"What kind of authority are they claiming that they can do this?"
"We're the Good ol' US of A!"
6926 posts • joined 19 Jan 2007
"We're the Good ol' US of A!"
... a BoFH story that doesn't involve cattle prods or "accidental" deaths (or both).
(I have nothing against them, just that too many recent BoFH tales have used these devices.)
I think he means St Andrew's Cross. And Ikea don't sell them.
They did, however, once sell a vaulting-horse style chest of drawers for kids' rooms which was a convenient height for someone to bend over *and* had lots of drawers for interesting "toys"...
... erm, allegedly...
"everything the government does is legal by definition."
Even if that definition is retro-active...
... just another buried Shadow vessel like the one at Syria Planum...
He did write some excellent books, but it's a shame that his latest ones mostly involved him franchising out his name to other writers.
For instance I'm currently reading (or, rather, struggling through) "Against All Enemies" which has TOM CLANCY in big letters all over the top of the cover and, below it the title. Sandwiched in the middle, in a comparatively tiny font, printed in grey on a crimson background it says "with Peter Telep" who clearly did most of the writing because it's certainly not a Clancy novel.
A bad case of Bait and Switch to end a glittering career :-(
No, they weren't. Note the words "scientific press" rather that "popular press":
"I should clarify that I’m talking about predictions in the scientific press. There were some regrettable things published in the popular press (e.g. Newsweek; though National Geographic did better). But we’re only responsible for the scientific press. If you want to look at an analysis of various papers that mention the subject, then try http://www.wmconnolley.org.uk/sci/iceage/."
"Back in the 1970's, the scientists were screaming that we'd be under a sheet of ice by now"
No, they weren't. See http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/01/the-global-cooling-myth/ for facts.
... putting a full Faraday Cage around the so-called "Quiet Carriages" so clueless, brainless or simply inconsiderate idiots can't ignore the signs saying "Please don't use Mobile Phones" and hold their equally mindless and irrelevant conversations in them whilst pissing off everyone else who wants a bit of peace and fucking quiet on their journey?!
.... Apple will patent the door...
Well unless they're going to get run-over by Curiosity...
... it's just Bob the Dinosaur who's been hiding behind the furniture!
Have a look at the figures cited by the Air Crashes Records Office here.
Note that, for instance, in 2012, there were 119 accidents and 794 deaths. That's the *GLOBAL* figure.
Now compare that with the approximately 1.23 *MILLION* road deaths last year
But aircraft crashes are big and spectacular and make for great TV news, so we keep worrying about the wrong thing because too many people can't see the bigger picture.
... Apple have failed in their attempt to patent the wheel...
... I saw someone saying something about The Waters of Mars recently.
Now Who was it?
"The scary part is that the fucking moron is involved in policy & procedure decisions in a nuclear state ..."
FFS, exaggerating much? He was a Deputy Mayor, not someone who's got their finger on the Big Red Button...!
... won't use it because it's the Spawn of Satan and a Sign of the Coming of the Anti-Christ and a Symbol of the Corruption and Decadence which their Once Great Nation has fallen prey to with all those Commie Left Wing Fags controlling all the News Media (apart from that Last Bastion of the Truth, Fox News) and Goddamn Pinko Democrats especially the one who sits in the White House...
... they didn't leave the engine running, otherwise some chav might take it for a joyride...
... they want a Civil Liberties Officer is to make sure that they have a "cut out" should anyone try to exercise their Civil Liberties and try to find out just how much inforamation the NSA are holding on their own citizens.
The job of the CLaP Officer will be to endlessly repeat variations on "I'm sorry, we cannot discuss that for National Security reasons..."
... from a company I'd never heard of, thanking me for my custom and inviting me to put a review on their site.
The e-mail was sent to <company name>@mydomain, however the company name in the e-mail address was a different company (I use this to see if someone is selling my e-mail details), so I took great delight in giving them a one-star rating and a comment slagging off both the original company and the one who asked for my review whilst salting the review with plenty of keywords to help it appear if someone searches for either business!
I looked at doing some work over the summer via services like Textbroker.
However not only does it only pay a derisory 1p per word, some of the assignments were inviting you to write blog posts praising products you'd never used or, even worse, saying how you'd made loads of dosh through a Make Money Fast scheme!
