Cockpits eye view landing video here. Looks amazing, lands to a standstill in half the runway, then performs a u-turn!
343 posts • joined 30 Dec 2011
Cockpits eye view landing video here. Looks amazing, lands to a standstill in half the runway, then performs a u-turn!
"Because the rules do not tell you what you can do..."
I was under the impression that this is how exactly those EU countries still following Napoleonic law work.
European Napoleonic law = everything is forbidden apart from that enshrined in law.
British law = everything is legal, apart from that which is forbidden by law.
Could anyone enlighten me why the plane has a yoke and a joystick? I would have thought it was one or t'other?
I'm seeing something like this regularly on my iphone in Safari. A pop up fills the window, and cannot be shut down unless I click the button being offerred that will "let me speak to a microsoft technician who will remove the malware from my PC". The image seems to be perfectly sized so that I cannot scroll up or down to get to the control bars at the top or bottom. If I kill safari, then once I start it back up, the last page viewed is shown, and blam, I'm back to the same screen. To get around it I have to kill safari, then go into the settings and erase the safari history.
That gave me such a groan I feel obliged to grab your coat off you, and leave myself :)
Let them know they screwed up (and possibly broke the law) on their Facebook page
Tweet them too https://twitter.com/smartwaternews
I read that (and still do) as "Dodgy ADSL".
I thought "Oh finally an IT angle to a political thread" :)
...on their facebook page
"Aye, i know at least one secondary school where Ipads are actually mandatory, with various finance options"
I was furious when my lads school sent home a letter stating all children would need an iPad in the following term. They had an offering for the latest and greatest with finance, and a disclaimer stating that lesser models might not be capable of running the schools software.
They were effectively painting a target on the backs of all the kids saying "mug me". Every kid in town now walks to and from school with a grands worth of iPad waiting for the bag snatchers.
Well, after a month of silence and no indictment, it looks like the local fuzz have decided that character assassination is in order. A detective who says he rarely comments on investigations, comments enough to fill this article. Surely the appropriate place for his comments would be court?
Probably not politically correct of me to say this, but one of my female friends was forbidden (as much as she could be) by her dad from following his footsteps in a career in the army, because (in his words) the female soldiers were treated as beds by the men, and that most of the women didn't mind this. He put it down to the training having a confidence boosting effect on both sexes, where there was no shame felt by what they got up to, until people started getting caught out when they went too far.
"If Uber operates in a country where Uber is not legally allowed to operate, then Uber is operating illegaly. Are you able to follow that?".
By your logic if the police set up a speed trap on my way to work, and I decide that day to change my route because of that, I should be arrested for avoiding the speed trap, because I normally speed on my way to work.
You're forgetting innocent unless proven guilty. Uber like most career criminals known to the police, are probably up to something they shouldn't be. But because we live in a civilised society, we just can't round people up based on "They are up to something". Likewise in the same civilised society, you can't set up a trap, then round up all the usual suspects who fail to fall into it. Due process and all that.
Are you able to follow that?
Reminds me of the time a CEO of a UK based chain-store wanted a webcam on his desk, but at the same time the webcam wouldn't be able to allow the person on the other end to read any documents the CEO might have within view of the webcam. "If I hold up a sensitive document in front of the webcam during a conference, I don't want him to be able to read it". It was a real head-banging moment, he genuinely thought that there was a technical way to stop the camera from focusing on anything other than his face. This was in 2001.
The paperwork trail will ultimately exonerate or lack of will crucify him.
If he has records of sending via some form of recorded delivery, or acknowledged email, an invoice for the service, a statement, a reminder, a 7 day letter and a final notice then he's covered.
If however he has seen red when they have terminated him, and he's shut down the service in spite, it's unlikely the judge will take his side.
Always do things in writing, never by phone.
I for one welcome our future post-apocalyptic magnetic cockroach overlords!
I'd love to know what transpired prior to the scientist getting the idea "I wonder how magnetic a dead cockroach is". It's just so random.
"The issue with a firewall is it requires network skills to be properly configured. NAT implies a simple "all inbound connections denied" default rule"
I think the issue is, that you have only ever used domestic / SOHO routers that appear to have merged the NAT and firewall functionality together, blinding you to the fact that they are 2 separate functions. You are blindly trusting the manufacturers of these devices to have made this choice for you and that it works in the manner you believe. Here's the eye opener for you, you are wrong. Many of the SOHO / domestic routers look like they work how you believe, but in reality they have fudged the interface to give you that impression. Have a dig down in the advanced settings, there you will see that the default settings are not configured as you believe (sometimes you have to enter the CLI), and that you have to do do some tinkering to make your network as secure as you think it is now.
TLDR: SOHO / domestic router manufacturers have lulled you into a false sense of security by hiding technical stuff.
The cynic in me says that the Donald will attempt to issue an EO that allows religious discrimination. That worked out well in Germany, and he seems to be going down the same route.
