Re: Really useful article.
You merely suspect? Haven't you been following the whole systemd debate?
1028 posts • joined 16 Jan 2007
You merely suspect? Haven't you been following the whole systemd debate?
What exactly is not clear about "up to" in an advert?
Today's news is basically that silly agitators have won on an matter of trivia. So none of the Chattering Classes are looking at poor reliability and service levels. Let alone the Great Firewall (aka IWF).
Oh dear. I don't think much of your musical taste. Among symphonists contemporary with Brahms I'd put Dvorak or Tchaikovsky head, shoulders and torso above the sub-Beethoven-wannabe.
That aside, if you look at any music, there's a lot of repetition. Sometimes identical, other times modified. Whole styles and genres are defined by how repetition works. One of the main things that distinguishes music worth listening to from a pop single is that it's not merely repetition, but development of ideas. From antiphonal echo, to the major classical forms like sonata and rondo, to the leitmotif and its many imitators, to name but a few forms spanning the centuries.
Take the familiar repetition away and you have Stockhausen. Or let the repetition overwhelm development for longer than a pop single and you have muzak.
Which is kind-of like github. Clone something, you have duplication. Fork and go your own way, or feed back to your upstream via pull requests, and you have different modes of development. Is not a bugfix branch just what you say of the genome: an essential component of corrections?
I guess an in-depth study of analogies to other complex systems might look more like a PhD thesis than an El Reg post. Maybe a good halfway house could be a paper examining some aspect in depth, which El Reg could then report and commentards could debate in an ingenious self-reference reminiscent of Escher.
Mine's a pint, please. I'll need it to take this any further.
Now remind us.
How much of the human brain is redundant?
How much of the human genome is duplication?
How much of a great artwork is duplication?
It seems to go with the territory of being large and complex.
but along the way, they turned up a “staggering rate of file-level duplication” that made them change direction.
So their own work was driven by what they discovered after they'd started. That makes it statistically worthless.
Was the slightly-ironic sub-headline El Reg, or from the research? If the latter, I hope the tongue was firmly in the cheek.
The Netherlands have a simple rule - any RTA involving a cyclist, it's the non-cyclists fault.
Citation needed, 'cos that sounds like a misrepresentation in more than one way.
First, it's not fault, it's a presumption of responsibility. That's not the same as fault. Persons in charge of dangerous machines have a responsibility to use them safely.
Second, it's not cyclists vs the rest, it's associated entirely with being in charge of a deadly weapon. Just as if you're in charge of a gun that accidentally goes off and does something bad - even if the person who got shot should never have been there.
There should be a rule - a lighthearted Godwin - about when a discussion gets turned into a punfest.
Yep. Get folks into the habit early. In my case, my first job after graduating made it abundantly clear that working whatever hours it takes for no extra pay was all part of being a professional person, as opposed to a unionised blue-collar worker. So that's the norm.
You want connectivity between the plane's telemetry and the airport. Not to mention weather information that tells you what you're descending into as you go down.
How do you do that with an airgap?
ISTR having been looking for something like that for about 20 years.
Real prize would be to get it in a laptop. Proper laptop, not some horrible keyboard-less device.
Thank you for asking the critical question. Has the CIA infiltrated trust lists such as those of browsers, and/or "real" CAs?
The followup to your question is, why did El Reg not address it?
The story wasn't about someone getting confused. It was about failing to figure it out, and escalating to a helpdesk.
Upvote anyway, for the chuckle.
If this isn't a 1990s PHB joke, it jolly well should be!
You trust a system that makes no attempt whatsoever to verify that people walking into a polling station are who they say they are?
You forgot convicted (in the US) fraudster Conrad Black, who was hacking the public mind for much of the same time as Murdoch. Colonials getting revenge on Blighty for having colonised their countries?
Trouble is, if autonomous cars are only, say, 99% safer than human drivers, what happens when a case is reported where one is responsible for killing someone?
There are lots of precedents for damaging backlashes. In the field of transport, just look at the completely different standards applied to rail deaths compared to road deaths. If the cost-per-death of the Hatfield disaster were applied to motorists, a year's insurance premium would cost more than a new car, and it seems statistically likely that the rail disruption that followed it caused more deaths (by driving people onto the roads) than the crash itself.
Is that related to Catch 22?
