Microsoft and AWS are already going hard for cloud business in Canberra
I'm not sure the business of Government is sitting around playing Xbox all day or even conversing with Alexa, but then again I'm not Austrailian, so I could be mistaken?
224 posts • joined 3 Aug 2014
LOL, of course you do and my name real name is Bill Gates.
I use to run a software company, clueless customers made me the richest man in the world, one of the key features of our software was turning SVGA colour screens blue, not only did our customers love it, they came back for more in future releases.
It's truely amazing what people will put up with when they are the impression that they are getting something for FREE, look no further than Amazon AWS and all those clueless numpties that have been duped into Prime subscriptions ;-)
"@returnofthemus the customer doesn't need to manage those things, and so the customer doesn't need to pay for a managed service on those things".
Manage what things?
You're obviously confused, may I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the NIST Cloud Computing definition for a better understanding of the general deployment models and service models, failing that this short tutorial should help ;-)
"Other than the application code and the deployment code there really isn't anything there. No patching, no security monitoring, no networking, no operating systems, no hardware ".
Fuck me, you're either not of this planet or you've been smoking some seriously strong shit!
I would've thought it common knowledge that IBM's cloud expansion follows it's aquisitions of
b) Verzion's Cloud and Hosting Business
c) AT&T’s managed application and managed hosting services business
As previously stated IBM has clearly been focused on the Cloud Managed Services aspects of it's cloud (multi-year, multi-billon dollar, long-term contracts), whilst differentiating what it offers more generally.
The public cloud has moved beyond IaaS and being able to spin up a VM is no longer a novelty.
PS I too purchase books on Amazon, subscribe to Office 365 and upload, as well as watch video's on Youtube, but that really is just about it.
LOL, I think the you'll find the real intention here is to differentiate it's cloud, though it would be fair to say the emphasis to date has been on it's Cloud Managed Services.
IBM may appear slow moving, but it moves strategically and with purpose, some people just do not pay enough attention and usually end up making dull comments on matters that they can't comprehend.
Though it really shouldn't take a Phd to work out the Cloud is a journey NOT a destination, the likes of the likes of American Airlines, Etihad Airways, Lufthansa, the US Army, the US Air Force, the BBC, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Marriott Hotels etc., can't all be wrong?
Anyway let the architectural battle commence I think we all know how the story ends ;-)
'office has nothing to do with Azure'
LOL,behave yourself cherub, do you seriously think Office 365 and the rest of the legacy deal they've bundled in runs on vapourware?
It's not hate, it's a matter of fact!
There is no magic unicorn inside of Azure, it's made up of the same infrastructure components every body has access to.
I guess that equates to zero customer demand, hence no real need for it to be supported, it was always going to be a a long-shot, the growth of Azure is solely down to the office productivity suite, why on earth would you bring the garbage that caused you so much headache in the first place back in house, the recycle bin has been well and truely emptied of that crap.
Not quite, IBM actually decoupled the software from XIV and rebranded it Spectrum Accelerate, the software can now be bought standalone or acquired as part of their Spectrum software suite.
The Flash System A9000 storage appliance incorporates Spectrum Accelerate, which is denoted by the 'A'.
Apart from the name, the only thing that IBM are sun-setting is the use of HDDs in their storage appliances as the world moves to Flash ;-)
Since when did the NVMe protocol dictate the use of SSDs, as opposed to custom-built flash chips, which already inherit the characteristics to deliver improved performance and lower latency, not only a minor point, but also totally irrelevent.
That said, I'm genuinely pleased that NetApp have finally found something to crow about, however short-lived.
Certainly more refreshing than listening to the Orange people drooling over Blade Servers.
Depends what you are looking for from your Cloud Service Provider , I think it's fair to say Cloud has moved beyond IaaS, a repository for storing Word documents/Excel spreadsheets or even a playground for video game developers
However, the short answer to your question is, a muppet looking to avoid vendor lock-in ;-)
"I used to work for IBM eBHS, (e-Business Hosting) we hosted the servers that customers web sites ran on".
It's funny for a term that was used to refer to platforms for distributed computing as early as 1993 is still causing so much confusion in 2018.
I don't think anyone should be surprised by the fact that IBM's eBusiness initiative has evolved over the years, unless of course, you think that 'Cloud' doesn't constitute the hosting of web applications?
