* Posts by Gravesender

21 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2013

Excel is for amateurs. To properly screw things up, those same amateurs need a copy of Access

Gravesender

What I did in the Army

This reminds me of my time in the US Army back in the late 1960s. I was assigned to a second echelon electronics repair section of a training unit at Ft. Benning GA.

At the time policy dictated that our supply room have in stock exactly the number of each item as specified in some document or other. The supply room was subject to regular "surprise" audits and there would be hell to play if any of the prescribed quantities were off in either direction. (I put surprise in scare quotes because for some reason or other our supply sergeant always knew about the audits a day or two in advance.)

There were two consequences of this arrangement. The first was that we were never allowed to draw spares from the stock room. If we needed so much as a new fuse we had to fill out a complicated legal size multi-copy form and send it up to Brigade. The item needing repair would sit on the shelf until a week or so later when the single fuse would arrive packed in military grade multi-layered moisture and mold resistant packaging. If the fuse blew again when we tried it we went back to step one.

The other fun bit was that the stock room had to carry excess inventory of some items to keep the unit running at all. When word of the audit came down two guys were s=dispatched to the motor pool to check out a large truck. All the excess inventory would be piled into the truck along with a case of C rations. The drivers were instructed to disappear into the boonies for a day or two until the audit was over. Great fun!

He was a skater boy. We said, 'see you later, boy' – and the VAX machine mysteriously began to work as intended

Gravesender

I remember a similar story involving a PDP-11 installed on a mezzanine in a warehouse that was experiencing random restarts. Eventually someone figured out that the event was occurring whenever a fork lift with a gasoline engine passed underneath the computer. The fault was with inadequate EMI suppression on the fork lift ignition wiring. The solution was to post a "No Lift Trucks" sign under the mezzanine.

Destroying the city to save the robocar

Gravesender

Who is going to pay for all this stuff?

I recently read of a request by Foxconn that the State of Wisconsin apply for a grant of $246 million from the US Transportation Department to upgrade 19 miles of Interstate highway and associated access roads and such so Foxconn can operate driverless shuttle buses around its new factory. This works out to about $13 million per mile. Extrapolating this to the 47,000 miles of interstate highways in the US yields a total cost of $616 billion to upgrade the interstate system alone, or 37 times the discretionary budget of the whole of the Transportation Department for 2018. The Foxconn report can be found here: https://news.thomasnet.com/featured/foxconn-needs-driverless-infrastructure-for-wi-plant

US Senate stamps the gas pedal on law to flood America's streets with self-driving cars

Gravesender

Re: If all thats required.............

"they benefit the massive reduction of transport costs for goods and services"

Most folks don't realize that truck drivers do a lot more than simply drive the vehicle. They usually have a lot of paperwork to manage, and local delivery drivers act as customer representatives for their employers.

Please explain how an unmanned UPS truck would work.

Gravesender

After seeing all the destruction in Puerto Rico and elsewhere I wonder how a predominately autonomous road transport system would work in this environment.

Census fail to get Oz Senate probe; NDIS fix promised this year

Gravesender

Re: "stripping staff and their skills out of the public service"

>>>It's become a sport for some senior managers.

>>>Remaining staff with skills are routinely ignored or bypassed.

Sadly, this seems equally true in the private sector these days.

I speak from much personal experience.

London's 'automatic' Tube trains suffered 750 computer failures last year

Gravesender

SPADs not the greatest danger

>>> So the automated system definitely comes out better then human drivers when it comes to putting passenger lives at risk.

The greatest risk by far of fatal injury to passengers related to train movement is when someone finds themselves on the roadbed in front of an oncoming train. I've had this happen to me six times in my short career as a train operator. I never hit anyone, but I came damn close a couple of times. I hate to think what might have happened had I not been there to recognize the problem in time to stop my train.

The last fatal accident involving a SPAD in New York was in 1991, which killed 5 people. I think the accident rate from being hit by a train in New York is about once every three days. This doesn't include the many near misses where tragedy was prevented by alert train operators.

Gravesender

The view from New York

After the dot-com bust I spent 6 years working as a train operator for New York City Transit--the subway system. We have both one person and two person operation here, and I've worked both.

There are two problems with one person operation as I see it. First, it makes for slower passenger loading at stations. Our conductors (guards) work from the middle of the train and have a much better view of the platform and can better control door closures to make sure folks get completely on and off the train without blocking a door and delaying the train. The second problem is that it creates a distraction for the operator by having to switch from conductor mode to train driver mode at each station.This adds additional dwell time at each station.

These problems are particular to our implementation of one person operation. I often visit London and think they have done a much better job of it. In particular, London provides plenty of passenger control people on the platforms to help with loading. We have hardly any here.

We have one line in CBTC operation here. It is one of our shortest lines, with little interaction with other lines. The project ran way over budget and schedule and is far from trouble-free. Station overruns are common, as are mysterious system glitches. I often wonder if the enormous investment could have been better spent on other pressing needs.

