Spreadsheet Them
Presumably they used some kind of spreadsheet with data telling them whom to admit or not.
Seriously though, how does this establishment relate legally to that Microsoft Office application ?
166 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Feb 2014
The warning was in the news last week : UK bank will be hacked in 2017 :
Then again, beware all the fake news nowadays
Back before I was personally even aware of the concept of GUI I knew of systems designed with at least an attempt to cater for the ( hypotheteical ? ) most stupid user. The term used for such systems was 'idiot proof'.
( I was cynical enough to think there was no such thing. )
Since the term is conspicuous to me by its absence from this article I presume the 'designs' in question are made by people unaware of the very idea. And that means they design FOR THEMSELVES.
( So since 'everybody knows' what the F5 button is for we''ll redesign it to do all sorts of 'obvious' loading. )
Computer fraud is as old as computers. Take computer fraud to mean the illegal moving of money through bank accounts via a computer's overnight jobs and the processing of individual computer records ( as happened in this case ).
The 'original' computer fraud job goes back to the time when rounding was a new idea in computing terms ( COBOL ? ). The question about this story is whether it actually happened or is it an urban myth ?
Seems a programmer rewrote a bank system so that any rounding done by the system benefitted him personally. So interest is calculated for an account and if said interest includes a fraction of a penny then that is NOT added to the account in question but sent to the programmer's account.
So the calculation says the interest is £31.735p but the account only receives £31.73p with the extra ha'penny credited to the programmer's account. A trivial sum, even back then, but when it happens literally tens of thousands of times then the money stolen does add up.
Obviously this 'dung dumper' completely lacks class.
If you MUST send someone a load of crap, then be absolutely stylish about it like
the queen of this trade, Sharon Osborne, and first buy a box from a jeweller :
As a general rule people are stupid about how many of their emails they actually read
whether at work or at home. And that includes CEOs.
Ideally people should not open an email at all unless they absolutely positively MUST.
And for their own financial sake companies should teach their staff to do that.
A carrot and stick policy could work : in extreme cases getting fired for opening too many dodgy emails
and bonuses for avoiding them ( and warning cow-orkers about the latest dodgy subject lines).
Company policy should be that you can only read emails to your company address PROVIDED
* You know the sender via the sender's address
* People with whom you are in regular email contact agree with each other how to recognise each other's
message
( eg. agree what the subject says exactlty even though it may have zero to do with the actual message.
I agree with Jane that her next important eamil will be headed 'It is raining in Borneo'. )
* a deparment ( sysadmin ? ) must manually allow me to read emails from people I have not previously
had email contact with ).
It had been known since 1977 that there were rings around Uranus
A story in itself. I seem to remember reading at the time how accidental the discovery was.
Something about punch cards etc. left in a box and only when they actually bothered to process them
...... 'Wow ! Look ! A ring system.'
@ Doctor Syntax
"a key whose use is limited to one particular OS?"
You're using the 'wrong' version of Linux. Here in Mint the Windows key is modelled on ....
Windows !!!! So the key itself gives the Start menu ( equivalent ) and Wnd+E shows me what's in my Home folder ( so is the equivalent of Windows File Explorer ).
First, I'm always amused when people ask whether a user is into gaming, with the basis being how much computing power the user might actually need for a prospective laptop, for example. For me, the short answer is 'no'. I DO play Solitaire, but that is trivial in terms of computing power needed.
Windows Solitaire was, I must admit, a guilty pleasure. But it used drive me mad, first, with the frequecy with which there would be two IDENTICAL cards ( such as BOTH red sevens, say ) after the initial deal. Usually I asked it to deal AGAIN ( and got another identical pair ). Then I'd get to a stage in the game where although I thought I was losing, I thought there was SOMETHING I might be able to do. However Windows refused to help me.
( btw, it kept my 'score' as winning 13% of the time. Which was nice. )
That brought me to the Linux version which is something called KPatience which has several card games, the version most like Windows Solitaire being called Klondike. This is infinitely preferable to Windows' version. It holds your hand all the way and gives a running commentary. It says 'this game is winnable'; 'this game is lost' etc.
What is frustrating is when I make several good moves and THEN it says 'this game is lost'.
It even has a 'Hint' button that can say exactly where to move certain cards. It regularly tells me half a dozen card moves that I would otherwise manage to miss and in effect wins the game for me.
I have Linux Mint, VmWare Player and Windows Build 9926 as a guest OS. VMTools even allows me to enter a password to log in to Windows. In Windows itself I have Word ( downloaded via an Office365 account ) which is is one of the Start jobs for Windows.
So from the Linux desktop I can get straight into Word with a few clicks. In effect, Word is on my LINUX desktop.
For me the most memorable thing about Beagle 2 was that it gave a whole new meaning to the phrase 'sending out for a Chinese'. Seriously. When it arrived at Mars obviously Beagle would start drilling. But where exactly would they get a drill ? They looked in the Yellow Pages and found this Chinese bloke who was great with DENTAL drills. Whatever he cobbled together was fitted onto Beagle.
Make it up ? Not even Monty Python could have.
As someone who is technically spastic, I walk in such a way that the untrained observer could well
think I'm drunk. There was even a pub once where the barmaid refused me entry as a 'previous' troublemaker. ( I have never been involved in trouble in any pub anywhere ever. )
Obvious solution for any pub where they think I'm drunk is to give me a breathalyser. At least I START OUT sober.
If the terrorists are effectively banning a movie using 'advanced technology', then show it using advanced technoogy :
Get a movie theater owner in a given town to organise a 'flashmob' whose point is to go to see an immediate showing of the movie. No chance of the turrists being in, say, Des Moines, Iowa.
And even if a terrorist WAS in a position to attend such a screening, the organisation of a bomb etc.
would have to be very fast indeed and get past heightened cinema security.
Actually FORTRAN is the very opposite of your proverbial dead parrot :
http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/05/scientific-computings-future-can-any-coding-language-top-a-1950s-behemoth/
Some examples are atmospheric modeling and weather prediction carried out by the National Center for Atmospheric Research; classified nuclear weapons and laser fusion codes at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Labs; NASA models of global climate change; and an international consortium of Quantum Chromodynamics researchers, calculating the behavior of quarks, the constituents of protons and neutrons. These projects are just a few random examples from a large computational universe, but all use some version of Fortran as the main language.
My own original 'error' regarding Windows 8 is a symptom of the disaster it became.
There was a time after the initial release when part of Microsoft's sales patter
was about how big a deal this new idea of 'tiles' was.
( Were windows themselves going to become '20th century technology' ? )
So I wondered in all seriousness how soon before 'Windows 8'
would ALSO be known as 'Tiles 1' ?
The more ridiculous that idea seems now, the bigger the failure of Windows 8.
W8 ( finally ? ) 'jumps the shark' to hatred by non-techies. The point about this title/headline in The Guardian is that it was written by Charlie Brooker, not a member of Tech staff. ( And if you want to get pedantic, it was ALSO written by the subeditor who actually put it in the headline. )
btw, what s the technical term for a Windows 8 hater ? An 8er ( geddit ? )
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/08/scottish-independence-david-cameron-no-campaign-windows-8
So exactly what lurgy is it you do have ?
And can you swear on your mother's life/grave that when introduced to a doctor at a party you have NEVER started discussing your then current medical problems ?
So doctors and computers nerds share an occupational hazard.
( But at least if you're lucky, nobody will treat you as if you are a character out of The IT Crowd. )