* Posts by Tom -1

101 posts • joined 22 Jul 2015

Page:

My HPE-funded lawyer wrote my witness statement, reseller boss tells High Court

Tom -1

> Like turning up to a job interview to find you don't recognise the CV the client has been given.

The people doing the interviewing are pissed off as much as the interviewee is, and the recruitment agency that gave them that CV may well be blacklisted by recruitment agent so that they get no more business from that client company. This is more likely to happen if the interviewee brings a copy of his real CV with him and shows it to the interviewers as soon as it becomes clear that the agency has modified it. I've been interviewer in those circumstances in the past, aand at other times the interviewee in much the same circumstances. I reached the conclusion that most recruitment agencies employ mainly out and out deceptive liars decades ago.

> Or like trying to read your own patent once it's been lawyerised.

My patents have always had understandable claims, even after the lawyers have revised them. Except when I refused to a party to submitring the patent application because the lawyer (or perhaps the person who was a joint-patenter for the patent) had rendered it incomprehensible and possibly dishonest

The algorithms! They're manipulating all of us! reckon human rights bods Council of Europe

Tom -1

Re: It's been going on for a long time

Perhaps it's worth remembering that until recently Britsh referenda required 40% of those eligible to vote to deliver a "yes" result. 37% "yes" versus 35% "no" would have been a win for NO, not for YES, but for Brexit it's being rammed down our throats despite the tradition, and Scots who voted massively against Brexit are being forced to accept it. Scotland got denied any devolution of govenment powers for decades because their majority in the devolution referendum towards the end of the 70s consisted of fewer than 40% or eligible voters - a bigger proportion (51.6%) of actual YES voters than the proportion (51.3%) of actual voters for Brexit. To me, as a Scot, that seems disgraceful - a bigger majority was treated as lost in 1979 that the small majority that won the Brexit referendum. I guess the majority or English in the house of commons may have something to do with this blatant prejudice.ANd claiing that British elections to parliament are binding is just so much crap; if they were binding, we would need elections we would have an even worse electoral dictatorship than we have today: after all, we elected a conservative govenment last time round? If that's binding, why should we ever hold another election that might deliver a different result? That's more sensible than what's being claimed to preclude a referendum that determines whether we will accept whatever mess the government produces as a Brexit agreement is, but the English newspapers and most or the English dominated Conservative parties are advocating that "it was binding". And presumably you have forgotten that what parliament authorised a couple of years ago was specifically a NON-BINDING referendum.

King's College London internal memo cops to account 'compromise' as uni resets passwords

Tom -1

Re: The mind boggles

> Complexity requirements aren't infallible - the classic (outdated) example is "Password1" which

> meets the default complexity requirements of AD quite a while ago, but is definitely a weak

> password.

Not at all surprising. A bit more than thirty years ago I looked at security on a departmental server, using a well-known poular password brute force cracker algorithm, and found that most passwords were hopelessly insecure: there was a good batch of 4 or 5 character passwords using only alphabetic and numeric characters which were or course trivially breakable even then, and at the other extreme there were two occurrences of "qbttxpse2" which were the securest passwords (apart from mine) on the system.

Currently I use mostly 32 character passwords with alphabetic (including characters with marks like àèìòùáéíóúý«âêîôûçïñ» and the rest of the usual West European marked characters, and their capitalised versions, not just lower case) and numerics and some special symbols such as !"£$%^&*',./..,|\ except where the thing I'm connecting to won't allow some of those or won't allow cpasswords that long - but since I'm lazy, for some sites which now allow 24 characcters I'm still only using 16 because i can't be bothered to change them. Of course I don't remember all these, I have a password safe (with an access key of about 200 characters that I can remember) which is easier that remembering 50 of so of the individual passwords. Or course none of this is adequately secure, so for many connections I'm using two factor authentication as well.

Be wary, traveller: There is no going back if you step over the Windows 10 20H1 threshold

Tom -1

No insider track Windows 10 for me!

I'm not on the windows 10 insider track. I'm on the windows 10 ordinary (non-insider) user track, with all currently released updates on that track - so it currently calls itself "Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows 10 Home 10.0 <X64> (Build 17763:)". Normally I tell the system to lock and hibernate when I'm not going to use it for a while, only rebooting when there is at least one update that requires a reboot to apply it. Neing on that track, I generally regard Windows 10 (and its updates) as more reliable than winows 8.1, 8, or 7 and vastly more reliable than anything later than wndows 2,1 and earlier than windows 7 (despite Windows XP Pro and/or embedded versions of it having been for years my favourite client OS). When I replace my current machine I'll go to Windows 10 Pro, I think.

The only real problem I have with Windows 10 is the somewhat grotty Intel software and firmware (or maybe updates of it) that sometimes overwrites display and or screen parameters in such a way as to delete any configured size option greater that 1280X720 and forbid such large sizes to be declared as an available configuration, which is a real pain as I've told Windows and all utilities and apps (including browsers) to assume the screen is 1600 X 900. This happens about twice per year, and takes hours of running diagnostic software and rebooting to fix (because the "settings" app can't add the size until the problem is fixed).

