Rights to what?
There's two rights, rights to the recordings and the rights to the sheet music (the actual song itself).
I doubt any record label would sell rights to the recordings, so I would imagine Jacko had the rights to the music.
2536 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Dec 2006
"Apple is crazy-innovative in terms of hardware and software design, but I can count the total number of software engineering advances they’ve made on one hand."
And what have Adobe ever done for software engineering?
Did they create a parallel processing engine and then give it away? Apple did.
What have Adobe given to the open source community?
It is a bit too expensive when you contrast the price against the dull generic plasticy rubbish that HP, Dell and others produce.
It you look at how it fits in Apple's range then it makes more sense.
It's pretty obvious that if you produce a new category of product that many people won't get it. Such people had no interest in computers until the Internet arrived.
It's a device for people on the move who want more battery life than a laptop, more screen real estate than a smartphone and the convenience of a very long standby time (near instant switch on).
There are a few music production tools appearing, Korg's iElectribe for instance implements a setup that would have cost you about £800 a few years back.
It can also be used by photographers as a highly portable photo management tool. Import your photos, review and post to the web.
Just because you lack any imagination doesn't mean others don't. Some people simply can't see the point of something unless it can be pigeon holed into existing device categories.
While it's nice to dream that a HP tablet will be good. They've not made a decent PDA or mobile phone in years.
This tablet will be some quick bodge using a design they've had sitting about. It will be ugly, inefficient and there will be no software for it. It may run existing WebOS apps, but scaled up. It will be a while before a tablet version of the OS comes out.
I'm sure if Adobe were creating flash from scratch they would do things differently.
The whole reason flash is so bad is because it is so common. Abobe can't throw it all away and start again due to compatibility and all the time people have spent learning all the script language.
If they did they wouldn't bother with much of what it has. It largely grew out of Macromedia's director, multimedia presentations for CDROMs.
Apple will ensure that this alternative is good for mobile devices with input devices other than keyboard and mouse. Multitouch will be possible.
Contrast the price of the 3G version at £529 with an unlocked iPhone.
E.g
http://www.superetrader.co.uk/apple-iphone-3gs-32gb-ukblack-sim-free-mobile-phone-p-4308.html?gad=CMDIu8kDEgg-s_Nh2Zr1URiY3OT-AyCY9p4z&
£787!
Or with a PAYG iPhone:
http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone?mco=MTAyNTQzMTI
£449!!!
I think the iPad is pretty cheap compared with a sim free mobile. It is more powerful in terms of CPU and the screen is higher res.
Browser plugins cripple the advancement of HTML and the web. If something isn't possible in the browser without a plugin then propose a standard, let people review it and improve it.
This is how the net used to work, people put out an RFC and others commented, it was then implemented.
POP3, NNTP and SMTP all started that way.
Adobe are second only to Microsoft in churning out lazy minor evolutions of software and charging a fortune.
Who in their right mind pays £640 for a graphic tool? I bet 50% or more of Photoshop users are using a pirate copy.
I really hope Apple produce a rival to Photoshop at half or less of the price. I remember buying Logic Audio for about half RRP on Ebay thinking I had got a good deal. Then Apple released Logic Studio for less than what I had paid (approx £319) and they dropped the USB dongle, I upgraded for £129. This for a professional audio tool used by all manner of recording artists.
Contrast this with Cubase which was over £500 at the time. Now Cubase Studio 5 can be bought for £299!! So competition is good, it's about time Adobe had some competition so they can't charge their extortionate prices and release lazy bloat-ware.
Now that's a really old analogy, thankfully there are some of us around here who remember those days (I did tons of programming on the Amiga). I had 1.2 myself.
Amiga OS 2.0 was a lot more optimised and therefore it was often quicker to use the OS routines in 2.0. Of course there were some amazing programmers in those days, writing everything in assembler.
Where's the anti-trust case against the Nintendo Wii because you can only code using their dev kit and by submitting your game to Nintendo who then take a royalty for every sale?
Same goes for Sony and Microsoft.
Since when did lack of portability = monopolistic practices?
That makes every computer system on the planet guilty, there are very few common APIs.
It still uses Gnome, I never liked Gnome. Even Linus has been critical of Gnome in the past.
KDE was always my preferred Linux desktop.
No amount of slick GUI and desktop software will hide the fact that behind the scenes is a monolithic kernel. If your hardware isn't supported then you can forget downloading a driver and installing it, it's time for a new kernel or hope there's a compiled module for your exact version of the kernel.
Years ago rolling your own kernel was pretty easy, these days there are just way too many options in the configuration screen. Menus and options for everything from embedded devices, to phones to washing machines (I'm joking, but if the Linux kernel team accepts it then it'll be there as an option).
This Nokia guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
Image sensor sizes will need to increase dramatically to produce the levels of noise that SLR users find acceptable.
Nokia will have to implement 45 point autofocus, selectable focus points.
People like the large lenses, they provide nice big tactile focus rings and zoom rings.
Large lenses have lens hoods, soft focus filters, polarising filters etc..
How are Nokia going to implement tilt shift lenses which are extremely good for taking photos of buildings without the inevitable perspective distortion.
Many people like through the lens viewfinders. They also allow you to check depth of field by pressing the depth of field preview button.
Camera phones triggering and syncing with pro flash guns? yeah right!
