Re: Another design approach:
That made me laugh!
58 posts • joined 11 Dec 2011
Yet again we Russia being blamed in a well-written article that on the face of it appears to be sound. Yet again no evidence is presented. Yet again we are asked to believe in "evil Russia". This is now a troll. Stop repeating the troll "Russia bad".
Russia does not gave the technical kniow-how to perform such influence on the most technologically advanced nation in the world! This is absurd.
Given that it was the UK govt that claimed it was an act of wat, with very little intelligence to back it up. One might assume Zurich have consulted their extensive legal panel. Does this imply that relatively unfounded govt statements can now carry considerable legal weight? If found for the claimant, then that would put the UK govt"s claim of an act off war on very shaky legal basis...
Excatly. Everyone seems to forget that the crew in a Soyuz are spam-in-a-can until they open the hatch to the ISS. (Yes they give them stufff to do to make them feel busy: it is just psychological.) Everything else can be done automatically or as a backup remotely from the MKS in Moscow. Sending up an unmanned Soyuz would not even require the investigation to complete... Thus the time for the crew on board can be extended to at least 500 days. Yes they will get bored. Yes they will miss their families. But then that is space for you.
Cosmonauts they are tough as nails; I expect astronauts too. I'd imagine they'd have viewed that the unplanned decent was at most disappointing regarding not reaching the ISS. No "brown trousers" in the slightest.
Apparently other restrictions:
"Visitors are also slapped with new restrictions. They must submit visit requests in writing to the embassy chief, giving their name, nationality, profession and place of work, reason for visiting, email and social media accounts, and even the serial numbers for phones and other devices they wish to bring inside. The new rules even mandate the collection of IMEIs, unique identification numbers specific to a phone handset.
While repeat visitors receive a less restrictive screening process, they can have their access revoked at any time without an explanation. All visitor data will be turned over to the Ecuadorian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other unspecified parties.
The restrictions include a threat to use UK police to arrest visitors or seize communications equipment should the journalist violate the lengthy list of rules. Adding insult to injury, the embassy threatened to remove Assange's cat to a shelter should they decide he is not cleaning up after the animal properly."
So if one wishes to visit Assange, one has to give over significantly intrusive details that may be passed on to "... other unspecified parties.". Wow. So potential total loss of "freedom" and welcome to no-fly lists, intrusive (TSA) customs searches, etc, etc.
It is disgusting that Assange is held, without trial in an effective jail for so long. Call ourselves civilised: 3rd world countries must be laughing at our hypocrisy.
Although your analysis of the use-case for the large wings on the shuttle is correct: it was *still* a bad idea: It turns out to be *MUCH* cheaper and more reliable to use ICBMs over the North (or South) Pole to do this, than launch the shuttle over a pole, nuke Russia, re-enter, turn through 90 degrees (what the big wings were for) then land.
Thank you: well said. The last people to die in a Soyuz was on landing from Salyut 1. A total of 4 people have died, sadly. The first was Komarov. Those last 3: Georgy Dobrovolsky, Vladislav Volkov, and Viktor Patsayev in 1971. One must not forget Valentin Bondarenko.For a total of 1+1+3=5. So how many died in the US space program? 3+7+7. (Apologies for not naming them all.)
Read that again 5 vs. 17.
The Russian segment is designed to be run either automatically independently, under ground-control or via cosmonauts on board. The multiple redundancy was designed in on purpose. The Soviets & Russians have great experience with de-staffing and re-staffing space stations: e.g. Salyut (commonly unmanned), Mir. Mir did not suffer permanent issues with de-staffing. It did suffer from the collapse of the Russian economy after the break up of the Soviet Union meaning that the items that previously came from the Ukraine now cost a lot of money that Roscosmos (of the time) simply could not afford.
Uuum: wrong, again. The hypergolic propellants used mean that ignition in space is 100% reliable. This is vital. Hypergolic propellants have been used in all space-based chemical engines. The ones designed by Isaev's design bureau were the only ones to be 100% reliable. (The current hypergolic engines in the Soyuz, Progress and Russian-segment of the ISS are all direct descendants of that superb engine design.) The fact that they are corrosive is an issue. But one has to live with that with chemical engines in space. Space probes use hypergolic propellants. The Shuttle did. It is NOT a "nasty Russian rubbish design" thing.
What a load of tripe: the Soviets & Russians have been far less cavalier about the survivability of their systems than the Americans. You need to read your history more carefully. The Soyuz has always been developed to be survivable in all stages of use, unlike the Shuttle or Apollo, etc. Moreover the ability of the Soyuz to operate fully automatically or under remote control, without crew intervention permits an incapacitated crew to potentially survive. Unlike the Shuttle.