Better late than never: Cisco's software-defined networking platform ACI finally lands on AWS

Tom -1

CISCO is evidently still as usual

I totally agree with the first two comments above. Last time I had to deal with Cisco (about 15 years ago) I had enough clout in the company I workd for that I could ban all further acquisition of CISCO gear for internal use and most importantly also ban including any Cisco stuff in what we delivered to our customers. I've been retired for nearly 10 years now, and haven't kept in touch with what's going on in the cooms and networking world, but from teh fist comment above I deduce that Cisco is still Cisco and hasn't changed a bit.

UK.gov's love-in with big biz for digital services continues, as does claim of boosting small firms

Tom -1

@Doctor Syntax re: best chance for SMEs

Sub- or sub-sub contracting to the usual suspects is probably a route to disaster for an SME- the usual suspects will eventually screw the SME.

Give yourselves a pat on the back, top million websites, half of you now use HTTPS

Tom -1

@tiggity Re: I'm not surprised.

As the daily mail site, unlike yours, does feature login (with the option of logging in using facebook, or twitter, or a google account; with your email address as a username) it does have the ability to log in as a user. However the login page does use https, so they aren't completely crazy. Just thoroughly crazy, as they apparently think it's OK that anyone who can get in between user and site can delete anything they don't like from (and add any junk they do like to) what people will see on any page but the login page.

Copper feel, fibre it ain't: Ads regulator could face court for playing hard and fast with definitions

Tom -1

Truth

I have two suppliers I can compare, because I need to use them both to keep my wife alive (by keeping her fom Englands very cold winter). In Spain, I was offered FTTP at a price lover than I was paying for copper, and told them I wanted it. An engineer arrived the next day with a replacement router and all needed parts to conect my existing telephones to it and also connect my computer and other digital devices, plus enough fibre to connect my house (by fibre) to the nearest fibre-connected cabinet; it was done qquickly; it worked - no problems. in England, I was offered "fibre", and I accepted it, and a week later a repacement router arrived by post withh instructions ast to how and when to connect it; I connected it; it didn't work; I called BT; a week later an engineer arrived; he discovered that BT hdidn't have fibre from the exchange yo the cabinet I was serviced by. I complained to BT. They sent an engineer to look at it about a week later - and I was without broadband for that week, because BT had configured things at its end so that for me only FTTC would be supported. No apology. No attempt to reduce the perios of disconnetcion. Completely useless crap compared to the treatment I get in Spain.

Frankly, this disgracefully incompetent customer service that I see from BT is something I see all too often in England, not just from BT but from just about everyone who has a country-wide monopoly. I guess our rules protecting consumers from exploitation by companies that don't care for their customers are the worst anywhere in the EU - mostly because reductons of responsibility of suppliers by special permission for Britain allows our big companies to do things that would be illegal everywhere else in the EU.

Sad Nav: How a cheap GPS spoofer gizmo can tell drivers to get lost

Tom -1

I don't understand why anyone thinks that spoofing is required to get GPS to take you the wrong way. It's famous for it.

Personally I look at Google Maps if I don't know the route and then while driving watch for signs that indicate problems. Unless I want to wander around pretty much at random and find new places (but still reading signs), which happens from time to time. I haven't yet found myself looking at a cliff or a four fathom deep water passage, but people who trust GPS have told me they hit those problems.

Up in arms! Arm kills off its anti-RISC-V smear site after own staff revolt

Tom -1
Unhappy

@Teiwaz: Re: It bears repeating: Building a CPU that runs C fast considered harmful.

Well, yes, but isn't having been taught in Pascal only marginally better than having been taught in C++? Surely being taught in decent languages would be more productive of competent programmers. Perhaps starting from Dijkstra's book "A discipline of programming" and then learing to use his Guarded Command Language along with Hoare Logic (and maybe some Haskell too) would enable certain universities to turn out decent programmers instead of awarding first class honours to people who specialise in C++ or Pascal but couldn't even write a working "Hello World" in any language.

Tom -1
Thumb Up

@AnonFairBinary: Re: It bears repeating: Building a CPU that runs C fast considered harmful.

I mostly agree, but would much rather use one of Milner's languages (SCCS, ACCS, or CCS) than Hoare's CSP. Maybe that's because I had more contact with Milner than with Hoare, or it may just be the horrible vending machine in Hoare's first CSP paper.

Tom -1
Happy

@John Savard Re: Re: It bears repeating: Building a CPU that runs C fast considered harmful.

