The list of committee members includes 2 politicians, 2 historians, a writer, someone in the mining field, someone without any degree, a doctor of medicine, and a mathematician, all on the side of manmade catastrophic global warming. On the other side are two scientists, one with a physics degree and the other with chemistry degree who are the dissenters.
From a common sense perspective, it would appear the politicians, the non- degreed person, the mining guy, the historians and the writer have the least qualifications to be on this committee. The medical doctor and the mathematicians are iffy, and the chemist and physicist have the most serious credibility, and it is telling that this faction makes up the dissenters of the supposed crisis.
Those of the category claiming that the science is settled are those who are out of touch with the true nature of what science is, and don't qualify as experts to determine anything. Science is never settled and is an ongoing process of learning and experimentation.
It is the politicians on this committee who appear to be the least qualified as their opinions have to reflect those of their superiors whose reasoning has been predetermined for a political cause. The deck is stacked against real science as a government entity is pushing for the conclusion most desired for their own purposes.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