London seeks trials of Google's robo-cars

Gravesender

Re: two class system

So what happens when one of the cars in the "train" breaks down or runs out of battery?

Some like it hot ... very hot: How to use heat to your advantage in your data center

Gravesender

Nothing new

When I was at college 50 years ago I picked up beer money by working as a transmitter minder for various broadcast stations around Pittsburgh. It was common practice there to use waste heat from the transmitters to heat the transmitter buildings.

There was one AM station that used plate modulation. The 5KW modulation transformer made enough noise that you could monitor the programming in cold weather by the sound coming from the heating vents. In the summer, when the transmitter was vented to the outside, you could hear it all over the antenna farm.

I cannae dae it, cap'n! Why I had to quit the madness of frontline IT

Gravesender

I'm with you Trevor. After 30+ years in the computer business, working at everything from developer to network management I'm fed up with the whole business.

This goes beyond security. It seems that nothing works right anymore--hardware, software, you name it. And please don't get me started on the quality of documentation these days.

For the last 5 years or so it seems I spend all my time on the telephone talking to idiots, trying to fix problems caused by their crappy products. No one cares about quality anymore. It seems everyone is so busy trying to become a billionaire by coming up with the next "Yo!" app that nobody is left to mind the engine room.

I started out life as an electrician. I'm ready to go back.

Paranoid about the NSA? The case for dumping cloud's Big 3

Gravesender

I've always thought that a cloud infrastructure dominated by the oligopoly of the big three providers presents unacceptable risks beyond the threat to data security for a particular user. Think what might happen if a terrorist or state-sponsored actor should somehow inject some kind of system-wide disruptive malware into one of these systems. Microsoft brags about how their security apparatus depends on a single global Active Directory instance. What if it became corrupted somehow? These systems present single points of failure and therefore attractive targets for all kinds of problems, both intentionally malicious and accidental. The mind boggles!

For pity's sake, you fool! DON'T UPGRADE it will make it worse

Gravesender

Sheep farming

There was a time when I very much enjoyed working in IT. Those days are long gone. The job no longer involves solving interesting problems and making the world a better place to live. I now spend all my time dealing with idiots. That's why I've decided to give up on being a computer geek and take up technical writing.

The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?

Gravesender

Re: Latin, softwre and misunderstanding

"The main requirement for a programmer is the ability to think in the abstract: a discipline that doesn't seem to be anywhere on the curriculum in schools. A close second, in terms of attributes that indicate good or bad programming ability is an analytic approach to problem solving."

Sounds like math to me.

Greedy datagrabs, crap security will KILL the Internet of Thingies

Gravesender

Just what we need--more cockups!

I wish people would start having conferences to figure out why our Information Society is already so hopelessly screwed up and what to do about it.

Gravesender

Surge pricing futures markets?

Can we look forward to a futures market for Uber fares, so that punters can hedge against hurricane rates? If so, will speculators use high-speed trading techniques to profit from instability? Maybe we can look forward to surge pricing futures options. The mind boggles!

What’s the KEYBOARD SHORTCUT for Delete?! Look in a contextual menu, fool!

Gravesender

Re: Devolution?

I would say less likely to explore, and I place the blame for this on the way kids are taught these days to pass tests rather than think.

We need to talk about SPEAKERS: Sorry, 'audiophiles', only IT will break the sound barrier

Gravesender

Re: Ancient technology

Guitar amps, whether valve or solid state, have nothing to do with any kind of hi-fi sound reproduction. They are always driven well into distortion at every stage, from preamp to output. The important thing is how that distortion behaves. That is one reason why there is so much variation in sound even between valve amps of different design from the same manufacturer. The other major factor is the interaction of the speaker, its enclosure, and the output stage impedance and feedback mechanism. Try hanging a scope off the feedback node of an old valve amp and giving the case a good thump. Solid state amplifiers then to clip very cleanly and have low output impedances so that the speakers are highly damped and have less effect on the sound.

Gravesender

Re: "Uni-directional oxygen free copper speaker cables"...

Oxygen free speaker cables are a myth--it's the crystal-aligned oxygen free mains cables that make all the difference. At least that's what I've heard.

Gravesender

Re: If you want to see how IT is actually helping to make audio better

The problem with touring sound is that the IM distortion caused by the non-linear compressibility of air at the high SPL produced turns everything to mush. One attempt to deal with this problem was the Owsley "Wall of Sound" used by the Grateful Dead when I worked with them in the early 1970s. Each element of the band--vocals, drums, guitars, and keyboards-- had its own channel, from microphone to speaker. The result was a very clean sound, particularly vocals. The problem was that they had no FOH mixer, but rather gave each performer their own control over their level with pots stuck onto the mic stands, so while it might have sounded good on stage the balance was often lacking in the house.

Kiss goodbye to quiet skies: Now FCC ready to OK in-flight cellphone use

Gravesender

It seems to me that the FAA, not the FCC, would have the last word here