Google's core algorithms that power search are affected by an unusual problem: they're under constant attack by spammers, for whom reverse-engineering those algorithms would be a Holy Grail. Every victory for those spammers is a defeat not only for google, but for all of us who use google for search.
Furthermore, google is a huge target for those spammers. A deep-pocketed "SEO" shop might justify a million-a-month R&D effort for the merest demonstrable advantage.
In those circumstances, it makes sense for Google to be less-than open about the detail of its algorithms, and to be constantly varying them.
... apple products.
Sorry for the downvote. The arrow was pointing upwards on my screen.
If the badge denotes that the website is accessible to all users it should be in Braille, or at the very least embossed.
Erm, jokes aren't always obvious in text. Trouble with yours is, it's scarily close to some of the misguided things idiots do for real in the pursuit of an illusion of accessibility.
Putting on my expert hat I should point out that accessibility comes straight from well-written HTML, and it takes a lot less effort to get right than many sites put in to subverting it. From memory, Lane-Fox's own lastminute was one of those that put vast effort into b*****ing it up.
 Some years ago I served as Invited Expert with the W3C on accessibility.
Sometime in the 1980s I first needed to learn C. I picked up the C book, K&R.
After reading the whole thing, it told me little of any value. Most memorably, I came out puzzled: surely C does dynamic memory allocation? Yet I had to ask "what's the C equivalent of Pascal's new"? Yes, it's true, there is not a single mention of malloc in the whole of K&R!
In fact, the most informative learning resource I could find was a Microsoft VC++ manual. Despite the fact that I wasn't even working on an MS operating system, let alone with their compiler. It just happened to be something I could find.
Towards the end of the '80s, I read Stroustrup on C++ and found him a lot more informative. Though when I wanted to get to grips with STL in the 1990s, I found again a great gap in available documentation.
Perl was so much easier, with all the docs built in. Never looked at a Perl book, though.
 I understand that may have changed in later editions of K&R.
A tool like this is more about lowering the bar to a job than about enabling it in the first place. The determined blackhat can do the same already. The competent network administrator might be able to too, if only he had time free from all those more urgent demands!
A tool simplifying the latter's job sounds like a Good Thing to me. And as I read it, this one's got builtin hurdles against casual misuse, so it doesn't lower the bar too much to a script kiddie.
To withhold it would smell of that old favourite, security by obscurity.
... and trawl social media for names and dates associated with lovers, pets, family, favourite things, etc.
Add a nice big database of leaked data and it could cover a lot of phishing grounds.
It's happened to me.
Domain is on auto-renew. All is well for many years, you forget all about it. Then your once-competent-and-reliable provider stops its secondary DNS and domain registration service. Whoops!
I can envisage a case in point.
I have a friend in her 80s, who had to go into hospital for something about a year ago. She lives alone, and normally needs no help. But when she had just been operated, they didn't want to let her out unless there was someone around just in case she needed it.
If I had a suitable spare room (and known about it at the time), I'd've been happy to offer it. If the NHS were paying, it could go a long way towards making it acceptable to a patient who doesn't want to be any trouble.
It's just one more step to do the same with strangers.
Seems particularly ill-considered: how many drivers will want to hang around a petrol station while the chariot gets recharged? Fortunately in the real world, people are installing them more sensibly in car parks: for example, at retail outlets such as supermarkets, city centres and park-and-ride, leisure venues such as theatre/music/cinema, etc.
Eventually it'll be depots for summon-a-car fleets. Recharging along with cleaning and other maintenance.
Selling unsafe goods is not allowed
Wow! What country is this, and when did they ban selling of cars?
If ever there was a time and a place for Windows bashing ...
In order to make a release, we need to push out release candidates. Those, at the very least, will contain whatever security fixes are required. And if a release candidate differs from the relevant public code repo, eyebrows will be raised, and blackhats very interested.
Our preferred solution typically involves committing the fixes quietly, with commit messages that don't mention any security implication of what's being done. The fix, but not the issue, is then public for as long as it takes to release. The security issues are announced when the release candidate successfully becomes a release.
(or at least since I first acquired a laptop, in about 1993 or '94)
I've been waiting for this (kind of thing). Something I could stuff in the backpack for a weekend - or (much better) a week - away, up in the mountains.
I wonder if we can get a spec something like this wishlist? We have the processor and (I imagine) the solid-state storage, so an e-ink screen would complete the trio of hardware fundamentals.
It's coming. Just as I'm getting too old to take advantage, and struggle ever more to lug camping gear and a week's worth of food&stuff over the mountains and still enjoy it.