Why is it that NASA "has to be satisfied"? Surely Roscosmos has to satisfy itself. NASA are just passengers. Why such biassed reporting? The ISS is composed of the "International" segment and the Russian segment. Note that the Soyuz is hugely safe & unlike ANYTHING NASA launched has no periods during its operation which are unsurvivable unlike the Shuttle, etc. This is ridiculous, alarmist reporting. "Abandon the ISS"?! What about the Russian crew on the Russian segment? The International team may get windy, but the Russians will satisfy themselves over their vehicle and launch as they see fit. It is NOT up to NASA - they do NOT pull the shots on the Russian segment that could detach from the rest and fly perfectly happily, attended or otherwise. With automatic resupply from the Progress ships (and refuelling for re-boosting). Again NASA nor anyone else has such automatic ships. (The Europeans had, but only 4 or so flew years ago.)
I know, let's make up load of malicious, baseless accusations, then ignore requests to justify them, and repeatedly demand that the organisation in question must explain itself. And then that organisation on the occasion gets in knots, let's use that as substitute "evidence" to support those initial claims. Brilliant reporting, Simon. Glad I am too dumb to think for myself!
IIRC a subsidiary of Kaspersky blew the whistle on Stuksnet. Which seriously pissed off the US & Israeli governments and permitted the Russian and other governments to become aware of such sophisticated cracks. Methinks that Kaspersky is a victim of over-zealous US government business practise.
Well said. It is a shame that some think you are incorrect and misguidedly believe that this information release proves the claim that Russia attempted to influence the US election. Maybe it did: but less that 100 clicks and impressions combined? Come-on: *seriously* that is a fine example of *failed* to influence. The vote was not swung by ~100 voters but orders of magnitude more.
There is a claim that Russia somehow significantly affected the outcome of the US election. This release of information further confirms how unlikely and ridiculous this idea is. It is a shame that the media-at-large will not follow this up so assiduously so that the population at large may still believe that unfounded claim.
It is an unpleasant fashion for volunteers to adopt said codes. Unfortunately these distract from the original purpose of the organisation and it becomes self-serving. Why because people bang on and on about the CoC and not about what was originally being done.
In the UK we have seen what happened with such thought policing: the surprise of Brexit. All that happens is people retain their original ideas, but practice double-think, lying or avoid the topics in wider groups. Thus they bubble themselves, cease engaging and the rest do not know because they do the same.
CoCs are a meme, a virus, corroding the very values they claim to promote by the very uninclusive, intolerant way they operate.
Especially to his family.
But also science and the population at large for his succinct, clear and involving popularisation of science. His influence shall be sorely missed.
We need more like him: studying hard & pure science of no immediate monetary value: for this is one of the endeavours that marks a civilisation so that it stands out long after its passing.... His corpus shall contribute to make our civilisation stand out: in the long eons after its passing.
Fortunately the wikipedia entry has been edited for "Pi Day" to include a non-US centric definition, so we may all celebrate Pi day! Huzzah!
"Note that for those counties in which 3/14 is not in US-centric MM/DD format, one may appeal to ISO8601 - "Date and time format" for a more internationally-inclusive definition: one may take the four least-significant-digits of a date in ISO8601-format: e.g. 2017-03-14 gives one 03-14."
A tragic loss; before his time. My thoughts go to his family, for which nothing can comfort that loss.
I will miss his excellent articles on the military. His wit. His contribution to Great British Boffinry. It is a loss that he will never see LOHAN launched (and curses to the FAA).
I too shall raise a glass of the "Blue Vodka"* in his honour & hard work at the SPB.
* Alcohol-based rocket fuel during the Great Patriotic War was coloured blue in an attempt to identify those soldiers desperate enough to drink it, e.g. during the Siege of Stalingrad, amongst other less comfortable engagements on the Eastern Front.
This set of adverts is extremely pant-ist: I feel that boxers and briefs are hugely under-represented & why not have tangas and jock-straps for the trains running after the watershed? Surely in these enlightened times, women should be equally represented in suitably under-clad states too?!!! Mary Pankhurst chained herself to the Houses of Parliament for female equality, you know!
Mars lost its atmosphere whilst it lost its magnetic field, which was slow. Currently Mars has a negligible magnetic field, so nothing protects the remaining, tenuous, atmosphere. Yes, nuking Mars would make it drier and irradiated, even less hospitable than it already is. Thank goodness Mr.Musk's foolish idea is unimplementable. Instead we'll just trust him to put us in poorly-designed high-speed tubes... Sounds like a great idea!
And apparently the Tsar Bomba was a "clean" version due to the lead tamper that reduced the yield...!
You also miss the obvious problem: no magnetic field means the solar wind will strip away any addition to Mars's atmosphere. Nuking Mars will not achieve the desired effect apart from a lot of wasted energy as useless radioactive isotopes, rendering it uninhabitable.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019