Said for a while I prefer Airbus as a passenger - though the Embraer 190's are very nice, the ride feels very 'crisp' with none of the wallowing that I associate with this size of aircraft [and the 737 in particular].
115 posts • joined 10 Dec 2011
Is your gadget using secondhand memory? Predictable senility allows boffins to spot recycled NAND chips
Re: Either good research or bad reporting
Don't ... feed ... don't ... feed ... ah sod it, I can't help it
But there is no reason to suppose whatever that this would have been forced to occur by "evolution".
There's every reason. Why do you think they looked where they did [a PET bottle dump] for "PET-eating bacteria"? In other words, they formulated the hypothesis that bacteria might evolve which could digest PET, then they proved the hypothesis, and then they started studying the discovery. It's evolution being predicted and exploited. Consider reading the abstract of A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate).
Re: unregulated rip-off site
Interesting - I prefer buying independently where possible (just got some kit from ebuyer, who were actually the cheapest of the 'usual suspects' for standard gear). Direct was (very roughly) 5% lower than Amazon price, and I really loathe the way Amazon treat me with the constant devaluation of their products.
Re: location trusted
Indeed. Props to the libcurl team for helping people not to shoot themselves in the foot, but the (previous) behaviour is exactly what I'd expect from the man page:
(HTTP) If the server reports that the requested page has moved to a different location (indicated with a Location: header and a 3XX response code), this option will make curl redo the request on the new place.
Headers are part of an HTTP request, so I'd expect them to be sent to "the new place".
Need USO for > 1 provider
Otherwise we'll end up with the country carved up between a duopoly, or maybe an oligopoly if we're lucky.
In my area you can only get Vermin Media who are a bunch of crooks* that claim that (1) a Hitron-aka-Rogers CGNv4 is "business grade" ADSL, (2) it's acceptable to provide a "static IP" by using a GRE tunnel, and (3) that prohibiting the use of your own [decent quality] hardware is reasonable for an ADSL "business grade" connection that I use for private hosting.
* Not proven in a court of law. Virgin, if you wish to sue me for libel then I've kept all the correspondence and documentation needed to correct.
Re: Microsoft is here to help!
Thanks for chipping in and being keen on improving things. For what it's worth, that attitude's the real solution to this type of problem. However, as this is a broader conversation and you'd like to hear us all, let's discuss this in public so that everyone can join in and benefit :).
Speaking broadly and bluntly, the majority of the Azure Portal is a buggy UX disaster that feels like "My First Single Page Application". It would appear to be designed for tablet use (presumably as part of the MS UI revamp, whatever they're called now. Quick list of annoyances:
- Constant horizontal scrolling required, actual content area constricted by nested panes/trees/blades/whatever
- Poor HTML forcing me to either use the mouse or learn your keyboard shortcuts. Incorrect element choices break my keyboard-shortcut software bindings that are part of my muscle-memory.
- Inconsistent behaviour, sometimes an X icon will close a "thing" (dialog-like behaviour), sometimes it'll shove me back on the dashboard. Thanks.
- Unbookmarkable URI's. I want to bookmark things I use all the time in my browser, just like other websites. URI's have to change when the logical location changes ... otherwise they're kinda worthless. Distinct URI's are for the customer's benefit, they are not the designer's optional choice.
- "Something went wrong"... gee, thanks. WHAT went wrong (these messages appear asynchronously - humans need context too)? Some details please?
Hey, you asked - I can't imagine I'm alone with these frustrations. Usable? Yes. Pleasant and easy? No.
Serverless vs Wordpress
Speaking as an experienced software architect & developer, there's absolutely no comparison between the "serverless" design idiom and something like Wordpress (as suggested by another commentard above). Essentially, we're outsourcing the entire webserver all the way from the tin to the actual endpoints ["Azure Function" in my case]. As always, there are tradeoffs involved particularly with respect to lock-in*. My _personal_ view is that the flexibility is very appealing, but I wouldn't want to tie a large long-term design (such as an entire company infrastructure) to a single proprietary platform. From a business perspective this seems analogous to the engineering mistake of a critical system with a single point of failure. On the other hand, for short-term applications (e.g. 2 year lifespan) it's highly appealing. To me, Subbu Allamaraju's absolutely bang-on in with his quoted views, though my gut feel is to do like Polvi and wait for an OSS alternative whilst the early adopters find both the technical and real-world pain points.
Windows user, because my employer's assessment of the tie-in is similar to Rockwell's. In a couple of decades we'll know who was right.
* there's also the uncomfortable fact that although Microsoft do the maintenance, it's still our responsibility to get the configuration right in the first place. Turns out that making settings very easy to apply doesn't help people that don't grok security ... see Red Disk & AWS et al. along with the ridiculous numbers of home routers with default passwords.
Re: Give me the goods
The internet in general, and WWW in particular, was built on a model of co-operation and resource sharing. HTTP/HTML in particular were created by Sir Tim for the explicit purpose of freely exchanging information between disparate systems which at the time had no other of talking to each other "simply". After this took off and became popular the usual group of w***ers promptly decided to "monetize" (vomit) the system with things such as paywalls or advertising. In many cases this has been done by initially providing services "for free" initially and then starting to demand ongoing payment once the market's been cornered.
The sad fact is that these people have effectively destroyed the WWW as it was intended. However, this behaviour (1) is remarkably similar to that of either a drug dealer ("first hit's free") or an extortionist ("you wouldn't want anything to happen to your data now, would you?") and is morally unacceptable to me. Moreover, some of us were here before Eternal September and still hold by the codes of conduct that existed before the apparently successful psy-ops efforts to persuade people that somehow they have an *entitlement* to treat me as a revenue stream. You would appear to have been a victim of said efforts if you really believe that those of us ***who built the thing in the first place*** are the people with an entitlement issue.
