Re: [citation needed]
Have I strayed onto wikipedia here? Can't see a begging banner.
410 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Feb 2013
There is obviously a difference, but there have been many implementations of the Java API and android was based on one of them, Harmony. The only time licensing has ever been an issue with anyone but Google was when someone released an implementation and using the Java name without passing Suns/Oracles Java TCK (Technology Compatibility Kit) process.
Microsoft fell foul of this when they shipped their own non compliant Java branded runtime. Android's only Java aspect is the programming language. Where are the lawsuits against GCJ, IcedTea or even Harmony.
It has been mentioned elsewhere on here Sun encouraged Java to be re-implemented which involves implementing the API. In a sane world where law makes sense the only potential issue would be around copying code that actually implements the API. If you go through the code that Oracle brought to the table in the first round of this, it were demonstrated to be test code inadvertently committed by a sub contractor or just so trivial that even the Judge stated that is the only sensible it could have been written (rangeCheck).
the rights of people in other countries to access lawfully published information
I love that line, they took the opportunity to point out how ludicrous this is. Judging by the comments and down votes here I think a few people have forgotten what the "right to be forgotten" is all about. It's not about deleting information from the internet, it's for people who decide they don't like the fact that things they have done have been published on things like news sites and turn up in a google search.
BBC news have a page where you can view all their articles that google have been made to remove search history for.
RE: To some extent, however Google Map's aren't the same quality as Streetmap's, probably because Streetmap uses Ordinance Survey maps..
That obviously depends on the purpose people are using them, OS is great for many things but not every usecase, but often you don't need to know contours or if a road is very steep. Generally, People obviously prefer a less cluttered and more interactive map, you can't overlay live traffic info on an OS map, it would look terrible.
Much of OS data is now open, Streetmap are very far behind, they just seem to be regurgitating OS raster maps, maybe if they just stopped whining and focused on improving thy could have got somewhere. Today, they could be using the OS datasets to create a much better product. I've used a lot of their data and you can create some nice accurate maps tailored to the task at hand.
Maybe my post was too subtle. The school is funded by tax payers money. Given that why should any preference be be placed on a potential pupil based on their religion. if a church was to fund the school out of their own pocket I'd be happy to concede that. But I pay the same tax the other parents pay so why does my child not have the exact same chance of getting into a school 100m away as my neighbours kid and instead I have to take her to a school in a different town?
Yes, I do know they can do this, there is even a specific clause in the discrimination act. My subtle(?) point which was "why", this is want makes my blood boil. Religion has no place in education other than a subject, but to explicitly bend over backwards to allow discrimination based on it has no place in todays world.
This simply makes my blood boil, the fact that someone attends church improves their chances of getting into a school. The fact that it is a religious school should have no consequence on can go there, if it were funded by a church, fair enough but not when it's tax payers money. I would love to see someone claim relgious dicrimination for failure to get in.
I still can't understand hpw in this day and age there is any aspect of religion in schools beyond RE lessons that simply teach about what people beleive in. And pesonally, I don't see why that has to be an individual subject.
It's a paypal bug, Anyone who accepts data from an untrusted source and uses it without validation should not be in the position they are in. It's quite a simple rule, and no different to the one we tell our children about strangers.
Java serialisation is something very useful, in the right circumstances, anyone who says that it flaw inherent in Java (as has been stated in comments to related articles) is simply wrong.
Oh, that's ok then. Why do companies think this is the most important thing to state. A lot of people would be covered for fraud done with data like this and the company would be expected be made to cover any costs involved.
However, personal and health info once released there is no way to undo
Not really sure what you are getting at.
However, Oracle are free to do do what they want with openjdk apart from revoke the GPL license.
They own it and can license it under a different license at the same time to themselves or anyone else. They already do this with their own java distribution, an openjdk build is not the same as oracle's distribution, if they want to add non-gpl code to their build they are not obligated under the GLP to open source the extras. If you GPL some code you are allowing anyone to use it under the GPL, you however can do what you want with it, there are plenty of examples out there.
"The root cause of the problem is down to apps not validating or checking untrusted input prior to deserialisation"
I bet c#/c++/ruby/... developers are pleased that this is a java specific problem then.
Who in their right mind does not validate untrusted input and find it hard to beleive that anyone would de-serialise objects with data from an unknown source or even expose an endpoint that expected it? Probably the same people who concatenate user input string to make sql statements. They deserve what they get.
I'd really love to.
But first we'd need cross browser support, only chrome comes close natively supporting the required features, and they are incredibly slow to start using a polyfill like polymer. Even then we still need javascript, or are they saying js embedded in a web component ok?
Free != Free as in beer.
There is nothing preventing people from selling GPL software as long as you abide by the GPL and make the code available to those you distribute to. Over the years I've bought quite a number of linux distos and it was quite common before fast internet connections were widely available to be able to buy copies of various GPL'd software.
, "Apple has its HomeKit scheme to produce an IoT standard that will make everything interoperate"
Let me correct that for you
Apple has its HomeKit scheme to produce an IoT standard that will make everything you have bought for a hefty price from Apple interoperate, everything else will fail or be glitchy.
No, this is still a very common use case for java, especially at the enterprise level. What are the alternatives? A bespoke app for each platfrom? Too much effort. All the cross platform APIs I've seen are pretty rubbish.
HTML5 falls far form the mark for a lot of applications.