Re: it would be like a car hitting a shopping cart
"it would be like a car hitting a shopping cart" doesn't give me enough data to assess how serious the situation is....is the shopping cart full of beer or full of vegetables?
1873 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Jul 2014
Because I "work with computers" I often get approached for advice on some misbehaving machine or another. The conversation normally goes.....
Not a customer although they are behaving like one: <charlie brown teacher voice noises>
Me: "OK, sounds interesting describe the problem to me in a bit more detail"
Me (inside voice): "take as long as you like, I'm mentally compiling my shopping list for trip to Sainsbury's later"
NACATABLO: <charlie brown teacher voice noises>
Me (loud enough for bystanders to overhear): "Hmmm...rings a bell...think I saw a problem like that before...hmmmm....oh yes, that was it...it was PC that belonged to a client, got misused a bit - you know surfing dodgy pron websites, adult chatrooms/webcam sites, that sort of thing...turns out they'd picked up a virus from somewhere...."
Reminds me of an old Compaq desktop I had at work. Sound out of the onboard speaker was OK but the signal path for the headphone output must have been too close to the CPU - there was a faint high-pitched buzzing when listening to music on headphones, and it used to fluctuate depending on how hard the machine was working. That was the PC that persuaded me to buy an MP3 player.
My pet peeve in the noise-making stakes is things like phone chargers, laptop power supplies, etc.. In the past couple of years I'm finding more that emit an annoying whine. Just the right pitch to be annoying, just loud enough to be noticeable, yet just quiet enough that they're right b*****s to locate.
There's also a big difference between rockstar and rockstar.
One rockstar is the one who is always front-and-centre on stage all night, playing their guitar with great skill, soaking up the glory. Then they go back to their hotel after the gig, drink like a demon and trash the hotel room. Hey, they're a rock star - that's what they do.
Then there's the rockstar who is the focus of the band and holds everything together.. They take their guitar solos in the spotlight, but also know when to step back and just provide a solid groove while their bandmates do their thing. After the gig they also go back to the hotel bar, but they sit in the bar and tell stories about earlier days on the road with <whoever> and buy the odd round of drinks for the rest of the gang.
Translate from a music context to a software dev context - there's still one type I wouldn't touch with a bargepole because they're a potential liability, and another I'd welcome onboard as they would be an asset both in terms of production and team spirit.
The aim was to provide a “single version of the truth” for financial and business performance, allowing more rapid decision-making than supported by the earlier patchwork of system
Exactly how rapid do you need to be for decision-making at that scale? If something goes across vast swathes of the business then I would expect it to be far more measured than "quick - get me a number out of the computer and I'll say 'do this' or 'do that'"
There was a section on one of the recent BBC Click programmes about the stat use in football (Liverpool possibly, I can't actually remember) and how important it was and they were tracking all the players' positions
I suspect that they track the players in rugby too. A while ago I noticed that the players' jerseys seem to have some sort of doo-dah on the back, just above the number, which I assume to be for tracking (probably not GPS - I suspect some RF-based system. Just thinking out loud - if anyone here knows what it actually is I'd be happy to be educated.)
But once they've retrained everyone, no more problems and no more surprises.
It's not just a case of retraining through is it?
There's also the matter of physically updating each client PC from Windows to Linux (either by OS update in situ, or purchasing new box, configuring Linux and swapping with Windows box). A far from trivial task in an organisation the size of the one in the article. And it wouldn't happen overnight, so raises issues around having part of the workforce on one platform and the rest on the other.
And all of this is predicated on the business software packages in use being available for Linux, or usable under WINE).
It's a sad fact of life that once an organisation of any reasonable size has embraced the Windows ecosystem, the logistics associated with a move to another platform are significant enough to preclude that move being made.
More's the pity
Someone must be profiting!!
That 'someone' will be 123-Reg, who decided that I wanted to automatically buy the .uk version of all the .co.uk and .org.uk domains I have registered with them. Fortunately I pulled it before the transaction went through, but I suspect many were caught out and ended up buying domains they neither wanted nor asked for.
Reminds me of a weekend away a few years ago with The War Department, when she'd organised a little family-run B&B in a little Scottish village. We were checking in and the proprietor said "Now, you've booked a double room - I can offer you that or I've got a twin room available as well"
"We'll take the double room that we'd requested" I said
Mein host pondered for a moment and asked "Have the two of you been together long?"
