Re: WTF
Maybe your coffee will help restore your sense of humour... :-)
Willie jokes are always funny.
600 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Oct 2013
Well, I watched it this evening, and I couldn't make head nor tail of the premise. I'm not surprised by the lack of comments (four in eleven hours, including my first one). A long, *very* long, two-hour film which could have easily been an engaging one-hour film if the editor had removed the irrelevant crud - a full minute of a soldier stroking a pigeon, FFS? WTF did that add to the message?
The informative parts were informative. I came away knowing more than I did, but I didn't need a full two hours to achieve it.
A great pity. I've seen a number of Adam's films and always been informed by them. This is borderline tedious.
I've always thought that UK daytime TV was introduced during a period of mounting job losses in the eighties for this very reason - to give the unemployed something to do instead of rioting about what was going on.
Is this a valid point? Genuine question - I don't know. But with the constant cynical political manipulation that's increasingly obvious these days I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Oh I just *love* people correcting others' English when they clearly haven't got a proper command of it themselves... :-)
Its - possessive - "The dog wags its tail".
It's - "It is" or "It has" - "It's a nice day" or "It's been a nice day".
"The dog wags it is tail" and "The dog wags it has tail" make no sense.
Me, I wouldn't use fingerprint recognition any more than I'd use face recognition. It's a flawed solution. Nobody can break into my brain for a password. They *can* swipe my finger or push my face into a scanner. And once broken, you can't change your fingerprint "password".
Another example of Apple's focus on appearance over function...
Now that's a really good question. There is a lot of noise around "Support ending for xxx", but in reality which of us consumers (as opposed to business staff) gives a rat's ass about support? By the time an O/S reaches end of life we've had 3 new PCs, each with a new flavour of Windows, and I personally have *never* felt the need to ask Microsoft for help or support. Once it reaches the point where it isn't patched any more, maybe it's time to move on, but until then...
By Naomi Klein.
This book, which I mentioned in another security article, proposes exactly this scenario - a massive shock to the public on which those neo-con right-wing vultures like May swoop to intruduce extended powers which the frightened populace not only don't retreat from but actively encourage. Little by little our privacy and freedom are eroded.
And the more people realise that these people are doing this, the better equipped we'll be to tell them where to put it.
I don't care whether there's an IT angle or not (even though there clearly is, because it has to do with using the web to raise awareness of human rights). Important stories like this need to be spread as widely as possible so that those who don't use the normal news channels (newspapers, TV, radio) get to hear about them.
I wouldn't have understood this unless I had myself had an over-hot Vindaloo in our local restaurant. With my kids. Foolishly trying to be The Big Man. It didn't work. After a few mouthfuls, sweat pouring down my forehead, mouth on fire, saying "Oh God, make it stop!", no amount of water quenching the flames, I had to leave over half of it on the plate. And that certainly wasn't a Carolina Reaper - I can only begin to imagine the pain.
Don't do it, people...
"The comment about "inviting him to Dallas" is inferring the same thing"
No, it isn't, it's implying it. Language matters.
But I agree with the sentiment. I too read the Dallas comment as an implied desire to see Cameron shot. And though I have no respect for the man I certainly don't wish him ill.
I hope this link works when I post it. Dilbert says it best.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=dilbert+etch-a-sketch&biw=1366&bih=663&tbm=isch&imgil=Ad1lSsP5eJze8M%253A%253BwPR6pS6h-05uvM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fpics.livejournal.com%25252Fallah_sulu%25252Fpic%25252F0002f3h8%25252Fg13&source=iu&pf=m&fir=Ad1lSsP5eJze8M%253A%252CwPR6pS6h-05uvM%252C_&usg=__iS8QCGdvIja9lfFm130ztK0LTEM%3D&ved=0CDcQyjc&ei=QOC3VP7FJYKvUYWJg6AN#imgdii=_&imgrc=Ad1lSsP5eJze8M%253A%3BwPR6pS6h-05uvM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fic.pics.livejournal.com%252Fallah_sulu%252F659446%252F12800%252F12800_600.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fpics.livejournal.com%252Fallah_sulu%252Fpic%252F0002f3h8%252Fg13%3B596%3B199
*I* voted for Cameron last time.
In my defence, I didn't know I was. I cast my ballot for Lib Dems, who promptly sold me down the river to a party which I despise and whose members will largely go to to Hades for their love of money and lack of love for their fellow man.
The Lib Dems are off my list for the rest of my life for their treachery.
I'd like to vote Labour, but we no longer have a Labour party, just a pale blue imitiaion of Tories - thanks for that, Tony. (And enjoy your Save The Children award. I hope it came with money...?)
I have to correct one point:
"The bible is a collection of stories written by many people over hundreds, or thousands, of years."
No, as any frothing-at-the-mouth redneck Christian fundamentalist will tell you, the bible is literally the word of God. You're proposing the secular sensible view (with which I agree), but that's not how it works when your mind is poisioned by religion.
As Christoper Hitchens (whom I recommend) said, religion is a force which makes good people do bad things.