I'm not sure what happened to the Burroughs operating system written in Algol 68, but the ICL operating system written in that language (for hardware designed to support that language as well as others) is still going strong - Fujitsu (who built hardware designed for that language for ICL and much later bought ICL) are still selling it and are still trying to recruit people who understand the operating system, databases, middleware, and language because they want to keep it going as it's very much wanted by enough of their customers to matter. Now I'm in my mid-70s and it's decades since I was part of that development and I'm more interested in other things these days, but I'm still proud of what I helped to achieve way back when.

ZTE can't buy chips from America – but can still get sued for patent infringement in the US

Tom -1
Unhappy

Re: If I didnt think...

Sadly, Dave 15, the UK government is set on abandoning business with the EU (no-deal hard Brexit is their clear intention) and setting up a trade treaty with the USA where the terms will inevitably be interoreted by Ameican courts to mean whatever is most beneficial to American companies regardless of what the actual wording of the treaty (which will in anycase have beeen forced as far as possible by the American negotiators towards giving American companies the rights to do what they like and British companies no rights at all, to allow the US administration to charge what tariffs they like and oblige British government never to increase tariffs on American exports, to oblige british suppliers to match American safety regulations and forbid Britain to enforce British safety regulations on gods supplied to British companiesor consumers by American companies.

So Britain will not be part of any "rest off the world" that ignores the USA and leaves them alone in their corner. Personally I find that very sad.

Brit retailer Currys PC World says sorry for Know How scam

Tom -1

Re: Sharp Practice

No, the minimum 2 year guarantee applies in all of teh EU except Britain, which negotiated a deal limiting the warranty to 1 year for sales in the UK because the requirements of teh 1 year warranty give the consumer advantage for that first year comapred to the EU requirement. That's teh official story. Of course the real reason was that our government wanted to give our manufacturers a license to sell absolute crap. Of course there are other laws about merchantable quality, and they are more use than any of the warrantees if you can cope with the hassle of getting the supplier to believe your threats of legal action.

US state legal supremos show lots of love for proposed CLOUD Act (a law to snoop on citizens' info stored abroad)

Tom -1

Re: "but how do I know where their servers are?"

If the cloud act happens, in won't matter where the servers are, it won't matter who owns them, it won't matter whose personal data is being demanded. If a US court says "give our US authorities that data owned by that EU company with no connection at all with the USA and held on servers owned by a company which has no connection whatsoever with the USA, and is personally identifiable data about persons who have no connection whatsover with the USA" and the company fails to hand over the data it and its officers will be guilty of contempt of that American court and probably the USA will try to extradite teh company officers on that charge (so if they are in Britain, they will probably end up in an American jail because they have chosen not to break British data protection law).

Don't shame idiots about their idiotically weak passwords

Tom -1

Re: But what if you forget the previous one, too?

@Mycho, the problem isn't remembering your mother's maiden name, it's remebering what you told this particular bunch of security wazzocks it was,

Tom -1

@Just Enough

Much more amusing is to add the number of digits differing between the octal representation of the highest prime below 3 to the power current number and the decimal repreenttion of fifth lowest prime greater than the current number to the current number.

The really smart ones don't care what the number is as long as the real password (the bit before the number) is seriously secure. They like the number bit to be amusing, and also to spread it around the password rather than always putting it at the end.

The really really genuinely smart people only have passwords for systems that have decent security (so they don't need to change their password frequently), use some sort of second factor authentication when a login is from an unknown device or an unknown location, or a lot of time has passed since last log in, and don't send pointless emails telling people they've logged in but do send messages when a login attempt has failed and been abandoned rather than retried successfully. Then the probably also use some sort of secure password store for most of their passwords, since remembering a hundred or so of the damned things is a pain in the butt.

Tom -1

@Adam 1

> Oh, and for the love of all things... Don't mandate special characters and numbers and the like. It's the size that counts. Not what you do with it.

Presumably you are aware that a 32 character password using letters, numbers, and assorted special characters so as to provide 8 bits per character is more than twice as long (since the useful measure of length is bit-count) as a 32 character password using only English alphabet upper and lower case characters? The rule has to be mandate nothing - permit the user to use whatever bit strings he likes and provide some reasonable charecter set that anables him to do that. Saying "don't mandate numbers etc is going to be interpreted by the averge user as "allow only alphabeitc characters" even is that's not wht yu intended when you say it.

El Reg assesses crypto of UK banks: Who gets to wear the dunce cap?

Tom -1

Re: Tesco online banking

Despite their current incompetence, they are marginally better than they were a decade or so ago. In those days, their credit card provided no mechanism for automatic payment of the full balance on the statement, and the only way they would provide statements was by mail to a UK address. Since I was spending about quarter of my time abroad that meant that several times a year I ended up paying only the minimum amount and getting stuck with interest on the rest. So I informed them that I was going to cease using their card unless they provided a means of having an automatic full amount payment (pretty well every other credit card supplier provided that means). They told me that they were going to provide that feature in about three months. Twelve months later they still hadn't provided it, and they wrote to me informing that my account was cancelled because I hadn't used it for a year. So instead of having a customer not using his card for a couple of years (until they did what they had promised they would do within a tenth of the time the actually took to do it) they had an ex-customer who would never use any financial service from them again.

