Huh?
So how does their service differ from Virus Total?
1542 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jan 2012
Makes sense on a lot of levels to only allow rideshares & airlines to own them:
1. Retail customers suck up of a lot more resources per dollar generated than fleet customers at the sales & marketing levels.
2. Aircraft maintenance is always a big deal. The more regular use also means incipient failures are more likely to be spotted. Organizations with fleets tend to adhere to FAA (or equivalent) requirements better than individuals due to the more regular use of the equipment.
3. The fleet customer gets sued first in the even of a mishap, with the manufacturer next in line. In retail, the manufacturer gets sued first.
It's Georgia. Has almost as many loopy family trees as West Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama & Arkansas.
It's a law that is a white supremacists wet dream. You can set up a website, have the TOS require that only white people can use the site, and then file criminal charges against any non-white people who access the site.
"...its certainly no worse than hitting a bird."
Clearly you aren't qualified to do more than sweep floors. By 2009, birds strikes caused $600M in damage per year. According to the FAA, about 500 planes were damaged by collisions with birds from 2000-2009, and 166 of those planes had to make emergency landings such as the one in the Hudson river in 2009. The worst U.S. plane crash blamed on birds came on April 10, 1960, when an Eastern Airlines aircraft crashed into Boston Harbor, killing 62 passengers. So yes a drone being "certainly no worse than hitting a bird" is a f*cking big deal.
Idiot.
Smart people, if they want to use this "service", would use the Idiot of Things (IoT) lock on a box/cabinet/closet on their porch, rather than on a door into the house.
It's kind of odd that Amazon hasn't already marketed a cooler size bolt-down IoT lock box for the porch. Sell crap to have your crap delivered into.
"Facebook is life clutter." - John C. Dvorak
(https://me.pcmag.com/consumer/5191/opinion/a-look-ahead-my-2016-gripe-list)
The worst part is most of these voice recognition devices are always on & listening even when set to "off". We have a smart thermostat whose settings are set with voice commands "off", yet about once a month it just belts out a "I didn't understand that". When I check to see if it's voice command feature got turned on by someone, the settings always show it "off". Be afraid, very afraid.
Or better yet, get rid of the thing.
Unfortunately, it's pretty much all cars made today.
Big Brother on wheels: Why your car company may know more about you than your spouse.
My 2018 car's software is already buggy, losing things like the contact list every couple of weeks, occasionally never being able to boot the navigation system. Yet like all car manufacturer's, they seem obsessed not fixing basic stuff and instead focus on trying to have crapware apps like Pandora & Aha Radio run on the thing. (Worse, you can only update the cars software, if they every produce an update, via the Aha app.) So I may get lost, and not be able to make a call, but I can always stream music. F*cking great.
No doubt malware safeguards & security holes are not even on their radar.
With regards to Samsungs reliability, well we sell Samsung, Crucial, Hynix, and SanDisk SSDs and the return rate on just Samsung drives is higher than the other three put together.
Interesting. I moved to Samsung's exclusively after having a bunch of SanDisk's fail within their first year. Have not had a Samsung fail yet. Have not tried Crucial or Intel. SanDisk replaced them, and we have nightly backups so data loss was minimal, but the experience was disconcerting.
Facebook's never invented a god damn thing, only rearranged deck chairs. And as such, the abuse of it's platform was "unforeseen" only by people dumb as posts and twice as blind. Which, like Mr. Chakrabarti, apparently is the only type of people Facebook has hired all these years.
My wife worked for McKinsey & Company for many years. According to her, the whole management consulting business is predicated on finger pointing at straw men.
Basically, management hires someone like McKinsey or Bain to pretty much tell them what they already should know but are too chicken to tell the board. But with an external management report in hand, they can point to it and say "these experts say..." (ignoring the fact that if the company's management aren't already the best experts about the company & its business, they should probably be replaced).
If the results of (mis)implementing the advice turns out bad, management can point the finger at "those experts". If the results of (mis)implementing the advice turns out well, then management can extol it's brilliance for hiring the consultants.
So the bottom line is that management consultants get the big bucks to be straw men.
"Those devices can’t do the job alone: users need to be signed up for Cisco’s StealthWatch service and let traffic from their kit flow to a cloud-based analytics service that inspects traffic and uses self-improving machine learning algorithms to spot dodgy traffic."
My experience running software through Virus Total is that the so-called AI machine learning antivirus companies have enormous false positive rates compared to the others, plus a lot of the AI AV vendors don't have a false positive submission procedure (or don't have one unless you are a customer).
Good luck with that, Cisco.
"The more interesting bit is that Russia actually has privacy of all communications as a constitutional right."
Which means nothing as Russia does not have Rule of Law anymore today than they did under the Soviet system. Trials of anything the State deems important are just for show, regardless of what the trolls from Olgino post here.