Re: Pot. Kettle. Black. - I forgot to mention
All those cloud services. It's doing for many IT people in SMEs. Perhaps the future is closer than we like to think
1261 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Jul 2007
These systems are doing what they're meant to do. As requested by the customers and built by the IT firms, broadly speaking in terms of readership, "us". It could put people out of jobs in that industry. It could cause more widespread damage to the economy.
Didn't the luddites have something similar against mechanical looms, or trade unions in the '70's against robot production lines and containerisation? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24058389 might be timely in that middle class jobs may go broadly the same way as working class ones. It's all a similar sort of progression.
I bet if your pension/investment fund said that they could make more money for you and at the same time have less fleshies earning telephone number bonuses you'd generally think this a good thing.
I'm not particularly advocating high frequency trading. I work part time in the city, not in that field, and I despair of the lack of ethics in some of what I read about however I think sometimes we should look at what we do before being too critical. That Lotus 1-2-3 sheet you installed in the late '80's probably did for a couple of accounts clerk's jobs, that colour laser printer with integrated stapler/duplexer was the nail in the coffin for the chap at Prontaprint etc etc. It's a bit like the chap who makes the tubes for a missile. His job probably involves someone getting killed. Maybe as "collateral damage" but he's doing something legal and supporting his family and it's not down to him how people use what me is involved in making, although some activists might differ on that.
All that efficiency we say IT can deliver to companies, well that's at the expense of someone's job. This is not really that different, it's just that now many of us are not on the crest of the wave and suddenly we find we no longer like the game so much.
Tha's just how life is.
I'd no idea hobby was a code word, but I guess that's the point.
If, for example, "hobby" (or something akin to it) were to be banned now, and I set up a legitimate business with a name and a website, let's say "protractor.co.uk"*, if after a few years that becomes a code for something nefarious, will my domain be pulled? What of the cost to my business, branding etc. In fact why stop there, I could have a newsletter that goes out, perhaps even in hard copy. Would that be stopped by the post office as a potentially obscene publication?
*Yes, yes, I KNOW. "Weapons of Maths Instruction" and all that, (sigh)
Humanssss. If you want a challenge to act as an imperative for your evolutionary processs, send breeding pairs to Mars instead of your old and expendable.
In a few generationsss, we'll have sssome sssport. That is if any of you sssurvive whilsst we wait
Icon: sorry I'm undressed at the moment
as vendors of systems try to work out how to prove absolutely that their systems are compromised neither by design (collaboration/back door) nor theft (of the key, difficult at the best of times) nor cracking (insecure/defective standards etc). After all that's what they're trying to sell us so that we can assure our own bosses/customers that we as IT departments are being dilligent.
I expect to see an awful lot of "we would comply with any lawful request/court order and cannot comment further" type statements to be boilerplated onto their responses, which in light of recent articles should be treated with the contempt they deserve.
Other interesting consequences of this might be that if the companies/products/technologies are named and (if appropriate) shamed, then as well as a possible drop in sales, there might be some legal actions for refunds from past customers or even possibly, if a key has been (as is alleged) stolen from a security product vendor by the NSA or at least obtained in a less than honest manner (I've no idea of the points to prove in the USA for their equivalent of theft) then maybe there will be a case by a vendor for damages against the NSA (even if only for "damage to reputation"), although given how retrospective legislation apparently allowed the warrantless wiretapping to be swept under the carpet, I'm not exactly holding my breath.
Are they kidding?
It's got some potential, but only in the same way as going to the optician has the sde benefit of picking up lots of non-ophthalmic conditions such as diabetes.
There are plenty of things that can alter the ECG that might neither be immediately life threatening nor even noticeable to the patient. Unless this thing is smarter than the average consultant cardiologist (nurses, you can stop laughing now) then every time someone cannot access an application or it alerts them to a change then waiting rooms at the GP will fill up with the "worried well".