Given that they were so incompetent that providing the full-payment option was beyond their capability to do in a reasonable time, I don't find it at all surprising that they are incompetent at security too.

Mozilla devs discuss ditching Dutch CA, because cryptowars

Tom -1

Re: Advancing our civilization into less a democratic state...

Kiwi, you clearly don't know teh history or referenda in the UK in the 20th century.

Back when there was debate about devolution to Wales and to Scotland a number of eferenda were held. The laws enabling the referenda in the 1970s said explicitly that if fewer than 40% of eligible voters voted for change from the status quo, there would be no change. In the 1979 Scottish devolution referendum the devolve side took 52% of the vote, but as few meant fewer that 40% of the eligible votes were for devolve, devolution didn't happen. Those of us who were in favour of devollution didn't go round claiming that the government was denying the will of the people, we accepted it as just common sense that fewer than 40% didn't indicate a general desire in favour of what would be a fairly big change in the status quo. In 1997 a further Scottish devolution referendum was held, again a majority in favour and this time 45% of eligible voters (nearly 75% of actual voters) voted yes, resulting in the Scotland Act 1988 which set up a Scottish Parliament with substantial devolved powers. The Welsh referendum in the 1970s voted heavily against devolution, but in 1997 the Welsh voted in favour of limited devolution, and in another referendum in 2011 the Welsh voted in favour of increased powers for their devolved government.

Tom -1

Re: Advancing our civilization into less a democratic state...

37% of eligible voters were in favour of Brexit. 35% were against it. 28% didn't vote. So we have no idea at all whether more people were for it or against it. Now we have a bunch of extremists insisting that we get out of the EU in as painful and damaging a way as possible and that any attempt to some to a sensible deal over the customs union and frontier controls is a denial of what people voted for - but the referendum didn't ask whether that sort of economically and socially disastrous sort of exit was wanted, and probably if it had asked that the answer would have been a resounding NO.

Back in the late 70s we had a Scottish deveolution referendum in which it was an explicit requirement that at the votes of at least 40% of those eligible to vote would be required to vote for a change for there to be any, and that seemed to be a common sense rule. I was in favour of change then, as were the majority of those who actually voted, but fewer that 40% of eligible voters voted for change so we didn't get the change, and no-one then claimed that he will of the people was being denied, perhaps because people in those days had rather more common sense than the anonymous coward to whom I'm replying.

Fake tech support 'scam' husband and wife banned FOR LIFE from computer repair world

Tom -1
Unhappy

I regularly get calls from people claiming to be Micrsoft Customer Service Engineers who have notice tha my computer is misbehaving - I usully make an attempt towaste as much of their time as I can, but sometimes tell them I don't have any Microsoft software on my computer instead. The (probably forlorn) hope is that this will be noticed and get at least one scammer team to stop calling me. I get similar calls from people purporting to be Apple customer support engineers, with them I just hang up - the more phone calls they make the sooner they will go bust, because surely no Apple customer is sufficiently dim to realise that the only customer support Apple ever does is to tell their customers nothing's wrong with the Apple stuff, it's just the customer is doing something stupid (eg holding their iPhone 4 the wrong way).

British snoops at GCHQ knew FBI was going to arrest Marcus Hutchins

Tom -1

Re: Rules

That's an unwarranted insult to the legal systems in the average banana republic, only below average banana republics have legal systems as dishonest as the USA.

Ofcom wants automatic compensation for the people when ISPs fail

Tom -1

I currently spend half my time in Spain, and use Telefonica(Movistar) for my land-line and broadband there. If I have a fault, I call them (using my mobile if I can't make calls with the land line). They answer, quickly - no ringing for ages, no silly music and "your call is important to us, an operative will speak to to you as soon as possible" recorded messages) and someone discusses the problem with me, passes me on to an engineer who attempts on-line diagnostics (and can sometimes fix the fault there and then). An engineer arrives either the same working day or before noon the next day and fixes the problem: if it's some idiot has cut through the line while doing some building modifications just down the road the engineer patches it, if it's my router playing up the engineer installs a new one, and so on. Before he goes away, the engineer checks that everything is working and has me check it and confirm it's ok. If I say yes it's ok, he leaves and reports completion to Telfonica. An hour or two later I will get a call from Telefonica to check that the problem is fixed - that the repair is reliable so far and hasn't broken down. There is of course no charge for this, and no threat to charge me if I call in a fault and it turns out to be mine. I pay about the same per month for my line and broadband access as I pay BT, installation was free (no charge at all, unlike BT), the router is supplied free and replaced (and upgraded) when broken or becoming obsolete (BT charges for routers and router upgrades, of course), all my calls to Spanish landline numbers are free (BT charges me for weekday calls), I have a substantial discount on international calls covering countries I call, not the whole world (so that it costs me less to call the UK from Spain than vice versa) and I can ask for the line to be temproraily disconnected now and again and pay no charge at all during disconnected periods (which are mulitples of a whole month) so if i'm going to be in Britain for a while and none of the family will be using my Spanish house I can have Telfonica disconnect it (and when I ask them to reconnect it is done within one working day), which I've done a couple of times (twice I've done this for a six month period, so in those two years I got a better service from Telefonica than from BT but Telefonica charged me only half what BT did).