Re your Oldham comment. It is indeed hard for this footballer that he will no longer be allowed (it seems) to pursue his career. However, one commentator said, and I agree, that this man is a public figure who can influence children by example (as your own comment says: "moulded..."), and this is therefore analogous to a teacher convicted of child abuse offences being denied the continuation of a teaching career. A child abuser does not get a second chance. Crimes have consequences.
1) Apple sells a lot of phones and therefore attracts more attention.
2) Apple is an American company and has more buyers; and more litigious buyers.
3) Apple attracts computer-illiterate buyers who wouldn't know a byte if it bit them on the ankle.
4) Apple doesn't give a stuff about what you think. Just gimme the money...
I go for 4, myself. Maybe 3...
Your points are valid but not completely thought through.
You get cold & wet walking to your car or waiting for a bus.
The use of a bike by a few loonies (yes, I agree there are too many, and "no fatalities yet"...? Do you not read the newspapers?) doesn't mean that the bike itself is at fault. As commented, it's healthy and life-prolonging as long as you're sensible.
And equally the cycle lanes badly-implemented by non-cycling civil servants don't detract from the utility of the most energy-efficient person mover ever invented.
Maybe a tangential/peripheral point, but here goes...
I've heard for years Facebook described as the FBI/NSA/GCHQ (take your pick) friend, since it contains such a fantastic wealth of personal information willingly handed over by the data owners themselves. I've always assumed that these snoopers would be monitoring it closely for the specific subject that is their primary purpose these days - terrorism. And yet...
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/25/lee-rigby-murder-internet-firm-could-have-picked-up-killers-message-report-says
If they are capable of reading every email, every post, every chat, every Whatsapp, every video call, and they miss people talking specifically about terrorist murder, what is the point of them?
Great video - thanks for pointing to it. I know JBL make great speakers, so it's impressive how the Bose blows them out of the water. Incredible bass for such a tiny device. Exactly as you say, I've asked my wife many times whether she's listening to the stereo or the Bose when I walk into the room.
http://www.johnlewis.com/bose-soundlink-mini-wireless-mobile-speaker-silver/p515184
I bought one for my wife last Xmas and not only is the sound incredible from such a tiny box, but ***she's able to make it work***! And she would be the first to tell you how she struggles with technology.
Quite expensive, but I'm so pleased with it that I've just bought another for my son.
I agree. Cycling seems to stir up a lot of dislike - I don't know why. Maybe because the few idiots who jump lights and frighten grannies on footpaths poison public perception of the majority of cyclists who behave responsibly?
Me, I'd quite like an Audi or BMW, but I'm afraid I'd become a supercilious overbearing twat... :-)
Now, now, calm down...
We aren't all like that. I myself shout at other cycling imbeciles who go through red lights.
But I agree with your title - it's a stupid idea which does not add any value to the simple proposition that every cyclist should have 360-degree awareness and, if in doubt, should pull over to the side of the road and actively check behind before trying to get across even a single lane of traffic. I've survived 35 years of city traffic accident-free apart from one bloke who actually uttered the immortal words "Sorry, I didn't see you" even though I was wearing a bright red cycling jacket in broad daylight.
But the loud squawk in the car is a good idea, though it's needed far more in BMWs & Audis, which appear to be driven mainly by arrogant asswipes...
Partly right. No, the solution is to scream loudly until the companies treat their employees properly.
In this particular case (Apple) does anyone think that fanbois, faced with an iPhone 7 that costs an enormous $870 instead of an affordable $850 will think "Nah, too much, not paying that"? Of course not. The additional cost doesn't come into their equation. The price is the price.
With such an enormous cashbag already in the bank the only thing preventing Apple from taking this action is greed. Pure greed. Just because they can.
My solution is to make a noise about what they're failing to do. Is that not what this is all about? Why have comments at all if they fall on deaf ears?
Doing and saying nothing, and therefore implicitly aquiescing, is not right and is therefore not a decent person's option.
Upvoted for the correction, but downvoted (in principle) because I love people making corrections who themselves make mistakes - and I'm gobsmacked that nobody else has commented, since the Vulture community is usually on this sort of thing like rabid hyenas... :-)
"Grammer"...? Jimmy Edwards would surely have you bent over a chair for that one... (for the cane... oh, er, missus, stop tittering...)
Surely the point is that Apple have put themselves up as people of good will (as always, appearance before substance) and therefore they deserve to be targeted when they fail so egregiously to meet their own trumpeted standards? I agree with you and other posters that the same may happen in other manufacturers' plants, but they don't shout about how well they look after their staff.
If you make boasts, be prepared to stand behind them and not play the usual Apple card of "We're too good to talk to you people". They had their chance to put their case on the programme, and they refused. They should suck it up and put their efforts into cleaning up their act to match their publicity machine instead of whining about how unfair the BBC is.
But why the ridiculously oversized full-screen pictures at the top of every article? When I click a link I want to start reading, not have to page down first before I reach the text. It's a benefit to you as well in not wasting time looking for vaguely-relevant images, so you can concentrate on the writing.
Come on, people, put a bit more thought into usability instead of pointless glitz...