I disagree with you and I think the majority of your arguments show a strong misunderstanding of the things your railing against.
"All the "motorheads" I know who say they love the speed and the acceleration and the wind in their hair, etc. won't touch electric cars or bikes. Despite the fact that they are the fastest moving things around."
They're not the fastest moving things around though. They accelerate fast (because of high starting torque) but that's about it. Purpose built race cars ARE making inroads (pike's peak hillclimb for instance) but that's VERY specific applications and they're very impractical vehicles for basically any other application. Electric bikes are also starting to get more adoption but the reality is that a lot of the ones currently on the market are quite frankly kinda shit for a variety of reasons.
As to F1 vs FE, the noise might have something to do with it (it's perfect to lull you to sleep) but that's only a minor factor. Biggest thing is that they simply don't put on good spectator racing. FE cars are nearly as heavy as F1 cars (FE: 760kg, actually on average 840kg including driver; F1: 798kg, actually 908 including full fuel load and driver) and most of that weight is battery, yet they can't cover even close to the same distance in a race, nor do they get even close to the same speeds as F1. The racing is generally done on tiny street circuits, shielding the so called "iconic" locations (which usually amounts to the back parking lot in a city far away from anything notable) from view with tall fences. And is quite frankly the racing is absolute shit-tier. I've seen better racing at my local karting track. Frequent stupid mistakes, silly crashes, cars running into each other, cars running out of energy. There's a large element of strategy and energy management (far more than F1) and while that is interesting from a technological standpoint it just doesn't make for interesting watching.
As to driving a high-performance sports car, range matters. Range matters a lot. On a track a petrol car burns through a tank of gas quite fast when racing, an electric car burns through a battery charge in the absolute blink of an eye. Instantaneous performance (actually only acceleration) is absolutely great, but it comes at the cost of absolutely blowing through a battery charge. Electric racing IS done, but the big problem is that most EVs would burn through a full battery in about a quarter of the laps it would take an ICE car to burn through a tank, after which an ICE car can be back on the track after a 5 minute refueling stop. A BEV most certainly wouldn't unless you had some sort of battery pack swapping system (which has been tried and isn't really a good solution either). Even just on a road, a heavy foot is going to drop a BEVs range considerably. Tesla's "ludicrous mode" is a fun gimmick, but it requires warming up the battery pack beforehand and absolutely devours battery charge (Iirc on a full charge, after conditioning the pack you only get 4 or 5 of those launches out before the battery is too discharged to get the performance out).
With proper maintenance an ICE performance car will also keep going for a lot of miles, while heavy use of a battery pack usually has strong negative consequences for their longevity.
I've driven different sorts of sports cars and BEV vehicles and the overal experience of "fun to drive" (SO FAR!) really is better in the ICE vehicles. That is not to say it will never happen or that all lovers of vehicular fun hate them, but the current crop of electric vehicles really just isn't there yet. They're fine for taking people to work, or to the shops, but that's not exiting or fun and the cars made for it aren't either.