Bonkers
Take an already stealable item, make it worth even more to thieves.
Good stuff.
2536 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Dec 2006
This is where their argument falls down, you pay a TV licence and you expect to be able to view the digital content. Freeview boxes aren't all made by one company, if they were there would be an monopoly investigation.
So why can't a system be devised that works for all platforms?
They beam the programming digitally around the country without DRM and at better quality (Freeview) yet on the web they add DRM and lower the quality?
"when will the corporates learn to let people do what they want with their devices once they have bought them?"
When will people who are on a mobile phone contract realise that they don't own the *subsidised* phone until they have paid for it?
Also, games consoles are often subsidised as they are sold at loss on the hope of revenue generated by software purchases. If you are able to run homebrew o the PSP then you won't buy any games.
If you want freedom you buy a SIM free phone, open source games console (or a PC for games).
To answer your question, does the average PC user know what a compiler is?
Mac users are in no way less IT savvy than PC users. Just because they like to spend our time using computers and being creative instead of building computer and overclocking does not mean they don't know anything about them.
I installed Leopard last night and I've had no problems with it at all, I was playing back a music composition in Logic Studio without a glitch (even though Spotlight was indexing my hard disk). Timing and audio stability Windows users can only dream of.
Vista can't even play an mp3 without throttling the network traffic:
http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2007/08/27/1833290.aspx
Apple makes machines for home users primarily, they're also good for design and media. While some developers like these machines, to say they're unusable just because they don't have the latest Java is stupid.
Anyone with half a brain who is doing commercial production work would do a test installation first anyway.
Quality Java apps are few and far between, they run slow and can't take advantage of native features (typically). Java is used for stuff like Apache Tomcat, but even then you're unlikely to use the latest greatest version of Java since you should probably hold back a version and ensure all the bugs and security holes are patched.
Someone purchased an item from me on ebay, I was suspicious of the purchase (looked like a stolen credit card), unconfimed address (deliberate spellling mistake?). I refunded the purchaser and relisted. Ebay warned me for doing this?
Basically you have to sell to anyone no matter how dodgy they look, you can't refuse or you may get suspended. No online retailer would send you an item if they thought you were using a stolen card, so why is it different on ebay?
When the SPV Windows Smartphone was released it had signing and wouldn't install unsigned apps. It resulted in a lot of negative PR and upset owners. Orange lifted the restricted eventually.
End users and freeware developers don't want signing, mobile operators and handset makers seem mad on it. Handset makers like it since the signing process earns them money, mobile operators are keen to stop the phones being unlocked.
I buy my phones SIM free as I don't like all the restrictions, it also means I can change the phone after a few months and get back most of the value. (try doing that after 18 months with your battered contract phone). Even a SIM free phone is subjected to this signing rubbish, it's bonkers.
Actually given Microsoft's reputation Windows Mobile is pretty reliable. There's bugs in it, some annoying ones, it's also slow. But compared to XP or Vista it does typically work and not require reboots.
It is however typical Microsoft, leaves temp files and rubbish in the filesystem which requires a clean up now and then.
Have you ever asked people why they are there?
Did you know that Apple provide workshops on things such as digital photography, music production, video editing?
This is why people queue up, they get good service and training on how to use their purchase.
I was like you, all dismissive of Apple, then I bought one and I've not looked back since. It's the ideal platform for creative pursuits, Windows is too distracting, unreliable and doesn't perform as well.
This is why we don't want media giants controlling any part of the Internet. It will be transformed into a huge money making tool if they have their way.
Too much emphasis is on money, music publishers should care more about the quality of the music they output and be proud of bringining genuine talent to the masses. But they're just bean counters obsessed with bleeding everyone dry.
I write music, I support those artists who aren't earning a fortune. When the labels can afford to shovel £85 million to one artist for a record deal then you do wonder if they need any more money?
Most news servers do handle 8-bit encodings. Yenc allows for smaller downloads as it uses 8-bit.
As for the RIAA action, they'd be happy if the Internet simply didn't exist. Media caveman who act like the mafia.
People will always copy things, it's better someone downloads an mp3 than steals the CD from the shop.
Apple's success is largely about their design, why would they want to make their OS run on a billions of possible PC hardware configurations? it would be a nightmare to test the OS and it would crash.
Apple's hardware is often much better than branded PC junk. My Mac Pro is very quiet considering it has 4 CPU cores. Apple uses a modern BIOS too.
I think the whole bury your head in the sand approach of Microsoft can be attributed to Ballmer.
He talks about the value of Microsoft all the time, what value? you pay a fortune for Windows Vista, a good PC will cost a fair bit too.
