Re: The data was hidden from anyone opening the files
It means the data was in an Excel file and was completely visible to anyone who spotted that the column numbers weren't sequential and then clicked on the 'Unhide' option.
1872 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Jul 2014
I'm a hybrid worker and I was in the office yesterday for one of my regular in-office days. The experience was the same as every other in-office day...constant intrusive background noise from 8.30 to 5 caused by colleagues all around conducting GMeet calls with customers and colleagues who are having a working-from-home day.
Today I'm working at home in peace and quiet with better productivity, and the bonus of better coffee and no time lost to commuting.
the employer is incompetent too.
Most likely the employer is competent but was negligent for failing to ensure that the employee they hired was competent enough to do the job they were hired for.
I guess the grey area is if the employee falsely represented themselves as being competent, but even then it would be up to the employer to adequately ensure that such claims were valid - and if they failed to do that, then blame lies with the employer.
(I'm speaking from experience as I remember a bit of a fiasco a few years ago trying to get rid of a s**t-for-brains coileague, and learning from our manager that the fact the antagonist had s**t for brains was not, in and of itself, automatic grounds for dismissal. Ah....the joys of working for a large organisation, and the politics which that entails)
one still wonders why nobody gets sacked for gross incompetence
Sacking for incompetence is a tricky one, as technically the employee is not at fault. Incompetence means that the employee is not skilled enough to do their job (as opposed to negligence, where they should be able to do theitr job, but failed to do so).
Recruitment of someone who is capable of doing the job, i.e. is competent, is the responsibility of the employer.
That means that dismissal for incompetence carries the implication that the employer is the villain of the piece (for making an incorrect hiring decision) rather than the employee being at fault.
There's rebranding and there's rebranding. What those cola companies did was play around with styling - the Twitter/X is a complete change of name and a logo of a completely different style to the one it replaces.
For an example of similar scale rebranding in the soft drink sector, take the recent example of Lilt Fanta Lemon & Lime, which was almost universally derided.
No, it is not only the magic fruity logo, other "sneaker" brands (or whatever these shoes are called) have a similar weird collectibles market.
You speak the truth. In my home town there's a shop that sells what I insist on calling trainers (for that is what they are) at vast prices. On some mornings there's a queue around the block waiting for them to open because some particular new shoe is about to come on sale.
On one such morning I was sitting in the coffee shop across the road and watched as one of the people who had been queueing came out with his purchase and handed it to someone outside, and got a very large wodge of cash in return. Madness.
Rather than building new data centres, could existing commercial property, i.e. all those offices which are supposedly empty/under-occupied because of home/hybrid working, be re-purposed? I appreciate that there would be effort required to get the infrastructure up to snuff, but surely it'd be less work than actually breaking ground and building from scratch.
These guys reverse engineered that, they effectively released secret key material for every emergency service in Europe, in one fell swoop.
I'm not sure if it's *every* emergency service. It's a few years since I worked in this field, bit when I did there were a number of European countries using Tetrapol which, despite the similarity in name, is a different technology.
That comment got me wondering...
When email first came on the scene, the whole 'inbox' thing was a metaphor for the In/Pending/Out trays that people had on their desks. Just letting stuff physically pile up in the In tray just wasn't a thing (except for the occasional really disorganised bod)
Now time has passed, and the physical In tray isn't around anymore, have people just generally lost that mentality of keeping the inbox tidy?
Many highly intelligent people are pretty awkward outside their specific field of expertise, like about living life in general.
Indeed. I think that extra brainspace is used for academic things at the expense of brainspace for real world stuff....like the case of a family acquaintance who was a top maths professor at the university. He flew over to the USA in 1969 to support NASA on the Apollo 11 mission. The trip was organised for him, all he had to do was catch the relevant planes and whatnot. All went well and he turned up at Mission Control as expected....still wearing his carpet slippers.
I think that's how ESN is intended to work in the UK - the physical network is provided by EE, using infrastructure already in place for consumers, but with suitable upgrades/extensions to meet the requirements of emergency services use. In particular, as other commentards have said, the ability for emergency services to continue to have comms at the expense of public access at times of high demand
For me - and, I expect, fellow Brits of a similar age - the name Threads immediately conjures up memories of that nightmarish made-for-TV move about a nuclear war.
