Re: Machine Learning is not AI.
It is barely even Maths.
388 posts • joined 11 Jul 2007
It is barely even Maths.
What, a journalist should actually call or email a source to check it's true?
Get with the 21st Century, dude. That kind of thing went out with operator assisted dialling.
"It is hard to imagine the TCO of Linux has gone up" etc
Linux is still sufficiently different that it is unfamiliar to 99 per cent of the population.
Of those 99 per cent maybe a third in my experience won't need the training at all, they are smart and figure stuff out. That still leaves two thirds asking the dumbest questions.
Retraining is a fact. It isn't a judgement on Linux being any harder to use than Windows or Mac - we know well configured and locked down isn't harder to use. It just that's Linux is different. Anything different causes problems.
We're talking about a boondoggle to put computers in libraries, don't confuse this with education.
I would not vote for Trump even if I could, and there is plenty of hypocrisy to go round. But:
Your comment is self-righteous, intolerant and ignorant.
Don't you get it yet? You are one of the reasons Trump won.
Not in the US they're not.
Obligatory commentard cliche about children.
Cheap labour. Same as what bosses have always wanted.
Thank you, CBI. We were never in doubt whose side you were on.
The list idea was abandoned without even being explored. Red meat for the Tory Conference.
But don't let facts get in the way of a good moan.
"Although DeepStack’s opponents aren’t the best poker players, the result is still impressive"
As other commentards have pointed out, poker is a lot less complicated than Chess, and a computer can beat a human at Chess. If you make the goalposts wide enough, you can't fail to score.
This is more PR masquerading as "news". Where do I need to go to find someone Biting The Hand That Feeds AI?
* IT wages will go up
* Manufacturing exports will increase
* We rebalance the economy away from The City - maybe
And yet all the author can do is whinge about the possibility that angel slices might get more expensive. Might being the operative word, as the competitive retail market has absorbed most of the wholesale price rises so far.
No tech angle here, just clickbait for Remoaners.
Exports are imported stuff with value added.
With a lower exchange rate you get a bit of inflation and an export boom. Rival countries hate it, of course. They weren't called "Dirty Devaluations" for nothing!
Expected more effort from Charlie. It's what you'd expect to hear from mates in the pub and he runs out of gags by April. Houllebecq's Soumission is as plausible and if possible even more scary.
Just like you should be able to shout "Fire!" in a crowded cinema.
Maybe Apple just didn't do anything interesting?
Which part of "there is no plan" did you not understand?
All of it apparently. So here's a dictionary definition:
a detailed proposal for doing or achieving something:
Trump mouthed off campaigning. There is not yet a plan. But since Trump is not yet President, this is not surprising. Whether there ever is a plan remains to be seen. Like you, I would expect it to be illegal.
The rest is you bloviating.
What plan? There is no plan. It was just another douchey thing Trump said on the campaign trail.
Journalist careless with language again - probably kicking back and thinking of Christmas.
Suicides are a personal tragedy. But obviously, it's always the Tories fault.
Any chance you could put your brain back in the jar and go somewhere nice for Christmas?
Devaluations are generally good for an economy, as they make exporters cheaper. That's why Labour devalued and why the economy grew so strongly after we left the ERM under Clarke. The pound was too high. There are several articles on here explaining why sterling was overvalued. When you have stopped crying you should try and read them.
"It's too early to call it profiteering."
Now you're apologising for IT customers being ripped off? Good work.
The Register has used the phrase "Brexploitation" several times, but now seems to have lost its bottle, and decided to go for a cheap shot against Farage instead.
"28% didn't vote at all"
They couldn't be bothered, so their views don't count.
Given a few more years of education, maybe you'll get the hang of it.
"No countries are sovereign"
Sovereign nations do trade: they trade as sovereign nations.
You would fail GSCE politics because you don't understand the modern definition of sovereignty, and from that misapprehension, you fail to understand what it is.
"Do you really believe that that (a) most of the Leave voters priced in anything - which in some cases may well prove to be their jobs - and (b) the result of a long term change will be short-term?"
Yes, because after six months of Remainers predicting catastrophe their beds, there is no buyer's remorse. We are leaving the EU. People are pleased to be taking back control, even it is less than they might ideally want.
And a General Election would wipe out the Remain parties: Labour and LibDem.
Remain supporters here really are beginning to sound like they need psychological help.
Let me explain it to you Voland:
We're leaving the EU.
You can cry into your beer all you like.
You can call people names - and "Mr FrogFace" is really imaginative.
You can whine about it until you are sick, then wipe your mouth and whine some more about lies.
But we're leaving the EU.
The British voter looked at Europe, saw it was a massive mess, saw that it was impossible to get a better deal for the UK, and voted for sovereignty.
This was a rational decision that prices in the uncertainty and short-term pain. The poll sponsored by Open Britain (a pro-EU campaign group) and cited in The Guardian (a pro-EU newspaper) was designed to produce the response it got. No surprise there.
Only an idiot thinks leaving a superstate pain free. Most benefits are long-term, prices will fall as the Common Tariff no longer applies to the UK.
Better a Brexit than a Le Pen or a Trump (thank God).
Why are "higher prices here to stay"?
Some IT companies like Microsoft have imposed price rises of over 20 per cent - far higher than can be justified. Others have not. Customers can (and should) move to the companies that price transparently like AWS. Give Microsoft the boot.
And as far as I know Farage does not own any tech companies and cannot be blamed for the profiteering. I would be very surprised if he condoned it.
