The only radio I listen to is Radio 4 and Kirsty Young would still sound amazing even at 8kbps.
367 posts • joined 6 Jul 2015
The only radio I listen to is Radio 4 and Kirsty Young would still sound amazing even at 8kbps.
Your paranoia is causing you to miss out on some very useful stuff.
Ever tried banking by app? It's much more convenient than walking into a branch. Most of the big banks have an app, but sadly not for Windows.
It was the apps.
I liked the look of Windows phones, I really did. But my bank didn't have an app. Nor did my car, or my heating system, or my accountancy software, or my work's VPN token provider, or any number of other suppliers of useful services.
Much as I'd have liked to play around with a Windows phone, I've come to find those apps far too useful to lose.
10nm is 50 silicon atoms end-to-end.
That's absolutely ludicrously tiny and, when you think about it, a monumental achievement for a bunch of jumped-up monkeys in clothes.
Does anyone still use the in-house Tesla forum?
All the action is on teslamotorsclub.com and the various Facebook forums (all of which are incredibly active).
This makes an ARM based Macbook an absolute certainty.
I would pay the TV license just for Radio 4 alone. The fact that we get a world class broadcaster and news organisation attached is a bonus.
When you consider how much Sky charge for 572 channels of utter garbage, the BBC is a wondrous thing.
by Robert Plant
If someone from ULA calls your idea "dumb", you know you're onto something good.
Donald Trump is a total and utter goat fucker.
Don't call it reused. Call it launch proven.
You can think of it as loosely analogous to a diagram of neurons and the connections between them in a brain.
Just for some perspective, 45km / year is 1.5mm / second.
Use your local recycling centre.
We're getting more and more throw-away by the day and all this internet of things nonsense isn't helping.
"A few years from now, it'll become obvious that the neural net weightings somehow missed (for example) children in striped pink and green rain coats (the latest fashion trend, circa 2021)."
All of that is true, and all of it misses the point.
The point is that human drivers are not perfect. Autonomous driving doesn't have to be perfect. It just has to be as good or better than the humans.
Read my post below. Tesla is not switching off Autopilot for existing customers.
What a load of cobblers, both in the article and in the comments.
For the commentards: Tesla is not disabling Autopilot. Cars that have it will keep it. Cars that are being built now will get it via a software update in a few months.
For Richard Chirgwin: The point here is that Autopilot is a fleet learning AI. The old autopilot code was activated months after cars that first had the hardware hit the roads. The reason was that the neural nets need huge amounts of data to train.
The same is true of the new hardware. Clearly the difference in hardware means that the old training can't be used, so they're going to have to collect data for a while.
And finally, as has been pointed out many times, human drivers are terrible. Anything that can improve that (and Autopilot has an excellent record) will save lives.
Full disclosure: I have a Model S on order but not yet in production and am pleased that I will be among the first to receive the new hardware.
It doesn't know and doesn't care. It just follows the lane that it's in when you activate it.
Small planes often have an autopilot that does nothing more than hold course and altitude.
Autopilot does not mean what some people appear to think it means.
Google is the world's biggest advertising agency.
They're persuading people to pay them to walk around with a Google-provided GPS locator beacon.
That is genius. Kudos.
Tempted by this (or its successor in a few years), now that Apple have started removing headphone jacks.
Windows Phone is a non-starter. My bank doesn't provide an app for it. My heating system doesn't have an app for it. My car doesn't have an app for it.
Buy one from me for 30% more than list price and I'll give you 20% back to spend in the app store.
Money is fungible. Does it matter if they give you credits or if you pay for apps yourself? No such thing as a free lunch.
The only thing I wish is that they'd stop sending me physical junk mail.
Every. Single. Week.
Even less keen to go now.
They still going then?
In other words it's Shiny that's the problem.
I'm involved in a large scale financial enterprise system (in-house for a large investment bank). It consists of a user-configurable highly responsive UI that allows rapid drilldown of massive datasets, configurable side-by-side charting and customisable dashboards.
It's fast, but it needs modern hardware.
None of it is there for "shiny". I'm not paid for shiny. It's there to provide subtle, powerful analysis of complex data. The data visualisation available through modern UI capabilities is not something I could code by hand from scratch, and it's not something I could shove through a 486-DX.
And it's certainly not something a team of our size (four developers) could write without access to some powerful but high level libraries.
Tools like node.js? Tools like unity? Tools like NHibernate? Tools like ActiveX? Tools like JQuery? Tools like Entity Framework?
