Re: You shouldn't trust Google Translate too much
Blame Mr. Finbarr Saunders, who apparently appears in HXT's staff directory.
512 posts • joined 6 Feb 2012
"I'm a bit suprised that this happened. An expired cert should have been flagged as a critical risk, if that resulted in a network shutdown."
It should be considered almost as important as filing the annual accounts - what do the tax authorities respond with if someone forgets that?
We could have had this, really.
It could have been the killer app for Google Glass - something that detects ads whether on billboards, backsides, or buses, and on-the-fly replaces them with more pleasing images - nice landscapes, beautiful women, specialist pornography, or a combination of all three.
For driving, it could just replace the ads with flat beige, to reduce distraction.
...but no, the word "Glasshole" was too tempting, and our urban views continue to be polluted by idiotic branding and the effluent of marketers' minds.
"Actually Galileo only operates by the consent of the US military. If they say turn it off, it has to be turned off otherwise they reserve the right to take out the constellation."
This is WAY out there (and not just literally) - see https://allthingsnuclear.org/lgrego/does-a-high-altitude-asat-test-make-sense
Navigational satellites are extremely valuable - "taking out" someone else's invites them to immediately do unto your own satellites (the capability to launch one is not that far removed from the capability to shoot one down). Even if there is no retaliation, you really don't want debris in those nice high orbits.
I honestly think the US would consider using nuclear weapons on someone before they try shooting at Galileo (or GLONASS/Beidou).
I was doing something with java and php where I needed to apply a remove operation to all items where their "expired" date was earlier than "now". Apparently the default date/time formats in java and php were not identical - I was comparing a value in seconds with one in milliseconds, and as soon as someone used the "remove expired items" command, the database was promptly emptied of all its items.
(University group project, I wasn't popular.)
"Imagine a fuzzy video of naked Donald Trump pissing all over a Russian prostitute. "
If they bring piss to a deepfakes fight, you bring shit.
If they bring shit, you bring animals.
If they bring animals, you bring... (completion is left as an exercise for the reader)
Welcome to the latest race to the bottom (fnarr fnarr), accelerated by the efforts of Nvidia/AMD.
"Seltzer cites an example of a model that noticed asthma patients were less likely to die of pneumonia. The model incorrectly assumed that asthma protected pneumonia patients based on that data.
"The problem is that if you show up at an ER and have asthma and pneumonia, they take it way more seriously than if you don't have asthma, so you're more likely to be admitted," she says. These patients did better than average because doctors had treated them more aggressively, but the algorithm didn't know that."
Er - in this case asthma does protect pneumonia patients - through the mechanism of aggressive hospital treatment from doctors when asthma is present.
The model is correct.
There could be the unintended consequence that companies start using local gentlemen of the road as directors. "Excuse me sir, would you like this free crate of cider? Just sign here... excellent!"
Do Companies House get perturbed if home addresses on the forms refer to particular cardboard boxes in the business's loading bay?
For the "...and questioning how the BBFC will identify which sites are most visited by children" part, I seriously wonder how they're going to do it.
Asking schools for records of how often their users tried to visit blocked domains?
Standing outside schools at 16:45 with clipboards? "Excuse me young man, would you mind taking part in a survey? I'll read you a list of websites and you can tell me if you've visited any of them..."
"Right, any others that we can have a laugh at?"
My theory is there are too many people leaving, and they're trying to get more out of the ones that remain - I got out about a week ago, after several years (mainly due to lack of signal where needed). The customer service was never great, but trying to get a PAC was frustrating: "...I assure you that you will have similar problems with other networks..." with a generalised bad attitude about me having the effrontery to shun the excellence that is Three.
"I'd be highly surprised if the machine itself wasn't capable of keeping track of the radiation delivered at a firmware level"
I'd want there to be a safety feature at a lower level than that:
My idea (based on 5 minutes thought and near-zero levels of medical technology knowledge) is to have some sort of dosimeter in the path of the beam physically connected to the machine's power source - the goal would be that once the dose goes above a certain level, the machine totally loses power - in such a way that some serious thought is required before restoring it (e.g. severing the cable, or blowing a big fuse). This could either be a hard limit, or something the technician has to physically dial in before the procedure starts. Could this be made only using mechanical (and simple electronic - no computation) components?
"Realistically, who would want to buy a murder scene?"
Plenty of murders take place in homes; most of them aren't demolished.
If you're satisified with the cleaners' performance, it could be a good deal.
edit: It's irrelevant anyway - in line with the victim's family's wishes the submarine is going to be destroyed once they're finished with it as evidence. (This seemed odd, legally, to me, but there we are.)
"To "qualify" for detention he has do be declared insane by shrinks - and apparently it is not as easy as most of us lay persons would expect."
Plus, if I'm understanding things correctly, the "insanity" route can result in a longer detention - so they will be checking whether he's faking, but it'll be the other way round.
How is jurisdiction actually determined where a crime is committed in one country, and has effects in another?
This isn't a new concept (e.g. an archer several thousand years ago could fire an arrow across a border in peacetime, killing a victim on the other side) so presumably there is precedent?
