Smart meters are necessary to achieve robust vendor lock-in.
486 posts • joined 30 Jan 2015
Smart meters are necessary to achieve robust vendor lock-in.
Just watch the subtitles on a popular news program to see daily demonstrations of this failure mode.
Zebras have stripes to throw off tsetse flies (or test files, depending on your AI).
Here in East London, we have long had a saying "If you cannot tell if you are being robbed - YOU ARE BEING ROBBED!"
In the same vein:
If they won't tell you how the security mechanism works - they know it doesn't work.
Standard big company shit. Turf wars, NIH, general mis-communication.
You would, however, expect a large software company to be better at this.
Microsoft IS a big company: as far as I am aware, they are among the world leaders when it comes to Turf wars, NIH, and general mis-communication.
I was once told it cost £30 in administration for each £1 paid in benefits.
Does anyone have the actual, up do date figures? or the time to do an FOI request?
Good old fashioned politicians studied History as part of their education, and History used to include the the French Revolution, with the aim if suggesting what could go wrong if you oppress the poor too much.
For those who did not study history: the outcome looks a lot like ISIS, Boko Haram, etc: mass killing sprees with not much logic behind them, mostly the poor killing the poor themselves, and very hard to stop once started. (It is true some of the rich go first, but once started, killing is hard to stop).
And don't forget Gordon Brown, in taxing the "filthy rich" decided that included people on the dole. The definition of "filthy rich" generally means "anyone I can get £1 out of" when it comes to inflicting pain.
Where are the square and triangular ones kept?<P>
Does that even matter? The Pentagon types are the ones to worry about!
Or, as someone more famous than me said about having shit flung in his face:
"No Shit, Sherlock!"
So Oracle is offensive? who knew?
When I head this story (in about 1979) the alarm was at an electricity sub station, and was allegedly genuine (ie I was told by someone who claimed to have involvement when I was working for an alarm manufacturer).
I have been told by several accountants, on many occasions. that the law states that if a company breaks the law, then, by implication, the contract forming the limited company is broken, and therefore, liability is no longer limited: the shareholders have unlimited liability, although in proportion to their shareholding.
If this is not the law, then it bloody well ought to be.
IF, and ONLY IF it is in the memorandum of association (which I doubt ever happens) the shareholders can pass the liability for criminal action to the directors (as they have legal responsibility for directing what the company does), jointly and severally - meaning that if they can't get the money from some directors, they can still get it from the others - even if one director is forced to pay the whole fine/costs. And even if he resigns before the fine, if it happened on his watch, he is still liable.
This should also be legally enforced.
Remember, we the people consent to the creation of limited companies. We are entitled to have a say in how they behave as a condition of that consent. If your MP does not support YOUR rights over the rights of companies, then you should probably not be voting for him/her, regardless of party affiliation. Companies may be "persons" in law, but they have no votes. You might need to explain this to your MP in words of one syllable.
I write this as the director on several companies. (I don't want to face competition from scum).
I wouldn't trust these idiots with my router.
Unfortunately, most of the closed source alternatives are seriously insecure and barely functional.
Not used OpenWRT for a while, but I put LEDE on my BT provided hub, and now it doesn't crash every few minutes, my downloads are 20 times faster, and my uploads are three times faster. On top of that, the UI is actually documented (although you would have to be fairly technically knowledgeable to configure it).
BT sent me a replacement hub when I complained about the crashing - it is exactly the same, and my son's at another location is similar (crashes only about once an hour instead of several times).
BT do not have any meaningful documentation on their "home hubs" and that on the Business Hubs appears to be a limited script on how to do what they think you want to do.
LEDE is not for everyone, but for some, it is wonderful. Or, maybe, BT Hub software is complete shite, but, IME, the other vendors are not much better.
The OSS would be massively better if the hardware manufacturers were to allow people to read the documentation on their products. I think they should be forced* to release all docs on any product that is EOL's to minimise landfill.
* This might need to be at gunpoint in the case of Oracle and Cisco.
I won't even get started on the marketing department
Please, start a Kickstarter for that ... you will be a millionaire overnight.
I assume 6 is for testing the smoke alarm.
No. That is 4. 6 is to burn the building down.
the database will have to be converted twice.
If you are lucky, the original will be left on a USB stick in a London train terminus - you are going to need a backup!
Would you expect a Scot to make special arrangements when moving to England?<P>
I think this has demonstrated that the Scots and Irish need to do so immediately or expect the same fate. The Welsh are clearly doomed.
But even better with rum!
Having declared Sparcs T1, T2 and T3 completely obsolete, implying no longer a source of profit, Does the Shower of Shit plan to allow firmware patches for them to be freely distributed to people with these systems so a future generation of users can learn the benefits of their architecture at home, or is their commitment to "dog in the manger" philosophy of suing people who are so impertinent as to look at their software, so great that they prefer to demonstrate that the best way to improve your ability to stand on your own two feet is to cut off your legs at the knees?
In other words:
Anyone who believes that their financial transactions are protected over the internet is in for a reality check? Thought as much. Someone should tell Amazon and Barclays Bank.
Incidentally, OTPs still work, whether you use a pen and paper, or a shell script. I think you will find MP3s and PNGs work quite well as OTPs. (random() is probably better). The trick is saying which file and getting a copy to the other end. Its not difficult, but I will not disclose my methods without being paid ;-)
How is this even legal?<p>
Racketeering is legal in America, apparently.
I would rather like to be able to pay a few cents for something that would silently throw Google away! And Facepalm, and the twittersphere.
I have a T61
So do I.Two in fact.