I'm in favour of employees or agents of bodies to whom we must hand over data under force of law (public authorities etc) being held personally liable for careless/reckless loss. A conviction, possibly with jail time, should prevent them being re-employed thus ensuring "that lessons really are learned".
For private companies, the ICO should have a range of options, possibly including the right to withdraw their permission to hold/process data (perhaps with 30 days notice to prevent absolute chaos). That really would be fun to watch. Once permission has been withdrawn from a company, with almost the certainty of corporate failure, you can be sure that pressure from disgruntled (ex-)customers, shareholders etc will ensure that other companies rapidly take their responsibilities much more seriously.
This http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/350498.stm might explain why some people are a bit nervous. It would appear that, where they are not just pure lumps of metal, these things might not be totally safe if you bump into one. I'm sure the naval recovery bods are OK with this and have procedures and equipment to suit, but they're not the only users of the sea, or around there, underneath it*.
I'm not saying it would be safer to go piling into a ship chock full of munitions, fuel etc with something dangling from an extremity that might well be armed and dangerous, but given the fragility of the reef (in a number of ways) it is a bit of an unfortunate place to do it, from a PR point of view if nothing else.
*I had a nice trip in a yellow submersible vessel of some kind around there. Other tourists missed their slot. I wondered aloud if in the case of the Germans they'd been looking for something greyer with U and a three digit number on the side. Not every appreciated this for some reason.
"Most users don't need 200Mbit/sec anyway to look at cat pictures on the interwebs."
Possibly not but it's that kind of patronising attitude, often from the utilities and authorities, that results in large swathes of the country (and not just the countryside, although I am in the latter) being palmed off with a poorer infrastructure which in turn can inhibit economic growth, amongst other things.
I recall being told many years ago when I used to bitch about the slow rollout of broadband (rather than the current rollout of slow broadband) that dial up was perfectly fine for internet access. Not, I think, an era that many of us would willingly opt to go back to now.
There's also a namecheck in "Remembrance of the Daleks" whilst some non-Terrans are giving it large to the local soldiery:
Rachel: 'I wish Bernard was here,'
Allison: 'British rocket group has its own problems,'
A nice touch.
I hope there will be mention of the (Sir) John Mills version sometime. I was lucky enough to see the full length version once.
Would it not be an idea to simply require the payment processing companies to remove from any "trader" on a website where there is payment for images that are illegal (and I appreciate the distinction from immoral/distasteful) the ability to receive funds?
I appreciate that there will be ways to get around this ("tokens" purchase elsewhere, private message boards where payment is not involved, Bitcoin type currencies) but pornography is mostly a commercial enterprise. The legitimate sectors could continue to be the economic drive for modern media (home video cassette players, the internet and whatever's coming next), but where I work some of the time we receive notices from HMG on blacklisted entities for any financial transactions. I would expect that a couple of court orders to the credit card companies once perpertrators have been identified (and I beleive that in reality there are only a couple, CC co's that is) would eventually cascade down the chain and make these enterprises too troublesome to re-establish on a continual basis. That would at least cut things down quite a bit and could also be used for other illegal enterprises (jurisdictional issues permitting).
I've no idea what is required to be able to receive CC payments but under the "know your client" rules a certain responsiblity rests also with the banks and related companies. A bit of personal liability or reputational issues here (few would deal with a bank known to be facilitating child porn, as an example) could solve this issue much more sensibly.
The trouble with shielding is that the device is designed to detect extremely faint signals and then react appropriately to them (or their absence, but some cardiac waveforms require action so it's not just a simple "absence of signal = shock now" issue). It's the same as when the ambulance crew turn up with a monitor and start putting ten sticky pads on you (12-lead is actually a slight misnomer) or you're in a cath lab. The human central nervous system and the heart don't exactly work only in a regulated frequency band and all those leads are in effect antennae (ariels?) that could also pick up lots of stuff around. One reason (perhaps less of an issue now) why in some areas of some hospitals you are requested to turn off your mobile phone, airwave handset etc.