You can get a 20 inch iMac for £799 with come good productivity tools. OS upgrades are around £89.
Where's the value of Vista and Office? they cost £200-300 each if you want the proper full versions.
Ballmer famous said he'd brainwashed his kids into not using Google or an iPod. His children's insight into why Microsoft's products suck would have been invaluable, sadly they will never have that conversation.
I've used Windows Mobile devices for about three years now, time to move on as the mobile OS has gone nowhere in that period of time. Additional functions like 3G and hard disk support have been added, but it clunky and dull.
Linux is the OS that provides real value, if your hardware is fairly common and you have no need for DRM, high end professional tools (eg. Music software, Film editing) or some PC games then Linux will cost you little.
You can't build and redistribute your own Windows Mobile OS. You also can't get it for free, there is no freely available phone for developing your own Microsoft custom OS.
You can't simply take the Windows Mobile code, hack it around and improve it then share these improvements.
OpenMoko is a Linux based phone platform which allows anyone to contribute, ideas are taken on board, you can implement things yourself and have them accepted in the project. It's not about if the code is available, it is about if you can do anything with this code without being sued.
1. UK pricing is stupid, we get charged double when it should be half.
2. Too different and too restrictive.
3. Too many planned features omitted.
4. Bloated.
Having had the pleasure of trying Mac OS Leopard I'm glad it's an improved 10.4.
Microsoft has to change stuff around radically all the time. 2000 to XP was obvious, XP to Vista seems like a company trying too hard to innovate and just making the user experience worse.
An upgrade should have only positives, too many negatives with Vista.
Their decline wasn't helped by them laying off loads of employees in the early 2000s, losing valuable employees with knowledge all in the pursuit of increasing the share price.
I worked there for a while and they laid off all of the web interface experts, the product I was working on would have shipped with really awful inconsistent graphics had I not redrawn them myself (luckily I grew up with DPaint and pixel based graphic apps).
Are you kidding? unless you get a Mac or build your own x86 PC it's pretty to avoid paying the borg tax.
The EU are making some right moves in discussing the practice of OEM Windows licencing. Maybe then people can buy a naked PC easily without the OEM having to report you to Microsoft for suspected piracy (yes, Microsoft encourage that).
I'm happy with my Mac, call me smug or whatever you like. It's the first time I've had a computer I can just switch on and use since the days of the Amiga. Linux and Windows both had their annoyances.
There can be damages simply because writing software can cost time and money. If someone improves a product you give the code away for which makes it more useful to a commercial supplier of that product then you can argue that if they don't give the code back they have lost you that potential revenue stream.
GPL is a licence, if you don't agree with it then don't use GPL code, simple as that.
We're not talking about someone at home hacking away at Linux for personal use, we're talking about companies passing off the work of others as their own.
I hate it when people talk about Microsoft innovation, it doesn't exist.
They are famous for waiting for the competition to release a product, analysising it's failure, fixing the problems and releasing their own. Even Apple does this, they weren't the first to market with an MP3 plater.
I remember when the hard disk blew in PC owned by a ex-partner of mine. They insisted it just needed to be re-imaged (re-install Windows). It was plainly obvious this wasn't the case and we told them that smoke had come out of it (a chip on the controller board had blown apart).
When they did fit the replacement drive the engineer was clueless, phoning people up for help all the time. The disk needed a jumper so it was recognised as the master drive, but obviously didn't have one with him and so he bent the two pins together to short them out.
I had to correct all this myself, I would have done it all anyway but it was under and insurance policy.
PC World sell boxed Linux, I even (stupidly) bought Mandrake there once.
So if they think it's good enough to sell, why do they treat it like it is some second rate OS which breaks stuff?
Even www.pcworld.co.uk is running on Apache, so they don't mind open source so long as it's making them a buck or two.
Those who says it is a victimless crime are deluded.
Firstly the growers bypass the electric meter and steal electricity, secondly drug dealers aren't exactly the nicest people around (if they don't respect the law then what do they respect?).
The drug culture has a lot of bad eggs.
then Microsoft will have a hard time shifting people from 2003.
Windows 2000 is still a damn fine OS and Microsoft made the mistake with XP of taking a stable OS with minimal clutter and junk then turning it into the annoyance that is XP (out of box experience anyway).
Lets hope the 2008 interface is still nice and minimal.
"Linux is such a cool idea, but again, only technical people can install and use it. If it was pre-installed on all new machines, MS would never have added that DRM crap in the first place"
Dell sell laptops with it pre-installed as do a few others. It's becoming easier to use. Windows can be a pain to get working if the hard disk gets partly trashed. So long as the re-install and configuration process is easy then it's not so bad.