The contrast between Telefonica's treatment of customers and BT's treatment of customers is pretty amazing. It's a pity BT can't be required to provide teh standard of service that I get from Telefonica.

Customer: BT admitted it had 'mis-sold' me fibre broadband

Tom -1

Re: Cable?

A bit over a year ago I called BT about a replacement router, as my existing one was a bit archaic. They offered me a fibre package (FTTC, not FTTP) at a cheaper rate than my current broadband package, and I accepted their offer. So a couple of weeks later they switched the congig at teh exchange to use FTTC. No connection was possible. I called them. After several days, an engineer arrived to llok at the problem. He could find nothing wrong at my end, so went of to check at the cabinet. Quite quickly he came back to me to explain that the reason I couldn't get a connetcion was that the cabinet had no fibre connection to the exchange. He also told me that this was a common problem, that BT commonly updated its data to say the various cabinets now had FTTC capability but every time the updates included some cabinets where the work had been reported by the subcontractor as completed but in fact had not even been started, and that BT nmade no atempt at all to check that the completion reports were valid. That struck me as sheer incompetence on BT's part.

I called BT to point out that the cabinet had no fibre connection and it took some time to get it through their heads that this had been reported by their own engineer and wasn't some weird dream of mine. They then told me it would take a week for them to switch me back to non-fibre connection, and I couldn't get that person to budge on that, so I demanded to talk to someone with authority to do something other than recite standard scripts, threatening a formal written complaint to BT which would include a statement that through the incompetence of their operative to whom I was talking I had found it necessary to make a formal written complaint to OFCOM, which suddenly changed the timescale to it would be fixed within one working day. The next problem was that the contract I had been on previously was no longer offered, it was only allowed to continue to next renewal date and as I had cancelled my non-fibre contract I had to pick one of teh ne ones - which cost more than the old one but delivered less time diuring which calls were free. Much complaining got me nowhere.

BT are just plain incompetent, they apparently can't be bothered to ensure that their records of what infrastructutre is actually installed and available for use are accurate, and since everyone else providing service around here simply uses BT's infrastructure it's clear that they too can't provide FTTC here, and won't be able to until BT actually provides a fibre connection between the exchange and the cabinet for this area, and I suspect they still believe they already have it.

How IT are you? Find out now in our HILARIOUS quiz!

Tom -1
Pint

Evidentally I'm non-IT

Because I drink either gin and FR or pink gin, or even g&t, never gin and IT. IT is useful in a manhattan if made with whisky that is bad enough to deserve such adulteration, but I prefer to avoid such whiskies.

Trump signs 'no privacy for non-Americans' order – what does that mean for rest of us?

Tom -1

Re: Mrs May is not an Angel, either.

"Women+power= ??" - until that line it was a good post. But do you really think that either Thatcher or May as prime minister has done (or will do) as much damage per day in that office as did any of Macmillan, Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Major, Blair, Brown or Cameron? And although May was a very anti-people's-rights home secretary she supervised less disgraceful decent towards a British Police state than did any other home secretary since 1997, and probably did less to reduce the freedom of British people than did James Chuter Ede who as (Labour) Home Secretary renewed the identity card laws when the came up for review in 1947, leading to many people being pointessly prosecuted (and punished) for not carrying their card during the next few years. (SIr David Maxwell Fyfe, the (Tory) Home Secretary at the next review date in1952, refused to present a motion to the house to continue the ID Card law, thus killing it dead). And Macmillan's treachery in 1956 probably did more damage to Britain than May will manage to do despite her best efforts.

Don't get me wrong - Thatcher was a necessary evil and is an unneccessary evil; but neither of them awas or is any worse than typical male politicians at that level have been for rather a long time, in fact neither was or is as bad as many of the males. That doesn't mean either was or is good - just less bad than others - but it does mean that your "Women+power= ??" was silly and uncalled for.

Tom -1

@JWG "they don't know the difference between a republic and a pure democracy"

Oddly enough though, unlike you suckers in the US, we do know that the US is neither a republic nor a democracy but a plutocratic oligarchy (or perhaps, given how congressmen gather round the barrel, it's a plutocratic kleptocracy like Putin's Russia).

Tom -1

Re: I was sat in the pub this evening.

