Re: Wrong game
"is bound to sell more as demand picks up"
If the demand needs to pick up it might be an indication the market is saturated.
33005 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"the inclusion of non-free firmware on the installation medium as standard,"
I took a quick look at the Devuan equivalent. It claimed the Atheros driver was missing - and then went on to connect to the WiFi anyway. As it happens the previous release does that as well. Actually, I think it's just a data file, possibly listing the channel requirements for various jurisdictions and it's now been realised the error can be displayed and ignored.
What puzzled me is that it refuses to use logical volumes. Unless my memory is playing false - at my age it might - I remember many times working through the Debian installer and assigning logical volumes to /usr, /usr/local, /opt and /var as well as /home with no problem whatsoever. A quick check shows that the previous (i.e. current) version also does that. I think that on the test laptop I was using the version I was trying to install had been an in-place update from the still earlier version. I decided I hadn't time to explore further and it's something I'll have to come back to. It's possible to work round it but it'd be a bit of a faff.
For an extreme example, imagine a government paying millions for custom software (work for hire so the government ought to be the copyright holder)
"Work for hire" usually means employment in which case the copyright would automatically belong to the government if that was the employer.
More likely this will be a contract to create a product. It differs from "work for hire" because in one case you're buying someone's time and in the other you're buying a specific item. If the government contracts to buy a custom package and doesn't get ownership then unless there is specific political interference you'd have to blame the department's legal team who drew up the contract.
"What was not part of the equation was the incredibly accelerated time frame of technological innovation."
Another thing not part of the equation is the incredibly extended time that the software may need to be in operation. Any OS can have no commercial value* other than as a component of the system in which it is installed. Where that system has a planned service life much longer than the OS vendor considers commercially desirable we have a mismatch.
To some extent we should blame the designer of the system for using an ephemeral component (a physical comparison might be lubricating oil) with no provision for changing it at EoL. However there may be no available alternative. What seems to be needed is a concept such as a "Capital equipment grade" grade for S/W which comes with some form of assurance - maybe code escrow - that it will never become unsupportable.
* This may not be the vendor's view. However a moment's reflection should show the vendor that unless it has such value to a purchaser it has no market and hence no value at all.
The thing with this sort of situation is that the spreadsheet was the wrong platform to start with. LO Calc would be equally wrong. MS Access would have been better than Excel (and probably better than LO Base; any time I've looked at that I've just shaken my head at it and I was an RDBMS specialist back in the day).
But will this voice commanded stuff obey?
"And those tools are: voice-controlled functionality in Windows 11; the updated Bing search engine with its interactive chat-based interface for looking up info; all that Copilot stuff in Microsoft 365, allowing users to create and edit documents among other things using natural-language instructions"
What happens when it's volubly cursed for yet again getting it wrong? Will it swear back? Will it do what it's told such as Bing finally return only what it was asked for and nothing else? Will it cower in a corner or hide by uninstalling itself?
"We know that this change may affect some of the ways you work in Windows,"...
and what's more, we don't care.
It's amazing the way those wedded to the Microsoft way will accept this kind of abuse and yet resist the one change that would get them out of it. Stockholm syndrome fails in comparison.
Back before my time, so it must have been the '60s, a filling station on the outskirts of small toen out in Co Tyrone kept getting done over. It was just nicely positioned for lads who'd been out on the booze to help themselves to a few ciggies & some cash on their way home.
Solution: alarm sensor in the filling station, bell in the local police house and a few quid to the local GPO linesman to run a length of twin core between them.
The way i heard it, at one point there were 3 lads doing time in Crumlin Rd., all nabbed separately.
This is the DWP. I take it you've never worked with them. They've always been like that under one name or another and quite immune to changes in government..
I remember helping one of my clients trying to sort out their (DWP's) self-billing system, that was the best part of 20 years ago. The colleague I was working with described them as "not the sharpest knives in the box". More than 50 years ago when I had to make use of a labour exchange (Job Centre) I formed the opinion that at least some of the staff were on the wrong side of the counter. Both those were when Labour were in power.
A few years ago you might have found a vendor-specific driver provided as a separate disk or maybe included with the pre-installed OS. It would have filled the same role but a little more overtly, Why do they do things differently now? Because they can. Back then the BIOS was a relatively simple (less so than back in 8-bit days) that did a few things and (hopefully) did them well. Now it's an OS running under the user's choice of OS with greatly enhanced powers including greatly enhanced powers of doing things badly or doing bad things. And we're told it can do things such as "secure boot" and provide a "trusted platform module". In whose view is the boot secure and who trusts it. Not the user, that's for sure.
"the land-sharks"
That's the problem. They're likely to be the ones who get "compensated" (in that strange US-ese way where "compensation" actually means "ordinary payment for the job"). But the FTC has identified the accounts. They've also identified the more egregious cases. How about the FTC and victims get together, agree a meaningfu*l tariff and send an enforceable bill to Amazon .
And no, the bill can't be paid by vouchers only redeemable at Amazon. We'll have no truck with that sort of thing.
* Meaning big enough to require an explanation in the annual accounts.
So this solid state cooling system is, in fact, an air-cooled system with a solid but essentially mechanical heat pump. I was expecting some sort of Peltier effect device such as those I used in the '70s & '80s. Even though they were solid state devices they were only heat pumps and they still needed water cooling to back them up.