demonstrated by your new distro, easily created with your favourite init system. Other people exercise their "init freedom" by choosing to use systemd. And others are aware they have an "init freedom" but are unsure how best to use it so they stuck to what they knew.
In short, some people didn't like a new feature so they used the free software to make a version they were comfortable with. This is perfect, however much you do or don't give a shite about systemd, you have to love that people have the tools to do what they want.
Not sure it is "news", but then El Reg has the freedom to decide what it calls news, not I.
I like the register, but I would rather slow news days were quiet rather than blowing tiny things out of proportion. I assumed the LTS was cancelled early after this headline, otherwise why would it be a story? If this really is a story how about:
"Long term support of Debian Squeeze happens at time originally announced"
"5 years have passed since Debian 6.0 was released, this marks then end of its support"
This is a good thing but the journal owners are just using it to rip off scientists further. I was part of a project where we were rightly told to publish open access. To publish open with most journals we have to pay money. Other groups with other grants don't publish open (plus there is the whole back catalogue) so we also pay for a subscription. Open access just becomes another revenue stream for these predatory publishers.
What we need to do is stop the reliance on stupid journal metrics. The journals the bean counters claim rate as good, know that we must publish there to please our bureaucratic overlords. Hence they have us by the balls and can charge us insane prices both to publish and to read what is published. While providing a bit of web-hosting and a name. What really takes the biscuit is they then get us to review work for them free of charge.
I don't really understand why El Reg is giving a whole series of articles to what appears to be a rather normal code editor with pretty standard features and a rather ugly default theme.
At least it seems pretty upfront on the the website about what data they are slurping from you.
I doubt they will be happy to freely allow an executable version of the code to be available to all who wish to test it. They would need to do this along with enoug description of the required inputs and outputs.
Even then, personally I am uncomfortable using people analysis code unless I can see the source. While yes I can run some test cases, it is nice to be able to dissect the code to know what mistakes might happen. And to be able to output what is happening in the middle of some analysis. If the analysis is difficult enough it is hard to know who made the mistake when two codes disagree. At this point is is nice to be able to run through both with a fine-tooth comb until you find out what the source of the disagreement is, and from there who made the error.
I also use Firefox, but I am really not that sure if it is my dislike of Chromium/Chrome or my own habits. The first version of Chrome that everyone shat a brick about didn't have RSS feeds as bookmarks (natively, perhaps via and addon), since that I have to admit I have barely tried it. But either way, at least like Firefox, Chromium consistently adheres to web standards.
Work has office 365 and it truly sucks. Being a turbo nerd I never touch word processors (LaTeX baby!!) and I run Linux, so I admit I am not their target audience. We run our email through 365, and the web client is far worse than even the old outlook web interface. Word online is a joke, 3-4 times I have needed to edit a document someone sent me and every time it has just thrown an error message about unsupported features or the file being too big. What is the point of a cloud office if it supports office features worse then open office. Utterly pathetic.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019