"Makes Putin look sane and a safe pair of hands. (God help us all :) )"

No, nothing could make Putin looks like a safe pair of hands. Trump merely makes him look less insane and a less dangerous pair of hands.

I would estimate the probability of Trump doing something wrong thing being only 1.1 times the probability of May doing something wrong, and the probability of May doing something wrong being about 1.1 times the probability of Putin doing something wrong wrong - in round figures call it 99% for Trump, 90% for May, and 82% for Putin during the next four years. That one of them will do something wrong is very close to certainty (in fact it lokkslike better than 2 to 1 on that each of the three will do something wrong), so let's just hope that whatever they the something(s) is/are don't leave us too damaged.

Why Theresa May’s hard Brexit might be softer than you think

Tom -1
Thumb Down

Re: 2 years? @Doctor Syntax

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland came into being on Jan 1 1800, not early in the 17th century, when two separate kingoms, the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of Ireland were united (although the King of England had also been the King of Scotland since 1542 (according to Irish law) or 1555 (according to Papal decree).

Scotland and England were two separate kingdoms until they were joined together as the Kingom of Great Britain on 1 May 1707; that's the earliest date you can talk about Scotland being a member of a United Kingdom, although since 1605 when James 1 of Scotland because King of England whoever was King of Scotland was also King of England.

So Scotland did become part of Great Britain (the Kingdom of Great Britain, not the Island) in 1707 and was not part of any United Kingdom before 1707. You got it wrong on both counts.

Paper mountain, hidden Brexit: How'd you say immigration control would work?

Tom -1
Flame

@fruitoftheloom Re: @Dr. Paul T: Let's hope

well, since Dr Paul clearly stated that the MPs failed to include any threshold your expectation that he should be able to pointyou to a Hansard reference supprting the existence of one seems to demonstrate that you are so dim as to be unable to understand plain English and probably therefor equally unable to cope with the complexities of a question like the one put in the referendum, which may explain why you were on the side you were.

Nul points: PM May's post-Brexit EU immigration options

Tom -1
Flame

@ Can't think of anything witty...

> we left back in June and everything...

Are you really that stupid or are you just trolling? We can't leave until 2 yers after we have activated the leving process, and we haven't done that yet.

And if we want decent leving terms we won't leave until after next years electins in mainland Eurean countries where there' s a risk of extreme right wingers gaining power, becuse invoking it would increase the chance of those people winning and they will all want to show their people that they can screw the eil British )to increase their bote next time round).

Fight over internet handover to ICANN goes right down to the wire

Tom -1

@Frank Os - Re: And ....

No discernable difference? I think it's made significnt discernable difference by its efforts to ensure that the domain name administration has been designed to line ICANN management pockets instead of do what's best for the net. Given the history, I find it amazing that anyone can disagree,

United States names its first Chief Information Security Officer

Tom -1

Re: Is Obaka going after wikileaks? @bombastic bob

> and PUNISH those who've been negligent and possibly got people killed... [no need to name names on THAT part]

Well, I suspect there probably is a need to name names because your bias is so damned obvious: If we are restricting ourseleve to dates after 1945 the first name on the list of thise who were negilgent and got people killed should probably be Lyndon B Johnson and the second George W Bush.

Top digital Eurocrat issues non-denial about hyperlink non-tax

Tom -1
Boffin

Re: Just how fucking stupid are the EU elite???

"a very low special tax rate that only applies to them, not the rest of the EU plebs"

You clearly don't understand how the tax rules work. Unless the rules have changed recently (since I last did any work for the EU) anyone working directly for the European Commission pays no tax on what he/she is paid for that work, regardless of which EU country he/she is tax-resident in; if someone works for a company which provides his/her services to the commission, that person is taxed according to the national rules for the country in which he/she is tax resident. VAT is not charged to EU government organisations - all services directly to the EU are zero-rated; for services provided to the EU through an intermediary, the intermediary is charged VAT.

This absence of income tax doesn't mean anyone is better off than they should be, because a person working directly for the commission gets payed less than a company providing that person's services to the EU would be payed to balance that out (enough less so that the company can pay him more than the EU would if he worked direct for it , and allow for the company to make a reasonable but not excessive profit on the deal). That saves bureaucratic effort to handle the tax, and means the EU doesn't have to collect as much from the member countries that if it paid enough to provide a decent salary after tax to the people working directly for it. The absence of VAT also does no harm - it just eliminates another heap of bureaucracy, with the companies collecting VAT from the EU bodies and paying that VAT to heir national tax systems which then pay it back to the EU. It's not a gravy train, it's elimination of expensive red tape.

Tom -1
Flame

No, the ODQ doesn't pay for all the sources they quote. Most of the sources they quote are long out of copyright, so why should they pay for quoting those? Or do you think that Chaucer's writings should have been given the same treatment as Disney's films, with copyright terms extended another decade or two every time those copyrights were about to expire? Personally I think we are better off in Europe where we don't have a congress who will assiduously change the law to deprive their constituents of rights that might impede the further enrichment of their paymasters.

