Re: Faster and easier
"does anyone have a keygen"
Sure, just make sure you run it on a PC with lots of confidential information, OK?
691 posts • joined 2 Nov 2012
"does anyone have a keygen"
Sure, just make sure you run it on a PC with lots of confidential information, OK?
A few years younger, but similar story. After graduation I applied for IBM, HP and Nokia as they had development centers close to my home town and were considered prime employers at the time.
I'm so happy none of them considered me good enough. Now working happily since 20 years at another company that may not pay top dollar but has a good working climate and our HR is populated by human beings (allegedly).
Can't say I dodged the bullet. It's more like I stumbled out of the way.
I'd opt for a me163. It would probably kill me, but I am sure it would be worth the experience.
and the buttons looked the same.
Hmm, now I have the Axel F. tune in my ear...
Now you'd think this wouldn’t be an issue for long. AT&T's a big company, as is Linksys, and they have a vested interest in protecting their customers and making sure that their kit isn't subverted. Not so it seems.
Nicely put. Made me spill my coffee all over the place.
I always have a sinking feeling when I read about falling creators.
Will they ever land?
If I copy all my failed clinical trial data to Borat-istan and then claim I can't say how many patients died because that would be against Borat-istan data privacy laws - you can bet the FDA is going to take a dim view.
The case is a bit different, however. It is not Google's data we are talking about. It is someone else's data that the Irish branch of Google stores for a third party.
The sensible move would be to force the data owner to hand over his data. If the owner cannot be forced for whatever reasons, then the US court should request the Irish authorities to support in this case.
The US is trying to use the market power of their multinational companies as a lever to support their policies and circumvent proper procedure.
No there isn't because the average person is too stupid to make the connection, and You Can't Fix Stupid.
Problem is - even relatively intelligent non-techie people have no clue about the risks of connected devices. They see the convenience and shrug away the risks.
On a personal note - Last week wifey bought a creepy connected talking teddy for our toddler. I told her the thing is nothing else than an unsecured bluetooth headset connecting to a dodgy app. Anyone around can connect to it. The app can probably hacked as well and the Android tablet it runs on hasn't seen a security update for the last one and a half year.
Wifey shrugged it away and meant that there is nothing interesting any listener could hear in our house, anyway. The depressing truth is - she is probably right.
Somewhere in the software they probably calculate the ratio of seized funds versus returned funds.
Obviously the software crashes with a division by zero error.
Maybe I should just reserve Meeting Room A in the central building as usual.
Or just use Lync, er, Skype for Business, erm Microsoft Teams, ... oh well, whatever it is called now, as long as it is still supported. And perhaps they will finally implement a microphone gain adjustment that actually works. (See icon)
Edit: Wow - not even 30 seconds up and already the first downvote. Looks like Microsoft is using downvote bots these days. Of course if you have a solution to turn on the automatic gain control on Lync (or however you call it) I'd be really happy. Feel free to post.
can we have this translated to something more universally understandable? Perhaps in guinea coin size or something?
Wanting more women working in IT is like wanting more women imprisoned.
Not sure what you want to imply here. Women are clearly discriminated in our society. For example they receive far fewer Darwin awards.
Or perhaps there might be a connection?!?
Sorry, but according to your media history we found out that you like to wield deadly weapons, have a history of violence and a secret "Conan" identity. For safety reasons you cannot enter the country any more Mr. Schwarzenegger.
You owe me a keyboard Mr. Trump.
And as we are on it. Could we also outlaw general relativity? Why should we limit ourselves to the speed of light?
I remember when 'stream ripping' was called 'home taping',
Yes, but as we all know, "Home Taping was Killing Music". That might also explain why so much popular music is produced by soulless zombie bands nowadays.
Do they have a USB interface?
Some special cattle prods might have.
Ohh, so surprised, how could this happen?!?
Anyway. Given how this octopus spreads its arm in so many modules, this is probably only the very tiny tip of a very big and cold iceberg.
to broadcast the songs. They would have called him a pirate and hang 'im from the yardarm.
Hmm, a short search of the microsoft website shows that there is at least a mechanism for microsoft to update the microcode. They seem to deliver it via windows update.
Perhaps Intel can persuade them to deliver this specific update quickly and with a comprehensive description?
Current Linux distros (Ubuntu from at least 15.04 on) have a "3rd party driver" feature to update the CPU microcode. Both, for AMD and Intel.
Does this solve the problem? If so, enabling that driver would be a simple workaround.
I wonder, if a similar feature is available for Windows, too.
Edit: See also:
can't be the reason, because no self respecting German would drink Lager.
Mine's the one with the pint glass in the pocket...
will hardly buy her a new Lear jet. She might want to stay to create more, er, value. Yes, that's it! Value!
"turn 'em off for two weeks" is a very dangerous but all too common approach.
If one of those services is only needed once a year but then it is absolutely essential, eg. for auditing purposes, you will surely miss it.
I foresee that some investor will buy the cubicles, add doors and give them for rent as luxury apartments.