That's actually a good point. Who is liable if an attacker successfully intrudes via a backdoor that you are legally required to leave open, and you are legally forbidden from admitting exists. Someone has probably pointed this out, and it's currently gone for consultation behind closed doors.
"But both seem to have convinced one another that government is just a big company with too much red tape....."
The funny thing is, that up until some time between WW1 and WW2 many government departments, were companies and corporations that had been given responsibilities via statutes. Local councils were corporations. Someth g came to mind this morning when I read about Trumps decree that for every new law, 2 old laws must be repealed. That's something we could do with in the Uk. We still have many statutes on the books relating to the East India Trading Company that have never been repealed!
I thought this was normal for Gmail email accounts.
I have a company gmail account for mydomain.com. When setting up the account I had to use another address (not mydomain.com) for the administrative user account. Google would not accept a mydomain email address as the administrative user, probably because at that point I wouldn't be able to receive the confirmation emails from google during the update of the MX records. Even now, I have to have a non mydomain.com email address as a registered contact on the account in the event that mydomain.com is down, and google need to contact me by other means. With access to this email address I have administrative access and ownership of the company gmail. I can and have set up additional administrative users that do have mydomain.com addresses, but you must have one account that isn't on the same domain.
I'm still not convinced that Brexit should take 2 years. We hold all the cards. The UK simply has to stop the £350 million a week payments, and the EU looses 20-25% of it's funding. You want to keep the money flowing, come to the table now and make a deal like grown ups. You don't want to? What are you going to do to us, we're leaving anyway, oh and we're still not going to pay you. It's ridiculous, May needs to grow a backbone and cancel the direct debit till everything is agreed one way or the other.
*Disclaimer, I'm with the remain camp, but the UK decided democratically that we were out, so I want this done as quickly and efficiently as possible with minimum cost and fuss.
"Apple...... they even told the court that they had invented touchscreen smartphones."
Now this is what I find crazy, in the years that have passed, everyone and their dog now knows that there are 1001 examples of prior art (eg. the first iPhone released 2007 could easily be mistaken for the Samsung F700 that first appeared at CEBIT in 2006) for pretty much every one of Apples claims.
With all this now established knowledge amassed in the past decade, why hasn't someone pushed in the courts to persue perjury charges? Given all the documentation that exists now, someone must have deliberately lied in court.
There's a petition here to get the Daily Mail website classified as a fake news site on Facebook.
I wonder how it will pronounce the word 'Ghoti'!
I'd love to know what financially stable world some of the posters that frequent this forum are living in. A day doesn't go by where someone is suggesting that an actual paying job is simply abandoned because of a disagreement. Can someone let me know where all these replacement jobs are available?
Wonder if they've got Global Thermonuclear War on that games list.
Are dishonest and malicious reviews now protected?
I read the article end to end, but couldn't find anything said about the other 2!
"Volvo has already noticed that some human drivers behave like bullies around autonomous cars."
If this is researched and documented then it will result in premiums being sky-high for owners of non-autonamous drivers all the more quickly. "You're insurance premium is going up this year sir, because we think you'll be acting like a dick!"
Reply to All was the bane of my life at one of the places I worked a few years ago. It got so bad I was asked if we could remove it from up high because what started off as an email conversation between 2 people, ended up going back and forth with more people added, to the point that towards the end, 30 or mo people were now in the To: / CC: field.
There was no automated way at the time to remove or even displace it automatically without visiting each user, and making all the relevant clicks in their profile.
Hence the word "essentially". On an equal map, with equal resource allocation and equal starting, the game is reduced to being turn based via mathematics. One of them must be processed first, then the other, and will always win via milliseconds.
This has been done before. The AIs have the advantage of seeing the full map, whereas the player doesn't. Also many of the maps are not 100% equal for both sides. Initial positioning and first player to take a particular vantage point factors a lot into which bot wins, as does starting race. Certain maps with certain races combinations are a guaranteed win when both AIs are playing fully optimized. Also, even if playing identically on a 100% equal map, one of the AIs is always mathematically ahead of the other in what is essentially a turn based game. And as such one will always win out by miliseconds.
So my take on this, is that he is guilty of not understanding that private browsing is enabled by default nowdays, probably not understanding what it is, and of not having the technical skills to turn the default setting to off. Sounds like most of the people coming to me for support on a daily basis. Lock them up too!
"There is no way in the game to see the distance nor direction of Pokemon listed as "nearby sightings""
Almost right, there is a direction you can infer from the nearby sightings using a process of elimination, but you are correct that there is no distance scale.
The sightings tab is a 3X3 grid in the same format as a telephone keypad, 1 to 9. 1 is the closest, 9 is the furthest away. If you walk in a particular direction, and see the pokemon in position 5 move to position 3, then you know you are walking in the right direction towards the pokemon now in position 3. It's very easy by simply walking in 50 yards in each direction to work out the approximate location of pokemon, and even easier if you have a friend with you walking in the opposite direction from your starting point you can confer with.