I thought he was being a bit judgemental so answered a bit indignantly "six or seven years as it happens"
"Oh, that's OK then...it's just that the double room doesn't have a toilet door"
A few years ago our dog was asleep on the sofa, as is his wont. He'd been dreaming and had twitched around a bit in his sleep and moved right up to the edge of the cushion. At one point he let out a truly thunderous fart, so violent that it woke him from his slumbers. As he jolted up, he fell straight off the edge of the sofa in a dead fall onto the floor - it looked for all the world like he'd farted so hard that he'd blown himself off the sofa.
I'm easily amused by such things, but it remains one of the funniest things I've seen in my life
Browser-based apps can only be astonishing if the client has connectivity to the web server. Don't overlook how many people work in places where connectivity is patchy or non-existent. I've managed to be quite productive on a long train journey by working with local files using local applications...something that just wouldn't have been possible is relying on mobile comms (despite what LNER / Virgin / whoever might imply in their advertisements, their onboard wifi is generally pretty s**t, and I don't trust any of the mobile phone providers to give me a data service I can rely on when I'm on the move).
I use similar logic for my wheezy old Netbook which runs XP and sits in the living room. plugged into my stereo system. All it does is act as a means of getting music from Spotify/wherever to listen through a good amp & speakers. It accesses the Internet, but it's through a NAT-ing router and still functional.
I get quite annoyed by folk who go an as if the machine will disappear in a puff of smoke the minute that an OS goes out of support.
To be honest, the days of direct connection from a modem are quite a way behind us. How many people have machines that are genuinely "on the Internet"? They might be able to access the Internet through a router, but so long as you set things up sensibly they're not going to be visible on public Internet for all and sundry to see.
I can *sort of * see a use case whereby you buy 2 of these - one for the office and one for when you're working at home. Transporting your machine between locations becomes no more cumbersome than popping a fag-packet-sized machine in your pocket......but for that sort of working scenario you're not likely to be using a Pi as you main machine - you're much more likely to use a laptop, which brings us back to your argument....
Going off-topic a bit but your comment about people giving TV interviews by Skype reminded me of something.... why do people doing interviews like that so often wear headphones?
I've never had any problems using Skype (or other videoconferencing tools for that matter) with the sound coming out of my PC speakers. The software's clever enough to manage to audio so that it doesn't descend into some howl of feedback reminiscent of Hendrix at Monterrey.
Why not just use speakers and ditch the earbuds, instead of appearing live to millions of people with bits of wire hanging out of your bonce?
To be honest, my phone has been nagging me for months that the new version of Android is available and it wants to update. I just keep dismissing the notification. Phone runs fine as it is - I don't want to risk updating the OS and some application(s) deciding to break, or the whole phone slowing down because the latest OS expects more up-to-date hardware and generally makes my older phone run more slowly.
Yes, I'm probably taking a risk by not getting the security patches, but on balance I trust myself to use web/email responsibly to reduce the risk, and just keep using my phone as I always have.
YMMV
It gets used as a SatNav whenever I travel long distances and it will be plugged in to power the whole time.
It's been used as a media player during holidays away in the countryside, again plugged in the whole time.
You're keeping it plugged in - that'll be why the battery is still quite healthy. What really hinders battery performance is allowing it to drain and then charging back up to 100%. Memory effect isn't an issue with modern batteries thankfully, but they can still only stand being drained & recharged so many times.
I travel quite a lot so most days my phone is running on battery all day and then gets recharged over night. With my usage pattern, a new phone might still be at 30% charge at the end of the day...once it get's to 2-years-old it could be struggling to be 10% by bedtime.
Indeed. I think the lifespan of a phone tends to be dictated largely by battery health (particularly in these days of sealed-in batteries), and this is influenced mostly by the number of drain/charge cycles.
For a typical modern smartphone that means that the battery will be pretty much fagged-out after a couple of years. A phone like this Nokia will be getting recharged less frequently, so time taken to reach a battery-defeating number of recharges ought to be far longer than two years.
However, many companies leave the initial CV vetting to the (let's not hold back here) total *uckwits in HR.
I'm lucky in that HR don't get involved in our selection process. The CVs I see come from a specialist recruitment agency who I trust to do a suitable initial filter.
Interestingly in the context of the article under discussion, is that part of their service is to reformat all of the CVs into a common format/structure, including removal of date of birth. My company explicitly forbids interviewers from asking interviewees how old they are.
Provided that the candidate is basically ticking the right boxes in terms of technical competence then the single factor that influences my thinking over a hire/bin decision - by a country mile - is their previous pattern of employment.