The "fault" really lies with the design of things like the sino-atrial node. You could complain to the creationists or those supporting "intelligent design", but other than that your options might be a bit limited.
One that functions as a remote keypad/screen for the xphone in my jacket pocket so I can see who's calling and accept/reject, dial numbers or look up contacts and control the media player functions, all whilst listening/talking through some tiny bluetooth headset.
That should cut down on all the opportunistic phone thefts involving bicycle riding ne'er do wells and similar problems.
So if I lived in the US and had the technical know how (or a transmitter bought from the wrecker's yard):
that's one to be fitted to the kid's bicycle to create a safe zone around them with nothing else moving within 200 ft on their way to school;
one to be fitted to the car with a manual trigger to get that tractor-trailer rig I'm trying to pass but who speeds up a bit as I pull out to let me in; also to get the driver of that Ponctiac who thinks he can overtake ME (the cheek!) to find suddenly he can't
one perhaps on each lamppost on the street so our kids can play safe..
Someone's going to be the first to do it....
IIRC there was a case a long time ago when someone's equipement was damaged by either the frequency or voltage of the UK mains supply being dropped a bit during a time of insufficient supply, and the end result was you either get supplied power that meets "the standard" or you don't. I have no idea if this still applies.
If there's not enough power for an area, the surely they'd just cut it from the substation onwards? Much simpler and probably cheaper in terms of control kit. Apart from dealing with non-payers but there's already a mechanism for that. One also hopes that there won't be profiliing of customers with these things so that (for example) most people get cut off but not "VIPs" (politicians, local officials etc)
If some devices are recognised as being "critical" such as medical devices etc then will some form of UPS be required? That could cause an upset regarding costs but I'd also be thinking of one for things like my freeview+ box, simply as if I can't watch something at the time of broadcast as the power to the TV is gone at least I can hopefully watch the recording later, but for those people running a home based business on (say) eBay or even filling in government forms on the internet as a citizen, if the power to the PC/Router etc is going to just drop off then there's going to be an awful lot of complaints and non-compliance "the power company ate my homework/tax return" etc.
If they are thinking of some form of prioritisation where dryers are turned off before pumps on central heating boilers then there'll be a market in hacking your goods so that everying reports to the meter as being "critical for life" and doesn't get cut off.
Clearly you are the one responsible for the fact that the computer games industry died an ignominious death shortly thereafter and is but a distant memory to a few older readers.
The RIAA, MPAA, BSA and others will no doubt want to hold you to account for the fact that they're all living in penury.
/irony
Unfortunately if users (as I assume they will eventually be able to) needing prescription lenses to see clearly have these integrated, that might not be an option. One could carry around a "dumb" pair of glasses and I expect many employers might well insist on this for work time but if you're the sort of person who'd wear google glasses in their own time then you've every instance of needing to enter the pin at the Tesco checkout or unlocking your smartphone (with the 2 minute autolock that we're all advised to have) when you want to reply to a text or something and quickly it will become too tiresome to do this.
"the electricity companies are paying for them"
Out of the goodness of their hearts?
No. This will be them paying for them in the same way that the mobile telco's give me a free mobile if I take out a high enough monthly tarriff.
Unless of course you think that any electricity company will take an exceptional charge (sorry) on their accounts, reducing their profit and director's bonuses because they really exist just to help us, the customer.
I'm not just worried about this threat for my home, but also my principal employer is in a multi-occupancy office building with separate metering per floor for recharging purposes. I can't really see them securing the intermal meters either, at least not until after all the tenants have gone to their offices with pitchforks and burning torches demanding the restoration of supply after the first outage. If these things are hacked "randomly" it will take ages to sort out if it's the main one for the building "in the street" or all the internal meters that have been done. All the while we'll be unable to conduct business, although a more damaging attack might be to get them to cycle every 45 minutes or so, just long enough to exhaust the UPS and frustrate all the staff