"OL "Oh, I think I'd better get a man in to do that""
The Mac update springs to mind that stopped searchlight from indexing our Dlink NAS's. They have around half a million files on them, and are pretty much rendered unsearchable without 3rd party tools.
If you are given the budget and the time to do so, yes*. Unfortunately time and money are very rare things when it comes to IT spending.
*But even then there are always the hacks that spring to the surface that some developer put together to solve an immediate problem, with the intention of doing it properly later. However due to the lack of time and money, the re-writes never occur, and everything comes crashing down at reboot because of one unfixed quickfix.
Is this the same HSBC that I had to give up trying to open an account with after 4 months, because their system was so inflexible that they couldn't handle that my passport had my full name of John Jack Smith*, my gas bill had the name John Smith and my telephone bill had the name John J Smith. It was ludicrous. I had to go in every 2 weeks with my documents over and over again, and each time it came back that I had to go in again because the names didn't match.
I tried getting my gas bill and phone bill adjusted, but it was impossible to get my middle name in full on the bills.
In the end I opened the account up with Barclays, took about half an hour and no documents were checked or asked for.
*not my real name
So they've taught the computer to slightly cross it's eyes, go just out of focus and then you can make out who it is?
For 14 years I've been telling OOo* users to open up any OOo app, go to Tools, Options, Memory, and then multiply any values they see in there by 10. Then their OOo will run like it's been greased and dropped off a steep hill whilst charged up with neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light.
The memory requirements for OOo were drawn up when 32MB of RAM was considered excessive and expensive, yet year after year, on and on, over a decade later, even now when my £500 PC comes with 16GB RAM, OOo defaults haven't changed from those back in 2002. It's stagnating, It hasn't moved forward, compatiblilty with MS's offering hasnt improved and simple layout issues documented over 10 years ago have still to this day not been fixed.
Kill it off. Kill it off with fire.
* This also applied to Libre Office too the last time I could be bothered looking.
Samsung have lost my confidence at the moment.
I had a dozen or so of the Evo 840, that kept simply corrupting and slowing down to a snail pace. It took about 2 years for the problem to be fixed in the firmware, by which time I'd simply gone out and bought reliable replacements from Crucial.
I don't think I would stick 6TB of data on a sammy drive.
From memory, 2 of the competing companies in the field that were doing all the research had quite literally bet their owners assets on the technology, and when the economy crashed a few years ago they lost the roofs over their heads. Not due to a failure of the technology or the research. but more to the fact that over the course of days any money and assets they had simply vapourised.
I saw a documentary about these guys recently, one of them still can't afford a car, and the other one quit the field, and went and got another job in marine engineering, ironically where a lot of the research he did on the elevator, could be put into practice.
There was a third guy who at one point had worked for both of the guys above. He was essentially the brains, and he decided to quit completely because he had worked out that the breakthroughs were predictable, and were about a hundred years away, and he would never get to see them in his lifetime, so he would rather work on something he knew he would be able to complete.
A long time ago I had a satellite office down in Dudley, that had several servers located at the side of the main office. Usual story of no budget for anything, and this was before the days of remote admin and email. I had macgyvered together a system that monitored temperatures inside the cases, and if the office got too hot an alarm would sound, and I would be called in to intervene, usually by telling them to turn the heating off and open a window (the girls would turn off the AC and turn on the heating, rather than say wear something longer than a belt of a skirt, or a cardigan over the strappy sleeveless top). This system worked quite well.
One day I get a call that everything had stopped working. I rush the 100 mile or so journey down, and find 2 dead servers, and my alarm wailing away. The server room was like an oven. Hold on.. room? what room, where did this room come from. I queried one of the staff, who told me that some months beeping was coming from the servers. The office manager didn't like this noise, so he arranged for a studded wall to be built around them, and a lockable door.
For months this alarm had been going off, and the office manager had simply been ignoring it when he dutifully went in each morning to swap over the backup tapes because "why would the room being too warm damage anything?"
I was reminded of the road roller incident in the first Austin Powers movie.
In the UK this fault would be covered by the sale of goods act, and anyone with the faulty phone can return ir to the place they purchased it for repair or replacement. Granted they would have to start small claims court proceedings while the retailer sat around laughing, but the courts take a dim view of firms who shy away from repairing documented and well known faults.
"I don't understand why people would ever ask for help on the internet, "
Indeed, I once made the mistake of asking for some help on a Linux related issue I was having trouble resolving. I was universally blasted on the forum as being a noob, and basically told in no uncertain terms to RTFM!
I responded that I had indeed read the manual, and pointed out using screenshots where necessary that the instructions provided didn't match the interface, the responses or the prompts, and that in some some cases, steps were clearly missing, because titles were present, but followed by blank spaces.
I was then informed by the same users who had roasted me earlier and told me to RTFM, that the manual was considered "beta".
That experience tainted my belief that Linux users are somehow more technically competant than Windows users. I now believe that they are a bunch of bullies, who just like to point at the new guy in the room, and pick on him.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017