(for any left-pondians who may not be familiar with this reference...around the same time your country released a move called The Day After - basically Threads made that look like Noddy Goes To Toyland)
So, the basic question really is just how well recorded does the target's voice need to be ?
I suspect the answer is 'not very'.
I've always been a bit dubious of the security of voice recognition. I've successfully passed voice recognition for my bank with a variety of cold symptoms, irritation, shouting over background noise, etc. without any problems. If it can authenticate me based on such variance in inputs, then I've long suspected that it could authenticate a nefarious source of my voice.
The other Tier 3 term is "segregate." It's recommended for replacement on grounds that it "is almost exclusively associated with the segregation of Black people from White people, an extremely racist context."
In an of itself the word isn't racist - it simply means to keep different things apart. The word will never get destigmatised if any time someone tries to use it in any other context they get told not to do so.
I remember reading about a science experiment where anthropologists visited a variety of of places/cultures and asked them about associations between things and colours. Almost universally black was associated with bad and white with good - even in cultures that had never been exposed to things like movies where the good cowboy sports a white stetson.
Ultimately, we are evolved from primitive folk who for millennia have associated the night/darkness with threats and danger, and day/light with relative safety. Similarly black clouds = rain, thunder, bad things....white clouds = pleasant weather, nice things.
Other colours tend to have associations too, such as red being commonly regarded as a 'danger' colour, possibly because of links with bleeding, fire/burning, etc., green with safety (pleasant green fields, nature, etc.) which have become engrained in DNA.
there is only one situation when you would want to open the hatch, and that is when you are on the surface.
There are two specialisations of that use case though. One is the normal situation where the support crew is there to welcome you back from a successful trip. The other is where something has gone wrong and the submersible has bobbed to the surface undetected and miles from anywhere.
Well, yes - you might need to do some work to figure out what your usage is, and therefore what tariff you can take advantage of.
I did, and that's why I'm on the tarrif that I am with the supplier that I currently use.
Even with a 40p peak rate I was paying an average of 27p (including SC) even before the PV and battery.
This conversation is about smart meters. Are you saying you fouind a supplier who was charging you 40p per unit with a normal meter but discounted to 27p per unit when you had a smart meter fitted? If so, then please do tell who that is because I'll be signing up.
I don't see the cost saving angle.
As a consumer, the rate offered for smart meter is same as for my existing meter, so no benefit
From a supplier angle, I already have to take my own meter readings and send them in to the supplier via their app, so it's not saving them any admin costs. If anything it's costing them more for supplying the smart meter in the first place
In my experience working on civil service contracts (employed by a contracted 3rd party company - *not* one of the usual suspects like Capita/Fujitsu/whoever) the problem is not so much a lack of engineers, it's a lack of civil service employees.
For example, I worked on a big job for a government department for a number of years, which had a comfortable 7-figure budget. In all that time I hardly worked with/for anyone who was actually employed by that government department - they were all consultants brought in as contractors. They were acting as my customer, but weren't actually part of the organisation.
As with so many government projects, it all went a bit iffy, but as those folk aren't part of the organisation I didn't see a a huge motiviation for them to fix the problems. They knew that in the fulness of time they'd move on and be pimped out by <consulting house> to some other project. When these things rely so heavily on people with so little actual investment in the organisation, then it's not surprising that things fail.
Back in 80's I was working in an office block in the city centre. A fairly senior member of staff moved office from something like 5th floor north-east corner to 2nd floor south-west corner. For some reason the building management couldn't reconfigure the internal phone system/switchboard to shift his telephone extension to the new office, and it was going to take ages / cost a fortune to get an engineer to come and look at it.
The building manager dispatched me to the nearby British Telecom shop (something of a novelty, as this had just opened as part of the post-privatisation activities) with a wad of cash to buy a load of the longest telephone extension cables I could find.
I returned with the goods and an insanely long extension was plugged together, using copious amounts of sparky's tape around each connection, and strung around the outside of the building.
Must have been close to the limit of maximum practical length, but it did the trick.