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Show me your tits,
Fancy a screw?
... the US hasn't demanded that this be banned because it lets whistle-blowers illicitly download files even quicker....
And, as the old joke has it, it was produced by unskilled labour :-)
... of many years ago when a local computer shop had a Hangman demo program written in Basic.
It was dead easy to go in, edit the word list to include certain *other* words that appealed to my schoolboy sense of humour at the time, and then wander off to the other side of the shop whilst keeping an eye on the next person to give the game a go...
... Your iPhone has been infected with a virus. Send $500 to this anonymous e-mail address or we remotely wipe it...
"He's just saying that people didn't care about FB privacy cock ups."
No, he's saying that Facebook doesn't care what people think about their privacy cock-ups.
Remember these are the people who change all
their your privacy settings on a whim and, when you complain, say "you can always leave Facebook..."
Bravo me buckos!
Hmm, nice bit of Double-speak there from Visa! What about *authorised* access (which, of course, being a US company, they're not allowed to talk about...)
... in one of Tom Clancy's stories about the Security Services complaining that TV Shows and Movies had better control centres than they got in real life...
I used to take card payments with a VX670 I got through Streamline, however they were withdrawn earlier this year.
I don't know if it has any relevance to this story, nor what they did with the old ones, but I thought I'd mention it.
... give a phuck!
....at the University of Woolloomooloo, Bruce?
Sure, no problem. There's just a bit of a waiting list.
30 years the last I heard.
Of course there is another way, see icon, but it's a bit tricky to collect it aftewards...
I wouldn't have downvoted you if it wasn't for the fact that companies from other countries get similarly "boned" by America's thinly veiled protectionist nationalism.
Matt, do you really think such childishness adds anything to the (lack of) validity of your arguments?
Still, feel free to down vote me and call me some more names if it makes you feel better. I'll even let you get the last word in since once again you've shown there's no point in trying to have a reasonable argument with you....
Oh dear, Matt, resorting to ad hominem attacks again.
There are parts of London (and other cities) where it is virtually impossible to avoid being within range of CCTV cameras yet, astonishingly, crimes *still* happen in those areas!
You may be happy to have the State monitor and observe and record your every movement and journey and phone call and e-mail and web access, but, please, don't assume that because you "have nothing to hide", you have the right to decide that we should be happy with it too.
And from 2010: "Number of crimes caught on CCTV falls by 70 per cent, Metropolitan Police admits"
"Prosecutions linked to CCTV have fallen in parts of Britain, raising questions about the true impact of the security cameras."
"Scotland Yard sources suggested the fall was because officers deciding only to mark down an involvement of a CCTV camera if it had formed part of the investigation. Previously officers had recorded if a camera was in the vicinity of the crime scene.
"Campaigners suggested that this change meant that the effectiveness of CCTV as a crime fighting tool might have been exaggerated by the previous figures. "
" Last summer an internal Met Police report concluded that for every 1,000 cameras in London, less than one crime is solved per year"."
Still, let's keep on having Big Brother watch us and snoop on our every move and journey and e-mail and phone call. After all, giving up essential liberties for a little temporary security has always been a good thing, hasn't it?
... is the False Positive Rate? How many people were arrested and then found *not* to be criminals?
Or don't we get told that because it makes their scheme look less good in the media?
"... improve their bottom line and boost their bosses' bonuses"
Fixed that for your.
... so there's going to be even more Londonization, concentrating people and jobs in the capital whilst the rest of the country is treated as somehow second class or second rate.
... Double-plus good, Proles!
... like the online version of Security Theatre?
"Will this make us safer?"
"Well, no, but it will make you *feel* safer, so don't worry your pretty little head about it.!"
... is Treasonous, Citizen!
- Your friend, The Computer
Great, but who are you going to tell...?!
I bet their roaming charges are out of this world...
... of axe grinding...?
Have you *looked* at the people who are being elected to office in the US or the UK or several other countries too?!
They're not just deluded, some of them are bat-shit crazy!
And you don't get a choice of candidate, you just get whoever the other nutcases tell you you're getting because they think the same way...
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018