Strobe flash for capturing motion? I don't think so.
The list is endless. SLRs and mid format will never be replaced with a camera phone. You would look like an idiot if you pulled out a camera phone in a photo studio.
Look at video cameras used by news teams, they're still massive even though you can shoot HD with a small handheld video camera these days. There's a good reason for this!
Many Amiga games were crippled by the code being shared between the Atari ST version and the Amiga version. If it was an arcade conversion and the original code was 68k ASM they would use part of the original arcade game code.
As a result the Amiga version didn't take advantage of the custom chips properly and was on par or even inferior to the ST version.
The moral of the story? cross compatibility results in a product that can only be as good a lowest common denominator. Cross compatibility only affects development, a product properly coded for the target platform will be better and the end result will be happy users and a good product.
In this world of increasing laziness and resource sharing (look at cars for a good example) this is Apple trying to increase quality.
People may think it's a high price, but it's only a bit more than an unlocked iPhone would cost you and this device is more powerful and costs more in materials.
Those who are saying you might as well get a laptop are missing the point, where's the ultraportable laptop that has 10 hours battery life and near instant switch on?
I'll wait to see the real price, I think these prices are a bit high.
Apple is becoming rather good at producing new products that actually sell and make money while Microsoft relies on Office and Windows while producing average new products that don't sell well and are eventually dropped.
Heard a good joke about Microsoft's new 'kin phone (in reaction to the iPhone prototype left in a bar), Bill Gates left a Kin phone in a bar as well, it's still there :)
I own this set, paid £500. I didn't want to pay £1000+ when I know that a few years down the line I will probably be upgrading again. I paid £779 for a 32 inch LCD a few years back and kept that for about 3 years.
The USB port can be enabled in the service menu. It requires downgrading firmware, applying the hack and once enabled you can upgrade again.
Obviously this will invalidate your warranty.
http://lgusb.wikispaces.com/
Since when have open source hobbyists ever produced a really brilliant UI? they may be good at the API and architectural side of things (although they get carried away and overcomplicate things), but Palm has produced a much better mobile interface than any of the other open source mobile projects.
An attractive, usable interface that rivals even Apple.
I've sat in on a few Gold Partner sessions and found them a bit lacking. There's simply no practical examples of the new features. When the presenter starts talking about the Start page and how you can hide it then you really wonder why you're bothering sitting through the presentation.
Moving on, at times I think there's great ideas and developers at Redmond, they're just managed by complete idiots. After all, who else would withdraw free mobile development tools only to reinstate them due to the success of the iPhone.
No USB, clock speed, coding?
It's not a PC. If you want a PC use one, it's not a phone, if you want a phone use one. If you want to access applications, games, books and movies on the move, buy some music, surf the net then an iPad is pretty handy.
Try getting your laptop out and set up in seconds. An iPad can be as quick to access as a phone, it isn't a clamshell design.
Your laptop will not last 10 hours on the battery!
They probably judge their losses based on RRP and selling a copy to every citizen in the country.
How can you judge if someone will buy music or not, are you really telling me they can guestimate the popularity of a film or music artist?
It's all part of a deception to earn more money than they would make doing it the hard way by selling, marketing and distributing music.
Why bother making a CD/DVD, selling it and waiting for a few pounds profit to come back when you can sue a pirate for £100,000?
Hollywood itself was formed by people fleeing to get away from paying patents for film equipment to Edison.
http://www.kobobooks.com/content/Hollywoods-Pirate-Legacy/sc-QdXz_ZORlEur56WfnQdMWA/page1.html
Application lock in? Since when has writing native code using the proper APIs been "lock in".
Christ, that makes any OS that provides an API a platform to lock in people. I don't see Microsoft pushing the "posix" API.
I don't see Microsoft helping the world run Win32 API applications on Linux, OSX and Unix. In fact, they tried to subvert and kill off the best attempt at "write once, run anywhere", i.e. Java.
Of course Apple doesn't want people porting substandard trash from Android to Windows to iPhone. Android's development platform is vastly different to the iPhone and different to Windows Mobile.
WinMo is C++, Android is Java based and iPhone is Objective C.
All have completely different APIs. Anyone writing an application to run on all would have to use a very high level language. This would create very suboptimal code, bloat, slow, buggy, just shit! and what's more the developer would still ask for a couple of quid for the privilege.
It's about time the 2G was left behind. It nearly three years old now, nobody who has one will be on a contract. It's had a good run, OS 1.0 all the way up to OS 3 (and patches). What other handset makers gives you *two* major upgrades?
With WinMo you're lucky to get a few bug fixes, you can only get the latest features by buying a new phone or installing a homebrew ROM (breaking licence agreements and invalidating your warranty).
You don't really want development held back by an older device.
"Audio interfacing has always tended to be rather unpredictable on computers, especially laptops."
Not on a Mac with a Firewire audio inteface. I have an Echo Audiofire 12, 24-bit 192Khz 12 channel audio with MIDI. Never had any trouble with it at all.
USB is simply a waste of time for pro-audio, even USB3 will suck, why? CPU load!
Consumers like software that is compact, runs fast, doesn't suck battery life, doesn't crash, is designed well for the platform and so on...
Developers are obviously more interested in cutting corners, writing one game that runs on many platforms. This is hardly in the interests of the end user. It's about time someone made a stand against the increasing bloat and abstraction in software.