Yes, it was rather crasp and somewhat illogical, I'm not sure anyone in their right mind would go out and buy a 'shed', ....potentially costing more than a house...., to store sentimental household ornaments.
Having never worked on a mainframe and far from being a mainframe expert, I'm struggling with your 'shorthand, my understanding is that you get a choice of either LPAR, zVM or KVM, which can also co-exist side-by-side on the same platform.
When did Vendor lock-in become a dysphemism for consolidating high-volume OLTP and OLAP mission critical linux workloads on the most reliable, most secure and most performant commercially available platform in the world?
Astonishingly, it's the one platform the majority of technical folk don't quite get, what leading business folk do, which is probably the reason why it has been around for 50-years+.
>>My analogy is different > the mainframe is a shed.<<
Where I live, the local authority still provide us a weekly refuse collection, all my junk goes in the bin.
However, I see you too are confused!
In this instance you are not going to buy a mainframe to distribute your linux workloads, you're going to buy one to CONSOLIDATE them!
A simple rule of thumb; 'Consolidate where you can, Distribute where you must'.
PS I voted you up for the comical analogy.
Considering that Linux was introduced on Z back in 1999 that question appears a little late in the day, especially as the total number of MIPS that run Linux has been growing steadily at a 45% CAGR.
However, I imagine the question you're probably asking is why would it be considered today, for which I can give you a very simple analogy....
Is not the Range Rover the best commercially available off-road vehicle in the world?
Apart from the fact that HP capitualated when it came to operating a large-scale public cloud, do you seriously believe that the world's largest IT consulting firms are somewhat oblivious to this trend, including DXC
This is classic HP, no sense of direction and still pissing in the wind!
Just when you thought that everything in the Cloud was stored on Flash and now instead of focusing on Project Hololens Microsoft wants to disrupt the Tape storage market to try and save a bit of money for storing peoples garbage. Looks to me as if Microsoft is exposing itself and The Empire is Striking Back!
"HP has pioneered this process to a fine art".
IBM has placed it's big bet on Cloud & Cognitive, nobody's got a clue as to where HP is placing it's big bets?
HP's acquisition strategy was the straw that eventually broke the camels back which is why you've got two HPs instead of one ;-)
Ginni doesn't burn bridges... She builds them
And I Quote:- "note to The Register that it had just announced a plan with French president Emmanuel Macron to open a new AI research center in France that will create 400 new jobs".
Sacre (big) bleu.
This is never a good idea, especially for a tech company.
IBM maintain an annual R&D budget of circa $6bn and is probably the sole reason for it's 100-year plus existence.
The only figures that ever look good are growing revenues and healthy margins, notwithingstanding those of voluptuous women!
Must have been a slow news day
To think most of the week they've been hosting the inaugural Think 2018 conference and the only thing El Reg has to show for it is this, LOL!
My only real question is how this ended up in the Data Centre section???
Good luck on getting IBM to respond to this garbage and welcome to the Cognitive Era!
I think what the author is highlighting a modern use case for a 10-year old+ technology, at the moment storage veterans appear to be besides themselves salivating over anything NVMe like it's the best thing since sliced bread, whilst IBM have been taking it in it's stride
Notwithstanding it's many video surveillance cases, it's also part of the engine powering the world's fastest supercomputer.
"So you get the situation where, for example, Spectrum Virtualize is also called Storwize.
It's not! Spectrum Virtualize is the code decoupled from SVC, which can be run independently of the appliance, much the same way Spectrum Accelerate is the decoupled code from XiV.
Naturally, IBM have incorporated this code in some of their storage devices, AFAIK they still sell the SVC appliance, have incorporated the code on both Storwize and FlashSystems, now with the option to buy it as software only.
As I previously stated 'Spectrum' is largely a collection of software assets, harmonising and consolidating it's storage software assets under a single unfied brand, as well as consolidating features and functions is nothing more than common sense
In my experience those who are easily confused by 'freedom of choice' don't understand their own use cases and probably lack the ability to think outside the box, I thought the industry/market was suppose to be shifting away from dictatorships?
You must be the only person on the planet that it doesn't work for, I don't think they could've made it any more simple, especially in an industry full of three and four letter acronyms, the naming convention of it's storage software assets (Spectrum) is pretty much self-explanatory and something most objective commentator's would applaud IBM for.
Your assertion is also a bit wild, though would point out that their prior OEM agreement in this space was with NetApp (N-Series/SONAS), in the end it boils down to maintenance and support.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019