Re: Unfortunately there are only so many pet rabbits one can hunt and eat in Surbiton.
You can definitely raise your own pigs and chickens in Surbiton though, there was a documentary series about it in the 70s.
213 posts • joined 9 Oct 2013
You can definitely raise your own pigs and chickens in Surbiton though, there was a documentary series about it in the 70s.
For the benefit of anyone else who, like me, googled it and couldn't work out if it meant Unique Device Identification, Unilateral Declaration of Independence, the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration, or Unexplained Drinking Injury:
Give it another 10 years, that thing you liked will probably come back into style.
Like my beard: I grew it back when Charlie Darwin made it cool, and now I'm a fashionable hipster. A little patience is all that's required.
At least the VS team had some sort of good reason for switching to non-standard scroll bars - to display useful stuff like the locations of changed lines, compile errors, breakpoints etc. Worse is applications that use non-standard scroll bars for no reason at all: yes, MS Office team, I'm looking at you.
For extra fun in recent Visual Studio versions, go into options, Text Editor > All Languages > Scroll Bars, and select "Use map mode for vertical scroll bar".
Well P in P/E is price, not profits. But yeah, I was wrong to pick out the revenue figure (which was actually 6 months revenue anyway) instead of net earnings. All I can say was it was a long lunch.
$2.535b / $98.7m = a P/E of 25.7, slightly above the average of the S&P500, but the point stands that on the face of it the price is not completely unreasonable.
The numbers quoted equate to a P/E of 14.3, which is historically pretty average, and well below the current market rate (P/E ratio for the S&P500 at 1315 EDT today: 24.61). So on the face of it, not an unreasonable price,
The buyers might take the view that Red Hat being 18 times SUSE's size represents growth potential for SUSE.
Indeed, good advice.
The Dymo machine's not just for printing "fuck the police" labels to stick on the boss's car's bumper, after all.
Cook, Ive, they're all just following the course laid in by Jobs. It used to be said that Steve Jobs cared passionately about Apple customers, from the moment they walked into the Apple store, all the way to when their credit card payment cleared. Apple products are designed exactly the way they need to be to attract buyers. Long-term usability isn't really a consideration. Given that job description, Ive is doing it pretty well.
It only gives you more precision if you can't work a decimal point.
Now I've heard everything.
Not bad for a company whose name sounds like something from a spoof motivational poster.
That's a particularly upbeat way of saying that the weather's shit.
I expect the answer from the car-makers will be "you'll have to take over manual control." And then we just have to hope that after 10 years of relying on the computer, we're somehow better-prepared to do so than this Uber car-supervisor was after 19 minutes.
I agree. This is the most bonkers suggestion I've read about passwords ever. Second worse is to change a password regularly.
Indeed. I thought we'd finally managed to agree that making password systems more obstructive to users just results in weaker passwords being chosen. I guess the University of Carolina didn't get the memo.
It's the craziest thing I've heard all day. Clearly it won't persuade anyone to leave if they wanted to stay, so all they've ended up doing is paying off people who were going to leave anyway for free.
I guess in a tight employment market there might be a case for wanting first pick of the alternative jobs, but IT work is a seller's market right now.
Computationally, strcmp is, and always has been, the wrong way to do this. The correct answer, as it always has been, is to use inet_pton (or the equivalent in your favourite language) and compare the two addresses in binary form.
I think Adam's point was that the human brain's stdlib only has strcmp(). It doesn't implement inet_pton or binary comparison.
Almost all... I knew there was a reason I stuck with 10base2.
The concept that every piece of software is constantly undergoing change and release with every other piece of software is just plain idiotic, not to mention wasteful of developer's time.
Anyone trying to do low-level Windows API-based stuff on the shifting sands of Windows 10 will concur with that, I'm sure.
I bet that includes the mandatory IT security training, that tells you to be careful when browsing the web, doesn't it.
It means debateable or subject to discussion. A moot being a sort of Anglo-Saxon town council meeting.
Americans like to use it when they mean "irrelevant". It seems unfair to blame Americans for using the English language wrongly; they can't really help it after all. But I don't think Rebecca Hill has that excuse.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
The main problem I had when I first encountered the Swindon magic roundabout was seeing where I was going through the tears of laughter. Surely the greatest practical joke ever.
Never mind 4K, the Spectrum had 6K graphics! Of course in those days, that meant something different.
When one of the monitors finally dies I will be moving to a 1440p monitor - there's none of the scaling issues prevalent with 4K
With a bit of luck, your existing monitors will last long enough for the scaling issues to go away. Things are a lot better than they were. Application compatibility is steadily improving. I'm even optimistic that the next version of SQL Server Management Studio may work propery in 4K.
Depending on the type of business 45 minutes downtime may or may not be reason for dismissal.
If 45 minutes downtime is that much of a problem, then sacking the tech who caused it by a simple finger fumble is nothing more than scapegoating. More reasonable would be to sack the executive who failed to put in place systems ensuring a simple human error couldn't cause such a serious problem.
Especially when you have staff discount.