Probably more profitable than whatever Cisco did there.
ITT estimates it owes $177,466.46 on an agreement that runs until May 31.
Quite a rough estimation, it seems.
It reminds me of the presentation our VP gave regarding the efficiency gains of "lean" introduction.
18.42%. I wanted to ask if it is not rather 18.41 or 18.43, but kept my mouth shut. I had the feeling I was not alone.
This is the fix for the F35 flight avionics SW issues...
And now remain gone illegitimate faced buggerfolk! And, if you think you got nasty taunting this time, you ain't heard nothing yet! Daffy English kniggets! Thpppt!
one lesson that should be learned by this mess: Make fixes available for wormable holes, even if the OS is not officially supported any more. Once the shit hit the fan it is too late.
Edit: For systems that are still in widespread use, of course.
what 16TB of core memory would look like.
In the past you were locked out of your car because the lock was frozen and the de-frosting spray was in the car.
Nowadays you are locked out because your smartphone has no battery any more and the charger is in the car.
Smartphone as a service. Just to make sure your better half stays in the fold, so to say. Come on, who could be opposed to a little bit of telemetry?
You are alone in an artificial world, yet millions are watching every step you make.
You would think that a company with the resources and the research power of IBM would be able to innovate, grow with new products and generally thrive.
Instead they cut the research, abandoned products and tried to shift to services, where they are just a "me too". In my opinion they were only successful with services in the past, because they had the products in the first place.
I wonder how long the tail can wag the dog until it breaks.
Shame on you, NASA!
Alternatively ask them politely to leave the plane before the flight:
Or just grab some random guy and throw him out, because...
stellar black holes. I wonder what would be the gravity wave resulting of the merger of two supermassive black holes. Must be spectacular.
be backed by V2.0 of a 6502
You mean the version that supports the ror instruction? What a luxury!
Clones pretty much almost killed Apple last time. Why would they go down that same road again?"
It's about market segmentation. While it makes no sense to allow low cost hackintosh clones, it would make a lot of sense to sell OS licenses to the professional crowd, that prefers to have their hardware build to spec and doesn't care so much about the price, if they can get what they want.
Some licensing model based on CPU cores, together with a nice service contract can be very profitable. It would open a high profit market segment that Apple cannot reach with their current strategy. Investment would be minimal. Kind of win-win for everyone.
@Steve Davies 3
If 70 million sales (for this year) is sinking to Windows Phone levels then WinPhone was once a best seller.
WinPhone effectively owned the smartphone market with 47% market share in 2007.
A few tactical mistakes and a market can be lost very quickly. CP/M anyone?
Exactly what sort of 'disruptive design' are you wishing for, a flying wing?
Flying wings are not so practical for passenger jets. What I am wishing for is something that shortens the time I have to spend in a cramped space with bad air and smelly fellow passengers that share the same armrest. Cruise speed of the 707 was 977km/h. Cruise speed of the 787 is, well, erm, 903 km/h.
60 years of progress and we are moving slower than our grandfathers.
Edit: @AC, I agree with you. yes, there has been a lot of progress. Certainly in commercial point of view. affordable tickets are nothing to sneer at. On the other hand I feel optimisation was too one sided. No one is really pushing the limits. Certainly not the airline companies.
So about 1 meter = 8 passengers?
Yes, in a 2-4-2 configuration as in the cattle class of the 787 this is what you get. But hey - you got real LED lighting that'll stop you from falling asleep and none-reclining slide-forward seats to support your spine and squeeze your kneecaps.
Good thing is that airlines are not allowed to issue standing room tickets (yet).
but then again they look just the same than nearly all commercial jets that came out before.
OK, they use new materials, engines and electronics, but basically all these passenger jets are direct descendants of the 707 and DC8 models of the late 50s.
Sure, jet design is expensive and no one wants to go for a disruptive design that might fail, but somehow this evolutionary approach is a bit boring.
The one that looks exactly like my last few coats, please ------------------>
We know what happens to species that can only eat one kind of leaf or bug or whatever.
That would depend on the availability and survivability of your food source. Ant eaters and Pangolins are doing quite well since a very long time.
That said, I think our civilization is far too dependent on fragile electronics that can be taken out by sun flares or other EMP sources. It's a bit like settling on an active volcano. Our life is just too short to take eruptions into account that happen only every few hundred years.
Of course there are so many other things that could threaten civilization as we know it, as well. Some large caldera eruption or an asteroid impact could take out our main food sources at any time. Then the question would be how well we could cope. I suppose not well at all.
And suddenly I realised that I need to clean my screen.
The one with the small black spots, please. ------------->
Meanwhile, kittenfeed.com now redirects to facescratch.com, which appears to be down, presumably under a weight of traffic.
Use the Streisand effect to effectively DDOS a unfriendly webpage - ingenious.
I suppose we'll find out the batteries are non-removable next
Come on, we all know you can't have removable batteries and waterproofing at the same time, right?
Btw: What is the IPX rating of an aircraft carrier?
Beer - what else could be used for testing!
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018