Oh, you want my health record, Google? And you're paying me how much, Google? Nothing?
OK, fine. Bye.
"VAT is also the cheapest tax to collect per pound collected."
No it isn't, property taxes are the cheapest to collect. Avoidance is very low: houses don't generally move around you know who owns them. Google "unpaid VAT HMRC" and you'll see how much VAT is owed.
I don't necessarily disagree, but what are you taxing exactly?
Are you taxing a corporation just for being a corporation? Or profits earned in the USA? Uncle Sam is very keen to repatriate foreign earnings, I would expect Trump to go after Apple and Microsoft .
From my experience, I have concluded that Californians struggle to hold anything "deeply", let alone a belief.
But it's nice to learn something new.
You have fallen into the trap of thinking that Shiny New Thing is always better than Older Thing, and always obliterates Older Thing.
The Thing here is complex: it is knowledge, but not just knowledge, it's also a desire to acquire knowledge. Which means rewards and social skills like group work.
A classroom of kids clicking in silence through a "gamification experience" while the teacher does a crossword is not progress. It's actually what North Korea looks like. But without the technology.
I have a theory is that this series of self indulgent, content-free advertorials is a new kind of torture weapon devised by the CIA, as a retaliation against Vladimir Putin's bot army. All I can say is "Go CIA!", but please stop inflicting it on us guinea pigs here.
Phew. Just in time, too.
"not a legally binding referendum."
But it is a morally binding promise: sovereignty was handed to the people for this decision (and this decision only).
"The City is too powerful. We need to rebalance the economy away from the City. Goldman Sachs is evil"
- The Guardian, BBC, academics etc for as long as I can remember.
"The City is wonderful. We must do everything we can to keep the City happy. Especially Goldman Sachs. This is a disaster".
- The Guardian, BBC, academics now.
So either they didn't know what they were talking about, or they're just hyping every bit of bad news they can find.
"With computers getting smarter and more inventive"
" the law was changed just over 20 years ago to allow *any* *old* *shit* to be filed as a patent..."
The law didn't change. Patent Offices employ monkeys.
"As if the patent system isn't already full of rubbish and inhibiting the progress of humanity"
Of course it is biased - the author is a renewable energy fanboy.
He has omitted any evidence that might put the wind operators at fault for the blackout. (Eg, they failed to turn off the turbines.) Fortunately we can read all this in the comments.
"Using the expression "SJW" pretty much signals "I'm a dick" IME."
SJW is a derisory term for the self-righteous, smug and intolerant personalities who attach themselves to some Left Wing political causes. Tom Lehrer wrote a song about them. Look it up.
I suspect you hate the phrase SJW because it's a truthful and accurate description of your personality, too.
This is just a wild guess based purely on intuition... and on your posting history.
So demonstrating your lack of gender bigotry by demonstrating religious bigotry.
It is hard to tell what the author objects to, since not one example is cited.
Perhaps the next one will enlighten us all.
Diddums. You lost, you're in the minority. Get over it. (Etc)
Davis & Co won't get everything they want. But a brake on unskilled immigration and easier skilled migration is pretty feasible.
And that's good enough for most people, except sub-minimum-wage paying bastards. Slave labour is not a good thing
"Norway has said it will veto us joining the EFTA"
More desperate Project Fear FUD. Norway has the potential to block the UK's application, but it also has lots of reasons not to do so:
EFTA was originally a club for the non-EEC states - the UK helped found EFTA and was a leading member along with all the Nordics.
Yes, I would say the outlook has tons of potential and upside. It's really up to the UK's exporters trade negotiators to make the most of it. For once it's up to us to make the most of the UK's advantages in contract law and the English language, rather than whinging about Brussels or whatever.
Our trade with the Rest of the World was rising anyway - that's where the new markets and strong demand is coming from. The EU is falling because a) it's in a slump and b) Germany has it sewn up. As I wrote, our emphasis has been and should be on the RoW regardless of Brexit.
"And you really wanted to say the outlook looks good? OK then..."
The needle seems to be stuck on Project Fear. Are you doing this so I can say "I told you so". It sounds very childish.
Our trade balance with the Rest of the World is positive and rising.
Our trade balance with the EU is negative and falling.
Therefore, regardless of Brexit, we the UK should have been focussing on global not EU trade any way. On balance, we got out in time. Trade is the biggest Brexit bonus. A recent David Davis article has lots more useful stuff in it.
"Neoliberals" ... "Shock doctrine" ...blah.
I'd rather assess TTIP independently for myself, rather than take the world of a ranting soap-dodger.
The two countries with the highest per-capita EU science funding go to... two countries not in the EU.
"if I were the EU dishing out grants, or a group of Italian scientists looking for some partners, I wouldn't be waiting around for the us Brits to invoke Article 50, let alone the actual leaving date: I would start making arrangements to do less and less work with British scientists starting right now."
You don't seem to have a clue.
Israel and Switzerland participate in EU science projects, receiving funding. Neither is in the EU.
"The real cause of the industry decline is people spending all their time on facebook."
Nothing to do with not paying for content. That disposable income still gets spent though. It gets spent on other leisure goods and services. If you were right the economics would be reflected in higher savings. The evidence for that isn't there.
It's probably you. I think we can all guess who he means: Guardian readers.
Are you seriously saying that there isn't a metropolitan Left? Is that your point? Then you seem to be demonstrating Kotkin's argument at that people who are signed up to the club are incapable of self-awareness.