We have a NAME for this: Paperclip scenario.
It's funny you should say that, because the first thing that came to my mind is that this is like an Anti-Clippy situation...
"It looks like you've tasked me with taking out some enemy combatants - I don't need your help with that"
Possibly the most shocking quote in the article is the one at the end where Amazon say "We did nothing wrong.".
Yes.
I was at least expecting the usual "our customer's privacy is our top priority" statement. We all know that nobody ever means that when they say it, but I thought they'd at least go through the formality.
Approx 25% less passengers means at least 25% more costly tickets.
No, it'd be worse than that.
For the sake of keeping the maths easy, let's say 100 seats at £100 each, meaning a full plane is worth £10,000 to the airline, Remove 25% capacity and you need to raise that £10,000 from just 75 seats, which would mean £133.33 per ticket - that's 33.3% more cost per ticket
Trim-sensitive aircraft are more sensitive than I realised. One time I was on a short-haul internal flight which was far from full and I was asked to move seats by a few rows. Not a problem (and the cabin crew kindly gave me a complimentary bottle of wine for my trouble) but I was surprised that they picked on me because I'm only about 9.5 stone / low 60-odd kg
I too live in a rather idyllic little corner of the world. I love it.
I work from home where I can because I don't want to travel away from here,
However, I'm not completely blinkered, and am interested in experiencing other environments and cultures. How do I get to experience that? I travel
I love music, but there's zero chance of any of my favourite big-name bands coming to a village with a population of <300 where the only venue is a tiny church hall. Guess what I do when I want to see a live show? I travel.
Over time, a number of family and friends have had to migrate to other locales, e.g. because it suits them better for work, study, or because they find some other place more idyllic. I'm not going to sever all ties with them because they've moved away, so and we value our relationships enough not to exist by Zoom alone. How do we maintain human contact? We travel.
I could go on, but I won't
To be honest, it makes me a little sad to think that you have such a blinkered view of life and by staying in your bubble you'll rob yourself of so many opportunities to experience so much.
Exactly.
Adding technology/tricks/toys to cars is a curse. My current car is without doubt the worst car that I have ever driven. Mechanically it's great, but every time I use it, at least two stupid little glitches will occur in the electronic gubbins (whatever the car equivalent of avionics is) which leaves me more angry at the end of the journey than when I started. Always just little annoyances, and very often related to features that I never wanted but which the manufacturer included in the software, seemingly for the sake of it.
Not sure what the legal position would be if you contrived not to hand over the correct passwords
IANAL but I think that the employer could argue that as you'd created the passwords while on the clock and employed by that company, then ownership of the passwords rests with the company and not you, so it'd be hard for you to get away with withholding the info
I worked with that too - quite a lot of years ago now. At the time I remember it being a bit of a pain to integrate with compared to GPRS (which some of my other customers were using) but real-world performance offered similar speeds to GPRS. I've since moved on from working with those customers, but I expect that the improved performance of 3G/4G/5G from a simple GSM modem means that they'll have moved away from Mobitex by now.
I'm not an expert in radio comms, but why do they want a solution based upon mobile phone tech?
Better speed and bandwdth than what's available with existing radio tech. There are other radio technologies that offer something better, but I expect they'd require investment in a nationwide network of masts. A solution based on existing phone network means existing infrastructure can be utilised with upgrading/extending where necessary.
How long do mobile networks keep going in a power outage?
Based on experience of the local phone mast and not-unusal powercuts...not long enough. I usually lose mobile signal after less than half an hour. That's a Vodafone-owned mast though - I'd like to think that EE base stations which would form the ESN would be upgraded to give them more resilience, although that might be a bold assumption on my part :-/
It's not hard to enviage some sort of emergency which takes out power and/or masts.
True, but those scenarios wouldn't be specific to phone masts - a TETRA mast could equally well cop an unfortunate lightning strike
Given how backwards and insular North Korea is & is perceived, it’s amazing they can develop this kind of technology in country.
The BBC podcast 'The Lazarus Heist' sheds light on this. In particular a recent episode from the second series explaining how things are procured from overseas in dubious ways, using money obtained by state-sponsored hacking.