Google had Obama's ear during antitrust probe

Tom -1

I can't imagine what world the AC who says Microoft is shiving edge on everyone is living on. Edge isn't the default browser for any of my Windows 10 logins - although I do use it occasionally. It is trivial to pick a default browser during the upgrade process.

Password strength meters promote piss-poor paswords

Tom -1

Re: Passwords need to be rethought (@Crisp)

How long ago was XKCD/936?

way back in the dard ages, I used passwords with about 60 bits of entropy, a long time before XKCD suggested that using something with 44 bits of entropy was a good idea, and now I'm happy using passwords with 150 bits of entropy (the XKCD scheme would require a dozen or more English words to match that); I guess our salvations is the good ole password safe.

Actually, given how many passwords I want (and how reluctant I am to use the same one twice) I's probably have to use a password safe even to hold that many passwords with 44 bits each of entropy (even more so with 64 bits of entropy, which I believe is more like the correct number for a sequence of 4 English words than XKCD's underestimate); and once I'm doing that, I can passwords as complex as I like, all I need to remember is a decent pass phrase (decent means more that 500 bits of entropy, and using famous bits of Shakrspeare or Chaucer or the like) in case someone gets access to my safe or its backup.

So I believe that the thing about passwords that needs rethinking isn't a switch from things we can't remember to things we can, but a switch to acceptance that passwords we can't remember are what we have to live with - I'm happy to remember one nice long pass phrase, bu I'm not going to truy to remember a hundred (and anyone who does try is crazy).

CERN staff conduct 'human sacrifice' at supercollider site

Tom -1

@Nonesuch

"Welcome to a world where your boss needs to give you a thumb up before you make any joke."

What makes you think authorisation was required? The simplest explanation for it not having been authorised is that no authorisation is required for jokes.

29 years of data shows no mobile phone brain cancer link

Tom -1

Re: next up

"I think you have that bassakwards ... try instead "suffering from the effects of lower intelligence, leading to radio wave paranoia"

No, it's a vicious circle so iyt can be expressed either way - the paranoia leads to lower intelligence which amplifies the paranoia which descreases the intelligence which ....

US House to vote on whether poor people need mobile phones

Tom -1

Re: Same

"Where did I say I was a Trump or Cruz supporter? I hated them both. I would much prefer someone like Allen West or a libertarian such as Gary Johnson. I cant believe that these idiots are the best we can find to run our country but then again...WE don't find them really they are chosen for us for the most part."

That "we don't find them" strikes me as totally naive. It was very clear that most of the senators and representatives of the Republican party thought Trump was a terrible candidate who, if elected, would make a disastrous president, so it wasn't them who found him. It's the ordinary guys like you (but not like me, I'm a Scot not an American so guys like me had no say) who chose him as your party's candidate. SO yes, YOU (maybe not you individually, but certainly the collective YOU corresponding to your WE) did find him and choose him, so stop pretending it was otherwise.

New UK trade deals would not compensate for loss of single market membership

Tom -1

Re: Good grief.

I find it rather difficult to understand what William 3 is trying to say. He appears to be objecting to hypocritical wankers, which is remarkable since that would clearly mean he is objecting to himeslf. anyone who believes that aprox 37% of eligible voters constitute a democratic majority for a massive change in direction isclearly an idiot (like those who set this referendum up without a minimum threshold like that used for the 1979 scottish referendum), but since he pretends to believe that everyone who thinks there should be sensible minimum threshold for such referenda is clearly died in the wool hard left marxist he is clearly a hypocritical wanker since there is abundant evidence that that is not true (Margaret Thatcher, for example, supported having a minimum threshold included in the legislation for the 1979 referendum, and although william 3 is clearly an idiot he surely can't be quite enough of a fuckwit to believe that she was a hard left marxist).

Well, I suppose I ought to happy that william 3, a person so poisonous, uncivilised, and idiotic as to be rare even in these columns, has proven himself to be a hypocritical wanker and evidently hates himself.

FBI electronics nerd confesses: I fed spy tech blueprints to China

Tom -1

"..... don't hire people that were not born and raised in the US. even then they should be at least second generation born in the US before they should be able to get a security clearance"

What a load of coblers! Clearly you must think it was a terrible mistake letting people like Benjamin Franklin (whose parents were born in England) or Patrick Henry (parents born in Scotland) take on positons of trust. They were 1st generation American, not 2nd, unlike those other evidently (according to you) even less trustworthy founding fathers, Thomas Paine (born in England) and Alexander Hamilton (born in Nevis) who weren't even 1st generation American, Presumably you also reckon Washington was an insecure idiot for appointing Hamilton, a French-Scottish cross from Nevis, as his principal military aide during the war. Clearly you haven't a clue.

