Re: One other potential use
but why?
plenty of better and cheaper options available that are proven to work with CM
827 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2013
"I run a multi-boot OS Machine i.e. Linux / Windows + VM Images of various earlier OSs. 16GB Spare is not something I have lying around even on a fairly large SSD." - you better check your other OSs as MS - via said update - started enforcing removal of incompatible and privacy violating products (they have monopoly for this;).
No, the "easy" boot (with TPM opening the key store for normal start) is not a problem, just a reasonable compromise between usability and security. You can still manage BL lockout so failed login to Windows would force BL key prompt at boot.
It's true that the machine is exposed on the network to all other security exploits (once Windows started) but this particular issue is ridiculous due to type of the problem. Looks like "domain trust failed" is one way affair only and this is the crux of the problem.
Exactly. It looks like a computer account is validated more stringently than server's (certificates etc). Try using VM's snapshot after restore. Same for RDP. Yet servers can be impersonated so easily even though Windows PC has all the certs needed to authenticate DC.
If I recall, MS has recently patched an issue where networked system would execute any logon scripts as long as the path matched. I guess it was too much to ask for MS to really address the source of the problem. Bandaid type of fix it was then.
amd has never made a secret of this "news". Everyone that cared, knew this from the beginning, everyone understood potential shortcoming and everyone else purchased more expensive intel chip.The idea was that in mixed load (real life or not) 8 treads could be executed simultaneously. I won't recall if this best case scenario was more likely to happen than in hypertreaded intel and estimates of what would be performance impact of having this extra fpus present (disabling ht was easy to do and test).
As usual, no love to lawyers and please, do not represent me in your class action or I'll sue you for damages to my preferred chip supplier.
Plus 401k and other retirements schemes we're "encouraged" to save money for the promise of future returns (but no guarantee). Few months back I heard of the same practice being proposed for China to prop their collapsing stock market. If you can't attract investors, legislate them (and the same for the model of health insurance that works mostly to the benefit of insurers).
unless you're in EU where taxes on engine displacement and gasoline skewed the market towards diesel. It was all fun and games until the rules for diesel emissions got so tough that these could not be truly met on economy car (original reason for diesel). Now, not adding the premium for additional emission systems on luxury cars is somewhat surprising, but doing so would bring undue attention to cheaper product.
One conglomerate, same vehicle platforms and the more of less same engines (with slightly modified tune to differentiate performance).
It's amazing how the same engine block can power 170hp golf, 200hp gti and 290hp r. Few modified parts and mostly the same ECU code.
Similarly for TDI engines (including the cheat codes).
Hopefully this is not the case as I do enjoy great mpgs of tsi (all this with real MT - albeit only 5 speed - instead of some awful AT or worse yet, CVT). I'm not sure but normal gasoline vehicle catalyst converter is good enough at scrubbing both carbohydrates and NOx. And in the worst case, I can always say that the car is optimized for CO2 emissions and minimizing of fossil fuel use. While I'd like it comply with all rules I just don't agree with EPA's definition of clean emission vehicle that somehow glances over amount of fuel burned (as long as gas exiting the tailpipe is "clean" percentage wise), allows for disparities due to size and supposed purpose of the vehicle (that ends up hauling all of one occupant 99% of time) etc. All in all, it looks like the most efficient vehicles carry the most burden of rules (that can't be fulfilled withing target cost and/or performance).
There's media center installer for 8 and 10 floating on the Internet. I've "secured" my copy and it works really well (besides EPG that MS given up on, this requires extra work) and seems mallware-free. One has to install missing codecs on 10 (and 8) but on 10 (test box, broken already while cutting down on telemetry and tile eyesores) WMC window looks better than native one on 8 - no more retarded/gaudy wide window frames.
Still, all my system run with updates set to manual, disabled "install recommended updates the same way..." and other precautions. Needless to say, MS made 10 desktop virtually unusable by shifting some system management files into the Metroland (that breaks while you attempt to restrain this gossiper of OSs).
In general I could care less for Metrocrap (easy to keep it out of sight), hate telemetry (but I can manage or even block it). What I'm really afraid is digital servitude. There's no way I'm going to be singing in to my PC with MS/internet account linked to some services I don't care for and can't control or getting my "approved" software only through the Store. While we may still be able to use local account today it's clear that with next "security" update MS will convert our local account to cloud. I'm not buying into this and games (DXn is the only reason to keeps Windows box outside business settings) is too little to keep me inside MS' walled garden.
I'd not trust important updates. All my systems have been set to manual, every non-security update checked before approval (and I'll keep an eye on security updates because MS lost my trust). Plus all the CEIP schedules disabled. And 3GB would strangle my "broadband" for longer than I'd care to wait.
Linux on the emergency exit.
"Smart phones are regularly updated to make them better than when they were purchased. Cars will require the same capabilities."
From experience it looks more like every phone gets slower/worse with OS updates (with extra unusable functionality crammed onto outdated "engine"). I bet everyone asked for the same to afflict their vehicle. Good for automakers, not sure about consumers.
I have no idea in regard to numbers of malicious apps on different platforms. All I know is that the store model is too costly for open/free platform. It's probably low number of apps that helped them catch it and greater popularity would overwhelm Ubuntu team. I'm not a fanboy of other mobile OSes (definitely not Windows;), I just despise walled gardens and believe in mutual responsibility of both sides (OS vendor to provide OS that can be used in secure manner and user that knows better than just to click on next "great" app).
