Re: Experts all giving advice how how to stay secure
The best one I see was Herb Lin on BBC news 24 telling people to update their PC's before switching them on? How the Fsck ... Chicken and egg or headless chicken
184 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Nov 2014
Indeed, I've been through the 'process' with a loved one who was granted full benefits upon appeal. That indeed seems to be the entire point of this costly and pointless process. Possibly(robably) some accept the outcome of their ATOS decision, and never appeal. The scummy politicians think this charade is perfectly acceptable.
Ideology!
Before ATOS existed the claimant GP's word, and opinion was accepted.
Not so now
I've used K for a windows box, primarily because of its' good independent test reports and the involvement of K in many international IT security efforts. Should I seek to switch? If so, can anyone recommend a good non-Russian cum non-American (obviously) alternative for work laptop?
PS I don't store any sensitive government, military, or politcial information.
For those unaware : https://youtu.be/gM7Q77m7CZM the interesting bit starts at 58'30'' where microsoft declare their intentions towards security
Funnily defender drops a bit in the latest test here : https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/windows-10/october-2016/microsoft-windows-defender-4.10-164047/
and serves as a starting point here:
https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/avc_sum_201612_en.pdf
LMAO
Chaffetz said the technology makes mistakes, with one in seven FBI facial recognition searches incorrectly returning a list of innocent people as matches, despite the presence of the actual matching image in the database.
One minor detail, a truly air gapped system won't get infected with the malware unless assisted by something with stuxnet like capabilities, and/or lax protocols allowing the pluging of USB's, or forgetting to disable all wireless comms at the driver level etc.. All the demos seem to presume the air gapped system is infected in the first place, apparently the trivial bit is infecting such systems. Perhaps I'm missing something really obvious.
They could kill the golden goose in one swift move which would not only make other companies potentially fly away
Do you honestly believe these vampiric, blood sucking vultures would flyaway from one of the lowest corporate tax hideouts in the largest market outside of the good ol' US of A, and the 'not so communist' China, to setup office in Budapest? Your conjecture is facile at best.
Or perhaps the Irish government, merely have to be seen to be opposed to the notion, while privately wondering what to spend the wind-fall monies on.
... and everything to do with politics, if you belive what the tech republic article posted on the 10th has to say about this.
"At the time the report was released, the FSFE questioned why Accenture was commissioned to co-author a report assessing the use of Microsoft software, when the consultancy runs a joint venture with Microsoft called Avanade, which helps businesses implement Microsoft technologies. For its part, Accenture said it has an "independent view of the technology landscape"."
Fortunatrely avenade have an office nearby, how lucky is that for munchen council?
The citizens of Munchen must be so proud of there elected councillors, I for one feel so sorry for the poor bastards.
Quite, MoD contracts have always represented stupendously good value for money. Plus BAE have had a good number of years to practice the dark art ;)
Oracle are not being insane, like any other company they have a fiduciary obligation to maximise profit by any realistic means possible. They own Java, and monetising Java is potentially a very lucrative way of cashing in on the success of Android. If they're not seen to be pursuing every opportunity properly their own employment is under threat from aggrieved and out of pocket shareholders.
That depends on your definition of realistic, and the win/loss risk assessment. They own java?, where does that leave open JDK, in the court? I read somewhere : "the jury found that Android does not infringe Oracle-owned copyrights because its re-implementation of 37 Java APIs is protected by fair use".
To me neither corporation is a beacon of hope, though you have to wonder what Oracle hope to achieve. Should IP be granted for abstract concepts like API interfaces? In my view that could lead us down a very murky avenue indeeed, wouldn't you agree.
Andrew Orlowski using his editorial power to pursue a grudge, file next to any el reg articles with wikipeadia in the title ;)
To be fair, there is some irony in this mozilla 'privacy edition', however it is fully disclosed, and open source to boot. This is hardly the stuff of sinister conspiracy plots ... meh?!
Call me simple if you will, but I like to call a spade a spade, and when I hear words like 'alt-right' what I really hear is 'nazi' or 'fascist'. Those are not a nice words, but the PR guys managed to make them
acceptable, or so it would appear. Similarly when I hear 'post-truth', I hear 'lying sheister' or 'lies like a politician'. That's just my take on it. As the old saying goes, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and only time will tell how sincere these people have been.
Everyone's entitled to an opinion ...
Google has enough money to buy the next president of USA the same way it "owned" this one.
Too true, they're also expanding their bases with new HQ in London, and something Andrew might be interested in. Being a bit of an old campaigner at heart, I found this pretty nice looking job.
The people who check the fact-checkers. Who are in turn checked by the people who check the people who check the fact checkers. Who in turn are checked by the people who check the people who check the people .....
Bit late now, but something is better than nothing, yes?
At the same time I am deeply troubled by the imbalance between the standards of prima facie evidence that has to be provided by either the UK or the US as the case may be. In that respect the UK government has, and continues to, let its citizens down.
That'll be the special relationship, you know the drill turn around and assume the position
From where I'm standing there's one culprit who deserves a good kicking more than a spotty teenager with a bad network probing habit, and that's the big corporation handling all this personal data in a rather haphazard, even cavalier manner. The irony is they've apparently managed to increase corporate profits despite all this, truth indeed, fools do seem to be easily parted from their money.
In the middle of reading weapons of math destruction, and this is exactly the kinda thing Cathy discusses. Nice to see real world proliferation. Great book so far, recommended
- a shameless plug