UK employers still reluctant to hire recent CompSci grads

Tom -1

@Roo Re: Interesting...

Your list of 5 points is interesting, but I would hope that a CS course would cover something a bit more scientific and a lot broader than your point 2" developing useful tests" (perhaps "error detection, containment, recovery and elimination") and while I have great respect for Tony Hoare and his CSP I would prefer people to be familiar with Rob Milner's work instead (CCS, ACCS, SCCS, and Pi-calculus) because it covers a much wider spectrum of styles of cooperation between processes. And I would regard your 1st example as good material for an engineering course but not computer science, and the 5th is about a particular build tool, nothing to do with science, and may be of interest to one employer in four.

Michael Gove says Britain needs to create its own DARPA

Tom -1

@anonymous coward - first commenter

I'm not aware that we had a Tory PM any time between 2003 ans 2007, while the selling off of DERA at a bargain price to Tony's cronies was played out.

If your suggesting that Blair was a tory prime minister you re just crazy - no tory prime minister in history was such disgraceful right wing twit as that man.

Russia, China fight UN effort to extend human rights onto the internet

Tom -1

@Hstubbe Re: Theresa May

At least a decade? Actually at least since July 2000 (when RIPA receied Royal Assent) and maybe a lot earlier, depending on when the various agencies started using section 94 of the Telecomms Act 1984 - I know it was used as early as October 2001 (after 9/11), but that's seven and a quarter years after the Act received Royal Assent so it may have been used for mass surveillance any time after July 1984.

It's sad to see a Tory Home Secretary trying to top the anti-privacy pro-surveillance stuff promoted by the Home Secretaries of the Blair and Brown periods, but she is the Home Secretary who guided the Identity Documents Act 2010 which abolished the Blair era national identity card and the associated register so she can't be all bad.

Kill Flash now. Or patch these 36 vulnerabilities. Your choice

Tom -1

Re: Why?

"Just how is it that Flash is so relentlessly shit and never seems to improve any?"

Maybe Adobe is incompetent at producing any reasonably secure software? I've heard it said that over the years almost every alternative to Acrobat has been more secure than the Adobe product, and I decided years ago to avoid all use of Acrobat and stick to Foxit for viewing and printing PDF. If I could avoid all use of Flash I would.

In fact I would like to be completely Adobe free.

Things we should regulate: Spyware cowboys – EU Data Protection Supervisor

Tom -1

Re: I'd like to report a violation

I think you've got th ewrong address, the driving force in this violation of the privacy and data protection regulations is based in SW1P 4DF.

Oooooklahoma! Where the cops can stop and empty your bank cards – on just a hunch

Tom -1
Flame

So no-one wants to enforce the constitution? After all, the supreme court ruled (in February 1993) against the confiscation of assests of innocent people even if those assets are themselves tainted in whole or in part by illegal activities. And it ruled (in June 1993) that confiscation of assets is a punishment (the Department of Justice had contended it wasn't) and a strong case can be made that a punishemnt applied to innocent people is cruel and unusual (which was why the DoJ was frightened of confiscation being classed as a punishment). And it further ruled (in June 1993) that eighth amendment's prohibiion of unreasonable seach and seizure applies to confiscation of assets.

I'm not aware of the supreme court having reversed itself in any of those matters, or of any constitutional amendment since 1993 that could void any of the rulings in question. But maybe that's because I no longer keep track of the shambles that is the American "justice" system since I no longer go to the USA.

But I suppose that it's situation normal in the USA: the powers that be (even minor powers like the local cops) will merrily violate the constitution (with the possible exception of the second amendment) and there is little or no chance of them being prevented from doing this or being punished for doing it or for anyone getting redress when harmed by it since it would be inconvenient for the ruling plutocrats to have the laws and the constitution enforced.

I suspect that we are better off with our "unwritten constitution" than with a written one like the American one or the Russian one,

Visitors no longer welcomed to Scotland's 'Penis Island'

Tom -1

Re: apparently...

Your Gaelic doesn't appear to be quite up to the challenge. But you're right that "Bhoid" isn't a word, and that this story is the result of a pedant being rather silly (unless it's the result of someone thinking the missing grave accent was a m opportunity for goofg laugh).

"Eilean Boid" means literally "The Island of a Penis" which would, by the usual rules of translating place names, "Penis Island". "Eilean Bod" is meaningless, because it is grammatically incorrect - bod is nominative case, but in a name like that the second word needs to be in the genitive case. Of course if bod were a proper name (Bod) rather than an ordinary noun, the the genitive case would be Bhoid but it couldn't mean penis since penis isn't a proper name.

Being oversensitive about "bod" in a placename seems rather ungaelic, though. Up in Skye people are happy to call a particular rock "bod an Stòrr" (bowdlerised by Màiri Mór to "Leac an Stòrr" in her famous song "Nuair bha mi òg") so why should people dow south be so upset by his missing accent?

Page:

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019