Re: OS Adverts
I suppose it cuts out those long distance calls from India.
33045 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"Switching over from office to anything else requires people to relearn the tools they use to do their chores, and nobody wants to do that."
Each new version or even update of Windows? Switching UI to ribbon?
You're quite right, of course. That's why I'm sitting in front of a Linux UI which looks more like W2K than anything Microsoft serves up these days. (Actually when I fire up a VM with W2K it looks a bit pixelated in comparison. Was it really so rough sitting directly on the H/W?)
"Besides, Linux is simply not user friendly for most people once you get beyond clicking on icons and have to go into the terminal"
It's always easy to spot those who haven't used Linux in the last 20 years or so.
Sometimes the terminal option is quicker than clicking through a list of stuff and for a lot of work vi is a better option than any GUI editor on Linux, Windows or anything else which is why I used it in a terminal emulation window on Windows just as I do on Linux. But the occasions when it's really necessary to drop into a command line? - about the same has having to edit the Windows register.
"The big problem is that every time a woman lies it hurts not only the man/men directly involved but it hurts women in general."
This, above all.
It means the genuine cases are apt to be severely cross-examined in court. It's far from misogynistic to believe it wrong that so few cases get to court. Not only do investigators want to avoid miscarriages of justice, they want to avoid making things worse for the genuine cases when they do get to court. Setting quotas for prosecutions, let alone convictions helps nobody.
"A good number of these women are suffering from some personality disorder and think they are the centre of the universe and nothing else matters."
Maybe mores have changed since I was professionally involved* - '70s & early '80s - but experience of reading a lot of statements suggested that personality disorder very rarely came into it. Complainants mostly fell into two groups:
1. Those who woke up realising it might not have been the good idea it had seemed at the time and were probably worried about being pregnant. The police surgeon provided them with a morning-after pill.
2. Those who wanted an excuse for daddy who had been waiting up for them. I'm pleased to say that my own daughter never gave me any problems in this regard and I'd have tried to avoid putting her in that position if I thought there was a possibility. I did have one variant of this go to court; the DPP for some reason insisted but eyewitness evidence totally demolished the claim, embarrassed the complainant and left her family looking rather angry with her.
I have to add that my personal view was that if under-age drinking had been heavily stamped on there would have been a much lighter caseload. Certainly one or both parties in many cases were under pub-age but had drink taken.
There were, of course, a number of cases which were taken very seriously by everyone and, if at all possible, brought to court.
* Alleged sexual offences are a large part of the forensic biologist's workload.
The way the police force is telling it it just seems to have happened spontaneously.; nobody made a decision.
Well, it may be true that nobody made and informed decision but that was lack of due diligence.
It's no good just reprimanding the force although this is the appropriate procedure for a public body. The expectation should be that having been reprimanded the public body will take career-affecting disciplinary action against whoever landed them in that situation however far up the command chain that goes. And far up the command chain is very probably appropriate because that's where the organisational culture will have been set. Sacegoating wouldn't be appropriate Without consequences there's no assurance that things will be done right, just an assumption.
The likelihood, of course, is that it'll be reported that whoever was to have been disciplined has retired.
"Not all open source projects have retained that right."
That's the essence of open source. If it gets things wrong it's possible for a sufficiently knowledgeable and committed members of the community to fix it. In practice that can be the majority of the developers, e.g. Openoffice->LibreOffice.
"I wouldn't even go that far. It's just an excuse not to spend money they don't want to / can't spend."
The whole stupid idea started out as a money-saving exercise. More lanes were needed but adding them by buying up more land was expensive. Just relabel what's already there, it'll be cheaper...
Of course, unless you really do feasibility studies before making the decisions it never seems to work out as expected. Isn't that odd?
"If there are capacity problems then motorists just need to adapt"
Best to tackle the problem at cause. Heavy traffic is a consequence of years of planning that concentrated employment in city centres to the extent that each centre requires more than 1000 sq miles surrounding it to accommodate the people who work there. Until that's dealt with complaining about traffic is simply victim blaming.
I remember the press reports from those early days. The IBM-compatible market was enabled by clean-room implementations based solely on the published APIs. The BIOS vendors were very careful about avoiding any possible basis for suggesting their code could have been copied from the originals. After all they were confronting a a massive law firm with a computer company bolted on the side of it.
As long as spam is cheap and the expense of dealing with it falls on the recipient this sort of thing will continue.
The solution here is to require the spammer to pay a reasonable amount, say several £ to the recipient for their trouble in dealing with it. I've used the threat of that to stop a snail-mailer who simply couldn't grasp that having their mail to a former tenant returned as "No longer at this address" meant that they were misaddressing it.
We should regard spam - snail mail, email or phone - as pollution and apply the "Polluter pays" principle where payment is the economic cost of dealing with it, not a small fine.
Governments tend to be inward-looking. As a consequence they seldom think of how the real world will react to their decisions. The real world will very often work round the decisions so the achievement is usually at best minimal and at worst adverse.
“Many of these AWS customers tell us that they’re not cost-cutting as much as cost-optimizing so they can take their resources and apply them to emerging and inventive new customer experiences they’re planning,”
But will AWS's customers' customers appreciate the inventive new experiences?
As an Amazon (not AWS) customer I'd very much like to see some optimisation of their search engine so that it delivers hits that match the search terms and nothing else.
I fear, however, that what I actually get is what was once a new, inventive customer experience that Amazon's marketing thought would be ideal - it's not a bug, it's a feature. Never underestimate the ability of marketing to screw things up for customer.
"to find no obvious clue where the test was"
I've often thought there should be a recognised test procedure requiring three people.
One is the developer or a reasonably senior member of the team is there's more than one. The next is a user. The user should have no knowledge of the application that's been developed but a good knowledge of the application domain and of what the application should do.
Ostensibly it's to allow the developer to learn how users use the application, in reality it's to learn just how unusable it is.
The user is allowed to ask developer no questions other than "How does it tell me how to do X?" and the developer is allowed to answer no other questions.
Ostensibly the third person is an invigilator to enforce these rules but is, in reality, there to stop the other two coming to blows.
Ah yes, the bad old days of "IE or nothing"
The bad old days are still with us, just a bit updated from IE to whatever short, possibly very short, list the devs bothered about. And then there are those who take umbrage and won't display anything at all unless JavaScript is enabled for their site. Or won't display a close button on their cookie pop-up (looking at you, National Archives).
I don't know what snipping tool does but in Linux, if you're running KDE, the default is that it opens a program (Spectacle) that has a copy of whatever you configured - the screen, a current window with all sorts of options such as retaking the shot when you click the mouse (useful if you want to snapshot a video frame, then you can save directly as a file or copy to clipboard. If snipping tool is as useful as that then there should be no complaint.
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that "supply" and "commercial activity" are extensively defined somewhere
P16 paragraph 10 in full, my emphasis:
"In order not to hamper innovation or research, free and open-source software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial activity should not be covered by this Regulation. This is in particular the case for software, including its source code and modified versions, that is openly shared and freely accessible, usable, modifiable and redistributable. In the context of software, a commercial activity might be characterized not only by charging a price for a product, but also by charging a price for technical support services, by providing a software platform through which the manufacturer monetises other services, or by the use of personal data for reasons other than exclusively for improving the security, compatibility or interoperability of the software."
"or else there would be a second tier of commercial repositories who would vet new additions before adding them"
In fact, this sounds to be the sort of thing I had in mind: https://it.slashdot.org/story/23/04/12/1623201/googles-free-assured-open-source-software-service-hits-general-availability