Well done, Mr. McCarthy! Take a couple of attaboys out of petty cash.
Or let's at least offer him one or two of these -------------->
I have to go wash my hands now, the dripping sarcasm is all over them and dripping on the floor.
12880 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Nov 2012
I wish I could find some old shit lying around the house that an idiot would buy for silly money
My parents tossed my stuff in the attic several decades ago. Only now do I find out that I could have had a great retirement from them.
Had such things as
Complete baseball card sets form the late 50's, a full library of the Fantastic Furry Freak Brothers comics, along with quite a few of the old Marvel comics and other comic books including early Mad Magazine issues.. <sigh>
I'm curious how they will find all of us who are using 2016 or older. Here on my box, the Windows 7 partition never sees the Internet as it's more of legacy programs that I use. The Linux side... only for Internet use currently. But stil... are they going to door to door and insist on checking your computer? How will they get "everyone" as there's an implication that one has to have acquired Office via employment? Greedy bastards.
Oh, I think the apathetic public does indeed give a damn. Most are just sitting around bidding their time until his term(s) up. From what I can tell from associates, co-workers, even people in the pub, they're pretty fed up with Tweet-storms and BS coming out the White House.
And he probably will get a second term as the Dems are destroying each other instead of focusing on their target next year. It is apparently true in politics that the squeaky wheel gets the grease and Trump squeaks the loudest and more often then the others.
Perhaps they should use Apollo era parachutes, they all folded into an impossibly tight space yet never failed and they didn't have long to test them.
Maybe pride has something to do with it? It is an EU and Roscosmos project. They'd probably hate to have the US credit for the chutes. The other thing is Roscosmos does have quite a bit of experience using chutes.
Japan is a little trickier -
I'd say more than "a little" as they really have no natural resources. That's part of why they tried to establish the empire and brought on WWII in the Pacific. They can export manufactured goods all they want but without access to the raw materials, their' economy is screwed.
That's what I was thinking. The slope down has started. It wouldn't be too much of stretch that anyone drawing any benefits including Social Security could find themselves on a list.
BTW, NHS is for those in Britain. We don't have an NHS here in the States. Well, not as such because we do have various programs for medical... Medicare, Medicaid and probably more that I don't know the acronyms for.
The underlying assistant technology will, of course, find its way into Office.
I'm sure that having Cortina on every PC in a call center or large open office will go over well. So more spying there then....
As for One Drive.. why have they been so pushy unless they're getting something in return like file access and then subscription fees.
I think Windows 7 will just stay put forever on other boxen as there's no Linux drivers for my Laser Cutter. Meantime, my Linux box is where I want it.
It seems bizarre that if weed is legal in a state that someone can still be fired for using it.
Alcohol is legal also but there is a line one shouldn't cross. Ok.. manglement excluded but some workplaces (machiniery, chemical) have zero tolerance if a pee test during working hour shows drugs/alcohol in your blood. Those usually are for jobs where alertness, etc. are required like pilots, machinists, and others.
Indeed, and for Top Secret and Cryptoclearnce, they go back a long way. I think it's normally about 10 years for anything "Secret", but I remember getting my clearance they went back something like 20 years but I was 21 at the time.
Disclaimer: That was about 50 years ago and I only had the clearance for 3 years. Even so, they probably still have that file on me.
If Boeing is proven to be wrong then they are finished as a company as this really is a case of three strikes and you are out.
Only the civilian airliners part of the company will be in danger. The rest is buried in military work, NASA, etc. The company structure and finance that control those structures are probably more resilient than the hardware/software.
Microsoft gets customers’ permission before collecting and using their voice data.
Indeed, it's buried in the fine print out back, behind the shed. Or more accurately, in the terms and conditions fine print that users seldom ever read before clicking on "ok.. let's go see what this does?" type thing.
Right. Except people with power want more power so they will control this and there's a large segment of society that would allow this because "everything now feels good". Walk into a store and suddenly you're buying stuff because the brain waves tell you to. Or we set this up to control our militaries.
Sorry but this tech should scare the crap of anyone with a rational functioning brain.
I think it is just illegal to buy aircraft that is militarised, or equipped with weapons, military mission systems eg fire control radars, or any other type of equipment or systems which have national security classifications.
You're right. The plane has to be "civilianized" (for lack of a better term). All war-fighter gear removed.
Upon reflection of the title of your post, the answer methinks is "both".
Here in the States we have a rise in extreme right and the extreme left. We also, for the most part, have easy access to firearms. Eliminating guns may cut down the number of "attacks" but it won't stop them. Remember the Oklahoma City bombing? No guns involved.
Those motivated to do evil won't be stopped by gun controls or any other panacea. It's the mindset they have. Changing that will be a big part of the solution but also a very daunting task to say the least.
There's an interview floating around with a former extreme right type who's know working to get folks out of that. But he points out that if, per his example, one pilot is ready to take out a bunch of people it wouldn't be all that hard.
So solving the extremist problem is going to be harder than solving the gun problem. And the solutions and will to implement will have to come from the top. The demand for such changes will have to come from we, the people.
Actually, you can own a .50 cal machinegun, an anti-tank weapon, even a fully operational tank. There's a place in Nevada that actually has a gathering every year where folks do bring all sorts of weapons and blast away in the desert. The catch is they are highly restricted via license fees and background checks.
Remove people's guns and you remove their ability to kill large numbers of people.
While the "mass" shootings get the press, we have places here in the states where the gunfire can resemble a combat zone such as Chicago.
As for the idea of "removing people's guns"... how do you propose to do that? Door-to-door searches? The US is big... really big. A law banning firearms won't do it as even if all the places that sell guns were shut down, there's still one helluva lot of them.
So.... how do you remove the guns? Answer that and you'll solve the problem.
Disclaimer: I am a licensed firearm owner of just one gun. You want me to give up my gun, guarantee me that no one with evil intent will try to break in my house or assault my person. The cops sure as hell can't offer that protection.
I'm not a fan of Amazon or Bezos but I do have to wonder about the timing of this. What's scary is that they are in the running for that fat, exclusive Defense Department contract (JEDI). If they won't help with Netflix's situation, I would wonder what they won't do for the Defense Department.
Followed by wailing and gnashing of teeth and a stern word from the CEO for "disrupting" his business...
Curiously, the company went into receivership shortly thereafter...
I'm surprised that they didn't blame you for going out of business. The old saying "a scapegoat must be found" applies.
How long until the entire 737 fleet (original/classic/next gen/max) is grounded because it was only luck and some chewing gum that kept them in the air after failing all of the modern testing due to a lack of redundancy?
It's not just redundancy. They now have two of each for the computers and sensors... there probably should be three to "vote" as if one burps now, which one of the two is the problem?
I did wonder what they'd be wanting encryption for, because (like OP) my first thought was that the comms is generally a ground->ground relay so the decryption need only happen at the ends.
Since this is just a test, they're probably thinking about banking and military data transfers via satellite. Just a guess as to the "why".
Id I were in the age group they're now hiring, I'd have to think twice before even applying. They probably won't keep these new hires around after they reach a certain point in salary. Yet, the old guys in charge will hang around forever and collect their mega-dollar bonuses. Definitely a rigged system for a company that seems to be dying slowly.