Re: Good
...because it's terrible.
468 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Feb 2012
I have found they have been the BEST product supporters in tech. Aftersales have been fantastic, providing replacement mouse feet free of charge and shipped at their cost. I also had a G5 mouse replaced with a newer model when they couldn't provide said feet any more. Their quality control is generally excellent as well.
I can sense a great disturbance in the Force... A Disney executive has just decided that the Kessel Run will be a race... A teenage Han Solo will be piloting the Falcon... for a Hutt crime lord... against a variety of aliens in similar vessels...
I am seeing... an annoying sidekick who constantly frustrates Chewbacca....
My god...
"MEEESA HERE MISTA SOLO, OKIDAY?!"
Umm, so your mugger is attempting a mugging empty-handed in order to try to steal a weapon from a victim who is OPENLY carrying a gun, while he is actually legally allows to carry a firearm and could therefore have one to use anyway, to then steal the gun to use in a mugging against someone else who may or may not be openly carrying? I know criminals are stupid, but this must be a Floridian mugger.
I don't understand why kids tv is even made any more. With the attention span and memory of children, with their whimsical attitude and relatively simple minds willing to grasp onto any catchphrase, pretty pattern or gibberish spluttering bipedal character going, added to 40 year's worth of back catalogue, there shouldn't be a need to introduce NEW stories or NEW characters.
Just re-run everything from the 70s and 80s and that's it sorted. The kids aren't going to critique the show, or wonder why Bagpuss moves in such a stop-motion effect. Bloody Philistines, the lot of 'em.
Wrong. You keep the signs in place and plant a minefield underneath it.
If the law stats that acting as a taxi is illegal, those caught doing it should have said car crushed.
Whether the law is even realistic or appropriate (I don't think it is, protectionism like this is basically a Government approved cartel) is another matter entirely, but to fail to enforce it is just lame.
They should be letting illegals into 'sting' lorries at Calais and then driving them back to the Mediterranean as well, but apparently they have 'rights' which trump ours.
Umm the number of horizontal lines and the number of vertical pixels are the same thing? There are 1080 horizontal lines of pixels in a 1920x1080 display, ergo there are 1080 pixels in a single vertical plane of alignment with one another...
I presume you mean the number of HORIZONTAL pixels in each horizontal line?
The 4K misnomer was just some shitty rounding of 3840 to the nearest thousand which, yes, was horizontal pixel count bollocks.
You've got the download (duh) and paintjobs - it's the green/white/black 'Mercenary' skin for the Cobra. Guess you will have to save up to use it if you didn't get the Explorer starter kit though! I also think there were some other skins for the Viper. The digital player guide could be the manual which was released last week (hey, no one said it was exclusive), so only the art book is a wash. I'll agree that you didn't get any extras added since then, but what on earth did you expect it to be - a custom bobblehead?.
I sat through the excruciating episode last night between the Linguists ("Oh, how cunning!") and the Gallifreyans (sweet Jesus... one of them flew 6000 miles for a first date which should tell you something) and the ridiculous affectations they have implemented to try and make the show seem more intellectual than it is ("Ooh I'll pick the Eye of Rah please, no wait the Horned Asp" - fuck off, it's numbers 1-6 you bell ends) rather than a glorified guessing game are purely there to make what could be over in 12 minutes last 28. It's no better than Noel Edmunds and his red boxes of bollocks. Scrap it!
Did I say I haven't changed the default password? No I didn't. My devices are secured thank you.
The problem is not ignored, the problem has been evaluated and determined to be of insignificant threat.
Here are a few things where default passwords are worse than on an IP camera:
1. Cable modems/ADSL modems/Routers. (MITM attacks, dodgy DNS you name it)
2. Servers of any kind (exploited/used to host unsavoury files/keylogging etc)
3. ATMs (steals money from the bank)
4. Smart Electricity meters/central heating (costs you money, boils the cat!)
Better put a camera outside my front door so that I can see the nasty Russians coming up the path when they decide that my sofa is worth breaking into my house to nick then! Heaven forbid the cat is verbally abused by a 14 year old Moscovian school child through the in-built microphone. PERSPECTIVE people. People should be far more concerned about their neighbours, close relatives, the plod and teachers abusing line of sight into their lives than a camera they have placed themselves.
Where is the harm (no matter how ill-perceived the media wish this to sound) in any of these situations? The cameras are in place for a reason and even in public locations such as gyms etc there should be an expectation that the camera is on and SOMEONE can see it.
I have IP cameras at home to view my pets while I am away, and I can tell you half a dozen places where I would expect privacy for both myself and them and so HAVEN'T placed cameras there:
1. The bedroom.
2. The toilet.
3. The other toilet.
4. The cupboard under the stairs.
5. The Jacuzzi
6. The secret underground lair beneath the dormant volcano
Even if evil kiddy fiddlers can catch an eyeful of a blurry 320x480 image of a 7 month old sleeping in a crib in terrible IR mode, so what? You won't be able to tell the location of the household, or learn PIN number of the father's bank account!
Of all the situations where a password has been left as default, I can think of a lot worse!
If you posed for the picture but someone else took the photo, it's not your photo to complain about if it is shown around. By all means take selfies (keeping the copyright to yourself, store them on a non-networked product and avoid saving them to the Cloud, natch) but don't let someone take pictures of you in the nud if you aren't sure you trust/want someone/anyone else to have them. Why is this so hard for people to understand?
Nah, what he could and should have done was send back a picture of someone else's (more impressive) tackle. That way he could have avoided all this 'guilt' by simply claiming he knew it was a scam and he was playing them for fools. Remember the golden rule - Only one head in the frame at any one time!
So if a picture was made of this gymnast when she was under 18, and it's now been published in the UK, and she presumably owns the copyright (otherwise she has no legitimate request for it to be removed) she is therefore a filthy child porn creator and should be arrested if she ever lands in Blighty, right?