I have seen too many cases of people who have held a number of previous posts for a year or two each but who are fundamentally rubbish at what they claim to do. In a suitably large organisation one-to-two years is just about long enough to get away with not being found out to be an oxygen thief...stay any longer than that and you get found out.
So option 1 - candidate in their late 20's with a few jobs at major employers under their belt, versus option 2 a 40-or-50-something guy who's been steadily employed by one or two organisations over the last decade or two
Option 1 looks to have more years in them than option 2, but I'd seriously question whether they might be out of the door a lot sooner than that. Option 2 might not have any many years left in them, but they've shown they can hold down a job.
Then it comes down to the final test of do I like them / do they seem like they'd be good company in the cafeteria / happy to get their round in on a team night out down the pub?
But there's nothing to stop you buying the kit at retail price from existing channels and selling it on at a markup.
On the face of it that sounds correct, but I suspect there would be some legal rope to hang you with relating to warranty - either you're supplying goods for which you can't offer manufacturer's warranty / the manufacturer not approving you passing the warranty on to the end user. IANAL but I have a feeling in my water that there's something relating to warranty provision that would prevent you from being able to pull a stunt like that.
Who thought Soylent was an attractive name for a health food?
To be honest, it's not an attractive drink in either taste or appearance, so an unattractive name seems appropriate,
I was given a bottle at an event and tried it out of curiousity...I don't think I would have sampled it otherwise, and I certainly won't be doing it again
From what I remember, Mensa membership criterion is being in the top 2%, and was around the 140 mark when I was a member a decade or three ago. I don't think the UK or worldwide IQ range has slipped so low that 132 represents top 2% now.
I think you do a trial test at home and if you score 132 or higher then you can apply for the formal test for joining - and that has the threshold of around 140.
"Geek" has an interesting origin I believe, and is a contraction of "grotesque" and "freak". Based on that, it could be seen as very offensive, yet I don't think I've ever met anyone who is offended by it...indeed, some geeks revel in being called such.
"Boffin" is a term used quite often here on El Reg.
There was an absolutely wazzo article a couple of weeks ago about Spadeadam, and in the comments section someone recommended the book "Backroom Boys: The Secret Return of the British Boffin". I bought the book based on this recommendation and I can honestly say that based on what's in there, if anyone called me a "boffin" I'd take it as a total compliment.
I was a member of Mensa for a while, but to be honest I only did it so I could put it on my CV. I'm intelligent enough - I got called swot quite a lot at school, and at high school my nickname (from one of the teachers no less) was "The Prof" - but got bored of education and left after only a few weeks of sixth-form. With little more to my name than a handful of O-levels, something interesting and academic, like Mensa membership, was useful for CV padding.
Of the names mentioned in the article, the only one which would potentially cause me offence is "egghead" - but only because I don't like being reminded that my hair is definitely less plentiful that it was in years gone by.
For a while, the soubriquet of choice for the intellectually gifted at my school was "Tefal Head", after a TV ad that was running at the time....that's me starting to show my age.
What part of "no-connection available" do you not understand?
I understand "no-connection available" perfectly well. What I don't understand is why an application which stores data which is considered to be "serious stuff" does not maintain some secondary copy of that data, e.g. copying to a server when a connection does become available, rather than an all-eggs-in-single-offline-basket model.
"I heard from a company that uses local storage for offline no-connection available that had local record[s] of animals getting vaccination. The update 'erased' all the data. They don't know which animals got [a] vaccine and can't repeat on all of them. Serious stuff,"
Not to defend Google here, but in this particular case some blame must lie at the application developer's door. This sort of data is indeed "serious stuff", so to trust its storage only to a client device, and not to maintain a copy on a server somewhere seems sloppy.
IR35: If you're affected, raise your prices or go full-employed. It's really not that hard.
Makes total sense.
Various companies I work for routinely review their prices and pass increases in therr costs on to me. Acme are supplying me with pre-fangled widgets at £10 a pop, having sourced un-fangled widgets from their supplier at £5 a pop. Their supplier ups their wholesale price to £7 due to price fluctuations in the international widget market, then I understand why I might well end up paying £12 instead of £10.
If a contractor's costs, in the form of taxation, go up then it makes sense to just add that to their rate to the customer.
That becomes the going rate for contract labour. It's then up to the employer to decide if they'd rather pay that bit extra and retain the flexibility of contracted labour, or commit to employing staff.