Which brings up the question - do any of the new thingies have Ultrabays? Somehow not mentioned in the reviews.
Guaranteed to avoid Elks
As someone who has been a tape user for over 40 years, I do not recall ever selecting tape "because it is fast".
However, IME, the life of hard disks which are constantly spun up and down will be short, nasty and brutish. And the power consumption during spin up is huge, so there may not be a net saving anyway. (I had an early example of RAID with 5 1/4" drives that claimed to take a kilo-amp for a microsecond during spin up. I doubt the power supply could source that, but it seemed to work. RFI was a problem though.
Never realised being Amish was so much fun.
Can I join?
Surely it is illegal to even ask for this under the GDPR?
I suspect they're only there as a backup to the electronic controls.
Obviously needed, owning to total inability to engage competent subcontractors to do anything electronic involving data - other than lose it.
> Most third world countries don't have Victorian terraced houses, and generally better weather....
Nor do they rely on on-line buzzword matching for recruitment of technical experts to local jobs
(although quite a few rely on "uncles" already in the company for talent spotting)
Please can we put BT into space between now and the year 2069.
Hell, why not make it permanent.
It seems no one has yet pointed out that Twitter specifically targets twits.
It is possible that media targeting the marginally sane may respond differently from media for the self-selecting insane,
Is that not the case for most people?
Maybe most in some cultures. In the west, there is a strong tradition of supporting positions by reference to established facts and logical structures. However, this is far from universally the case.
In many cultures, support for deference to authority is a much stronger. Often, in these cultures, age is a measure of authority. Hence statements by elderly (possibly orange and/or demented) gits trumps arguments by well informed young specialists.
Deference to authority is particularly strong when literacy is low, or where facts are complex - people unable to grasp complexity often refute its existence to defend their stance.
For Example, Boko Haram are militantly opposed to the very concept of rational argument (as in use guns against anybody presenting a rational argument). They are not alone. (We are 118)
I used to have a phone with a decent screen form-factor, replaceable SD cards and battery.
Ohl, I still use it, because the new stuff has not got any of the essential features.
Phone manufactures are in a foot shooting competition, and they are all winning!
I am quietly confident the plod can't tell a joule from Jules Holland, and I doubt I can do much better. However, I have a good idea what 1.2kg hitting me at 18m/s would feel like, and I don't want it.
I have flown a small drone (under 250gms) , as have others of my family, and it is pretty hard to predict who will get hit next.
There were discussions on Usenet about speculative execution in the 1990's.
uploading it to a cloud
As in "set fire to it"?
- need - more - coffee -
Surely it's horses for courses.
I can say with complete confidence that horses are not much use in the North Sea.
I am somewhat less confident that Windows is suitable for "real work". Fake work, maybe.
Except that "out of order" cpus do not inherently have a predictable instruction execution time, even in a single thread environment, and Intel's threads are "virtual" ie not dedicated - which is where these bugs originate - which means if the CPU is hard at work on multiple threads, unless you have control over what all of them are doing, timings are being actively randomised,<p>
I am not saying "don't panic" I am saying "you only need to panic a small amount, and quite slowly" - there is time for a cup of tea first.<p>
OTOH, since Intel did this deliberately, you might want to go to another supplier next time.
Am I being naïve?
Yes. This is a privacy case. If there is a list of victims contact details and back accounts, and the penalty for leaking them is not up to a fraction of a chocolate bar for each offence, then obviously, those details will be sold within the hour.
I have just developed some software of my own. It cost me $37, and it was delivered on time and to spec. But I don't work for Ocado or the government.
I was using BSD in 1977 so was I, but it was not free in those days. You paid quite a lot for the licence (or some else did - in my case GEC).
Free distribution was normal before Bill Gates. Its a simple as that.
He wrote a famous letter saying "the programmer deserves to be paid" a few months after he ripped off the author of what he renamed to DOS.
and you pay people based on their WORK QUALITY
Then how do you explain Windows?
Open source is a totalitarian dream. It means you can't have competitive advantages
So there's only one Linux distribution, and the BSDs are not different operating systems?
More and more developers just reuse some bad library, or copy shitty code.
Would not dispute that shitty developers have shitty processes, and expose their shitty code to public view, for others to copy. But eventually, some of it gets fixed.
I think you will find that closed source is far worse - not only is shitty open source code copied without crediting the actual authors, it is not updated when the open source version is fixed.
Because writing their own code is too expensive and time consuming. affects closed source every bit as much as open source - probably more so - many open source contributors write the code because they want the code, and then open source it so others will help maintain it. (I speak for myself here). Closed source code is just not fixed. (Have you ever phoned in a bug report to MS and got a fix?)
So roughly the equivalent of "a slap on the wrist with a soft pillow".
(Sounds like the potential title of a reggae song by Si Cranstoun. - maybe I need more coffee).
the skeletons are coming home to roost.
featuring Wallace and Gromit?
For reliability you want your VMs spread across hosts and data centers.
For security, you might not!
If your organisation is big enough to have more than one building, you can have a server closet in each. Hell, if you are a CEO, you probably have several closets big enough to hold a rack full of servers, and desperately need a reason why your entire mansion should be tax deductable expense: put an Enterprise scale server in one and network it to your galactic HQ. It justifies the cost of food for the enormous, man eating dog you need for security. Saves on the heating bill too! With some creative accounting, it probably even covers a pink pony for your daughter as well.
(But remember 77dB is QUITE LOUD!)
You might as well just use... your own server.
That was the "Halt and Catch Fire" instruction.
Very useful in military applications where you did not want you software leaking from chips with on board ROM.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018