Maybe we should put a bit of funding into this higher education thing.
Accountants and train drivers are two more occupations that must have some sort of special automation-proof magic in them, otherwise surely they'd have been automated out of existence decades ago.
Ah, the thinklight. Sadly missing on the latest Thinkpads.
I don't think patents can have been an issue on that feature. I remember seeing a Dell that had something similar some years ago. In a way it was better than the IBM version, because you turned it on with a physical switch next to the light, instead of playing a chord on the keyboard.
A cynic might even suggest that this is actually about making sure some of their competitors are far less appealing (because they'll get blocked by Chrome), driving more advertisers to Google (who'll make sure their ads follow the new rules to avoid blocking).
That last bit is the wrong way round: the blocking rules will be designed around Google's own ads.
Discover is another one that is, to quote an assessment I read on a forum, a dumpster fire of an application. It seems to get more crash-prone with every version increment.
It shouldn't be too hard to make roads more suitable for driverless cars. First put big fences down both sides so pedestrians can't get anywhere near them. Then add a signalling system so the car can easily see if it's getting too close to the car in front. Maybe add metal rails to guide the cars, so they don't even have to worry about steering and cars going in opposite directions can't possibly hit each other. Driverless cars should be no problem at all then.
Oh wait, no, according to the RMT, the cars would then need a driver _and_ a guard.
I don't know, I enjoyed Hayden Christensen's performance in this scene.
No, nowadays it's "Share and enjoy."
I wonder what Apple's company song is.
Dilbert had a great solution to this video conferencing problem:
Yeah I was scratching my head trying to work out what the portmanteau was... "clodern" perhaps.
"This can happen quite easily if multiple sources are cross-referenced."
Well yes, and what that tells you is that the GP's data, in the example you gave, was not, in fact, anonymous. It was personal. It contained information that could be used to identify the individual. The users of it were just claiming it to be anonymous to circumvent restrictions on handling personal data.
There's only one kind of anonymous data in my book, and that's data which is _impossible_ to convert back to personal data. Yes, that is a very high bar. If it's possible to convert it back to personal data, then it is personal data - even if the law bans such a conversion in one particular country. Converting so-called "anonymised" data back to personal data should be a non-issue, because if it's not really anonymous, it should be handled as personal data already.
Making it a crime to de-anonymise data seems rather like shooting the messenger.
Surely the real problem is at the other end of the line, with the person who claimed that the data was "anonymised" when it really wasn't, as a pretext for ignoring the normal restrictions on handling personal data.
The big omission from principle 6 is the failure to define "lifetime". What's the betting the car firms will interpret it as "warranty period."
The front one has the bridge, near the front so the person at the steering wheel* can see where he's going.
The one at the back has the air traffic control as it's a better position to keep an eye on all the planes being shuffled around ready to take off.
American carriers have one island near the back, which makes the ship harder to drive, but they don't care because if they crash it into a lighthouse or something they've still got another 10 or 11 spare.
* Nautical terms may not be strictly accurate
@Ken Moorhouse: no, not necessarily. If the designers are sensible, the user name won't be validated until both the user name and password have been entered. Whether you enter them on one page or two, there's no need for that to change.
There are all sorts of errors people make on login pages that might be affected by this design. Like forgetting to fill in one or other field; typing the password in the user name field; tabbing too many times and trying to type the password while the login button is highlighted instead of the password field; I'm sure there are many others. I'd be interested to see the research. It seems to be an increasingly popular model for login pages.
@FuzzyWuzzys: that is one really weird sandwich, but you know I'm tempted to try it.
Sky have had far more new programming than just those 3. What about Twin Peaks: The Return, the new Micky Flanagan thing, Last Week Tonight With John Oliver, Madam Secretary, The Leftovers, Colony, How To Get Away With Murder, Ballers, Nashville, Zoo, 1993. And that's just shows that had new episodes on Sky 1/Living/Atlantic this week.
You can argue about whether any of them are any good or not (personally I rate John Oliver highly), but to say there's no new programming is really not true.
HMS Fanny, HMS Spanker and HMS Cockchafer are surely due for a revival.
How about HMS Cheerful or HMS Candytuft. Serving on a ship with a name like that must surely put a smile on your face, even if it is World War 2 out there.
Or they could make a bit of extra cash by taking a lead from the current minesweeper HMS Quorn, and selling the naming rights, so you could have something like HMS Marmite or HMS Cillit Bang.
And the even less subtle HMS Violent. There's still a patrol boat called HMS Puncher.
Though calling a ship something like HMS Invincible is just tempting fate, I think. I mean, anything can sink.
One of Violent's sister ships was HMS Versatile, that one could go both ways I believe.
I think that's 20 minutes into the future.
It's as if they're producing sports coverage for people who don't like sport. Which is probably what they're doing, actually.
If the same event is on both BBC and Eurosport, you're usually better off watching it on Eurosport. Even with the ad breaks, Eurosport still manages to show at least twice as much actual coverage of, say, an athletics meeting.
@Jake: well, I want to know who won the sweepstake.
The roads must roll.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018