Re: An easy solution
Should. Mostly don't though.
1368 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Nov 2012
All utter rubbish.
Jujitsu is staking all the flak here but most of the issues are on the buyers side:
"Budgets should be baked into the contract and legally enforceable" - legally unenforceable if the buyer changes the specification constantly, which always happens.
"Likewise timescales" - see above.
"...to a maximum of 20% of the total contract value." And if the buyer demands changes costing +100% of the original contract?
Until government/civil service learns to nail requirements down up front and stick to them, this is going to keep on happening.
I think it is far too easy to claim that because in-house government projects worked well in the past, they would work well now. I suspect this wouldn't be the case. Back then civil service was seen by many to be an honourable duty; people tried to do the best they could. I don't think this is the case any more, in the private or public sector.
"(see also: US school shootings)"
You were doing so well until this, which as written is meaningless but I'm going to assume you favour increased gun control of some sort. Which isn't the problem, never has been and will not be fixed by 'political will.' The US constitution will put paid to that.
The real issue is the mental health and routine doping of ten's of thousands of kids.
Prices are not connected to costs, except insofar as you don't want to price something lower than your costs. Prices are what the market will bear/what someone is willing to pay. We get these prices for mobiles because people put up with them, or don't understand them, or don't care about them. Which isn't entirely surprising: ignoring hardware, the contract for air-time/data is going to be the same for a billionaire as it is for a pauper.
This isn't actually true. The supply of money is far more complicated than that (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply) and governments/central banks do have significant control over it through absolute control of the M0 and MB supply and by legal restraints on banks gearing of M1 and above.
"Train drivers are paid for taking responsibility for other people's well being."
They most certainly are not. H&S on the railways is almost entirely down to Railtrack in the UK. Nobody has been killed by a driver error where there wasn't infrastructure faults as well, for decades. Drivers are glorified bus drivers on three times the salary.