And they may not need an IDE with cutesy graphics, but software development isn't a contest in theoretical purity, it's a race for productivity.
A modern "cutesy" IDE contains many features which make development very much faster and more productive.
I speak from direct, long standing and - if I may say so - very successful professional experience.
It's shitty lazy code that's the problem.
No, it's not that simple. Code is a product. It is paid for with money.
Modern code is produced - feature for feature - for a fraction of the price of code 30 years ago. The reason for this is that development tools have become unbelievably productive. There's a trade-off in terms of performance on the underlying hardware, sure, but the way to improve raw metal performance of the code would be to forgo some of the tools that make developers so productive.
The obvious solution is to salt the passcode and store the salt in the processor's secure module.
What are the chances Apple already knew of this built in in fault and have not fixed it so that the phones have a maximum life span before you need to buy a new one?
The chances are close to zero. Phones have a maximum lifespan already, and most consumers won't ever hear about this story or care about it. There is no clear motive for Apple to do this. On the other hand, if what you're saying was true and the story got out it would be major headlines.
Apple aren't out to put themselves in a position where their reputation could be shredded by a leak. Just look at what happened to Volkswagen.
Furthermore, search for articles on the web about the internal culture at Apple, particularly from ex-employees. It's a strange place - secretive, authoritarian. But it's extremely focussed on pleasing the customer.
"You can't compare the work of some amateur"
"University of Cambridge senior research associate Sergei Skorobogatov"
Not so amateur. Besides, the headline was clearly classic Register. Don't take the headlines seriously round here.
I think the point is that he was physically isolating the flash. By doing so, he was able to construct a brute force attack that did not require the rest of the iPhone, so lock-out counts and things were irrelevant.
There are huge swathes of enterprise development which, for regulatory reasons, can't use public clouds. For the most part, banking is one such area. I've spent my career in financial IT and public cloud is still a non-starter here. Which means, for the moment, that Google don't have a toehold.
We voted to leave the EU.
We didn't vote for anything else the more vocal Brexiters are clamouring for. We didn't vote to "take control" of our borders. We didn't vote to restrict free movement. All we voted for was to end membership of the European Union. That was the question on the ballot.
The result was so close that there's no way it can be interpreted as a mandate for any of the leave campaign's specific pledges. The only thing that can be said is that we answered the actual question that was asked. No more.
I have a smart home. My wife has a PhD.
I don't always agree with The Register, but it's this sort of stuff that keeps me coming back.
OK, so that's another standard that any given USB C port may, or may not, support.
Good luck with buying a laptop and having any idea at all whether it will work with your particular piece of kit. It's already hard enough finding out which version of USB, DisplayPort, charging and (sometimes) Thunderbolt a given laptop's USB C socket supports. And sometimes different sockets on the same machine have different capabilities. None of the manufacturers marketing departments go into enough technical detail on their websites and the vendors are even worse.
USB C is rapidly turning into total chaos.
Bingo. The shuttle gets a free pass from commentators talking about the dangers of reusing rockets.
I assume there's some sort of psychological reason for that - the Shuttle had wings and looked a bit like a plane, after all.
"So you'd have to assume some of the percentage of leave voters either wished for this or along with some of the other 'promises'."
Yes, but even if 95% of leave voters wished it, that still means 5% didn't. Add those to the remain votes and it's clear there is no mandate for anything specific other than the literal fact of Brexit itself.
So you're saying it's effectively a tax levied in response to shelter from failure?
That's an interesting perspective. I'd never looked at it that way before.
Why tax corporations at all? They're ultimately just vehicles for conducting business on behalf of shareholders.
Corporation tax should be abandoned and rolled into dividend tax, capital gains tax, etc.
They're not planning on selling many. It's a halo machine to cement the brand in the minds of teenagers.
.... "created in partnership with camera specialists Hasselblad"
.... "Motorola paid Hasselblad some money and put Hasselblad logos on their camera"
Fixed that for you.
If you don't trust hardware, you shouldn't be plugging it into trusted or secure equipment. That's true of current USB.
The biggest change is the inclusion of USB3.1 and Thunderbolt support in the chipset. Hopefully we'll start to see them both really take off now.
> "But they don't have a real keyboard."
That's what I thought when I got a Macbook a few years ago. The only thing that bugged me after a week or so was the lack of forward delete.
It still bugs me a little bit, but only a little. Aside from that, the keyboard is outstanding in terms of feel and typeability.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018