The obvious answer is to find some way of poisoning the horn in a way that doesn't harm the rhino, but makes the end product fatal to consume (an alternative acceptable outcome is that it makes the receipient's genitals shrivel up, drop off, or do something else similarly amusing).
Maybe it would be worth seeing if Mr. Putin could be persuaded to take an interest in megafauna conservation?
"Now if the game is to 'maximise food stores', the AI might discover the optimum cheat is to kill everything that eats food."
You're overthinking it; anything that eats food is food. A carelessly developed foraging robot would immediately kill its creators, and diligently gut/bone/joint/render/refrigerate them.
"Air-launched rockets might have a 12 km head-start in terms of altitude but they still have to burn a lot of fuel to reach orbital velocity."
Have a read of a mad (doesn't imply bad) idea to mount a space shuttle main engine on the back of a 747, allowing it to fly (for a short time) at very high speed/altitude before launching a rocket carried on its back:
I chortled at the extract from Symantec's agreement - who else read it in Ali G's voice?
"IF YOU IS A CUSTOMER OF A RESELLER (AS DEFINED HEREIN), SUBSCRIBER REPRESENTS AND WARRANTS THAT IT AUTHORIZES SUCH RESELLER TO APPLY FOR, ACCEPT, INSTALL, MAINTAIN, RENEW, AND, IF NECESSARY, REVOKE THE CERTIFICATE ON SUBSCRIBER’S BEHALF."
Assuming the object doing the escaping is much less massive than the object from which it's escaping, escape velocity is independent of the mass of the escaping object.
So, you can observe the speeds of stars that actually have escaped the galaxy, and those that haven't.
e.g. if star A is going at 1000km/s and has escaped, and star B is going at 500km/s and hasn't, you can say the escape velocity is between 500 and 1000km/s and therefore the galaxy's mass (strictly speaking it'll be a combination of mass and size/density) is between some two values.
Better explanations welcome.
"So... when will the first case be heard should an innocent person be deepfaked onto a rumpypumpy video which causes said person to lose his/her job?"
Now that this technology is accessible to anyone with a PC + respectable GPU, the question of "guilty" or innocent is going to become irrelevant - people can just say "deepfaked - it wasn't me" when confronted with video evidence of them carrying out any activity they would rather keep secret.
"Reasonable doubt" just got a whole lot bigger.
(Yes, I know the videos produced still have identifiable artifacts - how long will that last?)
Of course I'll eat that.
If it's a normal-ish Yorkshire pudding with stuff added, it's going to be far too dry imo - that means gravy, but to dunk, not poured - so put it in a ramikin.
As for toppings, add pineapple (for polarising opinions), ham (yorkshire pud needs meat, but beef on pizza is vile), and basil leaves.
To balance out the stodge, serve with Caesar salad, I'd also be drinking some inexpensive red wine it.
For afters, a few chocolate digestive biscuits sandwiching some dairylea (or equivalent) cheese.
"I swear that sometimes the RAF pilots firewalled the throttles and yanked the nose up just so they could punish poor pongos as their livers were garrotted by seatbelts ..."
The occasional (unsure exactly how often it was needed) vigorous leap into the sky was very much a requirement for the VC-10 in the RAF procedures - probably to give the engines a workout. My dad was a navigator on them and described a time when they were stationed at another airfield, where the residents were described as "a bunch of fucking arseholes", or words to that effect. The morning of departure was after a particularly heavy night (for those not about to fly) and one of the pilots mentioned that the aircraft hadn't had a full-power take-off in a while. Fortunately, the airfield's layout allowed a fairly close flypast of the mess, giving them the benefit of four Rolls-Royce Conways at full throttle to start their day.
"Q: how many additional boosters can you strap onto a Falcon Heavy before it can't handle the load?"
It's not a question of whether the vehicle can take it; the ground infrastructure (pads, towers, etc.) is not set up for anything more than two strap-ons. *
Unless something seriously bad happens to the BFR plans, Falcon Super Heavy probably won't ever exist.
* apparently - I asked Elon on twitter, unsurprisingly he didn't reply, but a random someone else did - so treat the information accordingly
It's a good idea, but "Simple, fair and no way of avoiding it." matters much less than:
- the Government deciding it deserves time in Parliament
- transport minister(s) being prepared to lose part of their little empire to the Treasury
"But there's no need to increase the tax on fuel, it's already expensive enough thanks"
"Wait,even more tax on fuel? Supposedly we pay 61%of fuel duty, plus VAT on top of the duty and fuel. It might not be called tax but it's practically the same."
Er, OK - so how is the shortfall to be made up? Not sure of the most recent numbers, but I'd expect somewhere above £6,000,000,000.00/year would be required if the car tax was abolished.
They only need to be in there for launch/re-entry - the idea is that habitation modules (both for transit and/or on Mars) would be launched separately. The different spacecraft would rendezvous in earth orbit for crew transfer.
edit: Also, the SLS capsule (Orion) is actually bigger than the Apollo equivalent.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018