Re: So? - Addendum
And, sadly, I doubt that GNU/Linux ever will be ready for the mainstream (although it's been my personal choice for over ten years). The distinction between Linux-the-kernel and GNU/Linux-the-OS is becoming more important than ever when one remembers that the ?majority? platform is now Google/Linux, aka Android. Linux is a nice kernel which, at least in my experience, is significantly superior to the Windows kernel; unfortunately, outside of Android, userland is at best clunky and at worst downright hostile.
I'm willing to go through the pain of periodically having to reconfigure the bluetooth setup because of some breaking change in bluez/alsa/pulse/$PACKAGE and that of having to type some cryptic commands to get an A2DP connection in exchange for the computational efficiency, decent file systems and ability to build an environment that fits with my preferences, but that's the last thing that my (Mac-user) wife would want to have to contend with.
Cowardly Microsoft buries critical Hyper-V, WordPad, Office, Outlook, etc security patches in normal fixes
Makes plenty of sense to me. As a developer, I like git and appreciate the "added value" from github et.al. In practice, CodePlex has long been abandoned for active development, so I would only look there for something old and obscure. As Microsoft, what do they gain from maintaining a product that's been effectively abandoned by end-users? Given that they've (1) given plenty of notice, (2) are providing migration assistance [how effective remains to be seen...] and (3) will be providing a "sensible" archive of the site available I'm not personally unhappy with something that feels like a pretty sensible decision.
I think those statements illustrate the commodification of IT. A hundred and fifty years ago, if I could afford electricity then I might have started to consider outsourcing the generation instead of having my own generator. Now, I don't even consider it as outsourcing - I just use a public utility provider and pay for what I use (as measured by a dial on the little box where the wire comes in). We outsource the vast majority of our lives these days, with the trend having been present from the dawn of civilisation as we specialised our roles and skills. There are very few people [in the UK] who grow their own food and rely on domestic electrical generation these days.
Re: Best traps
Ours are faulty! We've got four, and they're all very good at catching pests and bringing them home but haven't grasped the killing bit. The cuteness bit's broken too, there's nothing cute about a mouthful of rat being paraded into the living room before release under the sofa. We've taken to having (properly enclosed and protected) traps in strategic positions to deal with unwanted live gifts.
What do you mean, "back in the day"? I routinely get this still on Win 8.1 (corporate install, not my choice). Combined with the other silly things like being able to checkout files with a path length >254 chars but then being unable to delete them. And of course, the all-time classic message "Access Denied" when you try to delete a file, which really means "Hey sucker, somebody else has it open and our file sharing model's broken".
Re: From the original article
From the viewpoint of someone who maintains about 8 Arch Linux boxes at home [plus the wife's MacBook] and a few hundred Windows machines at work, I don't think there's any comparison between the two. My Arch boxes have been typical Linux, i.e. lots of mostly simple configuration work and a few head-scratchers followed by years of solid service with occasional WTF's (such as when CUPS dropped support for parallel printers.... grrrrr....) and the Windows boxes at work have been typical Windows, i.e. a nightmare to configure followed by years of misery and "random" problems.
Re: "...a relic of the small disks in Linux's early days"
initramfs, the new root file system.
Joking aside, much as I understand the logic behind initramfs and don't claim to have a better solution, the idea of booting a minimal OS then swapping it out for a bigger one always feels very ugly and dirty to me.
Analogous to suid
Not identical, as suid actually changes the euid, but conceptually similar - the OS has been "told" to always launch a particular binary in an elevated context, and someone's found a way to exploit the binary. Not as bad as setting vim to suid, but the same basic idea. Interesting to see Microsoft re-using design flaws from Unix (and for those who'd like to play the "secure by design" card, whilst I'd generally agree it doesn't apply in this particular case).
A good thing
Waiting for the downvotes, but personally I think this is a really good thing and an important step forward. The dotnet runtime / C# language combination is both excellent and widely used in "the enterprise" with developers being (relatively) easy to obtain. Unfortunately, the current Windows-only limitation prevents us from being able to use Linux and instead we have to waste resources (in all senses) with Windows servers. I'd personally love to get shot of the Windows boxes with all their attendant headaches in exchange for the reliability and simplicity of my home [Linux-and-macOS] network!
Dotnet core is as "truly open source" as anything else - it uses an EFF-approved licence, is developed on github (https://github.com/dotnet/core) and they accept pull requests, so what more do you want?
Time will tell, and I have no intention of being a bleeding-edge adopter for "real world" workloads, but I suspect (and really hope) that .NET-core-on-Linux will gain a lot of traction over the next few years and become one of the preferred stacks.
Interesting ... I'm also in the process of migrating away from Linux and onto FreeBSD largely because of (1) ZFS and (2) systemd. And yes, I'm well aware that I can run ZFS on Linux, but there are significant differences in the encryption story that (IMO) make the BSD version much more compelling.
Lazy and inaccurate journalism again
From the FAQ on github:
Q. Is SONiC a Linux distribution?
A. No, SONiC is a collection of networking software components required to have a fully functional L3 device that can be agnostic of any particular Linux distribution. Today SONiC runs on Debian
So no - Microsoft has *not* released a Debian Linux switch OS. They've released some more software that runs on Linux (though only one particular distro)