I would not call it bad but 2013+ UI got worse, the metro style worse: bland and painfully flat (and MS keeps preaching this). Try to grab/drag the window and you may get lucky (if you figured out the active part of the window). And it lags, feels almost as if the UI was rendered remotely, somewhere in MS cloud - really odd when IM text barely keeps up with you typing it.
And the app seems to have bad habit of locking out user account.
Still better than IE.
Also the question is if universities (UW is not the 1st one to go after another business) should engage in this kind of practices. Sooner or later their alumni may find themselves unemployable as nobody will like to risk getting them on-board (as every former student may have the "insider" knowledge). US universities make plenty of money as is and should rather concentrate on science and not litigation (maybe with exception of law schools, these are useless by their nature anyway). Not an Apple fan but I simply despise lawsuit happy culture where nobody wins but lawyers.
Not seeing updates checked but MS likes to reissue same KBs with new time-stamp so one has to keep a watchful eye.
Uncheck - give me recommended updates the same way...
Also, if you keep getting updates un-hidden try not clearing IE cache (specifically cookies) or just uninstall IE altogether and this way you'll avoid "accidents".
7, 8 ... linux
Never cared for heated seats. Now, having heated steering wheel option is too much to ask for (maybe once one included all the crap the automaker had on sale). The grass is always greener elsewhere but to me it seems that EU buyers are offered more logical/practical choices while US customer is easily impressed with bling and ends up with big, heavy but often primitive pontoon on 4 wheels (and 72 months of car payments).
I guess US is poor stepchild - not even independent rear suspension (elantra gt that looks to be closest match, irs absent across all compact lineup). I guess you get what you paid for - lower $ here, but the only "important" similarities are big rims.
And just forget about 2(3) door option.
I don't often advocate for "new and improved" functionality in OS, but I'd admit that ever since "discovery" of mouse with the scroll-wheel there's no need for scroll-bar. Huge bright scroll-bars and title-bars definitely add insult to injury in ever since Windows 8 (and burn plasma screen attached to my HTPC). Obviously, user has been protected from his/her own choice on MS platform
Car makers keep developing head units instead just providing a spot to slap the phone into (magnetic mounts work great). All that's really needed is charging, good bluetooth link, decent amp and volume knob (no touch please). The rest does not matter much. With the size of new smartphones all these dashboard gadgets attempt to duplicate functionality (and fail miserably at it). CarPlay (and alike) locks out most of the phone interface (safety or not most users will get annoyed in no time), adds to the cost (or encourages cuts elsewhere - i.e. drive-train or even amp/speakers). And since it makes no other sense we know it's all about money, our money. And I'd rather spend it on the phone (or keep it given the choice).
150kg is quite a lot of mass. It'd be difficult to account for it in extra emission hardware. Quite likely 508 is slightly smaller, weaker structurally or to contrary uses more high strength steel, possibly better engineered or maybe has smaller/lighter rims/wheels and no spare. Anyway, 11% less mass = better efficiency in city. Lower mass and resulting frontal area of the vehicle = better efficiency on the highway (though not as much difference). Things like transmission/gear ratios matter as well.
new MS for you.
Just yesterday I installed 10 on brand new box. I cleaned it up/silenced it and then I realized that this system not only has little to offer to me but since I can't trust it I really have no use for it.
As for the update - little surprise. With 7 on extended life support MS will be actively sabotaging it to convince masses to move over to new, "better" offerings (that also suit their vision). Whoever hasn't disabled auto updates yet, got another warning shot now.
but verify.
I have a 10 Enterprise test box setup, local account, OS hacked to the point of braking it (all tin-foil applied;), all MS telemetry request denied and yet it wanted to slurp some. I did not monitor network traffic but when I rummaged through the folders looking for telemetry files I found them (content often difficult to read but keywords stand out here and there). Not just OS or MS apps. They actually would collect some queries of my Firefox searches. Is MS running Mozilla's CEIP? And why they care about what I typed and not just performance data.
"Hammond, who receives copies of the agency's compliance documents to ensure they are following the relevant legislation. These are documents the spooks provide themselves. Hammond is also responsible for signing warrants under RIPA."
I bet it works as well as VW's compliance with emission rules.
while they chase after little guy, their policies placed lower burden the bigger you got. The solution (at least here in US) - sell only "trucks". The result - hulking giants on highway (driver only most of the time), average fuel economy improving mostly on paper (windows stickers) and ballooning costs of safety devices necessary for all vehicles to keep occupants somewhat safe (probably not when hit by a giant). This and lack of choice for the few that would like something more sane (law of averages at play).
Running Disk Cleanup utility and cleaning up Windows Updates has unwelcome side-effects - all previously hidden updates come back out and one has to hide them again (or risk installing the next actual updates get mixed in). At least automatic updates don't get switched back on (for now knowing MS).
I have not switched yet to Linux but MS keeps nagging me to do so. No excuses at this point but plain laziness (FireFox runs just fine on anything and neither 8 nor 10 has nothing to offer outside of basic OS functionality... and forced telemetry).