Re: Oh, dear...
Blimey, what a depressing viewpoint. I think you're reading too many of the wrong news sources. There's plenty to be cheerful about, the trick is to look for it. TIP: Sky News isn't the place to get a world view.
185 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jan 2014
While I applaud users attempting to fix their own problems in my experience these just tend to lead to even greater issues that I end up having to fix further down the line when the user has forgotten what they did in the first place.
Despite the annoyances, I've made it clear at my workplace I would prefer they ask if they're not sure. And made it clear they are, in all likelihood, "not sure" even when they think they are.
From this list: Pricegrabber, Shopping.com, Dealtime, Nextag, Ciao, Pricerunner, Shopzilla and Bizrate I can say the company I work for has tried at least once to advertise through every one of these. Without exception, they all generated huge quantities of clicks and virtually no sales whatsoever.
I know this sounds like a defence of Google Shopping, but like any business ought to we analyse this kind of thing. Google Shopping is exclusively the one CPC referral "website" that we can actually make margin advertising with.
No, I don't like monopolies. But by the same token the above list of "competitors" are unworkable for the business I work for. I would prefer that not be the case but staying in business is kind of important.
Really? I'd have thought by now it was obvious to anyone they no longer control the results directly. The algorithm is simply too complex for a single human to be able to predict it's behaviour. They have to tweak it and see what changes - not plan changes and implement specific tweaks to accomplish them.
Partly because he kept on about how great they were so why not, but mostly because never having touched one myself I thought it might be interesting to see how he got on with a machine without being able to ask for my help.
He used it for less than a month before he'd punched the screen in frustration and destroyed it.
A TED talk went up this week regarding the FBI by researcher Trevor Aaronson. They don't need to catch actual terrorists - it's way easier to put a gun in someone's hands, arrest them and then claim to have stopped an act of terror. Targeting men of Middle Eastern origin with mental illnesses is the best way to do this apparently.
Aye carumba. Your saying if my mum buys an IoT kettle I'm going to have to pop in and setup a separate network? Because one things for sure, she ain't going to do it.
Actually, having said that I have already taken the precaution of setting up an allowed MAC address list on her router.
As for at work, this is already an uncontrollable nightmare with smartphones & tablets wandering into the building and gobbling up IP addresses like Smarties. Hopefully no-one buys a new kettle.
Speed limits and other road safety measures are simply trade off's between the number of deaths/injuries we're prepared to accept vs the economic impact of harsher restrictions. Uncomfortable an idea as that is, if we made everyone drive at 1mph we'd have next to zero deaths, but not be able to afford any hospitals.
For me, autonomous vehicle is the ONLY viable way to get what we all really want.
Interesting argument. I had an armed robbery at my workplace involving a sawn off double barrel shotgun. After the event, one of the other staff scoffed that it had been a replica.
When you're unarmed and looking down the barrel of a gun held by a shouting lunatic, there is absolutely no way thoughts about whether the gun is real will enter your head.
OK, I searched for some data and here's some. 2012, 1.2 trillion Google searches. Obviously that's a tiny proportion of the number of internet page loads in that year, but even that number, improved by one second each equals 38000 years of time saved.
Obviously, individually none of us can feel that time being saved. That doesn't mean it isn't real.
Subscribers can watch offline. I don't pay for a big data allowance, so having playlists of pretty much anything I fancy to play in the car suits me. I'm on the music beta.
If it's £10 or less for this new doohickey, I'll be signing up. Hate ADs, but too guilt ridden to use Adblock - the channels I watch put in lots of effort to create top quality stuff. Supposedly the Green brothers (for instance) have spent $4m on production and achieved only $2m in AD revenue.
I hear the rage, and understand the frustration.
It does, however, occur to me that a Reg reader ought to understand that while outages are generally rare, they do happen.
And for another thing, were Virgin to hire enough staff to handle calls in the event of a system wide outage occurring at any given time, they would be charging you a heck of a lot more.
Feels odd defending this company, because I hate them. With a passion.
I wonder how much that eats into their revenues. I'm frankly amazed they haven't (apparently) yet taken any action to prevent Ad blocking.
I've watched the Feynman lectures on YouTube and not too sure how easily I'd have been able to enjoy them without it. I'm aware some people watch videos of cats falling out of trees, but that doesn't mean I have to as well.
I'd have to agree. Manufacturers tend to do the finished design you end up with as they have to work out how to make the actual components required to make something work look as close to what the guy with the crayons sent them.
And anyway, a designer bemoaning users doing the design and removing him from the equation? Not really surprising his crayons got thrown out of the pram at that thought.
I honestly thought you had to have something called a "warrant" issued by something called a "judge" before demanding information from a private company or individual. If the warrant was issued, the harbinger of the data had to give it up or face prosecution.
It sounds like what happens here is governments are asking for data "just because we're curious" rather than via any legal reason, and Twitter is deciding what they can have and what they can't. That means Twitter is in charge. Not too sure I like it.
I am (or at least work for) a business trader. Go back 6 years and most of what we did was eBay. Today? There's no money to be made on eBay - we just use it for clearing old stock. If I was running the place we'd have closed our eBay account 3 years ago or at least restricted it to selling broken tat.
To put it in perspective, for 2014 just shy of 10000 orders through eBay, the majority at break even or a loss vs 20000 through Amazon and even with their charges, we made money on the vast majority.
Then there's absolutely no point offering me Windows 10 for any price, including free. I'm not about to change an operating system that's stable and works well on 20 client machines just because one with a bigger number in it is available.
The cost of upgrading from XP, which had essentially nothing wrong with it is still stinging.
Aye - I'd be more interested in some semblance of reality in the description of the "product" I'm paying for. Virgin says I get 30Mb down. I've NEVER seen as much as 10.
Analogy time again. If I bought a Kilo of sugar and the package contained less than 333 grams I'd have reasonable grounds to complain.
I seriously doubt that. Once autonomous vehicles are available, the insurance premiums for them will be tiny. In a short period of time, possibly less than 5 years the cost to insure a manually operated vehicle will sky rocket to the point virtually no-one can afford it. Unless you and I have a different interpretation of *long* periods of time.
I also doubt autonomous vehicles will get extensive (meaning costly) extra development to be able to cover rare situations. Autonomous cars do not need to be perfect. They just need to be better than humans and that's not all that hard. It's a powerful message to be able to say you saved 20000 lives. To spend an extra few million in development to maybe save 20001 just isn't something that happens in the real world.
I'm glad to hear it's not just me who wants one. I spend a lot of time picking up my "children" from pubs & parties. The idea of simply sending the car to get them...freaking awesome.
The parking at my property is atrocious. The idea I can disembark at my front door and let the damn car go and park itself...more freaking awesome.
I like driving, but not all driving.
There are some proper nobs posting inaccurate, misleading and worst of all technically incorrect stuff. There are also, however, a goodly number of knowledgeable, open minded folk. On several occasions what appeared to be an off the cuff comment on the part of the writer pointed me towards problems I hadn't even realised were problems and just how to go about fixing them.
That's what occurred to me. I have a Netflix account. I pay them a fiver each month and I watch stuff. I assume there are some terms somewhere but I never looked. I know if I do I'll just see a bunch of reasons why I shouldn't use the service. Can't do that until I've finished Dexter at minimum.