"I (almost) remember an error message I used to get on a mac some 10-15 years or so back. It went something like "The applicaton has stopped because something deep and unexplained has occurred.""
Perhaps the guru needed more time to meditate on it.
371 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Oct 2012
"Not sure how those weird veggies (you know, the ones that eat fish) stand on eating insects."
My partner is one of those, and since moving in with her, I am too. I wouldn't eat insects and I don't think she would either. There are plenty of other sources of protein that don't require death en masse. Perhaps, as a species, we should be progressing beyond what is rather barbarous if you think about it.
I'd have no problem with bio-engineered meat though, and that's where I'd invest if I wanted to invest in future food technology.
I graduated with a biological science degree seven years ago and still haven't found a job which uses it. I even spent more time and money on a masters in biotechnology, thinking it would make me more appealing to employers. The Job Centre just pushed me into applying for office temp work. Maybe I'd have more luck if I lived near Oxford/Cambridge, but I can't relocate.
Originally, the plan was to get into medical school on a graduate degree, but the places are so scarce that I was turned down after all four of my interviews. There's no point in my applying again, as I couldn't afford the fees now.
I seem to be just one of the un-tapped resources in the UK. A potential medical doctor/researcher, now reduced to trying to scrape together cash in the gig economy.
Addressing this point:
"work, in addition to fulfilling the practical need for money, can provide people with a sense of purpose and dignity."
I think this is a fallacy. Some people have jobs which are fulfilling and which give them dignity, whereas for many people, their jobs are drudgery. Once we get over the whole work ethic thing, we will realise that living to work is not the only way to exist. UBI will free people to do more of what they choose,which leads to a happier society.
"health benefits of using an axe over a chainsaw (a good workout, no fumes, no horrible noise, fewer unscheduled amputations)"
My chainsaw is electric, so no (local) fumes, not really noisier than a hedge-trimmer and pretty safe when clamped to its pivot on my log horse. Less of a workout than a manual saw, but moving heavy logs around and then splitting the cut bits with an axe afterwards,leaves me pretty exhausted!
"A 'g' before an 'i' is a soft-g is the general rule in English (though of course there are exceptions)"
Really?! Gimbal, gimlet, gibbon, give, gild, gift (one letter more than gif) and of course git. It doesn't seem like there is much of a general rule there.
If gif is "jif" then what am I supposed to put on my pancakes,Gamie Gones?
"Yeah i can't wait for vat to be added to my monthly expenditure..."
Even with tax, it should still be cheaper than buying it on the black market. Plus, at least some of your money would go e.g. to the NHS as opposed to funding some thug's fast car.
Besides, if it's legal you can grow it legally.
"More and more that biology is helped along by medicine (rightly or wrongly). So privilege sounds more correct than pure biology."
Absolutely. There's a lot of pressure to be 'normal' and have children. It's something you don't experience unless you are a childless adult. My girlfriend can't have children and is often upset by inconsiderate comments or simply by being excluded from events/conversations.
The government and businesses encourage the production of children to ensure a future workforce and the more the better (the great god Growth must be appeased). But how much longer can a country/world with finite resources grow? Why do we have to grow? Does growth bring only positives? We know this not to be the case. Perhaps it's time for a new way?
" It's our economic model that is the root of so many of our problems."
I'm more of the opinion that it's overpopulation. Fewer people = less of a problem feeding them or providing them with other forms of energy. Don't mention that to business people or governments though - they don't care about the long-term or the welfare of individuals.
I thought the only thing Dyson designed was the ball-barrow (are they still around?). He seems to me to be primarily an egotistical businessman like Branson (and Edison) who produces overpriced goods heavy on style and light on durability.
I seem to recall that Which said that Dyson vacuum cleaners are the least reliable (Miele being the most). £300 for a hairdryer indeed. White goods for Apple fanbois.
What seems to be needed, is the opposite of Silly Putty. So the car body would remain solid when bumped, but flow when hit at high velocity.
It'll be interesting to see more innovative vehicle designs, that are not based on accommodating a human driver. Backwards-facing seats, cameras/screens instead of fragile windows etc. I know what you're all thinking, yep, me too: SPV from Captain Scarlet.