Posts by Comments are attributed to your handle

Re: PAM?

How exactly will lubricating the device make it more secure?

Re: Re: @DAM (was: It's a fair cop.)

"Nurse, he's out of bed again!"

Re: Yes but

Reactor in the back - what could possibly go wrong?

Re: No Steven! It's a trap!

Didn't you see my public service troll advisory?

Re: @The BigYin

What the hell is your problem? batfastad wasn't bitching or demanding anything. He simply mentioned a feature that he would like to see implemented in GIMP. Now go take some Prozac.

Re: Vibrating pen? Interesting.

Upvotes for everyone!

Re: @Elmer Phud

Let's try that one again, shall we?

Re: Libre Office does it for me...

I just switched to Libre Office and I'm very happy with it so far. I actually like LO Calc better than Excel. In Calc, I can create a chart in one step; axis titles, chart title, data set, etc. - all entered on one screen.

Re: obsolete versions of IE

I suppose a better word would be 'deprecated'.

Re: @Benchops

Touché

Re: Chad H.

And your point is?

Re: C# is a pleasure to use

Another +1 for C#. Awesome language.

Re: Sean Timarco Baggaley

You obviously didn't read the very first comment, did you?

Derp

There's a pretty significant difference between the three that you (conveniently) overlooked. While security researchers are supposedly working to improve the product they analyze, bank robbers and burglars have a malicious motive. Doesn't take an AC to understand that.

I'm saying that researchers might make more of a difference in the long term by helping repair broken security, as opposed to the more easy (and rewarding in the short term) task of poking holes in the work of others. If you are a researcher solely dedicated to discovering vulnerabilities, then good, your work is much appreciated.

But I do think we need more people interested in proactive security.

Re: I didn't even come close to suggesting "America"

Oh really? It was only the second word in your original post: "Idiot Western teenagers..."

Unless you meant Canadian teenagers?

Re: It's a joke

Let's not attack strawmen, RICHTO, m-kay? If you read what I wrote (instead of drunk-skimming,) you'll see that the only observation I made about global warming was this: How the fuck could you possibly start a conversation about it in a thread regarding Death Stars?

Last I checked, the IRS != the American people. Unless you honestly believe that ~315 million are in support of Scientology, then maybe you (along with most rational thinkers) can arrive at the correct conclusion that the IRS screwed up. Maybe they're fearful of what would happen if they revoked their tax exempt status.

Now, please take your contrived arguments elsewhere.

@Obviously

What scares me is that you have a silver comment badge. Quantity over quality no doubt played an important role there.

Re: Why do people like JavaScript ?

I say the same thing about Ocaml, F#, and Go.

Too bad Apple currently maintains Objective C. So as you prophesize, when Apple someday fails, you'll be out of a language, slick!

Re: @petur

The same thing could be said about you (correctly, this time).

"Whoops, swing and a miss."

Fine, you can be pedantic about it. But if no one can agree on the number to begin with, then the original post that I initially responded to is incorrect as well.

Re: 12=13?

They're all the same anyway.

Quantum Crysis?

Re: tool-kit

Nah, it'll probably shine its laser on passing spacecraft. Just for the lulz.

"affordable tools"

We're still talking about Adobe, right?