The prize for winning is more opportunities and a lower bar for European companies to act as privateers, raiding the rest of the world.
At least, that's the general idea, based on how US economic imperialism has worked for a long time. I'm not convinced it can work for Europe, as the dynamics of the legal systems are so different (clearly German lawyers aren't up for it). I wonder if there's a profitable arbitrage to be had in jurisdiction-shopping?
Not just the police, Jock "justice" in general has form. Look at how long they've kept Stephen Gough behind bars.
Which is not to say us Sassenachs have anything to be proud of, though the rottenness south of the border is strongest in our Heart of Institutional Corruption civil justice system. And of course its criminal justice manifestation in Innocent until Proven Broke.
Also, having laws that prosecute people because something is "grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing" is asking for trouble. It is very subjective and easily abused to prosecute basically anyone at any time.
One generation ago: The Romans in Britain.
Two generations ago: Lady Chatterley.
Herby, I really envy you living where you do, if you're not alerted to every power cut by a very characteristic chorus of alarms.
I don't mind you taking my name in vain, but it seems I may have given a misleading impression:
Like Nick Kew who comments elsewhere in this thread,
I didn't say I had difficulty, merely that I had to figure it out. I don't think it took more than a few seconds. I think we were both saying the same thing: it's not entirely obvious how to hold a mouse until you've tried. Not everyone has the mindset to figure such things out.
As it happens, twenty odd years on from that first exposure to a mouse, I did experience difficulty using one, due to an RSI. So I learned to use a mouse left-handed. That took a bit of effort at first: a little more than, say, switching between left-hand- and right-hand-traffic.
In all my time I've never heard this one before. Yay for Fridays.
It's perfectly natural. Maybe more so with some mice than others.
When I first took delivery of a mouse, I wondered why things moved the wrong way. Had I hooked it up wrong, or missed a setting? Oh, right, I'm supposed to hold it the other way round.
 From memory, 1987, with an Acorn Archimedes. None of the machines I used at work had yet acquired mice.
The article is labelled "Team Register", yet uses "we" to speak of the event. As in language such as
The call for paper closes on October 20, and shortly after that, our esteemed programme committee will dive into the proposals, looking for the meat, and discarding the marketing waffle.
I think we should be told. Whose is the authorial voice asserting ownership of the event? What is the relationship of The Register to this event?
Damn thats going to be a huge list.
Precedent: the Domesday Book. How does he see himself on the history syllabus?
Kaspersky are techies, not Politicians (or journos). So they (a) know what they're talking about, and (b) don't have a politico's misinformation Agenda.
I wonder how much they have to lose by pointing fingers at the spooks? Would a Western-based outfit have been too fearful (of loss of business, if not actual arrest) to issue a similar report?
Top law official says welcome white hats.
That could be genuinely useful for some of those who find themselves charged with "hacking". Like "shoot the messenger" prosecutions against researchers who report a bug. Or cases like Randal Schwartz. Tell the court their overlord sees a distinction between hat colours, and argue that the prosecution has to show something bad, like malicious intent or actual damage.
Who remembers the "Blue/Orange/Grey Wall" ?
I remember the gaps, where whatever manual I needed should have been ...
One of the Great Ideas driving the WWW was accessibility - liberating the disabled. From the talking web browser to the alternative input device for Granny Arthritic. Not to mention what it does for the housebound.
It's over thirty years since my days in the Cambridge Maths department, and even back then Stephen Hawking's life and work were conspicuously assisted by both humans and technology.
Yep. All kinds of meds, from the performance-enhancing taken by anyone who goes in for high-level competitive sports through to those taken by older folks thought to be at risk of a stroke or heart attack.
But there's also the plain ol' progression of the ticker through life. And personal events like getting fit, or vice versa. Useful bit of built-in obsolescence there ;) Some of us would insist on there being an override, like (say) the classic password on a post-it note.
 Of the kind that exercise the heart, so maybe not darts or snooker.
Two hearts? That'll make life interesting for the pregnant. But it doesn't look like an intractable problem to me.
Could become a feature. Switch to Boss mode and the screen changes from your play to your work as soon as someone else is nearby. Find out if your boss has a heart.
Damn you for getting in first with that reference (have an upvote)!
I was going to ask if they were licensing the Reg code.
manbreaks automated tests at 00:30
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017